S. 4709: Unlocking Next-Generation Licensing and Opportunities for Collaborative Know-how for AUKUS Act
This bill would make a narrow change to U.S. law governing defense exports and transfers connected to the AUKUS partnership, which is the security arrangement among the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom.
What the bill changes
- Current law limits certain exports and transfers of defense articles and defense services under AUKUS.
- This bill would amend that limitation by carving out specific parts of the existing law from the restriction.
- In plain terms, it would make it easier to use the AUKUS framework for some defense-related exports, transfers, and cooperation.
Likely practical effect
- The bill appears aimed at reducing legal barriers for defense cooperation among the U.S., Australia, and the U.K.
- It could allow certain defense technologies, equipment, or services to move more smoothly between the three countries under AUKUS-related rules.
- The text does not itself describe new programs, spending, or specific items to be exported; it changes the legal restriction that applies to some AUKUS-related transfers.
What it does not do
- It does not create AUKUS itself.
- It does not, by its text, authorize any specific weapon system or contract.
- It does not set out new reporting requirements, funding levels, or enforcement provisions in the excerpt provided.
Relevant Companies
- LMT — Lockheed Martin could see increased opportunities if AUKUS-related defense exports and transfers become easier.
- RTX — RTX may be affected through expanded defense cooperation and possible transfers of systems or components used in AUKUS programs.
- NOC — Northrop Grumman could be impacted if the bill facilitates more cross-border defense work tied to AUKUS.
- BA — Boeing may be affected if the change leads to more defense-related exports, services, or collaborative projects involving AUKUS partners.
- GD — General Dynamics could benefit from easier defense transfers or cooperation under the AUKUS framework.
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
10 bill sponsors
-
TrackPete Ricketts
Sponsor
-
TrackMichael F. Bennet
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMarsha Blackburn
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackChristopher A. Coons
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRichard J. Durbin
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTim Kaine
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndy Kim
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJames E. Risch
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRick Scott
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDan Sullivan
Co-Sponsor
Actions
5 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Jul. 27, 2026 | Committee on Foreign Relations. Reported by Senator Risch without amendment. Without written report. |
| Jul. 27, 2026 | Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 517. |
| Jun. 17, 2026 | Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably. |
| Jun. 08, 2026 | Introduced in Senate |
| Jun. 08, 2026 | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.