H.R. 9868: Preventing Forced Abortions Act of 2026
This bill would limit how surrogacy agreements can be enforced in federal court when they involve abortion-related requirements.
What the bill does
- It says federal courts cannot enforce any part of a surrogacy contract that requires a surrogate mother to have an abortion at the request of an intended parent, another party to the contract, or an agent of a party.
- It also says federal courts must still enforce payment terms in surrogacy contracts, even if the contract includes an abortion requirement.
- That means a surrogate would still be entitled to agreed compensation, and the other side could not reduce payment, impose penalties, or claim damages just because the surrogate refused to have an abortion.
Federal court jurisdiction
- The bill would give federal district courts original jurisdiction over civil cases involving surrogacy contracts when those contracts are in or affect interstate or foreign commerce.
- In practical terms, that means disputes over these contracts could be brought in federal court rather than only in state court, at least in cases meeting that commerce-related standard.
Key definitions in the bill
- Surrogacy contract: an agreement for a child to be conceived and born to one woman with the understanding that the child will then go to another person permanently.
- Intended parent: a party to the surrogacy contract who will take permanent custody of the child.
- Surrogate mother: the woman who carries and gives birth to the child under the contract.
- Abortion: defined broadly as intentionally ending a pregnancy or intentionally killing the unborn child, subject to the bill’s stated exceptions.
What it would change in practice
The bill would not ban surrogacy contracts generally. Instead, it would make abortion-forcing clauses unenforceable in federal court and protect the surrogate’s right to receive agreed compensation even if she refuses such a clause. It would also prevent contract terms that punish a surrogate for refusing an abortion, such as reduced payment or liquidated damages.
Relevant Companies
None found
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
10 bill sponsors
-
TrackAndrew Ogles
Sponsor
-
TrackSheri Biggs
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLauren Boebert
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJosh Brecheen
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackPat Harrigan
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndy Harris
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMary E. Miller
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRobert Onder
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackKeith Self
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackChristopher H. Smith
Co-Sponsor
Actions
2 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Jul. 22, 2026 | Introduced in House |
| Jul. 22, 2026 | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
Potentially Relevant Congressional Stock Trades
No relevant congressional stock trades found.