$GHSI Risk Factor changes from 00/04/17/23/2023 to 00/03/28/24/2024

Item 1A. “Risk Factors”. Other unknown or unpredictable factors that could also adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations may arise from time to time. In addition, we cannot assess the impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

Given these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking statements discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may not prove to be accurate.

Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which only reflect the views of the Company’s management as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results or expectations, except as required by law.

RISK FACTOR SUMMARY Our business is subject to significant risks and uncertainties that make an investment in us speculative and risky.

Below we summarize what we believe are the principal risk factors, but these risks are not the only ones we face, and you should carefully review and consider the full discussion of our risk factors in the section titled “Risk Factors,” together with the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

If any of the following risks actually occurs (or if any of those listed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K occur), our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, revenue, and future prospects could be seriously harmed. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe are not material, may also become important factors that adversely affect our business.

BUSINESS Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “our company,” “Guardion” the “Company” and the “Registrant” refer to Guardion Health Sciences, Inc., a Delaware corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries. 5 In June 2021, the Company acquired Activ Nutritional, LLC (“Activ” or “Viactiv” as the context requires), the owner and distributor of the Viactiv® line of supplements for bone health and other applications. The acquisition and integration of the Viactiv line of products changed our financial position, market profile and brand and operating focus, as more fully described below. Recent Developments Agreement to Sell Activ Nutritional, LLC On January 30, 2024, the Company entered into an Equity Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Doctor’s Best Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Doctor’s Best”), for the sale of all of the outstanding equity interests of Activ for the aggregate cash consideration of $17.2 million, of which $1.7 million was placed in a third-party escrow account pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement. Activ is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Viactiv Nutritionals, Inc (“Viactiv”), a Delaware corporation, and Viactiv is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The sale of Activ, as contemplated by the Purchase Agreement (the “Transaction”), is conditioned upon receiving approval from our stockholders, and such approval is also required under Delaware law as the sale of Activ, which owns the Viactiv® brand and business and accounted for 97.2% and 96.3% of our revenues during the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively, constitutes a sale of substantially all of our assets and revenue-generating operations. The Transaction contemplated by the Purchase Agreement is the result of a broad review of strategic alternatives by our board of directors (the “Board”). The Board has determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of the Company and the Company’s stockholders to approve the Transaction. In the event that the Transaction closes, the Company will be left with minimal operations. Potential Dissolution In the event that the Company’s stockholders approve the Transaction and the Transaction closes, Additionally, the Board has determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of the Company and the Company’s stockholders to approve a voluntary dissolution and liquidation of the Company (the “Dissolution”) pursuant to a plan of dissolution (the “Plan of Dissolution”), which, if approved, will authorize the Company to liquidate and dissolve the Company in accordance with the Plan of Dissolution, but subject to the Company’s ability to abandon or delay the Plan of Dissolution in the event that the Board determines that another transaction would be in the best interest of the Company’s stockholders and further in accordance with the terms thereof. Assuming the approval of the Dissolution by the Company’s stockholders, the decision of whether or not to proceed with the Dissolution and when to file the Certificate of Dissolution will be made by the Board in its sole discretion. On March 15, 2024, the Company filed a Preliminary Proxy Statement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in order to solicit the approval of the Company’s stockholders in connection with the Transaction and the Dissolution. At the Meeting, the Company’s stockholders approved a proposal to amend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to effect a reverse split of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001, at a specific ratio, up to a maximum of a 1-for-100 split, with the exact ratio to be determined by the Company’s board of directors in its sole discretion. On January 6, 2023, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware a Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate of Amendment”) to effect the Reverse Stock Split. The Reverse Stock Split became effective as of 4:01 p.m. Eastern Time on January 6, 2023, and the Company’s common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis when the Nasdaq Stock Market opened on January 9, 2023. When the Reverse Stock Split became effective, every 50 shares of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock were automatically combined, converted and changed into 1 share of the Company’s common stock, without any change in the number of authorized shares or the par value per share. Any fraction of a share of common stock created as a result of the Reverse Stock Split was rounded up to the next whole share. As a result, we issued an additional 35,281 shares of common stock for such rounding. Product Offerings For the year ended December 31, 2023, sales of the Viactiv line of supplements represented approximately 97.2% of our consolidated net sales versus 96.3% for the year ended December 31, 2022. The Viactiv line of supplements contains several flavored nutritional supplement products, but the milk chocolate and caramel flavored calcium chews constitute the main product category. Viactiv Product Line In April 2022, the Viactiv product line was extended with the launch of Viactiv® Omega Boost Gel Bites, an omega-3 fish oil dietary supplement with a high level of DHA and EPA designed to compete in the growing omega-3 product segment. The 1200 mg omega-3 gel bite gummies are formulated to provide comprehensive body support, including cardiovascular, brain, joint, immune, hair, skin, nail and eye health. In a clinical study conducted at Western University of Health Sciences, participants who started omega-3 supplementation with Omega Boost saw a 50% average increase in their omega-3 levels in just 4 weeks compared with leading omega-3 brands as measured using the Omega Index test. In 2023, we increased our digital advertising, social media, and retailer-specific support for Viactiv Omega Boost Gel Bites with messaging that focuses on clinically proven efficacy combined with taste advantages. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company expanded on the launch of the Omega Boost Gel Bites product by executing a two-pronged approach to drive consumer awareness and trial of Omega Boost Gel Bites across the Amazon platform and the brand’s website, and by introducing the product in conventional and specialty retailers. Two new products will be added to the Viactiv product line in 2024. A clinically tested 600mg dose form of the Omega Boost Gel Bites product was introduced to the market in March 2024. The current 1200mg dose form of the Omega Boost Gel Bites product will be relaunched as a maximum formula to differentiate it to the 600mg offering. In addition to the innovation in the omega-3 segment, the Company will launch a magnesium citrate soft chew in April 2024. Both new Viactiv products will be available on viactiv.com and on the Amazon platform. Ocular Product Line We currently sell two ocular products. We sell GlaucoCetin® on our website, guardionhealth. The company sells Lumega-Z on our website, guardionhealth.com and uses a variety of marketing strategies to increase awareness of the brand among ophthalmologists and optometrists. We also market Lumega-Z through direct-to-consumer strategies. We recently changed the formulation of Lumega-Z from a liquid to a powder. Both articles were published in the journal Nutrients. The first published study assessed the level of absorption of the carotenoids in Lumega-Z compared to absorption of the carotenoids in the industry leading eye vitamin, PreserVisionTM (AREDS 2 formula sold by Bausch and Lomb) and determined whether an elevated level of carotenoid absorption leads to increased macular pigment optical density (“MPOD”). The study found that despite only a 2.3-fold higher carotenoid concentration than PreserVisionTM, Lumega-Z supplementation provides approximately 3–4-fold higher absorption, which leads to a significant elevation of MPOD levels. The second study evaluated the visual benefits in three groups; two treatment groups consisting of individuals with fine retinal drusen and a control group consisting of ocular normal individuals. The treatment groups were randomly assigned to either Lumega-Z or AREDS 2 (PreserVisionTM) soft gel supplements, the control group ocular normal individuals took no supplements. Each treatment participant had retinal drusen, delayed dark adaptation recovery time and was at risk of developing vision loss from age-related macular degeneration (“AMD”). The results showed significant improvements in visual function, as measured by contrast sensitivity, in the group of patients taking Lumega-Z. The patients taking PreserVisionTM showed a trend toward an improvement, but no statistical change, while the control group showed no change. Prior Product Offerings In September 2017, we acquired VectorVision Ocular Health, Inc. (“VectorVision”), a company that specialized in the standardization of contrast sensitivity, glare sensitivity, low contrast acuity, and early treatment diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity testing, from Mr. David Evans. As part of management’s comprehensive evaluation of our Company’s business following the acquisition of the Viactiv brand in June 2021, we determined to focus on the products that management believes provide the greatest growth opportunities. On November 30, 2023, the Company sold all the outstanding capital stock of VectorVision to David Evans for a purchase price of $25,000 and recorded a gain of $129,930. The Company had previously terminated the operations of VectorVision as of December 31, 2021. David Evans was a director of the Company from September 2017 through June 2022. Intellectual Property Patents We currently own and have exclusive rights to two U.S. patents, and one Canadian patent with respect to various products and product candidates. Products Manufacturing and Sources and Availability of Raw Materials We outsource the manufacturing of our medical food and dietary supplement product line to contract manufacturers. We process orders through purchase orders and invoices with each manufacturer. We believe that there are alternative sources, suppliers and manufacturers available for our products in the event of a termination or a disagreement with any current vendor.” Dietary supplements must meet the requirements of applicable food laws and regulations. A “dietary supplement” is defined under the FDCA as “a product (other than tobacco) intended to supplement the diet that bears or contains one or more of the following dietary ingredients: vitamins, minerals, amino acids, herbs or other botanicals; a concentrate, metabolite, constituent, extract or combination of the ingredients listed above.” Dietary supplements are intended to enhance the diet and may not be represented as a conventional food or as the sole item of a meal or diet. A manufacturer or distributor must notify the FDA if it intends to market a dietary supplement in the U.S. that contains a “new dietary ingredient.” A new dietary ingredient is an ingredient first marketed as or in a dietary supplement after October 15, 1994. The manufacturer must demonstrate to the FDA that the new ingredient is reasonably expected to be safe for use in a dietary supplement. There is no authoritative list of dietary ingredients that were marketed before October 15, 1994. Therefore, manufacturers are responsible for determining if a dietary ingredient is “new.” Owners or responsible parties of any facilities at which dietary supplements are manufactured, packaged, labeled, or held for distribution must register the facility or facilities with FDA pursuant to the Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (“Bioterrorism Act”) before producing supplements. Manufacturers of dietary supplements also must follow current good manufacturing practice (“cGMP”) regulations. Entities that manufacture, package, label or hold dietary supplement products must follow applicable cGMP regulations. These regulations focus on practices that ensure the identity, purity, quality, strength and composition of dietary supplements. We engage with contract manufacturers to manufacture our dietary supplements. Companies are responsible for determining that the dietary supplements they manufacture or distribute are safe, and that any representations or claims made about them are substantiated by adequate evidence to show that the claims are not false or misleading. The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has the primary responsibility to regulate the advertising of foods, including dietary supplements. Under the FTC Act, all advertising claims, both express and implied, must be truthful, non-misleading, and substantiated. Claims about the health benefits of a product must meet the basic substantiation standard of “competent and reliable scientific evidence,” generally randomized, controlled, human clinical trials. In practice, the FDA and FTC share jurisdiction over promotional practices and monitor the promotion and advertising of dietary supplements in multiple media forms, including TV, radio, social media (e.g. Dietary supplements also are subject to the Nutrition, Labeling and Education Act, which regulates health claims, ingredient labeling, and nutrient content claims characterizing the level of a nutrient in a product. Dietary supplements may be intended to affect the structure or function of the human body. If the label of a dietary supplement contains such structure/function claims, the manufacturer must submit a notification with the text of the claim to FDA no later than 30 days after marketing the dietary supplement with the claim and the label must bear the disclaimer: “This statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.” We are responsible for ensuring the accuracy and truthfulness of all product claims. Medical Foods Regulation The FDA is primarily responsible for regulating medical foods. A medical food is defined under the FDCA as a “food which is formulated to be consumed or administered enterally under the supervision of a physician or professional healthcare provider and which is intended for the specific dietary management of a disease or condition for which distinctive nutritional requirements, based on recognized scientific principles, are established by medical evaluation. FDA regulations further describe medical foods as a product that: (i) is a specially formulated and processed product (as opposed to a naturally occurring foodstuff used in its natural state) for the partial or exclusive feeding of a patient by means of oral intake or enteral feeding by tube; (ii) is intended for the dietary management of a patient who, because of therapeutic or chronic medical needs, has limited or impaired capacity to ingest, digest, absorb, or metabolize ordinary foodstuffs or certain nutrients, or who has other special medically determined nutrient requirements, the dietary management of which cannot be achieved by the modification of the normal diet alone; (iii) provides nutritional support specifically modified for the management of the unique nutrient needs that result from the specific disease or condition, as determined by medical evaluation; (iv) is intended to be used under medical supervision; and (v) is intended only for a patient receiving active and ongoing medical supervision wherein the patient requires medical care on a recurring basis for, among other things, instructions on the use of the medical food. However, a company must have data to demonstrate that the formula, when taken as directed, meets the distinctive nutritional requirements of the particular disease or condition. We currently consider our Lumega-Z product to be a medical food. Like any evolving area, especially where no premarket approval is required, the FDA reserves the right to raise questions about the qualification of products within any category. If the FDA were to disagree and consider our medical foods to be “drugs” under the FDCA, we and our products would be subject to considerable additional FDA regulation. The labeling for medical foods must comply with all applicable food labeling requirements, except for those specific requirements from which medical foods are exempt. Medical foods are exempt, for example, from the labeling requirements for nutrient content claims and health claims under the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act of 1990. As with all food labels, printing must be legible, and many required elements must be conspicuous, such as a statement of identity, which is the name of the food; the statement: “Must be administered under the supervision of a physician or professional healthcare provider;” the quantity; the ingredients listing; the name and address of the distributor, among other requirements. All ingredients in foods must be either generally recognized as safe (“GRAS”) or approved food-additives. Many ingredients have been determined by the FDA to be GRAS and are listed as such by regulation. Other ingredients may achieve self-affirmed GRAS status through a panel of experts on that particular substance that author a GRAS report. The standard for an ingredient to achieve GRAS status requires not only technical demonstration of non-toxicity and safety, but also general recognition and agreement on that safety by experts in the field. All ingredients used in our medical foods are either FDA-approved food additives or have GRAS status. Foods manufacturers must register with the FDA pursuant to the Bioterrorism Act before producing foods. Manufacturers of foods also must follow cGMP regulations applicable to foods. Entities that manufacture, package, label or hold food products must follow applicable cGMP regulations. These regulations focus on practices that ensure sanitary and cleanly conditions of manufacturing facilities. The FTC has the primary responsibility to regulate the advertising of foods. Under the FTC Act, all advertising claims, both express and implied, must be truthful, non-misleading, and substantiated. Enforcement by the regulators is post-market, mostly via FDA inspections of food manufacturing facilities, including packaging, distribution facilities, and fulfillment houses. This law and its supporting regulations, which have been amended and expanded substantially, are commonly referred to as the “Stark Law,” and prohibit a physician from making any referral of a Designated Health Service (“DHS”) to an entity that furnishes or bills for DHS (a “DHS Entity”) and with which the physician has a financial relationship, and prohibits DHS Entities from billing for any DHS that is referred, unless all of the requirements of a regulatory exception are met. Stark covered DHS include both outpatient prescription drugs and diagnostic testing that are reimbursable by Medicare or Medicaid. Many states have similar laws (“State Self-Referral Prohibitions”), some of which can apply to all payors and not just governmental payors. Further, we do not furnish any DHS to patients, nor bill any DHS to any federal program. We believe that the federal Stark Law is thus inapplicable. Further, we believe that State Self-Referral Prohibitions are unlikely to apply for similar reasons. To the extent that the products might become reimbursable under a federal program, or otherwise become covered under the Stark Law, we believe that the physicians who recommend our medical food, Lumega-Z, to their patients are aware of Stark Law and State Self-Referral Prohibition requirements. However, we do not monitor their compliance and have no assurance that the physicians are in material compliance with the Stark Law or State Self-Referral Prohibitions. If it were determined that the physicians who prescribe medical foods purchased from us were not in compliance with the Stark Law or State Self-Referral Prohibitions, it could potentially have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Anti-Kickback Statute The federal anti-kickback statute (the “AKS”) applies to Medicare, Medicaid and other state and federal programs. AKS prohibits the solicitation, offer, payment or receipt of remuneration in return for referrals of the purchase, or in return for recommending or arranging for the referral or purchase, of goods, including drugs, covered by the federal health care programs. At present, we do not participate in any federal programs and our products are not reimbursed by Medicare, Medicaid or any other state or federal program. The AKS is a criminal statute with criminal penalties, as well as potential civil and administrative penalties. The AKS, however, provides a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory “safe harbors” for particular types of transactions. Many states have similar fraud and abuse laws and their own anti-kickback laws, some of which can apply to all payors, and not just governmental payors. At present, our products are not reimbursable under any federal program. As a result of exclusion from government health programs, neither products nor services could be provided to any beneficiaries of any federal healthcare program. The Federal False Claims Act The Federal False Claims Act provides for the imposition of extensive financial penalties (including treble damages and fines of over $22,000 for every false claim) if a provider submits false claims to any governmental health program either knowingly or in reckless disregard or in deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the claims at issue. Liability under the False Claims Act can arise from patterns of deficient documentation, coding and billing, as well as for billing for services that are deemed not to have been medically necessary for the treatment of the patient. Many states have their own False Claims Acts as well. To the extent we were billing governmental health care programs, the False Claims Act may potentially be applicable to such operations. We put a fraud and abuse compliance program in place that was designed to ensure that our documentation, coding and billing were accurate and compliant. Any patterns of uncorrected deficiencies in documenting, coding and billing, however, may result in fines and other liabilities, which may adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, each state has a board of pharmacy that regulates the sale and distribution of drugs and other therapeutic agents. Some states require that a physician obtain a license to dispense prescription products. When considering the commencement of business in a new state, we consult with healthcare counsel regarding the expansion of operations and utilize local counsel when necessary.g., the Office of Inspector General), the United States Department of Justice and individual United States Attorney offices within the Department of Justice, and state and local governments. Pricing and rebate programs must comply with the Medicaid rebate requirements of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 and the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992, each as amended. If products are made available to authorized users of the Federal Supply Schedule of the General Services Administration, additional laws and requirements apply. All of these activities are also potentially subject to federal and state consumer protection, unfair competition, and other laws. In addition, we may be subject to federal and state laws requiring the disclosure of financial arrangements with health care professionals. Whether or not FDA approval has been obtained, generally we must obtain separate authorization for a product by the comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries prior to the commencement of product marketing in those countries. In certain countries, regulatory authorities also establish pricing and reimbursement criteria. The authorization or approval process varies from country to country. Employees As of December 31, 2023, we had a total of nine full-time employees and no part-time employees. We are not a party to any collective bargaining agreements. We believe that we maintain good relations with our employees. Corporate History Guardion Health Sciences, Inc. was formed under the name P4L Health Sciences, LLC in December 2009 in California as a limited liability company. We changed our name to Guardion Health Sciences, LLC in December 2009. In June 2015, we converted into a Delaware “C” corporation. On March 1, 2021, we filed a Certificate of Amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to effectuate a one-for-six (1:6) reverse stock split of our common stock without any change to our par value.

Proportional adjustments for the Reverse Stock Split were made to our outstanding common stock, stock options, and warrants as if the split occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS Investing in the Company’s common stock involves a high degree of risk.

Prospective investors should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information included or referred to in this Form 10-K, before purchasing shares of the Company’s common stock. There are numerous and varied risks that may prevent the Company from achieving its goals. If any of these risks actually occurs, the business, financial condition or results of operations may be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of the Company’s common stock could decline and investors in the Company’s common stock could lose all or part of their investment. If it cannot reach and sustain profitability, the Company will be required to secure additional financing, which the Company may not be able to obtain on favorable terms or at all. Management believes that the current cash balance and working capital resources are sufficient to fund operations for at least one year from the date the Company’s 2023 financial statements are issued. On January 30, 2024, the Company entered into the Purchase Agreement with Doctor’s Best for the sale of all of the outstanding equity interests of Activ, which owns the Viactiv® brand and business and accounted for 97.2% and 96.3% of our revenues during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, for the aggregate cash consideration of $17.2 million, of which $1.7 million was placed in a third-party escrow account pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement. Additionally, the Board has determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of the Company and the Company’s stockholders to approve a Plan of Dissolution, which, if approved, will authorize the Company to liquidate and dissolve the Company in accordance with the Plan of Dissolution, but subject to the Company’s ability to abandon or delay the Plan of Dissolution in accordance with the terms thereof. Assuming the approval of the Dissolution by the Company’s stockholders, the decision of whether or not to proceed with the Dissolution and when to file the Certificate of Dissolution will be made by the Board in its sole discretion. In the event that the Transaction closes, the Company will be left with minimal operations. Please see “Risk Factors Relating to the Proposal to Approve the Transaction” and “Risk Factors Related to the Plan of Dissolution” below. While the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business has largely abated, uncertainties continue in China, which is experiencing the ongoing effects of the pandemic and an economic slowdown. These and other disruptions in the Company’s operations and the global economy could negatively impact the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition. The Company may be negatively affected by the rate of inflation and its impact on the global economy. Current inflation within the economy has resulted in increased interest rates and capital costs, contributed to supply shortages, increased the cost of living and labor, and other related items. Although the Company may take actions to counteract the impacts of inflation, if these actions are not effective it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, higher future inflation or concerns of a recession could impact the demand for the Company’s products.S. and international financial markets, could adversely affect the Company’s business, liquidity and financial condition and its share price. U.S. and international financial market disruptions such as the ones experienced in the last global financial crisis and the volatility experienced as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, along with the possibility of a prolonged recession, may potentially affect various aspects of the Company’s business, including the demand for its products, its counterparty credit risk and the ability of its customers, counterparties and others to establish or maintain their relationships with the Company. Volatility in the U.S. and other securities markets may also adversely affect the Company’s share price. Unstable market and economic conditions and adverse developments with respect to financial institutions and associated liquidity risk may have serious adverse consequences on our business, financial condition and stock price. The global credit and financial markets have recently experienced extreme volatility and disruptions, including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth, inflationary pressure, and interest rate changes, increases in unemployment rates and uncertainty about economic stability. There can be no assurance that future credit and financial market instability and a deterioration in confidence in economic conditions will not occur. Our general business strategy may be adversely affected by any such economic downturn, liquidity shortages, volatile business environment or continued unpredictable and unstable market conditions. If the equity and credit markets deteriorate, or if adverse developments are experienced by financial institutions, it may cause short-term liquidity risk and also make any necessary debt or equity financing more difficult, more costly and more dilutive. In addition, there is a risk that one or more of our current service providers, financial institutions, manufacturers, and other partners may be adversely affected by the foregoing risks, which could directly affect our ability to attain our operating goals on schedule and on budget. Climate change and other sustainability matters could have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations. Climate change resulting in the increased frequency and severity of natural disasters and other extreme weather conditions may adversely impact our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Specifically, the predicted physical effects of climate change may exacerbate challenges regarding the cost, quality and availability of ingredients and packaging materials, pose physical risks to the facilities of our key suppliers, disrupt our global supply chain or impact demand for our products. In addition, the increased concern over climate change is likely to continue to result in business risks, including additional legal and regulatory requirements intended to, among other things, reduce or mitigate the effects of climate change and may relate to, among other things, greenhouse gas emissions (e.g., carbon pricing), alternative energy policy and additional disclosure obligations. Such additional regulation may adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition by increasing our compliance and contract manufacturing and supply chain costs and/or negatively impacting our reputation if we are unable to or are perceived (whether or not valid) not to satisfy such requirements or expectations. Achieving sustainability and social impact targets could require significant efforts from us and our stakeholders, such as our suppliers and other third parties. It could also require capital investment, additional expense (e.g., renewable energy costs) and the development of technology that may not currently exist. There is also increased focus, including by governmental and non-governmental organizations, investors, customers, consumers, regulators, our employees and other stakeholders on these and other sustainability and social impact matters, including responsible sourcing, deforestation, animal welfare, labor, employment and human rights, the use of plastic, energy and water, the recyclability or recoverability of packaging, including single-use and other plastic packaging, and a growing demand for natural or organic products and ingredient transparency. Our reputation could be damaged if we do not (or are perceived not to) act responsibly with respect to sustainability matters, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Development and commercialization of dietary supplements and medical foods involves a lengthy and complex process. Extended timelines to secure raw materials combined with cost increases on ingredients, packaging and labor, and demand for higher retailer margins have created challenges to the development and commercialization of new products. The Company cannot assure you that its products will be approved by regulatory authorities, if required, or ultimately prove to be useful for commercial markets, meet applicable regulatory standards, or be successfully marketed. Such endeavors involve significant risks and uncertainties, including insufficient revenues from such investments to offset any new liabilities assumed and expenses associated with these new investments, inadequate return of capital on the Company’s investments, distraction of management from current operations, and unidentified issues not discovered in its due diligence of such strategies and offerings that could cause the Company to fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such investments and incur unanticipated liabilities. Because these new ventures are inherently risky, no assurance can be given that such strategies and offerings will be successful and will not adversely affect the Company’s reputation, financial condition, and operating results. A key part of the Company’s business strategy is to establish collaborative relationships to commercialize and develop its products. The Company may not succeed in establishing and maintaining collaborative relationships, which may significantly limit its ability to develop and commercialize its products successfully, if at all. The Company may not be able to negotiate collaborations on acceptable terms, if at all, and if it does enter into collaborations, these collaborations may not be successful. The Company’s current and future success depends in part on its ability to enter into successful collaboration arrangements. If the Company is unable to establish and maintain collaborative relationships on acceptable terms or to successfully transition terminated collaborative agreements, the Company may have to delay or discontinue further development of one or more of its product candidates, undertake development and commercialization activities at its own expense or find alternative sources of capital. Consequently, if it is unable to enter into, maintain or extend successful collaborations, the Company’s business may be harmed. The Company’s long-term success may depend upon the successful development and commercialization of products other than its current products. The Company’s long-term viability and growth may depend upon the successful development and commercialization of products other than its current line of products. Product development and commercialization is very expensive and involves a high degree of risk. Only a small number of research and development programs result in the commercialization of a product. Product development is a complex and time-consuming process. If the Company fails to adequately manage the research, development, execution and regulatory aspects of new product development it may fail to launch new products altogether. Any litigation or claim against the Company may cause it to incur substantial costs and could place a significant strain on its financial resources, divert the attention of management from its business and harm the Company’s reputation. While the Company is not a pharmaceutical or a biopharmaceutical company, as a health sciences company, the Company’s products may come into competition with products in the medical foods and related industries, such as pharmaceuticals, biologics or dietary supplements. There has been substantial litigation in the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industries with respect to the manufacture, use and sale of new products that are the subject of conflicting patent rights. For the most part, these lawsuits relate to the validity, enforceability and infringement of patents. The Company currently relies upon and expects to continue to rely upon patents, trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to develop and maintain its competitive position. The Company may find it necessary to initiate claims to defend its intellectual property rights as a result. Other parties may have issued patents or be issued patents that may prevent the sale of the Company’s products or know-how or require the Company to license such patents and pay significant fees or royalties to produce its products. In addition, future patents may be issued to third parties which the Company’s technology may infringe on. Because patent applications can take many years to be issued, there may be applications now pending of which the Company is unaware that may later result in issued patents that the Company’s products may infringe on. If such a dispute were to be resolved against the Company, it may be required to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and attorney’s fees to the party claiming infringement if the Company were to be found to have willfully infringed a third party’s patent. The Company may also have to develop non-infringing technology, stop selling any products it develops, cease using technology that contains the allegedly infringing intellectual property or enter into royalty or license agreements that may not be available on acceptable or commercially practical terms, if at all. The Company’s failure to develop non-infringing technologies or license the proprietary rights on a timely basis could harm its business. Modification of any products the Company develops or development of new products thereafter could require the Company to become subject to other requirements of the FDA and other regulatory bodies, which could be time-consuming and expensive. In addition, parties making infringement claims may be able to obtain an injunction that would prevent the Company from selling any products it develops, which could harm its business. Competitors may develop products similar to the Company’s products, and the Company may therefore need to modify or alter its business strategy, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company. Competitors and contract manufacturers may develop products with similar characteristics to the Company’s products. Such similar products marketed by larger competitors could hinder the Company’s efforts to penetrate the market. Many large competitors have substantially greater financial, research and development, manufacturing, distribution and marketing experience and resources as well as greater brand recognition than the Company does and represent substantial long-term competition for the Company. Such companies may develop products that are safer, more effective or less costly than any that the Company may develop. Such companies also may be more successful than the Company is in manufacturing, sales and marketing. As a result, the Company may be forced to modify or alter its business and regulatory strategy and sales and marketing plans, as a response to changes in the market, competition, and technology limitations, among others. Such modifications may pose additional delays in achieving the Company’s goals which may have a material adverse effect on the Company. If the Company is unable to develop its own sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, or if it is not successful in contracting with qualified third parties for these services on favorable terms, or at all, revenues from product sales could be limited. In addition, establishing such operations takes time and involves significant expense. Even if the Company is able to identify one or more acceptable partners, it may not be able to enter into any partnering arrangements on favorable terms, or at all. If the Company enters into any partnering arrangements, its revenues are likely to be lower than if the Company marketed and sold its products itself. Depending upon the terms of the Company’s agreements, this remedies the Company against an under-performing partner may be limited. If the Company were to terminate the relationship, it may be difficult or impossible to find a replacement partner on acceptable terms, or at all. Product liability lawsuits against the Company could divert its resources and could cause it to incur substantial liabilities and limit commercialization of its products. The Company faces a risk of product liability exposure related to the use of its products. If the Company cannot successfully defend itself against claims that its products caused injuries, the Company will incur substantial liabilities. Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in: The Company’s insurance policies may not fully cover liabilities that it may incur in the event of a product liability lawsuit. The Company may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in an amount adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise. The Company may be unsuccessful in expanding its product distributions. The Company is dependent on third-party sales broker and distribution relationships. These brokers and distributors may not commit the necessary resources to market and sell the Company’s products to the level of the Company’s expectations. If sales brokers and distributors do not perform adequately, or if the Company is unable to locate distributors in particular geographic areas, the Company’s ability to realize long-term revenue growth would be materially adversely affected. Additionally, the Company’s products may require regulatory clearances and approvals from jurisdictions outside the United States. The Company is not certain that it will be able to obtain these clearances or approvals or compliance requirements on a timely basis, or at all.S. As a result, the Company’s business is exposed to risks inherent in international operations. The Company engages third parties to manufacture its products in sufficient quantities and on a timely basis, while maintaining product quality, acceptable manufacturing costs and complying with regulatory requirements. The Company is subject to the impact of changes to minimum order quantities and cost increases, including raw materials, labor and utilities incurred by its contract manufacturers. The Company experienced contract manufacturer related cost increases during the COVID-19 pandemic and from subsequent inflationary pressures in 2023. In determining the required quantities of its products and the manufacturing schedule, the Company must make significant judgments and estimates based on historical experience, inventory levels, current market trends and other related factors. Because of the inherent nature of estimates, there could be significant differences between the Company’s estimates and the actual amounts of products it requires. If the Company is unable to obtain from one or more of its vendors the needed materials or components that meet our specifications on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, the Company may not be able to meet the demand for its products. It may be difficult to find alternate suppliers in a timely manner and on terms acceptable to the Company, however, the Company believes that there are alternative sources, suppliers and manufacturers available for its products in the event of a termination or a disagreement with any current vendor. In the ordinary course of the Company’s business, the Company collects and stores sensitive data, including intellectual property, its proprietary business information and that of its customers and business partners, including potentially personally identifiable information of its customers, some of which is stored on the Company’s network and some of which is stored with the Company’s third-party e-commerce vendor. The Company strives to comply with all applicable laws, internal policies, legal obligations, and industry codes of conduct relating to privacy, data security, cybersecurity and data protection. However, given that the scope, interpretation, and application of these laws and regulations are often uncertain and may be conflicting, it is possible that these obligations may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another and may conflict with other rules or our practices. In addition, despite the Company’s security measures, its information technology and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to operator error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such breach could compromise the Company’s network and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect the privacy of personal information, disrupt the Company’s operations, and damage the Company’s reputation, which could adversely affect the Company’s business. During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company’s billings were derived from a limited number of individual customers and distributors. One other customer accounted for 13% of revenue during the year ended December 31, 2023. Customers may stop purchasing the Company’s products with little or no warning. Loss of customers may have an immediate adverse effect on the Company’s financial results. If customers do not accept the Company’s products or delay in deciding whether to recommend the Company’s products, its business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. The Company’s business model depends on its ability to sell its products. Third party brokers play an important role in the sales of the Viactiv line of supplements since the majority of these sales are made through traditional retailers. Achieving market acceptance for the Company’s products and services will require substantial sales and marketing efforts and the expenditure of significant financial and other resources to create awareness and demand by participants in the healthcare industry. The Company is highly dependent upon consumers’ perception of the safety and quality of its products as well as similar products distributed by other companies in its industry, and adverse publicity and negative public perception regarding particular ingredients or products or the Company’s industry in general could limit the Company’s ability to increase revenue and grow its business. Decisions about purchasing made by consumers of the Company’s products may be affected by adverse publicity or negative public perception regarding particular ingredients or products or the Company’s industry in general. Negative public perception may also arise from regulatory investigations, regardless of whether those investigations involve the Company. Thus, the mere publication of reports asserting that such products may be harmful could have a material adverse effect on the Company, regardless of whether these reports are scientifically supported. Publicity related to nutritional supplements may also result in increased regulatory scrutiny of the Company’s industry and/or the healthy foods channel. Adverse publicity may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flow. The Company could be subject to intellectual property infringement claims as the number of its competitors grows and if its products or the functionality of its products overlap with patents of the Company’s competitors. The Company could incur substantial costs and diversion of management resources defending any infringement claims whether or not such claims are ultimately successful. Furthermore, a party making a claim against the Company could secure a judgment awarding substantial damages, as well as injunctive or other equitable relief that could effectively block the Company’s ability to provide products. The Company’s business depends on its intellectual property rights, and if it is unable to protect them, its competitive position may suffer. Protecting the Company’s intellectual property rights is critical to its continued success and its ability to maintain its competitive position. The Company’s goal is to protect its proprietary rights through a combination of patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright law, confidentiality agreements and technical measures. The Company generally enters into non-disclosure agreements with its employees and consultants and limits access to its trade secrets and technology. Misappropriation of the Company’s intellectual property would have an adverse effect on its competitive position. The Company’s success, competitive position, and future revenues will depend, in part, on its ability to obtain and maintain patent protection for its products, methods and processes; to preserve its trade secrets; to obtain trademarks for its name, logo and products; to prevent third parties from infringing its proprietary rights; and to operate without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. To counter infringement or unauthorized use by third parties, the Company may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. The patent process is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in protecting its products by obtaining and defending patents. Thus, even if the Company or any of its licensors are able to obtain patents, the patents may be substantially narrower than anticipated. Failure to do so may result in slower expansion. The Company relies on its executive leadership team to drive business growth and attract and retain quality employees. Without experienced and talented management and employees, the growth of the Company’s business may be adversely impacted. The Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified members for its board of directors may be impacted due to new potential rules of national securities exchanges. Nasdaq has adopted listing rules related to board diversity and disclosure, which require all companies listed on Nasdaq’s U.S. exchanges to publicly disclose consistent, transparent diversity statistics regarding their board of directors. Additionally, the rules require most Nasdaq-listed companies to have, or explain why they do not have, at least two diverse directors, including one who self-identifies as female and one who self-identifies as either an underrepresented minority or LGBTQ+. Failure to achieve designated minimum gender and diversity levels in a timely manner exposes such companies to financial penalties and reputational harm. We cannot assure that we can recruit, attract and/or retain qualified members of the board and meet Nasdaq rules, which may expose us to penalties and/or reputational harm. Risk Factors Relating to the Proposal to Approve the Transaction to Sell Activ If we fail to complete the Transaction, our business may be harmed We cannot provide assurances that the Transaction will be completed. The closing of the Transaction is subject to a number of conditions, including but not limited to our obtaining stockholder approval of the Purchase Agreement and the absence of a material adverse effect on Activ’s business. If the Transaction is terminated because (a) the Board fails to recommend the Purchase Agreement to our stockholders in a way that is not materially adverse to Doctor’s Best or otherwise recommends a separate acquisition proposal, or (b) certain other triggering events occur, then we will be required to pay to Doctor’s Best a termination fee of $688,000. As a result of our announcement of the Transaction, third parties may be unwilling to enter into material agreements with us. New or existing customers and business partners may prefer to enter into agreements with our competitors who have not expressed an intention to sell their business because customers and business partners may perceive that such relationships with our competitors are likely to be more stable in the long-term. If we fail to complete the Transaction, the failure to maintain existing business relationships or enter into new ones could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if the Transaction is not completed, the market price for our common stock may decline. Our announcement of the Transaction may cause employees working for us to become concerned about the future of the business and lose focus or seek other employment. In addition, if the Transaction is not completed, our directors, executive officers and other employees will have expended extensive time and effort and experienced significant distractions from their work during the pendency of the Transaction and we will have incurred significant third-party transaction costs, in each case, without any commensurate benefit, which may have a material and adverse effect on our stock price and results of operations. If the Transaction is not completed, we may explore other potential transactions involving the Company, in whole or in part. The terms of an alternative transaction may be less favorable to us than the terms of the Transaction and there can be no assurance that we will be able to reach agreement with or complete an alternative transaction with another party. 21 The amount of net proceeds that we will receive from the Transaction is subject to uncertainties. We will receive aggregate cash consideration of $17,200,000, subject to certain upward adjustments related to cash holdings and working capital in excess of a target of $3,677,000, certain downward adjustments related to indebtedness, unpaid transaction expenses, and working capital below a target of $3,677,000. However, there can be no assurance that our closing working capital will be at or above the target of $3,677,000. If the adjustment amount, as finally determined, is less than the estimated adjustment amount plus $100,000, Doctor’s Best will receive from the escrow fund the amount of such shortfall. If the adjustment amount, as finally determined, equals or exceeds the estimated adjustment amount plus $100,000, Doctor’s Best will pay us any excess in an amount not to exceed $225,000. The amount of our working capital at any given point in time is dependent upon a number of factors beyond our control. For example, the timing of cash payments for purchases and receipts for accounts receivable cannot be predicted precisely, our inventory levels vary according to customer orders and prepayments and accruals fluctuate throughout the year. We may also have unforeseen liabilities and expenses that must be satisfied from the after-tax net proceeds of the Transaction. As a result, the amount of the net proceeds from the Transaction is subject to substantial uncertainty, and it is possible that the net proceeds from the Transaction will be materially less than we expect. Additionally, if the adjustment amount, as finally determined, is less than the estimated adjustment amount plus $100,000, Doctor’s Best will receive from the escrow fund the amount of such shortfall. If the adjustment amount, as finally determined, equals or exceeds the estimated adjustment amount plus $100,000, Doctor’s Best will pay us any excess in an amount not to exceed $225,000. Further, the amount of any distribution from the proceeds of the Transaction may be reduced due to the option of the Series A Warrant holders to exercise their respective repurchase rights to cause the Company to repurchase such warrants from the holders for cash. The Purchase Agreement limits our ability to pursue alternatives to the Transaction. The Purchase Agreement contains provisions that make it more difficult for us to sell our business to any party other than Doctor’s Best. These provisions include the prohibition on our ability to solicit competing proposals, the requirement that we pay a termination fee to Doctor’s Best if the Purchase Agreement is terminated in specified circumstances, and Doctor’s Best’s right to be advised of competing proposals and to submit revised proposals for consideration. If the Transaction is approved and consummated, Nasdaq may delist our shares from trading on its exchange, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to make transactions in our shares and subject us to additional trading restrictions. We are required to demonstrate compliance with Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements in order to maintain the listing of our shares on Nasdaq. Such continued listing requirements for our shares include, among other things, having at least 300 shareholders, 500,000 publicly held shares and a market value of our listed publicly held shares of $1 million. In addition, a Nasdaq-listed company must meet at least one of the following standards: (i) stockholders equity of at least $2.5 million; (ii) market value of listed shares of at least $35 million; or (iii) net income from continuing operations of $500,000 in the latest fiscal year or in two of the last three fiscal years. We cannot assure you that our shares will be able to meet any of Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements. If our shares do not meet the Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements, Nasdaq may delist our shares from trading on its exchange, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our shares and subject us to additional trading restrictions. If our shares do not meet Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements, Nasdaq may delist our shares from trading on its exchange. If Nasdaq delists any of our shares from trading on its exchange and we are not able to list such shares on another approved national securities exchange, we expect that such shares could be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this were to occur, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including: (i) a limited availability of market quotations for our shares, (ii) reduced liquidity for our shares, (iii) a determination that our shares are “penny stocks” which will require brokers trading in our shares to adhere to more stringent rules, including being subject to the depository requirements of Rule 419 of the Securities Act, and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our shares, (iv) a decreased ability to issue additional shares or obtain additional financing in the future, (v) a less attractive acquisition vehicle to a target business in connection with an initial business combination, (vi) our ability to complete an initial business combination with a target company contemplating a Nasdaq listing, and (vii) a limited amount of news and analyst coverage. 22 The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which are referred to as covered securities. Our shares qualify as covered securities under such statute. If we were no longer listed on Nasdaq, our shares would not qualify as covered securities under such statute and we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our shares. If we are delisted from Nasdaq, but obtain a substitute listing for our common stock, it will likely be on a market with less liquidity, and therefore potentially experience more price volatility than our common stock experienced on Nasdaq. Stockholders may not be able to sell their shares of common stock on any such substitute market in the quantities, at the times, or at the prices that could potentially be available on a more liquid trading market. As a result of these factors, if our common stock is delisted from Nasdaq, the value and liquidity of our common stock and warrants would likely be significantly adversely affected. A delisting of our common stock from Nasdaq could also adversely affect our ability to obtain financing for our operations and/or result in a loss of confidence by investors, employees and/or business partners. Even if our stockholders approve the Transaction, Doctor’s Best may be unable to secure the necessary cash to fund the purchase price. Doctor’s Best has represented to the Company in the Purchase Agreement that it will be able to fund the cash purchase price at closing. In order to mitigate any risk associated with Doctor’s Best’s ability to fund the closing purchase price, the Company and Doctor’s Best agreed in the Purchase Agreement, among other things, that Doctor’s Best would deliver (i) at signing, a consent of MUFG Union Bank to the transaction with MUFG Union Bank’s approval of the draw to fund the purchase price (the “MUFG Consent”) in a form satisfactory to the Company, and (ii) a weekly certificate during the interim period from the signing of the Purchase Agreement to the closing of the Transaction pursuant to which the Chief Financial Officer of Doctor’s Best must certify that Doctor’s Best has adequate capacity under its credit facility to fund the purchase price (the “Weekly Certificate”). Doctor’s Best failed to deliver the MUFG Consent at signing but has since delivered a MUFG Consent on February 29, 2024. Doctor’s Best failed to deliver the first Weekly Certificate when required but has complied with its obligations since that time. Further, Doctor’s Best has indicated to the Company’s management and advisors that it may utilize cash from its parent-group entities in China in order to fund the purchase price. Approvals from or registration with appropriate government and regulatory authorities may be required with respect to remitting cash out of China and/or converting any cash from China into United States dollars. Doctor’s Best is required to pay the cash purchase price at closing in order for the Transaction to be completed, subject to a thirty (30) day cure period. As a result of its potential financing uncertainty, if Doctor’s Best is unable to obtain or utilize its financing options in the United States, its ability to pay the cash purchase price may be delayed or inhibited. Under the Purchase Agreement, if the Company terminates the Purchase Agreement due to Doctor’s Best’s failure to fund the cash purchase price at closing, then the parties are obligated to release $1,700,000, representing the full amount held in escrow, plus any interest and earnings accrued thereon, to the Company. The Company will not have any material business assets following the consummation of the Transaction. The Viactiv® brand and business accounted for 97.2 and 96.3% of our revenues during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. As a result, the sale of Activ to Doctor’s Best constitutes a sale of substantially all of our assets and revenue-generating operations. Following the consummation of the Transaction, the remaining business of the Company will not be material. 23 Risk Factors Related to the Plan of Dissolution If our stockholders vote against the Plan of Dissolution proposal, our business could be harmed, and our stockholders could face adverse tax consequences. If we do not obtain stockholder approval of the Plan of Dissolution proposal, we would have to continue its business operations despite the sale of substantially all of our assets and our announced Dissolution. Assuming the completion of the Transaction, our remaining business assets would not be material and as a result we would have limited assets with which to generate operating revenue and likely will have retained only those employees required to wind-up our corporate existence. Further, we do not intend to invest in another operating business following the closing of the Transaction. Further, our stockholders could incur an increased stockholder-level tax liability from any distribution made outside the Plan of Dissolution. We cannot determine at this time the exact amount or timing of any distributions to stockholders because there are many factors, some of which are outside of our control, which could affect our ability to make such distributions in the future. If the Transaction is approved, we expects to receive aggregate cash consideration of $17,200,000, subject to certain upward adjustments related to cash holdings and working capital in excess of a target of $3,677,000, certain downward adjustments related to indebtedness, unpaid transaction expenses, and working capital below a target of $3,677,000. However, there can be no assurance that our closing working capital will be at or above the target of $3,677,000. If the adjustment amount, as finally determined, is less than the estimated adjustment amount plus $100,000, Doctor’s Best will receive from the escrow fund the amount of such shortfall. If the adjustment amount, as finally determined, equals or exceeds the estimated adjustment amount plus $100,000, Doctor’s Best will pay us any excess in an amount not to exceed $225,000 (see the Risk Factor subsection entitled The amount of net proceeds that we will receive from the Transaction is subject to uncertainties). Assuming the Plan of Dissolution is approved by stockholders, and subject to the possibility that the Board abandons or delays the effectiveness of the Plan of Dissolution in favor of a separate subsequent transaction involving the Company that the Board determines to be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders, we plan to distribute, in an initial distribution (with potential subsequent distributions thereafter), a portion of the net proceeds from the Transaction, which may include a portion of the Company’s other cash on its balance sheet, subject to the Company’s obligations to warrant holders and a contingency reserve for remaining costs and liabilities, after the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State. The amount and timing of the distributions to stockholders will be determined by the Board in its sole discretion, subject to the provisions of the Plan of Dissolution. Subsequent distributions would be made in such amounts and at such times as determined by the Board in its sole discretion in accordance with the Plan of Dissolution. However, there can be no assurance as to the timing and amount of distributions to stockholders, even if all of our remaining assets are sold because there are many factors, some of which are outside of our control, that could affect our ability to make such distributions in the future. Further, the Board may, in its sole discretion, take into account the timing of liquidating distributions or potential transactions when determining whether to make a distribution to stockholders following the consummation of the Transaction, if approved. If the Board, in its sole discretion, determines to promptly proceed with liquidating the Company’s assets pursuant to the Plan of Dissolution, if approved, then the Board may, in its sole discretion, elect not to proceed with initial distributions prior to such liquidating distributions due to the administrative costs and burdens involved. However, if the Board expects to engage in a potential transaction following the consummation of the Transaction, if approved, rather than proceeding with the dissolution of the Company, the Board may elect, in its sole discretion, to make interim distributions to the Company’s stockholders. If stockholders do not approve the Plan of Dissolution, the Company will seek to complete the Transaction, if the Transaction is approved by the stockholders and the other conditions to closing set forth in the Purchase Agreement are satisfied or waived. In that event, the Company will have transferred substantially all of its operating assets to Doctor’s Best and will have limited operations and working capital resources to generate revenue. With limited operations and working capital resources with which to generate revenues and no Plan of Dissolution approved, The Company anticipates that it would use its cash to pay ongoing operating expenses, and the Board would determine whether to make any distributions to stockholders. The Board would have to evaluate the alternatives available to the Company, including, among other things, the possibility of investing the cash received from the Transaction in another operating business, engage in a reverse merger or recapitalization or other strategic transaction. In the event that we make a distribution outside of the Plan of Dissolution, our stockholders could incur an increased stockholder-level tax liability from such distribution (see the section entitled Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences to Company Stockholders). 24 In addition, we will continue to incur claims, liabilities and expenses from operations (including various operating costs, salaries, directors and officers insurance, payroll and local taxes, legal and accounting fees, and miscellaneous office and operating expenses) as we seek to close the Transaction and effect the Dissolution. Our estimates regarding our expense levels may be inaccurate. Any unexpected claims, liabilities or expenses that arise prior to the liquidation and final dissolution of the Company or any claims, liabilities or expenses that exceed our estimates could leave us with less cash than is necessary to pay liabilities and expenses and would likely reduce the amount of cash available for ultimate distribution to our stockholders. Further, if cash to be received from the sale of our remaining assets is not adequate to provide for all of our obligations, liabilities, expenses and claims, we will not be able to distribute any amount at our stockholders. Further, the amount of any distribution from the proceeds of the Transaction may be reduced due to the option of the Series A Warrant holders to exercise their respective repurchase rights to cause the Company to repurchase such warrants from the holders for cash. For the foregoing reasons, there can be no assurance as to the timing and amount of distributions to stockholders, even if all of our remaining asset are sold or otherwise disposed of; provided that the Company must complete the distribution of all of its properties and assets to its stockholders as provided in the Plan of Distribution as soon as practicable following the filing of the Certificate of Dissolution with the Delaware Secretary of State and in any event on or before the tenth anniversary of such filing. Our Board may abandon or delay implementation of the Plan of Dissolution even if it is approved by our stockholders. Our Board has adopted and approved a Plan of Dissolution for the Dissolution of the Company following the closing of the Transaction. Even if the Plan of Dissolution proposal is approved by our stockholders, the Board has reserved the right, in its sole discretion, to abandon or delay implementation of the Plan of Dissolution if as a result of the Plan of Dissolution (i) we would be insolvent or unable to pay our debts as they come due, (ii) we would have remaining liabilities in excess of the Company’s remaining assets, (iii) we would otherwise be unable to satisfy in full all valid claims against the Company (iv) the Board determined to invest the cash received from the Transaction in another operating business, or (v) the Board abandons or delays the effectiveness of the Plan of Dissolution in favor of a separate subsequent transaction involving the Company that the Board determines to be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. Following completion of the Transaction, we will continue to exist as a public company until we are dissolved. The Board may also conclude either that its fiduciary obligations require it to pursue business opportunities that present themselves or that abandoning the Plan of Dissolution is otherwise in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders. If the Board elects to pursue any alternative to the Plan of Dissolution, the value of our common stock may decline. Our stock transfer books will close on the date we file the Certificate of Dissolution with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, after which it will not be possible for stockholders to trade our stock. We will close our stock transfer books and discontinue recording transfers of our common stock at the close of business on the date we file the Certificate of Dissolution with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, which is referred to herein as the final record date. Thereafter, certificates representing shares of our common stock will not be assignable or transferable on our books. The proportionate interests of all of our stockholders will be fixed on the basis of their respective stock holdings at the close of business on the final record date, and, after the final record date, any distributions made by us shall be made solely to the stockholders of record at the close of business on the final record date. 25 We will continue to incur claims, liabilities and expenses and a delay in the consummation of the Transaction and/or Dissolution will reduce the amount available for distribution to stockholders. Claims, liabilities and expenses from operations, such as operating costs, salaries, insurance, payroll and local taxes, legal, accounting and consulting fees and miscellaneous expenses, will continue to be incurred as we wind down. These expenses will reduce the amount of assets available for ultimate distribution to stockholders. If the Company is not dissolved, the SEC could classify the Company as a shell company, which could result in certain negative consequences, including a delisting of our common stock on Nasdaq. If the Plan of Dissolution is not approved and/or the Company is not dissolved, then the SEC could take the position that the Company is a shell company. Recently, the SEC has exercised heightened scrutiny in classifying companies as “shell companies” under Rule 405 of the Securities Act. This classification by the SEC would prohibit the Company from using Form S-3 “shelf registration” to register securities for public offerings until 12 months after it has ceased to be a shell company. Further, the Company would no longer be able to use Rule 144 for 12 months after it ceases to be a shell company, among other rules and regulations of which we would not be able to take advantage. Shell company status could dissuade certain parties from looking to acquire the Company in a change in control transaction in an effort to avoid SEC scrutiny and potentially onerous reporting requirements. In addition to the scrutiny and obligations the Company would have pursuant to federal securities laws and regulations as a result of such a classification by the SEC, we could be delisted from Nasdaq. We are required to demonstrate compliance with Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements in order to maintain the listing of our securities on Nasdaq. Such continued listing requirements for our securities include, among other things, having at least 300 shareholders, 500,000 publicly held shares and a market value of our listed publicly held securities of $1 million. We cannot assure you that our shares will be able to meet any of Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements. If our securities do not meet the Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements, including as a result of the Company’s potential shell company status following the consummation of the Transaction, Nasdaq may delist our securities from trading on its exchange, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our securities and subject us to additional trading restrictions. If our securities do not meet Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements, Nasdaq may delist our securities from trading on its exchange. If Nasdaq delists any of our securities from trading on its exchange and we are not able to list such securities on another approved national securities exchange, we expect that such securities could be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this were to occur, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including: (i) a limited availability of market quotations for our securities, (ii) reduced liquidity for our securities, (iii) a determination that our shares are “penny stocks” which will require brokers trading in our shares to adhere to more stringent rules, including being subject to the depository requirements of Rule 419 of the Securities Act, and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our securities, (iv) a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future, (v) a less attractive acquisition vehicle to a target business in connection with an initial business combination, (vi) our ability to complete an initial business combination with a target company contemplating a Nasdaq listing, including the Business Combination and (vii) a limited amount of news and analyst coverage. The National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities, which are referred to as covered securities. Our shares qualify as covered securities under such statute. If we were no longer listed on Nasdaq, our securities would not qualify as covered securities under such statute and we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities under each states respective “blue sky” securities laws. 26 If stockholders do not approve the Plan of Dissolution, the Company will still seek to complete the Transaction, if the Transaction is approved by the stockholders and the other conditions to closing set forth in the Purchase Agreement are satisfied or waived, in which case any distribution to our stockholders may be reduced or eliminated. In the event that our stockholders do not approve the Plan of Dissolution, we will still seek to complete the Transaction, if the Transaction is approved by the stockholders and the other conditions to closing set forth in the Purchase Agreement are satisfied or waived. In that event, the Company will have transferred substantially all of its operating assets to Doctor’s Best and will have limited operations and working capital resources to generate revenue and to fund its ongoing expenses. With limited assets with which to generate revenues and no Plan of Dissolution approved, the Company anticipates that it would use its cash to pay ongoing operating expenses, and the Board would determine whether to make any distributions to stockholders. The Board would have to evaluate the alternatives available to the Company, including, among other things, acquiring other businesses, investing the cash received from the Transaction in another operating business, or engaging in a subsequent reverse merger or recapitalization or similar transaction. In the event that we make a distribution outside of the Plan of Dissolution, our stockholders could incur an increased stockholder-level tax liability from such distribution. If our warrant holders exercise their respective put rights triggered by the Transaction being deemed a fundamental transaction under our Series A Warrants, we will be obligated to pay such exercising holders’ cash, which would reduce the amount each Company stockholder would receive from a liquidating distribution. In connection with our February 2022 public offering, we issued the Series A Warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. Such warrants contain a provision which provides that in the event of a fundamental transaction, such as a change-in-control transaction or sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, the holder has the option, exercisable at any time concurrently with, or within 30 days after the consummation of the fundamental transaction, to cause the Company to repurchase such warrants from the holders for cash in an amount equal to the Black-Scholes value of such warrant calculated in accordance with the terms of the warrant. We currently estimate that the liability to the Company associated with these warrants based on information currently available to the Company is approximately $5,100,000. That amount could increase or decrease based on a number of factors that are outside the control of the Company. Such factors include, among others, the trading and price volatility of our common stock, the number of warrant holders that may elect to exercise their warrants in accordance with their terms prior to the closing of the Transaction and forego their put rights, and the number of warrant holders that exercise their put rights in accordance with the terms of the warrants. To the extent that this obligation is triggered and exercised by the warrant holders, the Company would need to make such payments out of its available cash and/or the Transaction proceeds, and any such payments would reduce the amount each stockholder would be able to receive from any liquidating distributions. Such warrant holders are also able to exercise their warrants in exchange for common stock of the Company. Any such exercise would decrease the aforementioned liability of the Company but would result in dilution to the common stock held by all other stockholders. If it is determined that the Company or its suppliers or manufacturers are not in compliance with the laws and regulations to which they are respectively subject, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. As a participant in the healthcare industry, the Company’s operations and relationships, and those of the Company’s customers, are regulated by a number of federal, state, local, and foreign governmental entities with oversight of various aspects of product manufacture, distribution, sale, and use. The regulations are very complex, have become more stringent over time, and are subject to changing and varying interpretations. Regulatory restrictions or changes could limit the Company’s ability to carry on or expand its operations or result in higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales. The FDA and other federal and state governmental agencies regulate numerous elements of the Company’s business, including: The Company may be subject to similar foreign laws that govern all of the above elements of the Company’s business, including pre-market and post marketing obligations for our products. The time required to obtain authorization to sell the Company’s products in foreign countries may be longer or shorter than that required by the FDA, and requirements for licensing a product in a foreign country may differ significantly from FDA requirements. In the European Union (“EU”), member states are responsible for enforcing the EU’s rules and for ensuring that only compliant products are placed on the market in their jurisdictions. Member states have powers to suspend the marketing and use, or demand the recall, of unsafe or non-compliant medical products. They also have the power to bring enforcement action against companies or individuals for breaches of the rules governing certain medical products. Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements could result in enforcement action by the FDA, FTC, state, or regulatory authorities, which may include the following: Any of these sanctions could result in higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales and have a material adverse effect on the Company’s reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations. Dietary supplements, such as Viactiv and GlaucoCetin, and medical foods do not require premarket approval by FDA before they may be distributed in the United States (with limited exceptions). The company currently considers Lumega-Z to be a medical food, as that term is defined under the FDCA. While the Company believes Lumega-Z is a medical food, if the FDA determines Lumega-Z to be a “drug” under the FDCA, the Company and the products would be subject to considerable additional FDA regulation. FDA defines a “drug” as an article that is intended for use in the cure, treatment, prevention or mitigation of a disease. A medical food is defined as “a food which is formulated to be consumed or administered enterally under the supervision of a physician and which is intended for the specific dietary management of a disease or condition for which distinctive nutritional requirements, based on recognized scientific principles, are established by medical evaluation. The Company cannot anticipate how changes in regulations or determinations by regulatory agencies may evolve. Thus, application of many foreign, state and federal regulations to the Company’s business operations is uncertain. Further, there are federal and state fraud and abuse laws, including anti-kickback laws and limitations on physician referrals that may or may not be directly or indirectly applicable to the Company’s operations and relationships or the business practices of its customers. It is possible that a review of the Company’s business practices or those of its customers by courts or regulatory authorities could result in a determination that may adversely affect the Company. In addition, the healthcare regulatory environment may change in a way that restricts existing operations or growth. The healthcare industry is expected to continue to undergo significant changes for the foreseeable future, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company cannot predict the effect of possible future legislation and regulation. If the Company or its third-party manufacturers fail to comply with FDA cGMP regulations or fail to adequately, timely, or sufficiently respond to an FDA Form 483 or subsequent Warning Letter, this could impair the Company’s ability to market its products in a cost-effective and timely manner and could result in FDA enforcement action. The FDA requires facilities that manufacture FDA-regulated products to comply with cGMP regulations, which cover the methods and documentation of the design, testing, production, control, quality assurance, labeling, packaging, storage and shipping of the Company’s products. The Company does not manufacture any of its products internally and instead relies on contract manufacturers to manufacture its products. The Company and its third-party manufacturers are required to comply with cGMP regulations. The FDA audits compliance with cGMP and related regulations through periodic announced and unannounced inspections of manufacturing and other facilities. The FDA may conduct these inspections at any time. Failure to comply with any applicable law or regulation could result in penalties and restrictions on the Company’s manufacturers’ ability to manufacture and the Company’s ability to distribute products. If any such action were to be imposed, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. Although the Company’s supplement and food products do not require pre-market approval by the FDA, manufacturers of the Company’s products must be registered with the FDA. Manufacturers of FDA-regulated products are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA and state health authorities. The manufacture of the Company’s FDA-regulated products is outsourced in its entirety to three third-party manufacturers. The Company is evaluating additional manufacturers for selection as second source or back-up providers. The Company’s products have not been reviewed by the FDA. There is no certainty that the FDA will favorably review the Company’s products or its manufacturers’ facilities. If the outcome of an inspection is negative or if the Company or the Company’s manufacturers fail to comply with any law or regulation, the Company could be subject to penalties and restrictions on the Company’s manufacturers’ ability to manufacture and distribute products. Any such action may result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. For a more complete discussion of the laws and regulations to which the Company is subject, see “Business - Government Regulation.e., as drugs), or if it is using false or misleading claims in its promotional materials. Under the FDCA and other laws, the Company is prohibited from promoting its nutritional products for treatment of a condition or disease. The Company’s promotional materials and marketing activities must comply with FDCA, FTCA, and other applicable laws and regulations, including laws and regulations prohibiting marketing claims that promote the use of the Company’s products outside of their intended use as supplements or foods (i.e., as a drug) or that make false or misleading statements. The FDA also could conclude that a performance claim is misleading if it determines that there are inadequate non-clinical and/or clinical data supporting the claim. There is a risk that the FDA or other federal or state law enforcement authorities could determine that the nature and scope of the Company’s sales and marketing activities may constitute the promotion of the Company’s products for use as a drug in violation of applicable law, or that its promotional materials include false or misleading statements. The Company also faces the risk that the FDA or other regulatory authorities might pursue enforcement based on past activities that the Company discontinued or changed, including sales activities, arrangements with institutions and doctors, educational and training programs and other activities. Government investigations are typically expensive, disruptive, burdensome and generate negative publicity. If its promotional activities are found to be in violation of applicable law or if the Company agrees to a settlement in connection with an enforcement action, the Company will likely face significant fines and penalties and would likely be required to substantially change its sales, promotion and educational activities. In addition, were any enforcement actions against the Company or its senior officers to arise, the Company could be excluded from participation in U.S. government healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. The Company’s products may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties that could delay or prevent any required regulatory approval, limit the commercial potential or result in significant negative consequences following any potential marketing approval, or result in a product recall that could harm the Company’s reputation, business and financial results. If the Company’s products are associated with undesirable side effects or adverse events, or have characteristics that are unexpected, the Company may need to abandon its development or limit development to certain uses or subpopulations in which the undesirable side effects or other characteristics are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk-benefit perspective. The Company also may have to remove a commercialized product from the market as consequence of serious adverse events associated with the product. Any serious adverse or undesirable side effects identified during the development of the Company’s products, could interrupt, delay or halt commercialization and/or could result in the additional regulatory requirements by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, and in turn prevent the Company from commercializing its product candidates and generating revenues from their sale. A government-mandated or voluntary recall by the Company or one of its distributors could occur as a result of adverse side effects, impurities or other product contamination, manufacturing errors, labeling defects or other deficiencies and issues. Recalls of any of the Company’s products would divert managerial and financial resources and have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the FDA requires companies to maintain certain records of recalls, even if they are not reportable to the FDA. The Company may initiate voluntary recalls involving the Company’s products in the future that it determines do not require notification of the FDA. If the FDA disagrees with the Company’s determinations, it could require the Company to report those actions as recalls. A future recall announcement could harm the Company’s reputation with customers and negatively affect the Company’s sales. In addition, the FDA could take enforcement action for failing to report the recalls when they were conducted. While not available in pharmacies, the Company is mindful that the act of physicians prescribing, particularly if conducted across state lines, could potentially be subject to certain pharmacy regulations. Each state has its own regulations concerning physician dispensing, restrictions on the corporate practice of medicine, anti-kickback and false claims. In addition, each state has a board of pharmacy that regulates the sale and distribution of drugs and other therapeutic agents. Some states require a physician to obtain a license to dispense prescription products. While the Company does not believe these pharmacy requirements are applicable, should a pharmacy board or medical board determine otherwise, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to comply with the regulations of particular states into which the Company currently does business or may expand, or that we will be able to maintain compliance with the states in which we currently distribute our products. The Company is subject to anti-corruption laws, as well as export control laws, customs laws, sanctions laws and other laws governing its operations. If it fails to comply with these laws, it could be subject to civil or criminal penalties, other remedial measures and legal expenses, be precluded from developing manufacturing and selling certain products outside the U.S. or be required to develop and implement costly compliance programs, which could adversely affect its business, results of operations and financial condition. The Company’s operations are subject to anti-corruption laws, including the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, or Bribery Act, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and other anti-corruption laws that apply in countries where the Company does business (including in Malaysia) and may do business in the future, particularly as the Company expands its sales and operations to foreign markets. The Bribery Act, FCPA and these other laws generally prohibit the Company, its officers, and its employees and intermediaries from bribing, being bribed or making other prohibited payments to government officials or other persons to obtain or retain business or gain some other business advantage. Compliance with the FCPA, in particular, is expensive and difficult, particularly in countries in which corruption is a recognized problem. In addition, the FCPA presents particular challenges in the pharmaceutical industry, because, in many countries, hospitals are operated by the government, and doctors and other hospital employees are considered foreign officials. Certain payments to hospitals in connection with clinical trials and other work have been deemed to be improper payments to government officials and have led to FCPA enforcement actions. The Company may in the future operate in jurisdictions that pose a high risk of potential Bribery Act or FCPA violations, and the Company may participate in collaborations and relationships with third parties whose actions could potentially subject the Company to liability under the Bribery Act, FCPA or local anti-corruption laws. In addition, the Company cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future regulatory requirements to which its international operations might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted. If the Company expands its operations outside of the U.S., the Company will need to dedicate additional resources to comply with numerous laws and regulations in each jurisdiction in which it plans to operate.S., or the sharing with certain non-U.S. nationals, of information classified for national security purposes, as well as certain products and technical data relating to those products. If the Company expands its presence outside of the U.S., the Company will be required to dedicate additional resources to comply with these laws, and these laws may preclude the Company from developing, manufacturing, or selling certain products outside of the U.S., which could limit the Company’s growth potential and increase its development costs. The Company may not be completely effective in ensuring compliance with all applicable anti-corruption laws, including the Bribery Act, the FCPA or other legal requirements, including Trade Control laws. If the Company is not in compliance with the Bribery Act, the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws or Trade Control laws, the Company may be subject to criminal and civil penalties, disgorgement and other sanctions and remedial measures, and legal expenses, which could have an adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. The Securities and Exchange Commission also may suspend or bar issuers from trading securities on U.S. exchanges for violations of the FCPA’s accounting provisions. Any investigation of any potential violations of the Bribery Act, the FCPA, other anti-corruption laws or Trade Control laws by U.K., U.S. or other authorities could also have an adverse impact on the Company’s’ reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition. Risks Related to the Company’s Common Stock Please see “Risk Factors Relating to the Proposal to Approve the Transaction” and “Risk Factors Related to the Plan of Dissolution” above. The Company is an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). For as long as the Company continues to be an emerging growth company, it has elected to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including (1) not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), (2) reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in the Company’s periodic reports and proxy statements and (3) exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. In addition, as an emerging growth company, the Company is only required to provide two years of audited financial statements. As a result of these reduced reporting and disclosure requirements the Company’s financial statements may not be comparable to SEC registrants not classified as emerging growth companies. The Company may be an emerging growth company for up to five years following the first sale the Company’s equity securities in a public offering (April 2019), although circumstances could cause the Company to lose that status earlier, including if the market value of the Company’s common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700.0 million before that time or if the Company has total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more during any fiscal year before that time, in which cases the Company would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the following December 31 or, if the Company issues more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during any three-year period before that time, the Company would immediately cease to be an emerging growth company. Even after the Company no longer qualifies as an emerging growth company, the Company may still qualify as a “smaller reporting company” which would allow it to take advantage of many of the same exemptions from disclosure requirements, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements. The Company cannot predict if investors will find the Company’s common stock less attractive because the Company may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find the Company’s common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for the Company’s common stock and the Company’s stock price may be more volatile. Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. The Company has elected to avail itself of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, will not be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other SEC registrants that are not emerging growth companies. The Company’s stock price has fluctuated in the past, has been volatile and may be volatile, and as a result, investors in the Company’s common stock could incur substantial losses. The Company’s stock price has fluctuated in the past, has been and may be volatile. The Company may incur rapid and substantial increases or decreases in its stock price in the foreseeable future that are unrelated to its operating performance or prospects. Since the stock price of the Company’s common stock has fluctuated in the past, has and may be volatile, investors in the Company’s common stock could incur substantial losses. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted against companies. Such litigation, if instituted against the Company could result in substantial costs and diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects. There can be no guarantee that the Company’s stock price will remain at current prices or that future sales of the Company’s common stock will not be at prices lower than those sold to investors.” These short squeezes have caused extreme volatility in those companies and in the market and have led to the price per share of those companies to trade at a significantly inflated rate that is disconnected from the underlying value of the company. Many investors who have purchased shares in those companies at an inflated rate face the risk of losing a significant portion of their original investment as the price per share has declined steadily as interest in those stocks has abated. While the Company has no reason to believe its shares would be the target of a short squeeze, there can be no assurance that the Company will not, in the future be subject to a short squeeze and you may lose a significant portion or all of your investment if you purchase the Company’s shares at a rate that is significantly disconnected from its underlying value. The Company does not intend to pay cash dividends to its stockholders, so you may not receive any return on your investment in the Company prior to selling your interest in the Company. If the Company determines that it will pay cash dividends to the holders of its common stock, it cannot assure that such cash dividends will be paid on a timely basis. The success of your investment in the Company will likely depend entirely upon any future appreciation. As a result, you will not receive any return on your investment prior to selling your shares in the Company and, for the other reasons discussed in this “Risk Factors” section, you may not receive any return on your investment even when you sell your shares in the Company. The Company may require additional capital in the future to support its operations, and this capital has not always been readily available. The Company may require additional debt or equity financing to fund its operations, including, but not limited to, working capital. Accordingly, investors should consider the Company’s prospects in light of the costs, uncertainties, delays and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in the early stages of development, as the Company has, in fact, encountered. Potential investors should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties that a new company with a limited operating history and with limited funds, will face. Any debt financing secured by the Company in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to the Company’s capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for the Company to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities. In addition, the Company may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to it, if at all. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to it, when required, its ability to continue to support its current operations and to respond to business challenges would be significantly limited. If the Company cannot access the capital necessary to support the Company’s business, the Company would be forced to curtail its business activities or even shut down operations. If the Company cannot execute any one of the foregoing or similar matters relating to the Company’s business, the business may fail, in which case you would lose the entire amount of your investment in the Company. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. If the Company fails to comply with the rules under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act related to disclosure controls and procedures in the future, or, if the Company discovers material weaknesses and other deficiencies in its internal controls over financial reporting, the Company’s stock price could decline significantly and raising capital could be more difficult. If material weaknesses or significant deficiencies are discovered or if the Company otherwise fails to achieve and maintain the adequacy of its internal controls, the Company may not be able to ensure that it can conclude on an ongoing basis that it has effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Moreover, effective internal controls are necessary for the Company to produce reliable financial reports and are important to helping prevent financial fraud. If the Company cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, its business and operating results could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in the Company’s reported financial information, and the trading price of the Company’s common stock could drop significantly. The Company’s Second Amended and Restated Bylaws designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of state law actions and proceedings that may be initiated by the Company’s stockholders, which could limit a stockholder’s ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with it or its directors, officers, employees or agents. The Company’s Second Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”) designates the Delaware Court of Chancery as the sole and exclusive forum for certain state law based actions including certain derivative actions or proceedings brought on behalf of the Company; an action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty owed by an officer, a director, employee or to the stockholders of the Company; any claim arising under Delaware corporate law; and any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. This exclusive forum provision does not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Securities Act or the Exchange Act or other federal securities laws for which there is exclusive federal or concurrent federal and state jurisdiction. The Court of Chancery may also reach different judgments or results than would other courts, including courts where a stockholder considering an action may be located or would otherwise choose to bring the action, and such judgments or results may be more favorable to the Company than to its stockholders. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of the Company’s Bylaws inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, the Company may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations. If we are unable to maintain listing of our securities on Nasdaq or any stock exchange, our stock price could be adversely affected and the liquidity of our stock and our ability to obtain financing could be impaired and it may be more difficult for our shareholders to sell their securities. Although our common stock is currently listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market, we may not be able to continue to meet the exchange’s minimum listing requirements or those of any other national exchange. If we are unable to maintain listing on Nasdaq or if a liquid market for our common stock does not develop or is sustained, our common stock may remain thinly traded. The Listing Rules of Nasdaq require listing issuers to comply with certain standards in order to remain listed on its exchange. If, for any reason, we should fail to maintain compliance with these listing standards and Nasdaq should delist our securities from trading on its exchange and we are unable to obtain listing on another national securities exchange, a reduction in some or all of the following may occur, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our shareholders: ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS Not applicable. CYBERSECURITY Cybersecurity Risk Management and Strategy Our Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing our risk management and strategy and cybersecurity is a critical element of this strategy. Management is responsible for the day-to-day administration of our risk management strategy and our cybersecurity policies, processes, and practices. We do not believe that there are currently any known risks from cybersecurity threats that are reasonably likely to materially affect us or our operations, business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. For a description of the risks from cybersecurity threats that may materially affect us and how they may do so, refer to Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors for additional information about cybersecurity risks and potential related impacts on our Company. 35 Cybersecurity Insurance and Internal Audits The annual renewal of our cybersecurity insurance policy includes an internal audit of cybersecurity defense, response, recovery, and remediation protocols. The independent third-party audit is based on criteria designed to meet cybersecurity industry standards. Employee Awareness and Compliance Our IT policies including cybersecurity have been developed in conjunction with independent third parties that specialize in cybersecurity, cloud, and digital infrastructure. The policies include employee security awareness, employee onboarding and offboarding, incident response protocols, business continuity including backup protocols, and disaster recovery. Dedicated Company IT personnel supported by independent third-party cybersecurity resources are responsible for implementing and monitoring cybersecurity measures, conducting risk assessments, and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. The IT team regularly attends webinars providing cybersecurity training and industry updates to stay abreast of trends and apply learning throughout the Company. We implement ongoing employee cybersecurity awareness programs across the Company. The programs include cybersecurity best practices, phishing simulation exercises and targeted communication campaigns. Mandatory annual cyber awareness employee training developed by a third-party specialist is conducted to enhance management’s ability to detect and respond to cyber threats. The online training includes a system for scoring and reporting on the program’s efficacy to enable improvements to be made to subsequent training modules. Data Protection, Endpoint Management and Threat Intelligence Encryption protocols have been implemented to safeguard sensitive data. They include the protection of data both at rest and during transmission. We manage access controls to restrict data acquisition and system entry to authorized personnel only and enforce compliance with pre-set permission levels via Microsoft systems. We work with a third-party IT resource with an endpoint management system to monitor and secure all endpoints within the Company’s cloud-based network and invest in continuous threat intelligence resources and technologies to detect, analyze, and respond to emerging cyber threats. Cyberattack Response The Company’s cyberattack response plan has been developed in conjunction with independent third parties that specialize in cybersecurity, cloud, and digital infrastructure. The plan includes incident response protocols, disaster recovery strategies, business continuity measures, stakeholder communication and SEC compliance reporting. Simulated cyberattacks are conducted to assess the efficacy of the cyberattack response plan and identify areas of potential risk. Regularly scheduled cybersecurity initiatives include penetration testing to proactively identify and address vulnerabilities in the Company’s systems. Each penetration test is documented and reported. Post-test actions are implemented to drive continuous improvement across our systems. Cybersecurity Governance Cybersecurity is a key priority at the board level. Our Board of Directors provides governance of cyber-related risk management by establishing management and oversight expectations. The Board approves cybersecurity policies, including the annual cybersecurity insurance policy, and ensures regulatory compliance with the policies. The Board of Directors facilitates ongoing information exchange, including updates on SEC requirements for reporting on cybersecurity risk management and improving and standardizing disclosures related to cybersecurity incidents. Management regularly updates the Board on IT matters, including cybersecurity.

Recently Filed

Click on a ticker to see risk factors

Ticker *	File Date
EAWD	1 day, 3 hours ago
ARAT	1 day, 3 hours ago
IONM	1 day, 3 hours ago
NHWK	1 day, 4 hours ago
GBBK	1 day, 4 hours ago
APOG	1 day, 6 hours ago
FWAV	1 day, 7 hours ago
JRSS	1 day, 8 hours ago
PPIH	1 day, 11 hours ago
WAVS	2 days ago
GBNH	2 days, 2 hours ago
ACCD	2 days, 3 hours ago
EFSH	2 days, 4 hours ago
RFAC	2 days, 4 hours ago
GXXM	2 days, 8 hours ago
PGY	2 days, 11 hours ago
KPLT	3 days, 3 hours ago
MSB	3 days, 4 hours ago
MMMB	3 days, 4 hours ago
LVPA	3 days, 6 hours ago
HELE	3 days, 13 hours ago
RILY	3 days, 22 hours ago
BHAC	4 days, 4 hours ago
STZ	4 days, 8 hours ago
ARMT	4 days, 12 hours ago
ARMT	4 days, 12 hours ago
RCFA	5 days ago
FSR	5 days, 2 hours ago
TPIA	5 days, 2 hours ago
MEDS	5 days, 3 hours ago
PVNC	5 days, 3 hours ago
CDTX	5 days, 3 hours ago
ENCP	5 days, 3 hours ago
ACI	5 days, 12 hours ago
AZZ	5 days, 14 hours ago
DGWR	5 days, 14 hours ago
AURX	1 week, 1 day ago
CIRX	1 week, 1 day ago
GTCH	1 week, 1 day ago
HWNI	1 week, 1 day ago
CSSE	1 week, 1 day ago
WNLV	1 week, 1 day ago
RBTK	2 weeks, 1 day ago
BTTR	2 weeks, 1 day ago
ROYL	2 weeks, 1 day ago
VIRC	2 weeks, 1 day ago
SCS	2 weeks, 1 day ago
DHAC	2 weeks, 1 day ago
ALOT	2 weeks, 1 day ago
NUBI	2 weeks, 1 day ago

OTHER DATASETS

House Trading

Dashboard

Corporate Flights

Dashboard

App Ratings

Dashboard

Strategies

Alerts

Browse Data

Risk Factors Dashboard

View risk factors by ticker

Search filings by term

Risk Factors - GHSI

-New additions in green
-Changes in blue
-Hover to see similar sentence in last filing

$GHSI Risk Factor changes from 00/04/17/23/2023 to 00/03/28/24/2024

Recently Filed

OTHER DATASETS

House Trading

Corporate Flights

App Ratings

TRADE SMARTER

TRADE SMARTER

Strategies

Alerts

Browse Data

Risk Factors Dashboard

View risk factors by ticker

Search filings by term

Risk Factors - GHSI

-New additions in green-Changes in blue-Hover to see similar sentence in last filing

$GHSI Risk Factor changes from 00/04/17/23/2023 to 00/03/28/24/2024

Recently Filed

OTHER DATASETS

House Trading

Corporate Flights

App Ratings

TRADE SMARTER

TRADE SMARTER

-New additions in green
-Changes in blue
-Hover to see similar sentence in last filing