CN filed a motion with the STB seeking transparency in the Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern merger application.
Quiver AI Summary
CN announced that it has filed a motion with the Surface Transportation Board (STB) to obtain additional information regarding the proposed merger between Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern. CN argues that the applicants have not adequately disclosed competitive harms related to the merger, pointing out several shortcomings in the application, such as incomplete market analyses, missing market share projections, and an inadequate network map. CN emphasizes the need for transparency and thorough evaluation of the merger, criticizing the applicants for their lack of compliance with regulatory standards. The company believes that the information being withheld is crucial for proper assessment of the merger's impact on competition.
Potential Positives
- CN's motion to compel additional information demonstrates its commitment to transparency and regulatory compliance in the proposed merger between Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern.
- The press release highlights significant gaps in the original merger application, positioning CN as a vigilant player concerned about fair competition and potential impacts on the market.
- By calling for a more comprehensive and honest assessment of the merger, CN reinforces its role as an advocate for a competitive and equitable rail industry.
Potential Negatives
- CN's press release highlights significant deficiencies in the merger application submitted by Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern, which may raise doubts about CN's position in future regulatory processes and its ability to advocate effectively for competitive practices.
- The emphasis on transparency and the demand for additional disclosure could imply that CN feels threatened by the merger, potentially indicating a competitive disadvantage in the industry.
- CN’s assertion of incomplete analyses and missing information could reflect poorly on the overall integrity of the regulatory process, potentially damaging CN’s reputation among stakeholders and the public.
FAQ
What is CN's recent action regarding the UP and NS merger?
CN has filed a motion with the Surface Transportation Board to obtain additional information about the proposed Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern merger.
Why is CN seeking more information about the merger?
CN believes the applicants have not fully disclosed competitive harms and the impact of the merger, necessitating greater transparency.
What gaps did CN identify in the merger application?
CN noted incomplete market analyses, missing traffic data, an incomplete network map, and a lack of competitive enhancement proposals in the application.
How does CN view the applicants' disclosure practices?
CN criticizes the applicants for lacking transparency and urges them to provide a comprehensive discussion regarding the merger's competitive implications.
What are forward-looking statements in CN's press release?
Forward-looking statements in CN's release involve predictions about future events and include risks and uncertainties that may affect actual outcomes.
Disclaimer: This is an AI-generated summary of a press release distributed by GlobeNewswire. The model used to summarize this release may make mistakes. See the full release here.
$CNI Hedge Fund Activity
We have seen 291 institutional investors add shares of $CNI stock to their portfolio, and 390 decrease their positions in their most recent quarter.
Here are some of the largest recent moves:
- WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP removed 10,832,887 shares (-48.1%) from their portfolio in Q3 2025, for an estimated $1,021,541,244
- LAZARD ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC added 8,954,310 shares (+639137.0%) to their portfolio in Q3 2025, for an estimated $844,391,433
- FIL LTD added 5,807,825 shares (+122.9%) to their portfolio in Q3 2025, for an estimated $547,677,897
- TCI FUND MANAGEMENT LTD removed 4,221,292 shares (-18.4%) from their portfolio in Q3 2025, for an estimated $398,067,835
- GATES FOUNDATION TRUST removed 3,000,000 shares (-5.5%) from their portfolio in Q3 2025, for an estimated $282,900,000
- KINGSTONE CAPITAL PARTNERS TEXAS, LLC removed 2,690,400 shares (-100.0%) from their portfolio in Q3 2025, for an estimated $253,704,720
- MANUFACTURERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE removed 2,652,895 shares (-39.6%) from their portfolio in Q3 2025, for an estimated $250,167,998
To track hedge funds' stock portfolios, check out Quiver Quantitative's institutional holdings dashboard.
$CNI Analyst Ratings
Wall Street analysts have issued reports on $CNI in the last several months. We have seen 5 firms issue buy ratings on the stock, and 0 firms issue sell ratings.
Here are some recent analyst ratings:
- CIBC issued a "Outperformer" rating on 11/28/2025
- Susquehanna issued a "Positive" rating on 11/03/2025
- Citigroup issued a "Buy" rating on 11/03/2025
- Wells Fargo issued a "Overweight" rating on 10/06/2025
- RBC Capital issued a "Outperform" rating on 07/23/2025
To track analyst ratings and price targets for $CNI, check out Quiver Quantitative's $CNI forecast page.
$CNI Price Targets
Multiple analysts have issued price targets for $CNI recently. We have seen 8 analysts offer price targets for $CNI in the last 6 months, with a median target of $113.0.
Here are some recent targets:
- Ariel Rosa from Citigroup set a target price of $119.0 on 01/08/2026
- Kevin Chiang from CIBC set a target price of $151.0 on 11/28/2025
- Jonathan Chappell from Evercore ISI Group set a target price of $103.0 on 11/03/2025
- Bascome Majors from Susquehanna set a target price of $116.0 on 11/03/2025
- Walter Spracklin from RBC Capital set a target price of $158.0 on 11/03/2025
- Christian Wetherbee from Wells Fargo set a target price of $110.0 on 10/06/2025
- Brandon Oglenski from Barclays set a target price of $97.0 on 10/02/2025
Full Release
HOMEWOOD, Ill., Jan. 12, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- CN (TSX: CNR) (NYSE: CNI) today announced that it has filed a motion with the Surface Transportation Board (STB) to compel additional information in relation to the proposed merger agreement between Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern (NS). CN’s motion shows that the applicants have not been upfront with their assessment, failing to outline the full extent of competitive harms as a result of the merger, one of many problems with the application.
“Given the scale and stakes of the proposed combination, the applicants must meet the highest standard of transparency and compliance. The information the applicants refuse to disclose is critical to understand their perspective on anticipated competitive harms and inform the Board’s public-interest and competition analyses. Rather than hide behind an inapt legal argument, the applicants should welcome the opportunity for a transparent and fulsome discussion about the merger’s impact on competition. Rather than trying to convince everyone that there is ‘nothing to see here’, the applicants should instead be focused on meeting the rigorous and heightened standard called for by the new merger rules.”
-
Olivier Chouc, Senior Vice-President and Chief Legal Officer, CN
Several Gaps Identified in the Original Application:
CN’s latest motion builds on earlier filings on completeness. The application included a number of other shortcomings :
- Incomplete market analyses: Applicants neither disclosed the methodology and data underlying their claim that only three 2‑to‑1 shippers exist nor provided the full lists of 2‑to‑1 and 3‑to‑2 points as stated in the STB’s requirements.
- Missing projections for market shares by revenues and traffic volumes: Applicants did not provide required market share projections and omitted key traffic data in their analyses, undermining the traffic inputs for their Operating Plans.
- Incomplete network map : Applicants maps failed to depict certain trackage and haulage rights, including segments showing direct parallel or overlapping lines in watershed states, in what appears to be an effort to misportray the transaction as “end-to-end” and deprive the Board and parties of essential competitive context. Applicants have since conceded their error and have filed a new map.
- Failure to propose competitive enhancements – Applicants claim this issue should be dealt with at the merits stage. While adequacy of proposed remedies might be a merits issue, the failure to meet a basic regulatory requirement is a completeness issue. Applicants offer nothing to enhance competition and their application should be deemed incomplete.
CN Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements by CN included in this news release constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and under Canadian securities laws. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. CN cautions that its assumptions may not materialize and that current economic conditions render such assumptions, although reasonable at the time they were made, subject to greater uncertainty. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “assumes,” “outlook,” “plans,” “targets,” or other similar words. Forward-looking statements reflect information as of the date on which they are made. CN assumes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect future events, changes in circumstances, or changes in beliefs, unless required by applicable securities laws. In the event CN does update any forward-looking statement, no inference should be made that CN will make additional updates with respect to that statement, related matters, or any other forward-looking statement.
About CN
CN powers the economy by safely transporting more than 300 million tons of natural resources, manufactured products, and finished goods throughout North America every year for its customers. With its nearly 20,000-mile rail network and related transportation services, CN connects Canada’s Eastern and Western coasts with the U.S. Midwest and the U.S. Gulf Coast, contributing to sustainable trade and the prosperity of the communities in which it operates since 1919.
Contacts
:
| Media | Investment Community |
| Ashley Michnowski | Stacy Alderson |
| Senior Manager | Assistant Vice-President |
| Media Relations | Investor Relations |
|
(438) 596-4329
[email protected] |
(514) 399-0052
[email protected] |