S. 398: National Origin-Based Antidiscrimination for Nonimmigrants Act
This bill, known as the National Origin-Based Antidiscrimination for Nonimmigrants Act (also referred to as the NO BAN Act), aims to amend existing immigration laws and establish stricter guidelines on how the U.S. government can suspend or restrict the entry of individuals from certain countries or classes of aliens. The key provisions of the bill are summarized below:
1. Nondiscrimination Expansion
The bill expands the nondiscrimination provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to include nonimmigrant visas—meaning it prohibits discrimination based on national origin, religion, sex, and other factors in the issuance of both immigrant and nonimmigrant visas or entry into the U.S. The bill states that, except in specific cases authorized by other laws, no individual should be denied these benefits on the basis of their nationality or religion.
2. Limitations on Presidential Authority
The bill sets forth limitations on the President's authority to suspend or restrict the entry of certain categories of aliens. Key aspects include:
- The President may only impose such restrictions if there is credible evidence that the entry of a specific class of aliens would undermine U.S. security or public safety.
- Any such suspension or restriction must be narrowly tailored to address specific concerns and should use the least restrictive means possible.
- The President must notify Congress and provide specific evidence for the need and duration of any proposed restrictions prior to imposing them.
- A briefing and report are required within 48 hours following any presidential action, detailing the reasons for the action and its implications.
- If the required briefing is not provided, the suspension or restriction terminates immediately unless Congress intervenes.
3. Reporting Requirements
Within 90 days after the enactment of this bill, the Secretary of State must submit a report detailing the implementation of previous presidential proclamations and executive orders regarding immigration restrictions. This includes reporting on:
- The number of visa applicants and their approval/denial rates by country and visa category.
- The reasons for visa denials and any waivers granted.
- Information on refugees admitted from the affected countries.
Additionally, ongoing reports are required every 30 days after any presidential action to suspend entry, and a final report must be submitted when such restrictions are lifted. These reports must also be made publicly available.
4. Judicial Review and Remedies
The bill enables individuals or entities harmed by violations of the new provisions to seek legal remedies in U.S. district courts, including class action lawsuits. This extends the ability to challenge wrongful visa denials or immigration restrictions.
5. Airline Compliance
The bill provides for the Secretary of Homeland Security to impose penalties on airlines that do not comply with regulations regarding the detection of fraudulent documents. If a commercial airline fails in this regard, it may face restrictions on the entry of aliens it transports to the U.S.
6. Conclusion of Legislative Intent
The bill clarifies that it does not authorize any executive action that contradicts existing immigration policies. It emphasizes the importance of adhering to congressional oversight and empowering Congress in matters of immigration control.
Relevant Companies
- DAL - Delta Air Lines: Any restrictions on entry imposed due to airline compliance issues may affect their operations and passenger volume.
- AAL - American Airlines: Similar to Delta, compliance with survey and documentation requirements could impact their passenger traffic and operational capabilities.
- UAL - United Airlines: If any entries are restricted, the company might lose potential passengers, affecting their overall revenue.
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
37 bill sponsors
-
TrackChristopher A. Coons
Sponsor
-
TrackAngela Alsobrooks
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTammy Baldwin
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMichael F. Bennet
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRichard Blumenthal
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLisa Blunt Rochester
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackCory A. Booker
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMaria Cantwell
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackCatherine Cortez Masto
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTammy Duckworth
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRichard J. Durbin
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJohn W. Hickenlooper
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMazie K. Hirono
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTim Kaine
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndy Kim
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAngus S. King Jr.
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAmy Klobuchar
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBen Ray Lujan
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEdward J. Markey
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJeff Merkley
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackChristopher Murphy
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackPatty Murray
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAlex Padilla
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGary C. Peters
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBernard Sanders
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBrian Schatz
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAdam B. Schiff
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJeanne Shaheen
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackElissa Slotkin
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTina Smith
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackChris Van Hollen
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMark R. Warner
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRaphael G. Warnock
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackElizabeth Warren
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackPeter Welch
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSheldon Whitehouse
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRon Wyden
Co-Sponsor
Actions
2 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Feb. 04, 2025 | Introduced in Senate |
| Feb. 04, 2025 | Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.