S. 1804: Presidential Airlift Security Act of 2025

This bill, known as the Presidential Airlift Security Act of 2025, aims to ensure that funds allocated to the Department of Defense in the fiscal years 2025 and 2026 cannot be used to purchase or modify any aircraft that was previously owned by a foreign government or an entity controlled by a foreign government. Furthermore, this prohibition includes any aircraft owned by representatives of foreign governments. The primary intent is to prevent the use of foreign aircraft for presidential airlift, which refers to the transportation of the President of the United States. The bill emphasizes national security by mandating that presidential airlift options must come from domestic sources, thereby reducing reliance on foreign entities for this critical function.

Key Provisions

• No funds from the Department of Defense can be used for:
  • Procurement of aircraft from foreign governments.
  • Modification of aircraft that were previously owned by foreign governments.
  • Restoration or maintenance of such aircraft.
• The prohibition is applicable for the fiscal years 2025 and 2026.
• The bill is specifically focused on aircraft intended for presidential airlift purposes.

Intended Outcome

The bill seeks to enhance the security of presidential transportation by ensuring that the aircraft used are fully within the control of the U.S. government, thereby minimizing risks associated with foreign ownership or influence.

Importance of Domestic Aircraft

By prioritizing U.S.-owned aircraft for presidential airlift, the bill underscores the importance of maintaining a secure and reliable transportation method for the President, aligning with broader national security interests.

Relevant Companies

• BA (Boeing): As a major manufacturer of aircraft, Boeing could be significantly impacted by this bill as it emphasizes domestic sourcing for presidential airlift, potentially increasing demand for its products.
• RTX (Raytheon Technologies): This company, which provides various aerospace and defense services, may see implications on its contracts related to aircraft maintenance and modification for U.S. presidential transport.
• LMT (Lockheed Martin): As a provider of aerospace systems, Lockheed Martin could be affected by the emphasis on U.S.-built aircraft, possibly influencing its defense contracts related to airlift operations.