H.R. 4233: AUKUS Reform for Military Optimization and Review Act
This bill, known as the AUKUS Reform for Military Optimization and Review Act (or ARMOR Act), aims to enhance defense cooperation and trade among Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Here are the key components of the legislation:
Short Title
The bill may be referred to as the AUKUS Reform for Military Optimization and Review Act or ARMOR Act.
Sense of Congress
The U.S. Congress expresses that the President should collaborate with the governments of Australia and the United Kingdom to create policies addressing the issue of extraterritoriality, which affects defense repair, maintenance, and support for military articles and services not on a specific technology exclusion list.
Modifications to Defense Trade and Cooperation
1. Expansion of Export License Review
The bill proposes changes to simplify and expand the expedited review process for exporting defense articles and services to include:
- All exports and transfers within or between Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
- Reexports, retransfers, temporary imports, and brokering activities.
The President is also required to submit reports every year for 15 years detailing the use of this expedited review process, including:
- Progress on implementing the expedited review process.
- The number of licenses issued.
- A list of principal applicants who received licenses.
- A list of defense articles and services for which licenses were granted.
2. Congressional Notification Requirement Clarification
The bill amends existing regulations to clarify that specific congressional notification rules do not apply to the export or transfer of defense articles or services involving Australia and the United Kingdom under the new expedited review process.
3. Review of Excluded Technologies List
The Secretary of State, with input from the Secretary of Defense, is tasked with reviewing an existing Excluded Technologies List annually for five years following the bill's enactment, and then every three years thereafter. This review aims to ensure that only items necessary for national security continue to require licensing review.
Reporting Timeline
Notably, the first report about the new expedited review process must be submitted within 180 days of the bill's enactment, with subsequent reports due annually for the following 15 years.
Overall Intent
The legislation seeks to streamline defense cooperation and improve the efficiency of defense transactions among the three countries involved, enhancing military readiness and operational capabilities.
Relevant Companies
- BA (Boeing) - Boeing could see an increase in defense contracts related to the expedited export process.
- RTX (Raytheon Technologies) - Raytheon may benefit from expanded defense exports and increased collaboration.
- NOC (Northrop Grumman) - Northrop Grumman could be impacted positively by new opportunities for defense exports.
- LMT (Lockheed Martin) - Lockheed Martin may experience changes in their international defense trade due to the bill.
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
7 bill sponsors
Actions
11 actions
Date | Action |
---|---|
Sep. 03, 2025 | Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. |
Sep. 02, 2025 | Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3736-3738) |
Sep. 02, 2025 | DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 4233. |
Sep. 02, 2025 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
Sep. 02, 2025 | Mr. Baumgartner moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill. |
Sep. 02, 2025 | On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H3736-3737: 1) |
Sep. 02, 2025 | Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. |
Jul. 22, 2025 | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
Jul. 22, 2025 | Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 48 - 2. |
Jun. 27, 2025 | Introduced in House |
Jun. 27, 2025 | Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.