H.R. 9596: Value Over Cost Act
This bill, known as the Value Over Cost Act, aims to modify the way federal government contracts are awarded, specifically through the multiple award schedule program. The primary focus of the bill is to emphasize obtaining the best value for the Federal Government rather than just the lowest cost.
Key Changes Proposed
- The bill amends existing laws in titles 41 and 10 of the United States Code to redefine how “best value” is determined in government contracts.
- It allows the Administrator of General Services to prioritize "best value" when determining contracts if it is deemed necessary for the government's interests.
- Under the amendments, contracts can result in either:
- The lowest overall cost alternative, or
- A best value determination that meets the needs of the federal government, as assessed by the Administrator.
Implications of the Bill
If enacted, this bill could potentially change the procurement strategy of the federal government by encouraging agencies to consider factors beyond just price. This may lead to better quality goods and services being delivered to the government, even if they don't always represent the lowest initial costs.
Relevant Companies
- BA - Boeing Co.: As a major supplier of defense and aerospace products, Boeing could be impacted by changes in government contract awards that prioritize best value.
- LOCK - Lockheed Martin Corp.: As a leading defense contractor, Lockheed Martin may benefit from a focus on best value in contracts, as it often provides advanced technology solutions that may not have the lowest upfront costs.
- RTX - Raytheon Technologies Corp.: Similar to Boeing and Lockheed Martin, Raytheon provides critical defense technologies and could see changes in its contract opportunities based on the new valuation criteria in this bill.
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
5 bill sponsors
Actions
14 actions
Date | Action |
---|---|
Dec. 19, 2024 | Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Reported by Senator Peters without amendment. With written report No. 118-335. |
Dec. 19, 2024 | Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 755. |
Nov. 20, 2024 | Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably. |
Nov. 13, 2024 | Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. |
Nov. 12, 2024 | Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H5942-5943) |
Nov. 12, 2024 | DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 9596. |
Nov. 12, 2024 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
Nov. 12, 2024 | Mr. Higgins (LA) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill. |
Nov. 12, 2024 | On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5942) |
Nov. 12, 2024 | Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5942) |
Sep. 18, 2024 | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
Sep. 18, 2024 | Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 39 - 0. |
Sep. 16, 2024 | Introduced in House |
Sep. 16, 2024 | Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.