WTW's study reveals organizations see potential productivity gains from performance management optimization, yet many face effectiveness challenges.
Quiver AI Summary
WTW's recent study reveals that nearly half of organizations believe optimizing performance management could boost productivity by at least 10%, yet most struggle with clarity and effectiveness in their current programs. Despite recognizing the importance of clear goals and regular feedback, only 39% of organizations feel their performance management processes are effectively meeting employee expectations. The study highlights a significant reliance on manager feedback, yet only 20% of organizations find managers effective at providing coaching and feedback. As organizations increasingly integrate AI and skills into their performance management, 37% are already using AI for purposes like goal setting and performance reviews. Additionally, organizations are seeking improvements in performance rating simplicity and fairness, with over half either changing their rating scales or planning to do so. Ultimately, the report emphasizes the potential for enhanced productivity and employee engagement through optimized performance management practices.
Potential Positives
- WTW's study highlights a significant opportunity for organizations to increase productivity by optimizing performance management processes, with nearly 50% of organizations estimating a potential productivity increase of at least 10%.
- Over one-third of organizations are currently integrating AI into their performance management processes, indicating a trend towards innovation and improvement in employee performance evaluation.
- More than half of organizations have incorporated skills into their performance management processes, suggesting a shift towards a more holistic approach to employee development and career growth.
- The press release underscores WTW's expertise in performance management and employee engagement, reinforcing its position as a leading global advisory and solutions company.
Potential Negatives
- Almost half of organizations report ineffective performance management processes, indicating a significant gap between expectations and delivery.
- Only 20% of organizations believe their managers are effective at providing coaching and feedback, raising concerns about managerial capabilities and support.
- More than half of organizations are considering or have already changed their performance rating scale, suggesting dissatisfaction with current evaluation methods.
FAQ
What did the WTW study reveal about performance management?
The WTW study found that nearly half of organizations believe optimizing performance management could boost productivity significantly.
How many organizations are utilizing AI in performance management?
More than one-third of organizations (37%) are currently using AI in their performance management processes.
What challenges do managers face in performance management?
Many managers lack the training and tools needed for effective coaching and feedback, impacting performance management efficacy.
What role do skills play in performance management according to the study?
Over half of organizations have integrated skills into performance management, commonly for learning, development, and goal-setting.
How are organizations changing their performance rating systems?
More than half of organizations are considering changing their performance rating scales to improve fairness and effectiveness.
Disclaimer: This is an AI-generated summary of a press release distributed by GlobeNewswire. The model used to summarize this release may make mistakes. See the full release here.
$WTW Congressional Stock Trading
Members of Congress have traded $WTW stock 2 times in the past 6 months. Of those trades, 0 have been purchases and 2 have been sales.
Here’s a breakdown of recent trading of $WTW stock by members of Congress over the last 6 months:
- REPRESENTATIVE VAL T. HOYLE sold up to $15,000 on 09/23.
- REPRESENTATIVE GILBERT RAY CISNEROS, JR. sold up to $15,000 on 06/26.
To track congressional stock trading, check out Quiver Quantitative's congressional trading dashboard.
$WTW Insider Trading Activity
$WTW insiders have traded $WTW stock on the open market 7 times in the past 6 months. Of those trades, 0 have been purchases and 7 have been sales.
Here’s a breakdown of recent trading of $WTW stock by insiders over the last 6 months:
- CARL AARON HESS (Chief Executive Officer) has made 0 purchases and 5 sales selling 10,000 shares for an estimated $3,091,315.
- ANDREW JAY KRASNER (Chief Financial Officer) sold 1,600 shares for an estimated $505,200
- ALEXIS FABER (Chief Operating Officer) sold 265 shares for an estimated $81,333
To track insider transactions, check out Quiver Quantitative's insider trading dashboard.
$WTW Hedge Fund Activity
We have seen 350 institutional investors add shares of $WTW stock to their portfolio, and 356 decrease their positions in their most recent quarter.
Here are some of the largest recent moves:
- DODGE & COX added 1,278,423 shares (+inf%) to their portfolio in Q2 2025, for an estimated $391,836,649
- T. ROWE PRICE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. removed 981,804 shares (-34.4%) from their portfolio in Q2 2025, for an estimated $300,922,926
- SOUNDWATCH CAPITAL LLC added 890,015 shares (+inf%) to their portfolio in Q2 2025, for an estimated $272,789,597
- PRICE T ROWE ASSOCIATES INC /MD/ added 834,093 shares (+449.9%) to their portfolio in Q2 2025, for an estimated $255,649,504
- ALLIANCEBERNSTEIN L.P. added 462,249 shares (+80.2%) to their portfolio in Q2 2025, for an estimated $141,679,318
- FMR LLC removed 423,399 shares (-10.9%) from their portfolio in Q2 2025, for an estimated $129,771,793
- COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLS RETRMT SYS added 301,493 shares (+1320.9%) to their portfolio in Q2 2025, for an estimated $92,407,604
To track hedge funds' stock portfolios, check out Quiver Quantitative's institutional holdings dashboard.
$WTW Analyst Ratings
Wall Street analysts have issued reports on $WTW in the last several months. We have seen 4 firms issue buy ratings on the stock, and 0 firms issue sell ratings.
Here are some recent analyst ratings:
- Wells Fargo issued a "Overweight" rating on 10/08/2025
- Evercore ISI Group issued a "Outperform" rating on 10/01/2025
- Keefe, Bruyette & Woods issued a "Outperform" rating on 09/29/2025
- Raymond James issued a "Strong Buy" rating on 09/22/2025
To track analyst ratings and price targets for $WTW, check out Quiver Quantitative's $WTW forecast page.
$WTW Price Targets
Multiple analysts have issued price targets for $WTW recently. We have seen 9 analysts offer price targets for $WTW in the last 6 months, with a median target of $382.0.
Here are some recent targets:
- Elyse Greenspan from Wells Fargo set a target price of $382.0 on 10/08/2025
- Brian Meredith from UBS set a target price of $398.0 on 10/08/2025
- Paul Newsome from Piper Sandler set a target price of $387.0 on 10/06/2025
- David Motemaden from Evercore ISI Group set a target price of $387.0 on 10/01/2025
- Meyer Shields from Keefe, Bruyette & Woods set a target price of $372.0 on 09/29/2025
- C. Gregory Peters from Raymond James set a target price of $400.0 on 09/22/2025
- Vincent Sinisi from Morgan Stanley set a target price of $345.0 on 08/18/2025
Full Release
NEW YORK, Oct. 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WTW (NASDAQ:WTW), a leading global advisory, broking and solutions company, found that almost half of organizations believe performance management optimization would significantly increase productivity, yet most programs lack clarity and effectiveness. The study also found that more organizations are using AI and integrating skills as part of their performance management process.
According to the 2025 Performance Management and Pay for Performance Virtual Focus Groups, almost half of organizations say productivity would increase by at least 10% if the performance management process was optimized. However, while employers say that employees expect clear goals and priorities, regular feedback, fair ratings and strong ties to rewards, just 39% of these organizations say their performance management process is effective at delivering on these expectations.
Another obstacle pertains to the role of managers. Although manager feedback is the most commonly used source of data in the evaluation process, just 20% of organizations say that managers are effective at providing coaching and feedback to employees. And while most organizations use goal cascades to set goals, challenges remain around manager capability to help set goals, alignment and communication, and keeping goals relevant throughout the year.
“Managers often lack the training and tools needed to have difficult conversations and deliver honest feedback, which limits the effectiveness of performance management,” said Kristy McClellan, Director, Work and Rewards, WTW. “Companies are starting to use AI to increase efficiency, improve the quality of outcomes, and enhance both the employee and manager experience."
More than one-third (37%) of organizations are currently using AI as part of their performance management process and a similar number are considering doing so. According to the study, goal setting (44%) and development plans (40%) are the most commonly cited uses of AI, followed by use in performance reviews (37%), and continuous feedback and coaching (35%).
In addition to AI, more than half of organizations (54%) have incorporated skills into their performance management process. Among this group the most common uses include the areas of learning, development and career growth (78%), goal setting (40%), and promotion decisions (29%). Just 18% of these organizations are using skills for pay decisions.
Organizations are also seeking more simplification, fairness and differentiation around performance ratings. Currently about half of organizations (45%) use a five-point rating scale, with most of the rest reporting using a 3 or 4 point scale. However, more than half (54%) of organizations either have changed their rating scale already or are considering doing so.
“Optimizing performance management processes is more than a systems upgrade. By embracing AI, integrating skills, simplifying ratings, and ensuring fair pay practices, companies can reap significant rewards in productivity as well as employee engagement,” said Matt Kamensky, Senior Director, Employee Experience, WTW.
Other key findings
-
Compared to average performing employees, those awarded the highest performance rating get a merit increase that is more than twice as large at one-third of organizations and bonus payouts that are 50 percent larger at almost half of organizations.
-
The most common reasons organizations use pay for performance are to reward high performers (68%), motivate and engage employees (53%), drive business results (50%) and retain high potentials (48%).
-
More than half of organizations say they effectively differentiate and reward high performance. Just as many are confident using performance rating as an objective reason for pay differentiation.
-
To ensure fairness and consistency in pay for performance, organizations apply performance rating calibrations, clear guidelines and pay ranges, HR review and data analysis, training and communication support, and systematic processes and tools.
About the research
The 2025 Performance Management and Pay for Performance Virtual Focus Groups were conducted from September 15 to September 18, 2025, with multiple sessions to accommodate participants from different time zones globally. The Performance Management Focus Groups had a total of 280 registrants and the Pay for Performance Virtual Focus Groups had a total of 208 registrants. The registrants represented different geographic scopes (domestic, international, and global) across a broad range of industries.
About WTW
At WTW (NASDAQ: WTW), we provide data-driven, insight-led solutions in the areas of people, risk and capital. Leveraging the global view and local expertise of our colleagues serving 140 countries and markets, we help organizations sharpen their strategy, enhance organizational resilience, motivate their workforce and maximize performance.
Working shoulder to shoulder with our clients, we uncover opportunities for sustainable success—and provide perspective that moves you.
Media contacts
Ileana Feoli
[email protected]
Stacy Bronstein
[email protected]