Skip to Main Content
Back to News

Starbucks Faces Legal Battle Over Closure of Unionized Stores

Quiver Quantitative Logo

The U.S. National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has issued a complaint against Starbucks (SBUX), alleging the coffee giant closed 23 of its U.S. stores as a tactic to discourage unionization efforts. According to the NLRB, eight of these stores had already unionized when they were shut down. This action is part of a broader context, with over 360 Starbucks locations voting to unionize since 2021 amid numerous complaints of the company engaging in unlawful anti-union activities. Starbucks, however, has consistently denied any wrongdoing and maintains its respect for workers' rights to unionize.

The closure of these stores is now the subject of a legal proceeding, set to be heard by an NLRB administrative judge. This process allows for appeals up to the federal appeals court level. Starbucks is currently appealing a similar July ruling where an NLRB judge found the company had illegally closed a unionized store in Ithaca, New York.

Market Overview:
-Labor agency accuses Starbucks of closing 23 stores to discourage unionization efforts across the U.S.
-The National Labor Relations Board seeks to force store reopenings, employee rehiring, and union bargaining.
-Over 360 Starbucks stores have unionized since 2021, raising concerns about labor practices.

Key Points:
-The NLRB complaint alleges Starbucks violated federal labor laws by shutting down stores without notice or bargaining with unions.
-Eight of the closed stores had already unionized, further fueling accusations of anti-union tactics.
-Starbucks denies wrongdoing and maintains its commitment to workers' unionization rights.
Looking Ahead:
-An administrative judge will hear the case, potentially leading to appeals and legal battles.
-The decision could set a precedent for union organizing efforts in the service industry.
-Starbucks faces scrutiny over its labor practices and reputation as an employer.

The NLRB's complaint asserts that Starbucks failed to notify Workers United, the union involved in the nationwide campaign, about the closures and did not offer the chance for bargaining over these decisions. The labor agency is pushing for Starbucks to reopen the affected stores, rehire employees, engage in bargaining where required, and compensate workers for lost wages and benefits.

In parallel, Starbucks released a report on its labor practices prepared by an independent consultant, commissioned following shareholder requests. This report suggests that while Starbucks could improve its communication regarding the union campaign, it did not engage in a systematic anti-union strategy that breaks U.S. labor laws.

About the Author

David Love is an editor at Quiver Quantitative, with a focus on global markets and breaking news. Prior to joining Quiver, David was the CEO of Winter Haven Capital.

Suggested Articles