Credit Acceptance announces CFPB's unopposed motion to withdraw from a lawsuit, limiting the case to New York consumers.
Quiver AI Summary
Credit Acceptance Corporation announced that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has filed an unopposed motion to withdraw from a lawsuit it initiated with the New York Attorney General against the company in January 2023. Should the motion be granted, only the New York Attorney General would remain as the plaintiff, limiting the case to New York consumers. Credit Acceptance argues that the lawsuit aims to establish new, problematic legal theories that could negatively impact consumers who rely on financing for vehicle purchases. The company expressed approval of the CFPB's decision to withdraw, asserting that it will allow them to continue helping consumers improve their credit and access vehicle ownership.
Potential Positives
- CFPB's unopposed motion to withdraw from the lawsuit is a favorable development for Credit Acceptance, potentially leading to a reduction in legal challenges and associated costs.
- The withdrawal may limit the scope of the ongoing legal action to New York consumers only, which could lessen the company's overall legal exposure.
- The company emphasizes its commitment to providing financing solutions that empower consumers with non-prime credit, reinforcing its market position and social responsibility.
- Credit Acceptance expresses confidence in the legal validity of its business practices, which may bolster stakeholder trust and investor confidence.
Potential Negatives
- The press release reveals ongoing litigation with the Office of the New York State Attorney General, which may indicate regulatory scrutiny and potential background issues affecting the company's operations.
- The assertion that the lawsuit seeks to create new law through litigation suggests a challenging legal environment that could hinder the company’s business practices and financial outcomes.
- The mention of significant risks associated with competition, economic conditions, and the inability to generate sufficient cash flows adds to the concern regarding the company’s future stability and performance.
FAQ
What was the recent legal development involving Credit Acceptance?
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau filed a motion to withdraw from its lawsuit against Credit Acceptance on April 24, 2025.
How does the lawsuit impact consumers in New York?
If the CFPB's withdrawal is granted, the lawsuit will focus solely on New York consumers, with the NYAG as the only plaintiff.
What is Credit Acceptance Corporation's mission?
Credit Acceptance aims to facilitate vehicle ownership through innovative financing solutions for consumers with non-prime or non-existent credit.
Why is the CFPB's withdrawal significant for Credit Acceptance?
The withdrawal is seen as a move to avoid using litigation to impose regulatory changes, benefiting the company and its customers.
How many consumers has Credit Acceptance helped to purchase vehicles?
Credit Acceptance has provided financing opportunities to over five million people, enabling them to own vehicles through its dealer network.
Disclaimer: This is an AI-generated summary of a press release distributed by GlobeNewswire. The model used to summarize this release may make mistakes. See the full release here.
$CACC Insider Trading Activity
$CACC insiders have traded $CACC stock on the open market 3 times in the past 6 months. Of those trades, 0 have been purchases and 3 have been sales.
Here’s a breakdown of recent trading of $CACC stock by insiders over the last 6 months:
- DOUGLAS W BUSK (Chief Treasury Officer) sold 3,000 shares for an estimated $1,547,910
- JONATHAN LUM (Chief Operating Officer) sold 552 shares for an estimated $270,424
- NICHOLAS J ELLIOTT (Chief Alignment Officer) sold 300 shares for an estimated $150,600
To track insider transactions, check out Quiver Quantitative's insider trading dashboard.
$CACC Hedge Fund Activity
We have seen 120 institutional investors add shares of $CACC stock to their portfolio, and 98 decrease their positions in their most recent quarter.
Here are some of the largest recent moves:
- WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP removed 242,624 shares (-44.7%) from their portfolio in Q4 2024, for an estimated $113,902,263
- CANTILLON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC removed 227,057 shares (-100.0%) from their portfolio in Q4 2024, for an estimated $106,594,179
- LONDON CO OF VIRGINIA added 102,560 shares (+inf%) to their portfolio in Q4 2024, for an estimated $48,147,817
- CROW'S NEST HOLDINGS LP added 75,000 shares (+inf%) to their portfolio in Q4 2024, for an estimated $35,209,500
- ABRAMS BISON INVESTMENTS, LLC removed 53,306 shares (-23.3%) from their portfolio in Q4 2024, for an estimated $25,025,034
- GOODNOW INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC added 48,310 shares (+61.5%) to their portfolio in Q4 2024, for an estimated $22,679,612
- WEALTHFRONT ADVISERS LLC added 38,653 shares (+inf%) to their portfolio in Q4 2024, for an estimated $18,146,037
To track hedge funds' stock portfolios, check out Quiver Quantitative's institutional holdings dashboard.
$CACC Analyst Ratings
Wall Street analysts have issued reports on $CACC in the last several months. We have seen 0 firms issue buy ratings on the stock, and 1 firms issue sell ratings.
Here are some recent analyst ratings:
- Cowen & Co. issued a "Sell" rating on 01/31/2025
To track analyst ratings and price targets for $CACC, check out Quiver Quantitative's $CACC forecast page.
Full Release
Southfield, Michigan, April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Credit Acceptance Corporation (Nasdaq: CACC) (referred to as the “Company”, “Credit Acceptance”, “we”, “our”, or “us”) announced today that on April 24, 2025, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) filed an unopposed motion to withdraw from the lawsuit that it initiated jointly on January 4, 2023, with the Office of the New York State Attorney General (NYAG) against Credit Acceptance in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. As of the filing of the CFPB’s motion, Credit Acceptance’s motion to dismiss the case in its entirety remains fully briefed and pending before the Court. Credit Acceptance expects that, if the CFPB’s motion is granted, the NYAG would be the sole remaining plaintiff, and the case would thus be limited to New York consumers only.
As outlined in Credit Acceptance’s motion to dismiss, this lawsuit seeks to create new law through litigation and asserts legal theories that conflict with established statutes. Credit Acceptance believes that actions like this harm hardworking Americans by targeting companies that offer financing to customers with non-prime or non-existent credit. The financing provided by Credit Acceptance and other finance companies through auto dealers is essential to millions of Americans who otherwise would be unable to purchase the cars they need to get to work or school, or obtain quality healthcare or groceries, and otherwise take care of their families. The CFPB’s withdrawal would be a significant step toward ensuring that this lawsuit against Credit Acceptance is not used to sidestep the legislative process and impose sweeping regulatory reform.
“ We are pleased with the CFPB’s decision to withdraw from this case, which we believe never should have been brought in the first place ,” stated Erin Kerber, Credit Acceptance’s Chief Legal Officer. “We are proud to have provided over five million people with the opportunity to own a vehicle through our network of dealers. We look forward to millions more consumers having such an opportunity and remain committed to operating with integrity and in compliance with all applicable laws.”
About Credit Acceptance
We make vehicle ownership possible by providing innovative financing solutions that enable automobile dealers to sell vehicles to consumers regardless of their credit history. Our financing programs are offered through a nationwide network of automobile dealers who benefit from sales of vehicles to consumers who otherwise could not obtain financing; from repeat and referral sales generated by these same customers; and from sales to customers responding to advertisements for our financing programs, but who actually end up qualifying for traditional financing.
Without our financing programs, consumers are often unable to purchase vehicles, or they purchase unreliable ones. Further, as we report to the three national credit reporting agencies, an important ancillary benefit of our programs is that we provide consumers with an opportunity to improve their lives by improving their credit score and move on to more traditional sources of financing. Credit Acceptance is publicly traded on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol CACC. For more information, visit creditacceptance.com .
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
We claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for all of our forward-looking statements. Statements in this release that are not historical facts, such as those using terms like “may,” “will,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “forecast,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “target,” or similar expressions, and those regarding our future results, plans, and objectives, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements represent our outlook only as of the date of this release. Actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements since the statements are based on our current expectations, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, the factors set forth in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 12, 2025, and other risk factors discussed herein or listed from time to time in our reports filed with the SEC and the following:
Industry, Operational, and Macroeconomic Risks
- Our inability to accurately forecast and estimate the amount and timing of future collections could have a material adverse effect on results of operations.
- Due to competition from traditional financing sources and non-traditional lenders, we may not be able to compete successfully.
- Adverse changes in economic conditions, the automobile or finance industries, or the non-prime consumer market could adversely affect our financial position, liquidity, and results of operations, the ability of key vendors that we depend on to supply us with services, and our ability to enter into future financing transactions.
- Reliance on third parties to administer our ancillary product offerings could adversely affect our business and financial results.
- We are dependent on our senior management, and the loss of any of these individuals or an inability to hire additional team members could adversely affect our ability to operate profitably.
- Our reputation is a key asset to our business, and our business may be affected by how we are perceived in the marketplace.
- An outbreak of contagious disease or other public health emergency could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations.
- The concentration in several states of automobile dealers who participate in our programs could adversely affect us.
- Reliance on our outsourced business functions could adversely affect our business.
- Our ability to hire and retain foreign engineering personnel could be hindered by immigration restrictions.
- We may be unable to execute our business strategy due to current economic conditions.
- Natural disasters, climate change, military conflicts, acts of war, terrorist attacks and threats, or the escalation of military activity in response to terrorist attacks or otherwise may negatively affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
- Governmental or market responses to climate change and related environmental issues could have a material adverse effect on our business.
- A small number of our shareholders have the ability to significantly influence matters requiring shareholder approval and such shareholders have interests which may conflict with the interests of our other security holders.
Capital and Liquidity Risks
- We may be unable to continue to access or renew funding sources and obtain capital needed to maintain and grow our business.
- The terms of our debt limit how we conduct our business.
- A violation of the terms of our asset-backed secured financings or revolving secured warehouse facilities could have a material adverse impact on our operations.
- Our substantial debt could negatively impact our business, prevent us from satisfying our debt obligations, and adversely affect our financial condition.
- We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flows to service our outstanding debt and fund operations and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under such debt.
- Interest rate fluctuations may adversely affect our borrowing costs, profitability, and liquidity.
- Reduction in our credit rating could increase the cost of our funding from, and restrict our access to, the capital markets and adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.
- We may incur substantially more debt and other liabilities. This could exacerbate further the risks associated with our current debt levels.
- The conditions of the U.S. and international capital markets may adversely affect lenders with which we have relationships, causing us to incur additional costs and reducing our sources of liquidity, which may adversely affect our financial position, liquidity, and results of operations.
Technology and Cybersecurity Risks
- Our dependence on technology could have a material adverse effect on our business.
- We depend on secure information technology, and a breach of our systems or those of our third-party service providers could result in our experiencing significant financial, legal, and reputational exposure and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
- Our use of electronic contracts could impact our ability to perfect our ownership or security interest in Consumer Loans.
- Failure to properly safeguard our proprietary business information or confidential consumer and team member personal information could subject us to liability, decrease our profitability, and damage our reputation.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
- Litigation we are involved in from time to time may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
- Changes in tax laws and the resolution of uncertain income tax matters could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows from operations.
- The regulations to which we are or may become subject could result in a material adverse effect on our business.
Other factors not currently anticipated by management may also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We do not undertake, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter our statements, whether as a result of new information or future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.