CN criticizes Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern's amended merger application, urging the Surface Transportation Board to reject it for incompleteness.
Quiver AI Summary
CN has submitted comments to the Surface Transportation Board (STB) asserting that the revised merger application from Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern remains incomplete and should be rejected. CN highlights that the application still lacks critical information necessary for assessing the competitive and operational impacts of the merger, addressing only one of the three deficiencies noted by the STB in January 2026. The filing points out that the applicants have not provided essential competition analyses, consistent market share data, or an accurate assessment of potential competitive impacts on rail options for shippers. Additionally, CN criticizes the proposed Committed Gateway Pricing program, stating that it is overly limited and could increase costs for many shippers. CN urges the STB to uphold its standards for assessing the merger to protect rail competition and shipping affordability.
Potential Positives
- CN successfully highlighted deficiencies in the amended merger application of Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern, reinforcing its position as a key player in advocating for fair competition in the rail industry.
- The press release portrays CN as committed to regulatory standards and stakeholders' interests, which can enhance its reputation and trustworthiness in the market.
- By urging the rejection of the inadequate merger application, CN positions itself strategically against potential threats to its operations and competitive standing.
Potential Negatives
- CN's criticism of Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern's merger application indicates a potential regulatory risk that could affect CN's competitive position and market dynamics.
- The press release highlights deficiencies in the applicants' proposal that may prolong the regulatory process, leaving uncertainty for CN and other stakeholders in the rail industry.
- CN's assertion that the proposed Committed Gateway Pricing program could harm shippers suggests potential backlash from clients and may impact CN's relationships within the industry.
FAQ
What is CN's position on the amended merger application?
CN urges the Surface Transportation Board to reject the amended merger application due to its incompleteness and failure to meet regulatory requirements.
What deficiencies did CN identify in the merger application?
CN highlighted that the application omitted required competition analyses, consistent market share information, and downstream competitive impact analyses.
How does the Committed Gateway Pricing program affect shippers?
The Committed Gateway Pricing program is limited and could increase rail shipping costs for many shippers, according to CN's analysis.
What has the STB previously indicated to the applicants?
The STB instructed applicants to address three specific deficiencies in their application, only one of which was partially addressed.
How does CN contribute to North American supply chains?
CN supports North American supply chains by transporting over 300 million tons of goods annually via its extensive rail network.
Disclaimer: This is an AI-generated summary of a press release distributed by GlobeNewswire. The model used to summarize this release may make mistakes. See the full release here.
$CNI Hedge Fund Activity
We have seen 346 institutional investors add shares of $CNI stock to their portfolio, and 337 decrease their positions in their most recent quarter.
Here are some of the largest recent moves:
- 1832 ASSET MANAGEMENT L.P. added 9,294,926 shares (+98.3%) to their portfolio in Q4 2025, for an estimated $918,803,435
- TCI FUND MANAGEMENT LTD removed 8,917,840 shares (-47.5%) from their portfolio in Q4 2025, for an estimated $881,528,484
- FIL LTD added 5,210,403 shares (+49.5%) to their portfolio in Q4 2025, for an estimated $515,048,336
- WELLINGTON MANAGEMENT GROUP LLP removed 2,360,035 shares (-20.2%) from their portfolio in Q4 2025, for an estimated $233,289,459
- DEUTSCHE BANK AG\ removed 1,792,982 shares (-19.9%) from their portfolio in Q1 2026, for an estimated $184,264,760
- BEUTEL, GOODMAN & CO LTD. removed 1,218,404 shares (-31.7%) from their portfolio in Q4 2025, for an estimated $120,439,235
- AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC added 1,214,836 shares (+6329.2%) to their portfolio in Q4 2025, for an estimated $120,086,538
To track hedge funds' stock portfolios, check out Quiver Quantitative's institutional holdings dashboard. You can access data on hedge funds moves and 13F filings through the Quiver Quantitative API 13F endpoint.
$CNI Analyst Ratings
Wall Street analysts have issued reports on $CNI in the last several months. We have seen 2 firms issue buy ratings on the stock, and 0 firms issue sell ratings.
Here are some recent analyst ratings:
- Citigroup issued a "Buy" rating on 02/02/2026
- CIBC issued a "Outperformer" rating on 11/28/2025
To track analyst ratings and price targets for $CNI, check out Quiver Quantitative's $CNI forecast page.
$CNI Price Targets
Multiple analysts have issued price targets for $CNI recently. We have seen 8 analysts offer price targets for $CNI in the last 6 months, with a median target of $119.68.
Here are some recent targets:
- Brandon Oglenski from Barclays set a target price of $99.0 on 04/30/2026
- Jonathan Chappell from Evercore ISI Group set a target price of $108.0 on 04/30/2026
- Walter Spracklin from RBC Capital set a target price of $178.0 on 04/30/2026
- Ariel Rosa from Citigroup set a target price of $124.0 on 04/30/2026
- Ken Hoexter from B of A Securities set a target price of $122.0 on 04/09/2026
- David Vernon from Bernstein set a target price of $117.36 on 03/31/2026
- Brady Lierz from Stephens & Co. set a target price of $100.0 on 02/02/2026
Full Release
MONTREAL, May 11, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- CN (TSX: CNR) (NYSE: CNI) filed comments with the Surface Transportation Board (STB) demonstrating that the amended merger application submitted by Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern (NS) still fails to meet the Board’s requirements and thus remains incomplete. CN is urging the Board to reject the amended application.
CN’s filing shows that the amended application continues to omit required information regulators and stakeholders need to meaningfully assess the competitive and operational impacts of this major proposed merger. Of the three independent deficiencies the Board identified in rejecting Applicants’ first application in January 2026, the amended application meaningfully addresses only one — providing the complete Merger Agreement — while failing to remedy the other two. Applicants still have not offered meaningful competitive enhancements, falling far short of the STB’s higher burden for Class I mergers to enhance competition and meet the public interest standard.
More specifically, the Amended Application still fails to provide:
- Complete competition analyses required by STB regulations;
- Consistent market share information across the Amended Application;
- Accurate identification of points that would go from two Class I options to one, or from three Class I options to two;
- Analyses of downstream competitive impacts from future potential rail consolidation; and
-
A significant transaction application for control of the Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis (TRRA).
Finally, CN highlighted the insufficiency of the Applicants’ proposed Committed Gateway Pricing (CGP) program — the sole alleged enhancement to competition. This temporary and highly limited program applies to less than one percent of U.S. rail traffic. CGP excludes major categories of traffic, including finished vehicles, intermodal shipments, unit trains, and all customers currently served by CN, CPKC, and most short lines. According to Applicants’ own expert and modeling, CGP will actually harm many shippers. Importantly, many shippers would face increases in rail shipping costs due to the CGP program, as shown in the state maps submitted with CN’s comments.
“In January, the Board gave Applicants a clear roadmap: fix three specific deficiencies and take the opportunity to improve your application. Instead of doing the work, Applicants addressed only one of three — and ignored the Board’s invitation to meaningfully improve their application altogether. Rather than provide the required competition analyses, they recycled the same flawed approach the Board already rejected. Rather than submit the required TRRA application, they deleted their prior filing and offered a vague promise in its place. And rather than propose real competitive enhancements, they doubled down on a pricing program that will harm more shippers than it helps as shown by their own expert’s study. This is not a serious effort to comply with the Board’s requirements — it is a disregard for the process and for the stakeholders who depend on it.”
— Olivier Chouc, Executive Vice-President and Chief Legal Officer, CN
CN appreciates the STB’s commitment to conduct a thorough and fair review in this proceeding to protect rail competition, support affordable transportation options for shippers, and strengthen the resiliency of North American supply chains. CN remains confident the Board will hold Applicants to the standards required by the Board’s regulations and to reject this incomplete application.
CN Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements by CN included in this news release constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and under Canadian securities laws. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. CN cautions that its assumptions may not materialize and that current economic conditions render such assumptions, although reasonable at the time they were made, subject to greater uncertainty. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terminology such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “assumes,” “outlook,” “plans,” “targets,” or other similar words. Forward-looking statements reflect information as of the date on which they are made. CN assumes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect future events, changes in circumstances, or changes in beliefs, unless required by applicable securities laws. In the event CN does update any forward-looking statement, no inference should be made that CN will make additional updates with respect to that statement, related matters, or any other forward-looking statement.
About CN
CN powers the economy by safely transporting more than 300 million tons of natural resources, manufactured products, and finished goods throughout North America every year for its customers. With its nearly 20,000-mile rail network and related transportation services, CN connects Canada’s Eastern and Western coasts with the U.S. Midwest and the U.S. Gulf Coast, contributing to sustainable trade and the prosperity of the communities in which it operates since 1919.
Contacts:
| Media | Investment Community |
| Ashley Michnowski | Jamie Lockwood |
| Senior Manager | Vice-President |
| Media Relations | Investor Relations & Special Projects |
|
(438) 455-3692
[email protected] |
(514) 399-0052
[email protected] |