S. 3041: Tribal Warrant Fairness Act
The bill, known as the Tribal Warrant Fairness Act, proposes amendments to existing U.S. laws to allow the U.S. Marshals Service to assist with certain criminal matters involving Indian Tribes. Here is a breakdown of what the bill entails:
U.S. Marshals Service Involvement
One of the key changes is that the U.S. Marshals Service would be enabled to work on cases concerning Tribal fugitives. Specifically, the legislation allows the Marshals to engage in enforcement actions when requested by an Indian Tribe. This would mean that Tribal criminal matters could receive support from federal law enforcement when needed.
Amendments to Existing Laws
The bill includes specific amendments to title 28 of the United States Code and the Presidential Threat Protection Act of 2000. The main aspects of these amendments are:
- In the U.S. Marshals Service section, it inserts provisions regarding "Tribal fugitive matters" into the types of matters the service can assist with.
- It updates references to include "Tribal" along with local and federal authorities in discussions of law enforcement cooperation.
- Clarifies that the enforcement actions may relate to violations of Federal, State, or Tribal law.
Overall, the bill seeks to enhance cooperation between federal law enforcement and Tribal authorities, ensuring that there are mechanisms in place for the Marshals Service to assist in apprehending individuals wanted on Tribal warrants.
Objective of the Legislation
The objective of this legislation appears to be addressing the challenges that Indian Tribes face in enforcing their laws, particularly in cases involving fugitives who cross jurisdictions. By allowing federal assistance, the bill aims to promote fairness and justice for Tribes and their members.
Potential Impact
In summary, the Tribal Warrant Fairness Act aims to amend federal laws to provide better support for Tribal law enforcement by enabling the U.S. Marshals Service to assist in Tribal matters as needed. This could lead to improved outcomes in managing criminal cases that involve Tribal jurisdictions.
Relevant Companies
None found
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
16 bill sponsors
-
TrackCatherine Cortez Masto
Sponsor
-
TrackRichard Blumenthal
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackCory A. Booker
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackKatie Boyd Britt
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackChristopher A. Coons
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTed Cruz
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRichard J. Durbin
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLindsey Graham
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMartin Heinrich
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMazie K. Hirono
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAmy Klobuchar
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMarkwayne Mullin
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAlex Padilla
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackThom Tillis
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackPeter Welch
Co-Sponsor
-
Tracknan
Co-Sponsor
Actions
10 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Jun. 15, 2026 | Held at the desk. |
| Jun. 15, 2026 | Received in the House. |
| Jun. 12, 2026 | Message on Senate action sent to the House. |
| Jun. 10, 2026 | Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote. |
| Jun. 10, 2026 | Passed Senate with an amendment by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2723-2724, S2727; text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR S2723-2724) |
| May. 19, 2026 | Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. Without written report. |
| May. 19, 2026 | Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 412. |
| May. 14, 2026 | Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably. |
| Oct. 23, 2025 | Introduced in Senate |
| Oct. 23, 2025 | Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
Potentially Relevant Congressional Stock Trades
No relevant congressional stock trades found.