H.R. 9457: Diversity Visa Protection and Modernization Act
This bill would change how the Diversity Visa Program is handled by the executive branch. In plain terms, it says the government cannot shut down the whole Diversity Visa Program without clear legal authority, but it still allows narrower actions in some situations.
What the bill does
- It bars the Secretary of State or Secretary of Homeland Security from suspending, pausing, or stopping all Diversity Visa issuance under the program, except in limited circumstances.
- It allows country-specific or regional limits on Diversity Visa issuance, but only after notice is given to Congress.
- It allows individual case-by-case delays, denials, or extra screening based on a person’s security, criminal, or eligibility concerns.
- It allows a temporary program-wide suspension for up to 60 days, after which visa issuance automatically resumes.
Notice and transparency requirements
If the government wants to use a country-specific or regional limitation, it must give Congress notice at least 7 days in advance. That notice must include:
- the scope, geographic reach, and duration of the limit;
- the specific and extraordinary threat involved;
- why a narrower measure would not be enough, if applicable;
- the national security or foreign policy reason for the action;
- the legal authority being used; and
- the steps being taken to return to normal processing.
The notice must also be published in the Federal Register, except for any classified annexes sent to Congress.
Protection for visa selectees
The bill says that if someone has been issued a Diversity Visa, they do not lose eligibility just because there is a temporary suspension under the 60-day emergency provision.
Overall effect
In practice, the bill would make it harder for the federal government to stop the Diversity Visa Program across the board, while still preserving tools for targeted restrictions, extra screening, and short-term emergency pauses. It also adds more reporting and notice requirements for Congress.
Relevant Companies
None found
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
29 bill sponsors
-
TrackYvette D. Clarke
Sponsor
-
TrackYassamin Ansari
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackShontel M. Brown
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndré Carson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGreg Casar
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJasmine Crockett
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDanny K. Davis
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAdriano Espaillat
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSylvia R. Garcia
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJesús G. "Chuy" García
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDaniel S. Goldman
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAl Green
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackPramila Jayapal
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackHenry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr.
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackChristian Menefee
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSeth Moulton
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEleanor Holmes Norton
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDelia C. Ramirez
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEmily Randall
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJanice D. Schakowsky
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTerri A. Sewell
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBennie G. Thompson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRitchie Torres
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLauren Underwood
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackNydia M. Velázquez
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDebbie Wasserman Schultz
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackFrederica S. Wilson
Co-Sponsor
-
Tracknan
Co-Sponsor
-
Tracknan
Co-Sponsor
Actions
2 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Jun. 25, 2026 | Introduced in House |
| Jun. 25, 2026 | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
Potentially Relevant Congressional Stock Trades
No relevant congressional stock trades found.