H.R. 875: Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act
The "Protect Our Communities from DUIs Act" is a legislative proposal aimed at modifying immigration law concerning individuals who have been convicted of driving under the influence (DUI) or driving while intoxicated or impaired (DWI). The bill introduces two main changes to the existing Immigration and Nationality Act:
Inadmissibility for DUI/DWI Offenses
The bill amends Section 212(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to classify any non-citizen (referred to as "aliens" in legal terminology) who has been:
- Convicted of driving while intoxicated or impaired.
- Admits to having committed such an offense.
- Admits to acts that would constitute the essential elements of a DUI/DWI offense.
Such individuals would be deemed inadmissible to the United States. This classification applies regardless of whether the offense is categorized as a misdemeanor or felony by federal, state, tribal, or local law.
Deportability for DUI/DWI Offenses
The bill also modifies Section 237(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to establish that any non-citizen who has been convicted of a DUI or DWI offense is subject to deportation. Similar to the inadmissibility section, this applies regardless of how the conviction is classified under relevant laws.
Definitions
The terms "driving while intoxicated" and "driving while impaired" would be defined by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the offense occurred, allowing for variations based on state laws regarding DUI/DWI offenses. This means that the legislative changes would be applicable based on the specific definitions and legal stipulations present in each state's laws.
Overall Impact
The primary effect of this bill would be to enhance the government's capability to limit entry into the U.S. and to increase the grounds for deportation for non-citizens involved in DUI or DWI offenses. The focus is on promoting road safety and reducing the potential risks associated with impaired driving by ensuring that those who have such convictions cannot remain in or enter the United States.
Relevant Companies
None found
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
24 bill sponsors
-
Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
Actions
17 actions
Date | Action |
---|---|
Jun. 27, 2025 | Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. |
Jun. 26, 2025 | Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2993-2994) |
Jun. 26, 2025 | Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 530. (consideration: CR H2984-2989) |
Jun. 26, 2025 | DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 875. |
Jun. 26, 2025 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
Jun. 26, 2025 | On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 246 - 160 (Roll no. 183). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2984-2985) |
Jun. 26, 2025 | Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 246 - 160 (Roll no. 183). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H2984-2985) |
Jun. 26, 2025 | POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 875, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Raskin demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. |
Jun. 26, 2025 | Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3944, H.R. 275, H.R. 875 and H. Res. 516. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3944 under a structured rule and H.R. 275, H.R. 875, and H.Res. 516 under a closed rule, with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3944, H.R. 275, and H.R. 875. |
Jun. 26, 2025 | The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. |
Jun. 23, 2025 | Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 530 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3944, H.R. 275, H.R. 875 and H. Res. 516. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3944 under a structured rule and H.R. 275, H.R. 875, and H.Res. 516 under a closed rule, with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3944, H.R. 275, and H.R. 875. |
Mar. 21, 2025 | Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 19. |
Mar. 21, 2025 | Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-30. |
Feb. 26, 2025 | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
Feb. 26, 2025 | Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote. |
Jan. 31, 2025 | Introduced in House |
Jan. 31, 2025 | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
Potentially Relevant Congressional Stock Trades
No relevant congressional stock trades found.