H.R. 8075: To authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to direct the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the National Credit Union Administration to establish emergency transaction account guarantee programs, and for other purposes.
This bill aims to enable the Secretary of the Treasury to direct the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) to set up programs that guarantee deposits in emergency situations. These programs would specifically focus on non-interest-bearing transaction accounts held by banks and credit unions. Here’s a breakdown of the main components:
Emergency TAG Program Authority
The bill proposes an "Emergency Transaction Account Guarantee (TAG) program" that would allow the FDIC to fully insure deposits in non-interest-bearing transaction accounts during periods of significant financial stress. The implementation of such a program would require the following:
- Determining a Banking Stress Event: The Secretary of the Treasury, after consulting with the President, must determine that a serious banking stress event is present, which poses a threat to the economy or the banking system.
- Notification: The Secretary must inform the Board of Directors of the FDIC and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System of this determination.
Program Limitations
There are limitations on how the program can operate:
- Cost Cap: The Secretary, in consultation with the President, will set a maximum limit on the costs that can be incurred by the Deposit Insurance Fund for these programs.
- Duration: Each program established must end no later than six months after it starts. There may be one extension for an additional three months, subject to approval.
- Congressional Oversight: The Secretary must testify before Congress about the program within 30 days of its establishment, and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) must review it within 90 days after the program ends.
Recovery of Losses
If any financial losses are incurred due to the program, the FDIC will recover these costs from special assessments on insured depository institutions or their holding companies.
Definitions
The bill includes definitions for critical terms such as:
- Banking Stress Event: A significant decline in the stability of deposits at insured banks.
- Non-Interest-Bearing Transaction Account: Accounts that do not earn interest or earn only a minimal amount of interest as defined by the FDIC.
- Transaction Account: Accounts that allow for transfers or withdrawals for paying others.
Insured Credit Unions
Similar provisions apply to credit unions through the NCUA. The bill allows for the establishment of an emergency TAG program for insured credit unions, following a similar determination of a credit union stress event.
Like the FDIC program, this will require a maximum cost limit, program termination after six months, and congressional oversight. Losses incurred will also be recovered through special assessments on insured credit unions.
Conclusion on Implementation
Overall, this bill seeks to provisionally protect depositors during serious financial disturbances by guaranteeing their deposits in specific types of accounts, to help maintain stability in the banking and credit union systems.
Relevant Companies
- JPM - JPMorgan Chase & Co.: As one of the largest banks in the U.S., it could be significantly impacted by changes in deposit insurance due to the potential for increased deposits in non-interest-bearing accounts, if the program is activated during a banking stress event.
- BAC - Bank of America Corp.: Will also be affected similarly, as the assurance of deposits could lead to shifts in customer preferences in times of financial uncertainty.
- USB - U.S. Bancorp: As another major player in the banking sector, it may face implications regarding deposit flows and the general stability of its customer deposits under potential emergency measures.
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
1 sponsor
Actions
2 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Mar. 25, 2026 | Introduced in House |
| Mar. 25, 2026 | Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.