H.R. 7046: Qualified Immunity Abolition Act of 2026
This bill, known as the **Qualified Immunity Abolition Act of 2026**, aims to amend existing laws surrounding qualified immunity for law enforcement officers. Specifically, the bill will:
Remove Qualified Immunity Defense
The bill proposes to modify Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes, which deals with civil rights cases against law enforcement officers and others. The key changes include:
- The addition of a new provision that states qualified immunity will not serve as a defense in civil actions against law enforcement officers for actions that occur after the law is enacted.
- This means that if an individual believes that their constitutional rights have been violated by police or local law enforcement, they can sue those officers without the officers being able to claim they are immune from such suits based on their good faith conduct or their belief in the lawfulness of their actions.
Clarification of Civil Actions
Additionally, the bill specifies that in civil suits against law enforcement officers acting under federal authority, the definitions of what constitutes unlawful conduct are clarified. Under the amended law, the following defenses will no longer apply:
- If the officer was acting in good faith.
- If the officer believed their conduct was lawful, whether reasonably or unreasonably.
- If the legal rights in question were not clearly established.
- If the law applicable to the situation was such that the officer could not have reasonably known his or her actions were unlawful.
Implications for Law Enforcement Officers
Law enforcement officers at the federal, state, and local levels would no longer be able to use the defense of qualified immunity in civil lawsuits filed against them, potentially leading to increased accountability for their actions. The implications of this change could affect how law enforcement conducts their duties and the legal landscape surrounding police misconduct cases.
Relevant Companies
- None found
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
10 bill sponsors
-
TrackAyanna Pressley
Sponsor
-
TrackMaxwell Frost
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJesús G. "Chuy" García
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAl Green
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRobin L. Kelly
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJames P. McGovern
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackIlhan Omar
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackChellie Pingree
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLateefah Simon
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRashida Tlaib
Co-Sponsor
Actions
3 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Jan. 13, 2026 | Introduced in House |
| Jan. 13, 2026 | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. |
| Jan. 12, 2026 | Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H649) |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
Potentially Relevant Congressional Stock Trades
No relevant congressional stock trades found.