H.R. 6049: No Payola Act
This bill, titled the No Payola Act, proposes to repeal certain legal requirements related to Senate data disclosures that were established in a previous piece of legislation known as Public Law 119–37. The primary focus of the bill is to eliminate the need for Senate offices to be notified regarding legal processes that involve the disclosure of Senate data.
Key Provisions
- Repeal of Notification Requirements: The bill would remove the section of the law that mandates Senate offices to receive notifications when legal actions are taken concerning the disclosure of Senate data.
- Disgorgement of Funds: It states that any Senator who received funds due to a private legal action linked to the repealed notification requirement must return those funds to the general fund of the U.S. Treasury. This applies to funds awarded during the time frame between the enactment of the previous law and the enactment of this act.
By repealing these requirements, the bill aims to streamline legal processes concerning Senate data without the obligation of providing notifications to Senate offices.
Impact on Legal Processes
The elimination of these notification requirements may have implications for transparency and accountability in how Senate data is managed and disclosed under legal processes. It may affect how legal actions involving Senate data are pursued and what responsibilities Senators may have regarding funds awarded in these cases.
Overall Purpose
The bill is intended to clarify and simplify the legal framework surrounding the disclosure of Senate data, focusing on easing the procedural burdens related to notifications and potential financial penalties for Senators previously awarded funds.
Relevant Companies
None found.This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
41 bill sponsors
-
TrackTeresa Leger Fernandez
Sponsor
-
TrackGabe Amo
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackYassamin Ansari
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackNanette Diaz Barragán
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackWesley Bell
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDonald S. Beyer, Jr.
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndré Carson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSteve Cohen
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJasmine Crockett
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDanny K. Davis
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMaxine Dexter
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackCleo Fields
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLizzie Fletcher
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMaxwell Frost
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSylvia R. Garcia
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAl Green
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSteven Horsford
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJared Huffman
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSydney Kamlager-Dove
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMarcy Kaptur
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRobin L. Kelly
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGreg Landsman
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRick Larsen
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJohn B. Larson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTed Lieu
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJames P. McGovern
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSeth Moulton
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJoe Neguse
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEleanor Holmes Norton
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJohnny Olszewski
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMike Quigley
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEmily Randall
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndrea Salinas
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMary Gay Scanlon
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSuhas Subramanyam
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEric Swalwell
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackShri Thanedar
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDina Titus
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRashida Tlaib
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJill N. Tokuda
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMarc A. Veasey
Co-Sponsor
Actions
2 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Nov. 17, 2025 | Introduced in House |
| Nov. 17, 2025 | Referred to the House Committee on House Administration. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
Potentially Relevant Congressional Stock Trades
No relevant congressional stock trades found.