H.R. 5604: National Guard Proper Use Act
This bill, titled the National Guard Proper Use Act, seeks to amend two sections of the United States Code related to the Armed Forces and the National Guard. The key provisions of the bill include:
Prohibition on Enforcement of Immigration Laws
The bill clearly states that:
- Members of the Armed Forces (under Title 10) are prohibited from being ordered to perform any duty that involves enforcing or supporting the enforcement of immigration laws.
- Members of the National Guard (under Title 32) are also prohibited from being ordered to enforce or support the enforcement of immigration laws.
These prohibitions are in accordance with the Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts the military's ability to act in civilian law enforcement roles. The bill formally integrates this prohibition into the legal framework governing military and National Guard operations.
Overall, the National Guard Proper Use Act aims to ensure that the military and National Guard remain separate from the enforcement of immigration laws, thereby focusing their efforts on their primary defense and national security roles.
Context of the Legislation
The bill reflects ongoing discussions about the appropriate use of military resources, particularly in relation to domestic law enforcement and immigration issues. It underscores a commitment to a clear boundary between military duties and civilian law enforcement, particularly in regards to immigration enforcement.
Implications
By passing this bill, the responsibility for immigration enforcement would remain solely with civilian agencies, thus maintaining a distinct line between military and police powers in the United States. It could potentially affect current practices involving the National Guard and military personnel at the border or in support roles related to immigration enforcement.
Relevant Companies
None found
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
28 bill sponsors
-
TrackAndrea Salinas
Sponsor
-
TrackYassamin Ansari
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackWesley Bell
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSuzanne Bonamici
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJanelle Bynum
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGreg Casar
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDanny K. Davis
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackChristopher R. Deluzio
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMaxine Dexter
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLloyd Doggett
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSylvia R. Garcia
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJahana Hayes
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackVal T. Hoyle
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJared Huffman
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackHenry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr.
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRobin L. Kelly
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackZoe Lofgren
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSarah McBride
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLaMonica McIver
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackKevin Mullin
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEleanor Holmes Norton
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBrittany Pettersen
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJanice D. Schakowsky
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRashida Tlaib
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJill N. Tokuda
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackNydia M. Velázquez
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBonnie Watson Coleman
Co-Sponsor
-
Tracknan
Co-Sponsor
Actions
2 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Sep. 26, 2025 | Introduced in House |
| Sep. 26, 2025 | Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
Potentially Relevant Congressional Stock Trades
No relevant congressional stock trades found.