H.R. 4696: Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929
This bill, known as the "Renewing Immigration Provisions of the Immigration Act of 1929," aims to amend existing immigration law, specifically section 249 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The key changes proposed by the bill are as follows:
Definition of Long-Term Residents
The bill proposes to alter the language in section 249 to update the criteria for individuals who are eligible for benefits under this section. Currently, the section specifies only those individuals who entered the United States before January 1, 1972. The amendment would change this to focus on individuals who are defined as long-term residents of the United States.
Eligibility Criteria
Under the revised criteria, individuals would need to demonstrate that they have:
- Entered the United States at least **7 years** before the date they apply for the benefits.
By changing the threshold from a specific date to a duration of residency, the bill aims to make it possible for more individuals who have been living in the U.S. for a significant length of time to qualify for legal status or other immigration benefits.
Effective Date
The changes proposed in this bill would take effect **60 days** after the bill is enacted into law. This means that once it is passed and signed, eligible candidates would be able to apply under the new guidelines within two months.
Impact on Long-Term Residents
The intent behind these amendments appears to be to provide a pathway to legal status for individuals who have established lives in the United States over many years but may not have qualified under the previous criteria based on dates of entry.
Relevant Companies
None found.
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
46 bill sponsors
-
TrackZoe Lofgren
Sponsor
-
TrackBecca Balint
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackNanette Diaz Barragán
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSalud O. Carbajal
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGreg Casar
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJudy Chu
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJ. Luis Correa
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJim Costa
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJason Crow
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDanny K. Davis
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDiana DeGette
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMadeleine Dean
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAdriano Espaillat
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRobert Garcia
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJesús G. "Chuy" García
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDaniel S. Goldman
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJared Huffman
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackPramila Jayapal
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackHenry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr.
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackSydney Kamlager-Dove
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRo Khanna
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRaja Krishnamoorthi
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJames P. McGovern
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRobert Menendez
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGrace Meng
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJerrold Nadler
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackIlhan Omar
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackFrank Pallone, Jr.
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJimmy Panetta
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBrittany Pettersen
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDelia C. Ramirez
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDeborah K. Ross
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRaul Ruiz
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMary Gay Scanlon
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJanice D. Schakowsky
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTerri A. Sewell
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBrad Sherman
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLateefah Simon
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAdam Smith
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackThomas R. Suozzi
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMike Thompson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRashida Tlaib
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackNorma J. Torres
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJuan Vargas
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMarc A. Veasey
Co-Sponsor
Actions
2 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Jul. 23, 2025 | Introduced in House |
| Jul. 23, 2025 | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
Potentially Relevant Congressional Stock Trades
No relevant congressional stock trades found.