H.R. 3628: State Planning for Reliability and Affordability Act
This bill is known as the State Planning for Reliability and Affordability Act. Its purpose is to amend the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 to introduce a new standard that states must consider when planning for electric generation reliability. Here’s what the bill proposes in clearer terms:
New Requirement for Electric Utilities
The bill requires each state-regulated electric utility that uses integrated resource planning to include measures that ensure a reliable supply of electric energy over a 10-year timeline. This is to be achieved by:
- Ensuring the operation of reliable generation facilities, or
- Procuring electric energy from reliable generation facilities.
Definition of Reliable Generation Facilities
A "reliable generation facility" is defined in the bill as an electric generation facility that provides a consistent availability of electric energy by meeting certain criteria, including:
- Generating electric energy continuously for at least 30 days.
- Having sufficient fuel supply or energy sources available on-site for continuous production during that time or having contracts ensuring fuel availability.
- Being capable of generating energy during emergencies or severe weather conditions.
- Providing essential services related to electric energy reliability, such as frequency and voltage support.
Implementation Timeline
Each state regulatory authority is required to start considering this new standard for their electric utilities within one year of the bill's enactment. They must complete their consideration and make a determination within two years of the enactment.
Exemptions for States
States can opt out of these requirements if they have already implemented a comparable standard for their electric utilities before the bill's enactment, or if they have conducted proceedings related to the implementation of such standards within the prior three years.
Updates to Existing Regulations
The bill also amends existing laws to align with the new requirement, ensuring that any referenced deadlines and procedures specifically account for this new standard regarding reliability in electric generation.
Relevant Companies
- DUK (Duke Energy Corporation) - A major utility company that may need to adapt its generation strategies to comply with the new reliability standards.
- EXC (Exelon Corporation) - As a utility provider, compliance with the enhanced reliability regulations may impact their operational planning and resource allocation.
- NEXA (Nextera Energy, Inc.) - This energy company may need to evaluate its generation sources and practices to align with the bill's requirements.
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
2 bill sponsors
Actions
20 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Dec. 15, 2025 | Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. |
| Dec. 11, 2025 | Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H5789) |
| Dec. 11, 2025 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
| Dec. 11, 2025 | On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 218 - 207 (Roll no. 323). |
| Dec. 11, 2025 | Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 218 - 207 (Roll no. 323). |
| Dec. 10, 2025 | Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 936. (consideration: CR H5522-5528; text: CR H5522-5523) |
| Dec. 10, 2025 | DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 936, the House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Moore (WV) amendment No. 1 |
| Dec. 10, 2025 | DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 3628. |
| Dec. 10, 2025 | POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 3628, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. |
| Dec. 10, 2025 | Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, H.R. 3668 and S. 1071. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, and H.R. 3628 under a structured rule; and H.R. 3668 and S. 1071 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, and H.R. 3668; and one motion to commit on S. 1071. |
| Dec. 09, 2025 | Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 936 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, H.R. 3668 and S. 1071. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, and H.R. 3628 under a structured rule; and H.R. 3668 and S. 1071 under a closed rule. The resolution provides for one motion to recommit on H.R. 3898, H.R. 3383, H.R. 3638, H.R. 3628, and H.R. 3668; and one motion to commit on S. 1071. |
| Sep. 19, 2025 | Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 260. |
| Sep. 19, 2025 | Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-306. |
| Jun. 25, 2025 | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
| Jun. 25, 2025 | Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 23. |
| Jun. 05, 2025 | Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote. |
| Jun. 05, 2025 | Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
| Jun. 03, 2025 | Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy. |
| May. 29, 2025 | Introduced in House |
| May. 29, 2025 | Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. |
Corporate Lobbying
8 companies lobbying