H.R. 3492: Protect Children’s Innocence Act of 2025
This bill, known as the Protect Children’s Innocence Act of 2025, aims to amend existing laws regarding the mutilation and chemical castration of minors. Here are the primary components of the bill:
Definition of Offenses
The bill clearly defines two main offenses related to minors:
- Genital or Bodily Mutilation: This includes any non-medical procedure that harms a minor's genitalia or body. Actions considered mutilation include, but are not limited to, female genital mutilation and various surgeries aimed at altering a child’s biological sex.
- Chemical Castration: This refers to administering drugs that suppress puberty or alter sexual characteristics through hormonal manipulation.
Legal Penalties
The bill proposes penalties for any individual who knowingly performs or attempts to perform these actions on minors. The punishment can include:
- Fines
- Imprisonment for up to 10 years
Specific Provisions
There are several important clauses regarding the circumstances under which these offenses would incur penalties:
- Travel across state lines or using federal facilities in relation to these actions increases liability.
- Payments made using interstate commerce for these purposes also fall under this law.
- Communications regarding these actions transmitted through interstate commerce are included in offenses.
Exemptions
The bill outlines certain exceptions where these actions might not be considered violations, primarily related to health:
- Genital or bodily mutilation or chemical castration that is deemed necessary for the health of the minor, conducted by licensed medical practitioners, does not violate this law.
- Female genital mutilation that occurs during childbirth for medical reasons is also exempt.
- Certain specific conditions affecting minors, such as intersex conditions or prior gender transition complications, can exempt individuals from the bill's provisions under medical advice.
Defenses and Protections
Victims of these procedures are protected from being prosecuted under this law. Additionally, religious, traditional, or customary defenses cannot be used to justify carrying out these mutilations.
Definitions
Several terms are explicitly defined within the bill to clarify what constitutes mutilation and chemical castration:
- Minor: Any individual under 18 years of age.
- Genital or Bodily Mutilation: Includes female genital mutilation as well as surgeries intended to alter a child’s biological sex.
- Chemical Castration: Involves the administration of puberty-blocking drugs and hormones.
- Female Genital Mutilation: Defined as any harmful procedure to female genitalia performed for non-medical reasons.
Clerical Updates
The bill also proposes clerical changes to update sections of federal law that reference the related prohibitions.
Relevant Companies
None found
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
45 bill sponsors
-
TrackMarjorie Taylor Greene
Sponsor
-
TrackBrian Babin
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJames R. Baird
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackStephanie I. Bice
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndy Biggs
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJosh Brecheen
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEric Burlison
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEarl L. "Buddy" Carter
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndrew S. Clyde
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMike Collins
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJames Comer
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackElijah Crane
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDan Crenshaw
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMonica De La Cruz
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBrad Finstad
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBrandon Gill
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLance Gooden
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackPaul A. Gosar
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGlenn Grothman
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMichael Guest
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackHarriet M. Hageman
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndy Harris
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDiana Harshbarger
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackKevin Hern
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackClay Higgins
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAshley Hinson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRonny Jackson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDavid Kustoff
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAnna Paulina Luna
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAddison McDowell
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJohn McGuire
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMax L. Miller
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMary E. Miller
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRiley Moore
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBarry Moore
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTroy E. Nehls
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRalph Norman
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndrew Ogles
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBurgess Owens
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGary J. Palmer
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMichael A. Rulli
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackW. Gregory Steube
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackClaudia Tenney
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackWilliam R. Timmons IV
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRandy K. Weber, Sr.
Co-Sponsor
Actions
21 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Dec. 18, 2025 | Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. |
| Dec. 17, 2025 | Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H6008-6009) |
| Dec. 17, 2025 | Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 953. (consideration: CR H5992-6000) |
| Dec. 17, 2025 | DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 3492. |
| Dec. 17, 2025 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
| Dec. 17, 2025 | Ms. Balint moved to recommit to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR H5999-6000) |
| Dec. 17, 2025 | On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 210 - 218 (Roll no. 350). |
| Dec. 17, 2025 | On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 211 (Roll no. 351). (text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H5992-5993) |
| Dec. 17, 2025 | Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 216 - 211 (Roll no. 351). |
| Dec. 17, 2025 | POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 3492, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Balint demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. |
| Dec. 17, 2025 | Rule H. Res. 953 passed House. |
| Dec. 17, 2025 | Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 6703, H.R. 498 and H.R. 3492. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 6703 and H.R. 498 under a closed rule and H.R. 3492 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill. |
| Dec. 17, 2025 | Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 953 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 6703, H.R. 498 and H.R. 3492. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 6703 and H.R. 498 under a closed rule and H.R. 3492 under a structured rule with one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill. |
| Dec. 17, 2025 | The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX. |
| Dec. 17, 2025 | The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. |
| Sep. 26, 2025 | Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 265. |
| Sep. 26, 2025 | Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 119-311. |
| Jun. 10, 2025 | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
| Jun. 10, 2025 | Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 17 - 10. |
| May. 19, 2025 | Introduced in House |
| May. 19, 2025 | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
Potentially Relevant Congressional Stock Trades
No relevant congressional stock trades found.