H.R. 29: Laken Riley Act
This bill, titled the "Laken Riley Act," proposes changes to immigration laws regarding the detention of certain aliens who are involved in theft-related offenses. Below is a summary of the key provisions of the bill:
1. Purpose of the Bill
The main aim of the Laken Riley Act is to authorize the Secretary of Homeland Security to take custody of non-citizens who have been charged with crimes related to theft, such as burglary, larceny, and shoplifting. It seeks to ensure that these individuals are detained and potentially removed from the country if they are already inadmissible under specific immigration regulations.
2. Key Provisions
- Detention of Aliens:
- It specifies that the Secretary of Homeland Security must issue a 'detainer' for any alien who fits this criterion and is not already in custody by other law enforcement agencies.
- Definition of Theft-Related Offenses:
- The bill includes a specific definition of burglary, theft, larceny, and shoplifting, referring to the laws of the jurisdiction where the act occurred.
- State Attorney General's Role:
- The legislation allows state attorneys general to sue the Secretary of Homeland Security in cases where state residents are harmed by the release of aliens who should be detained under this law.
- This clause includes provisions for expediting any civil actions brought forth in such cases.
- Enforcement and Compliance:
- The bill gives standing to state officials to enforce the provisions and mandates that the federal government complies with detention and removal requirements as outlined in the bill.
- It emphasizes ensuring that the procedure is followed to prevent the release of aliens who are charged with serious offenses.
- Penalties for Non-Compliance:
- State attorneys general can also take legal action against the Secretary of State if there are violations of visa issuance rules that pertain to aliens involved in theft.
- Modification of Procedures:
- The bill modifies how specific immigration procedures are handled to give more authority to state-level enforcement against aliens who have committed theft-related offenses.
3. Legal Framework Changes
The Laken Riley Act introduces amendments to various sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act, particularly those that deal with the detention and admissibility of non-citizens. It alters both the enforcement mechanisms at the federal and state levels for dealing with alien criminals, especially those charged with theft.
Relevant Companies
None found
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
55 bill sponsors
-
TrackMike Collins
Sponsor
-
TrackRobert B. Aderholt
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRick W. Allen
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBrian Babin
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndy Barr
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMike Bost
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRobert Bresnahan
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackVern Buchanan
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackEarl L. "Buddy" Carter
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJuan Ciscomani
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBen Cline
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndrew S. Clyde
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDan Crenshaw
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackHenry Cuellar
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTroy Downing
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMike Ezell
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRandy Feenstra
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBrad Finstad
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMichelle Fischbach
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackScott Fitzgerald
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBrandon Gill
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMark E. Green
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMarjorie Taylor Greene
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDiana Harshbarger
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAshley Hinson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackErin Houchin
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackWesley Hunt
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBrian Jack
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDusty Johnson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJohn Joyce
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDavid Kustoff
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackNicholas A. Langworthy
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBarry Loudermilk
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAnna Paulina Luna
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackNancy Mace
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackNicole Malliotakis
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMichael T. McCaul
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTom McClintock
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRichard McCormick
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJohn McGuire
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMark Messmer
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMary E. Miller
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRiley Moore
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTroy E. Nehls
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackZachary Nunn
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndrew Ogles
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBurgess Owens
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJohn W. Rose
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDerek Schmidt
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAustin Scott
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackPete Sessions
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackPete Stauber
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackClaudia Tenney
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJefferson Van Drew
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRandy K. Weber, Sr.
Co-Sponsor
Actions
13 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Feb. 10, 2025 | Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 10. |
| Feb. 06, 2025 | Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time. |
| Jan. 08, 2025 | Received in the Senate. |
| Jan. 07, 2025 | Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H61) |
| Jan. 07, 2025 | Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 5. (consideration: CR H53-61) |
| Jan. 07, 2025 | DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 29. |
| Jan. 07, 2025 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
| Jan. 07, 2025 | On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 264 - 159 (Roll no. 6). (text: CR H53-54) |
| Jan. 07, 2025 | Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 264 - 159 (Roll no. 6). (text: CR H53-54) |
| Jan. 07, 2025 | POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 29, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Raskin demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. |
| Jan. 07, 2025 | The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. |
| Jan. 03, 2025 | Introduced in House |
| Jan. 03, 2025 | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
Potentially Relevant Congressional Stock Trades
No relevant congressional stock trades found.