H.R. 26: Protecting American Energy Production Act
This bill, titled the Protecting American Energy Production Act
, aims to establish specific guidelines regarding hydraulic fracturing (commonly referred to as fracking) for oil and natural gas production in the United States.
Key Provisions of the Bill
- State Authority: The bill emphasizes that states should have the primary responsibility for regulating hydraulic fracturing activities on state and private lands. This suggests that states will retain significant control over how fracking is conducted within their jurisdictions.
- Moratorium Restrictions: The bill prohibits the President from declaring a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing unless such a moratorium is specifically approved by an act of Congress. This means that any potential ban on fracking would require legislative approval, limiting executive power in this area.
Context and Implications
The act is introduced in response to concerns about federal regulations impacting state-level energy production, particularly in relation to hydraulic fracturing, which has been a contentious issue in discussions about energy policy, environmental concerns, and economic development.
Legislative Process
The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives and has been referred to the Committee on Natural Resources and the Committee on Energy and Commerce for further consideration.
Relevant Companies
- XOM - Exxon Mobil Corporation. As a major player in the oil and gas industry, any changes in regulation regarding fracking could significantly impact its operations and future projects.
- CVX - Chevron Corporation. Similar to Exxon, Chevron engages heavily in the extraction of oil and natural gas, and regulatory changes could affect its business strategies.
- PXD - Pioneer Natural Resources Company. This company primarily focuses on the exploration and production of oil and gas, relying significantly on techniques like hydraulic fracturing.
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
19 bill sponsors
-
TrackAugust Pfluger
Sponsor
-
TrackBrian Babin
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJames R. Baird
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndy Barr
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackNicholas Begich
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackStephanie I. Bice
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBen Cline
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJulie Fedorchak
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBrandon Gill
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackCraig Goldman
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTony Gonzales
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMike Haridopolos
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackErin Houchin
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackNicholas A. Langworthy
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMichael Lawler
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJohn McGuire
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDaniel Meuser
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMichael A. Rulli
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRandy K. Weber, Sr.
Co-Sponsor
Actions
12 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Feb. 10, 2025 | Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. |
| Feb. 07, 2025 | Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 5. (consideration: CR H561-569) |
| Feb. 07, 2025 | DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 26. |
| Feb. 07, 2025 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
| Feb. 07, 2025 | Mr. Casten moved to recommit to the Committee on Natural Resources. (text: CR H568) |
| Feb. 07, 2025 | On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 205 - 207 (Roll no. 34). |
| Feb. 07, 2025 | On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 226 - 188 (Roll no. 35). (text: CR H561) |
| Feb. 07, 2025 | Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 226 - 188 (Roll no. 35). |
| Feb. 07, 2025 | The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX. |
| Feb. 07, 2025 | The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. |
| Jan. 03, 2025 | Introduced in House |
| Jan. 03, 2025 | Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
