H.R. 2215: Salem Maritime National Historical Park Redesignation and Boundary Study Act
This bill, known as the Salem Maritime National Historical Park Redesignation and Boundary Study Act, proposes two main actions regarding the Salem Maritime National Historic Site in Massachusetts.
Redesignation
The first action is to officially change the name of the Salem Maritime National Historic Site to the Salem Maritime National Historical Park. This renaming would ensure that any references in legal documents, maps, or regulations would reflect the new name.
Boundary Study
The second action involves conducting a boundary study. This study, mandated by the bill, would be carried out by the Secretary of the Interior. The purpose of the study is to:
- Evaluate the suitability and feasibility of including additional sites and resources associated with maritime history, coastal defenses, and military history in the Salem Maritime National Historical Park.
The study area for this evaluation is defined as Salem, Massachusetts, and its surrounding vicinity, including the Salem Armory Visitor Center building and the adjacent Salem Armory Park.
Reporting Requirements
Within three years of the availability of funds to conduct the study, the Secretary of the Interior will be required to submit a report to both the Committee on Natural Resources in the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources in the Senate. This report will include:
- The results of the boundary study
- Any findings, conclusions, and recommendations made by the Secretary
Definitions
The bill includes specific definitions for the terms used, clarifying that:
- The Secretary refers to the Secretary of the Interior.
- The study area includes Salem, Massachusetts, and its nearby locations relevant to the proposed changes.
Relevant Companies
None found
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
1 sponsor
Actions
11 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| May. 15, 2025 | Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. |
| May. 14, 2025 | Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2021-2022) |
| May. 14, 2025 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
| May. 14, 2025 | On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 382 - 31 (Roll no. 125). (text: 5/13/2025 CR H1984) |
| May. 14, 2025 | Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 382 - 31 (Roll no. 125). (text: 5/13/2025 CR H1984) |
| May. 13, 2025 | At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed. |
| May. 13, 2025 | Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1984-1985) |
| May. 13, 2025 | DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2215. |
| May. 13, 2025 | Mr. Westerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill. |
| Mar. 18, 2025 | Introduced in House |
| Mar. 18, 2025 | Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
Potentially Relevant Congressional Stock Trades
No relevant congressional stock trades found.