H.R. 1949: Unlocking our Domestic LNG Potential Act of 2025
This bill, titled the Unlocking our Domestic LNG Potential Act of 2025, aims to change regulations regarding the export and import of natural gas in the United States. The main points of the bill include:
Key Amendments
- The bill proposes to repeal certain restrictions currently in place in the Natural Gas Act. Specifically, it would remove existing subsections that govern the authority to approve or deny applications for natural gas export and import facilities.
- The bill grants the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) exclusive authority to make decisions on these applications. This means that FERC will be responsible for determining whether the exportation or importation of natural gas is in the public interest.
- Furthermore, it ensures that existing laws related to national security, including sanctions on foreign countries, remain in effect. Thus, the President retains the ability to prohibit certain imports or exports if they pertain to countries classified as state sponsors of terrorism.
Implications of the Bill
If enacted, the bill could simplify the process for companies seeking to build or expand facilities for exporting or importing liquefied natural gas (LNG). This might encourage investment in LNG infrastructure within the U.S. and potentially increase the country's ability to trade natural gas with foreign markets.
Federal Oversight
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission would now have the sole authority to evaluate and approve applications for natural gas facilities. This concentrated decision-making could streamline the approval process compared to previous regulations that may have involved multiple agencies.
National Security Considerations
The legislation ensures that while it aims to facilitate the energy market, it does not compromise national security. The President's existing powers to impose sanctions or restrictions on imports and exports related to certain countries remain unaltered by the bill.
Relevant Companies
- EXC - Exelon Corporation: This company might be directly impacted due to its energy production and trading operations, especially if additional LNG facilities are developed.
- CQP - Cheniere Energy Partners: As a major player in LNG exports, this company could benefit from fewer regulatory hurdles for facility expansions.
- SLB - Schlumberger Limited: This oilfield services company may see increased business opportunities as demand for LNG exports rises.
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
44 bill sponsors
-
TrackAugust Pfluger
Sponsor
-
TrackMark Alford
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJodey C. Arrington
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackBrian Babin
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDon Bacon
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTroy Balderson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTom Barrett
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMichael Baumgartner
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAaron Bean
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackStephanie I. Bice
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGus M. Bilirakis
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLauren Boebert
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJohn R. Carter
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAndrew S. Clyde
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDan Crenshaw
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackNeal P. Dunn
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJake Ellzey
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGabe Evans
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackCraig Goldman
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackH. Morgan Griffith
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackHarriet M. Hageman
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackClay Higgins
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRichard Hudson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJohn Joyce
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMichael Lawler
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackLaurel M. Lee
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJulia Letlow
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackMorgan Luttrell
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTracey Mann
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackAddison McDowell
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDaniel Meuser
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackCarol D. Miller
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackTim Moore
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDan Newhouse
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRobert Onder
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGary J. Palmer
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackDerek Schmidt
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackPete Sessions
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJefferson Shreve
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackVictoria Spartz
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackGlenn Thompson
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRandy K. Weber, Sr.
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackRoger Williams
Co-Sponsor
-
TrackJoe Wilson
Co-Sponsor
Actions
20 actions
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| Nov. 20, 2025 | Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H4850-4851) |
| Nov. 20, 2025 | Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 879. (consideration: CR H4841-4849) |
| Nov. 20, 2025 | DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 1949. |
| Nov. 20, 2025 | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. |
| Nov. 20, 2025 | On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 217 - 188 (Roll no. 304). (text: CR H4841) |
| Nov. 20, 2025 | Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 217 - 188 (Roll no. 304). (text: CR H4841) |
| Nov. 20, 2025 | POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 1949, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote announced the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Pallone demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced. |
| Nov. 20, 2025 | Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107 and H.R. 5214. The resolution provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214, and one motion to commit S.J. Res. 80. |
| Nov. 20, 2025 | The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. |
| Nov. 17, 2025 | Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 879 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107 and H.R. 5214. The resolution provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 80, H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H. Con. Res. 58, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214 under a closed rule with one hour of general debate on each measure. The resolution also provides for one motion to recommit on H.J. Res. 130, H.J. Res. 131, H.R. 1949, H.R. 3109, H.R. 5107, and H.R. 5214, and one motion to commit S.J. Res. 80. |
| Nov. 17, 2025 | Supplemental report filed by the Committee on Energy and Commerce, H. Rept. 119-269, Part II. |
| Sep. 11, 2025 | Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 225. |
| Sep. 11, 2025 | Reported by the Committee on Energy and Commerce. H. Rept. 119-269. |
| Jun. 25, 2025 | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
| Jun. 25, 2025 | Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 26 - 23. |
| Jun. 05, 2025 | Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 13. |
| Jun. 05, 2025 | Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held |
| Jun. 03, 2025 | Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy. |
| Mar. 06, 2025 | Introduced in House |
| Mar. 06, 2025 | Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.