H.R. 1773: Federal Firearms Licensee Protection Act of 2025
The Federal Firearms Licensee Protection Act of 2025 aims to amend existing laws related to firearms by increasing penalties for certain crimes involving firearms theft from federally licensed firearms dealers. Specifically, the bill proposes the following key changes:
Enhancing Penalties
- It would increase the maximum penalty for theft of firearms from a licensed dealer. Offenders could face fines and imprisonment for up to 20 years.
- If the theft occurs during a burglary, the minimum prison sentence would be set at 3 years.
- If the theft occurs during a robbery, the minimum prison sentence would increase to 5 years.
Definitions of Crimes
- The bill defines "burglary" as unlawfully entering or remaining in the business premises of a licensed importer, manufacturer, or dealer with the intent to commit a crime.
- It also defines "robbery" according to existing legal definitions, which involve taking property from a person or place through force or intimidation.
Additional Provisions
Furthermore, the bill clarifies that the penalties apply not only to successful thefts but also to attempts to commit such thefts from licensed firearms dealers.
Implementation
The proposed changes would be incorporated into Section 924 of Title 18 of the United States Code, which governs firearm-related offenses.
Relevant Companies
- RGR - Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.: As a manufacturer of firearms, Ruger could see implications for their operations if thefts from dealers become more heavily penalized, potentially affecting their sales and market operations.
- POWW - AMMO, Inc.: This company, involved in ammunition and firearm products, may be impacted by the increased penalties linked to firearm thefts, influencing the market dynamics and security measures required for retailers.
This is an AI-generated summary of the bill text. There may be mistakes.
Sponsors
64 bill sponsors
-
Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
-
Co-Sponsor
Actions
2 actions
Date | Action |
---|---|
Mar. 03, 2025 | Introduced in House |
Mar. 03, 2025 | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. |
Corporate Lobbying
0 companies lobbying
None found.
* Note that there can be significant delays in lobbying disclosures, and our data may be incomplete.
Potentially Relevant Congressional Stock Trades
No relevant congressional stock trades found.