Risk Factors Dashboard
Once a year, publicly traded companies issue a comprehensive report of their business, called a 10-K. A component mandated in the 10-K is the ‘Risk Factors’ section, where companies disclose any major potential risks that they may face. This dashboard highlights all major changes and additions in new 10K reports, allowing investors to quickly identify new potential risks and opportunities.
View risk factors by ticker
Search filings by term
Risk Factors - IE
-New additions in green
-Changes in blue
-Hover to see similar sentence in last filing
Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Annual Report.





















We utilize internal personnel and external cybersecurity consultants to focus on assessing, detecting, identifying, managing, preventing and responding to cybersecurity threats and incidents. The underlying controls of our cybersecurity management process are based on recognized best practices and standards for cybersecurity and information technology, including the framework of Critical Security Controls of the Center of Internet Security. To assess the design and effectiveness of our cybersecurity controls, we engage with external consultants, auditors and other third parties. We have experienced cybersecurity incidents in the past which have not materially affected us. We may not be successful in preventing or mitigating a cybersecurity incident that could materially affect our results of operations or financial condition. Refer to Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further information on the risks we face from cybersecurity threats. Our cybersecurity risk management and processes are led by our Chief Financial Officer , with support of management, internal personnel and external consultants. While management is responsible for the day-to-day management of cybersecurity risks, our Board of Directors , through its Audit Committee, has oversight of the Company’s processes, policies and procedures for assessing, identifying, and managing material risks from cybersecurity threats including the integration and establishment of cybersecurity processes into the Company’s overall risk management system or processes .
You should carefully consider these risks, as well as the additional risks described in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We also operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in, or implied by, any forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations of our management based on available information and are believed to be reasonable. In light of the significant risks and uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included in this Annual Report, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that such results will be achieved, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to revise the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. You should read this Annual Report and the documents we file with the SEC, with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and achievements may be materially different from what we expect, predict or forecast. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by the cautionary statements referenced above.
Glossary of Technical Terms
Certain terms and abbreviations used in this prospectus are defined below:
“Ag” means the chemical symbol for the element silver.
“Au” means the chemical symbol for the element gold.
“Breccia” is rock composed of broken fragments of minerals or rocks cemented together by a finer grained matrix.
“Concentrate” is the product of a physical concentration process, such as flotation or gravity concentration, which involves separating ore minerals from unwanted waste rock. Concentrates require subsequent processing (such as smelting or leaching) to break down or dissolve the ore minerals and obtain the desired elements, usually metals.
“Cu” means the chemical symbol for the element copper.
“DC/IP” means an induced polarization geophysical survey that uses Direct Current Resistivity to recover conductivity and chargeability distribution.
“Exploration” is prospecting, sampling, mapping, diamond drilling and other work involved in searching for ore.
“Feasibility Study” is a comprehensive technical and economic study of the selected development option for a mineral project, which includes detailed assessments of all applicable Modifying Factors, together with any other relevant operational factors, and detailed financial analysis that are necessary to demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that extraction is economically viable. The results of the study may serve as the basis for a final decision by a proponent or financial institution to proceed with, or finance, the development of the project.
“Grade” means the concentration of metal in a rock sample, usually given as weight percent. Where extremely low concentrations are involved, the concentration may be given in grams per tonne (g/t) or ounces per ton (oz/t) or parts per million (ppm). The grade of a mineral deposit is calculated, often using sophisticated statistical procedures, as an average of the grades of a very large number of samples collected from the deposit. The grade of an ore deposit is calculated, often using sophisticated statistical procedures, as an average of the grades of a very large number of samples collected from the deposit. Grade is also used when disclosing the results of drilling activities that have been assayed.
2
“g/t” means grams per tonne.
“Hypogene” means processes occurring at depth; especially, the primary hydrothermal processes that form a mineral deposit.
“Indicated Mineral Resource” or “Indicated Resource” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of adequate geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with an Indicated Mineral Resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply Modifying Factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The level of geological certainty associated with an indicated mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because an Indicated Mineral Resource has a lower level of confidence than the level of confidence of a Measured Mineral Resource, an Indicated Mineral Resource may only be converted to a Probable Mineral Reserve.
“Induced Polarization Geophysical Survey” means a method of ground geophysical surveying employing an electrical current to determine indications of mineralization.
“Inferred Mineral Resources” or “Inferred Resources” is that part of a Mineral Resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological uncertainty associated with an Inferred Mineral Resource is too high to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability. The level of geological uncertainty associated with an inferred mineral resource is too high to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability. Because an Inferred Mineral Resource has the lowest level of geological confidence of all Mineral Resources, which prevents the application of the Modifying Factors in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability, an Inferred Mineral Resource may not be considered when assessing the economic viability of a mining project, and may not be converted to a Mineral Reserve.
“Initial Assessment” is a preliminary technical and economic study of the economic potential of all or parts of mineralization to support the disclosure of Mineral Resources. The Initial Assessment must be prepared by a Qualified Person and must include appropriate assessments of reasonably assumed technical and economic factors, together with any other relevant operational factors, that are necessary to demonstrate at the time of reporting that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. An Initial Assessment is required for disclosure of Mineral Resources but cannot be used as the basis for disclosure of Mineral Reserves.
“km” means kilometer.
“km2” means square kilometers.
“kt” means kilotonnes.
“kW” means kilowatts.
“m” means meter.
“m2” means square meters.
“Ma” means mega-annum or million years.
“Measured Mineral Resources” or “Measured Resources” is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of conclusive geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with a measured mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors, as defined in this section, in sufficient detail to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. The level of geological certainty associated with an indicated mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit.
“Mill” is a processing facility where ore is finely ground and thereafter undergoes physical or chemical treatments to extract the valuable metals.
“Mineral Reserve” is an estimate of tonnage and grade or quality of Indicated and Measured Mineral Resources that, in the opinion of the Qualified Person, can be the basis of an economically viable project. More specifically, it is the economically mineable part of a Measured or Indicated Mineral Resource, which includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined or extracted.
“Mineral Resource” is a concentration or occurrence of material of economic interest in or on the Earth's crust in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. A Mineral Resource is a reasonable estimate of mineralization, taking into account relevant factors such as cut-off grade, likely mining dimensions, location or continuity, that, with the assumed and justifiable technical and economic conditions, is likely to, in whole or in part, become economically extractable. It is not merely an inventory of all mineralization drilled or sampled.
“Modifying Factors” are the factors that a Qualified Person must apply to Indicated and Measured Mineral Resources and then evaluate in order to establish the economic viability of Mineral Reserves. A Qualified Person must apply and evaluate Modifying Factors to convert Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources to Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves. These factors include, but are not restricted to: mining; processing; metallurgical; infrastructure; economic;
3
marketing; legal; environmental compliance; plans, negotiations, or agreements with local individuals or groups; and governmental factors. The number, type and specific characteristics of the Modifying Factors applied will necessarily be a function of and depend upon the mineral, mine, property, or project.
“Moz” means million troy ounces.
“Mt” means mega-tonnes or a million tonnes.
“Mtpa” means million tonnes per annum.
“MW” means megawatts or a million watts.
“MWh” means megawatt hours.
“NI 43-101” means National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators.
“NSR” means Net Smelter Return, which refers to the proceeds returned from the smelter and/or refinery to the mine owner, taken as the sale price of the metal products less certain transportation, treatment and refining costs.
“Ore” is rock, generally containing metallic or non-metallic minerals and non-ore minerals, that can be mined and processed at a profit.
“Ore Body” is a sufficiently large amount of ore that can be mined economically.
"oz" means troy ounces or 31.1035 grams
“Pb” means the chemical symbol for the element lead.
“Preliminary Feasibility Study”, “Pre-Feasibility Study” or “PFS” means a comprehensive study of a range of options for the technical and economic viability of a mineral project that has advanced to a stage where a Qualified Person has determined (in the case of underground mining) a preferred mining method, or (in the case of surface mining) a pit configuration, and in all cases has determined an effective method of mineral processing and an effective plan to sell the product. A Pre-Feasibility Study includes a financial analysis based on reasonable assumptions, based on appropriate testing, about the Modifying Factors and the evaluation of any other relevant factors that are sufficient for a Qualified Person to determine if all or part of the Indicated and Measured Mineral Resources may be converted to Mineral Reserves at the time of reporting. The financial analysis must have the level of detail necessary to demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that extraction is economically viable. A Pre-Feasibility Study is less comprehensive and results in a lower confidence level than a Feasibility Study. A Pre-Feasibility Study is more comprehensive and results in a higher confidence level than an Initial Assessment.
“Probable Mineral Reserve” is the economically mineable part of an Indicated Mineral Resource, and in some circumstances a Measured Mineral Resource.
“Proven Mineral Reserve” is the economically mineable part of a Measured Mineral Resource and can only result from conversion of a Measured Mineral Resource.
“QA/QC” means quality assurance/quality control.
“Qualified Person” has the meaning ascribed thereto in Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K.
“Reclamation” is the process by which lands disturbed as a result of mining activity are modified to support beneficial land use. Reclamation activity may include the removal of buildings, equipment, machinery and other physical remnants of mining, closure of tailings, leach pads and other features, and contouring, covering and re-vegetation of waste rock and other disturbed areas.
“Recovery Rate” is a term used in process metallurgy to indicate the proportion of valuable metal physically recovered in the processing of ore. It is generally stated as a percentage of metal recovered compared to the total material originally present. It is generally stated as a percentage of material recovered compared to the material originally present.
“Refining” is the final stage of metal production in which impurities are removed from the molten metal.
“Sampling” is a naturally occurring area where metals and elements leached from nearby rocks have accumulated at surface, typically in the form of oxide minerals.
4
“Smelting” is an intermediate stage metallurgical process in which metal is separated from impurities by using thermal or chemical separation techniques.
“Stringers” are narrow veins or irregular filaments of a mineral or minerals traversing a rock mass.
“Supergene” means a process by which mineralization is enriched by the circulation of groundwater and the weathering process; significant in porphyry-copper and iron oxide-copper-gold deposits, where zones of much higher-grade mineralization may be found.
“Tailings” is the material that remains after all economically and technically recovered precious metals have been removed from the ore during processing.
“t” or “Tonne” means a metric ton or 2,204.6 pounds.
“Ton” means a short ton which is equivalent to 2,000 pounds, unless otherwise specified.
“tpa” means tonnes per annum.
“Trenching” is a long, narrow excavation through overburden to expose a vein, structure, or rock surface.
“Veins” are fissures, faults, or cracks in a rock that are filled by minerals.
“Waste” is rock which is not ore. Waste typically refers to that rock which has to be removed during the normal course of mining in order to get at the ore.
Summary of Risk Factors
We are subject to a number of risks, including risks that may prevent us from achieving our business objectives or that may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, including the principal risks summarized below:
•Changes in the prices of copper or other metals Ivanhoe Electric Inc. (“Ivanhoe”, “Ivanhoe Electric” or the “Company”) is exploring for.
•The results of exploration and drilling activities and/or the failure of exploration programs or studies to deliver anticipated results or results that would justify and support continued exploration, studies, development or operations.
•The final assessment of exploration results and information that is preliminary.
•We will require substantial capital investment in the future and we may be unable to raise additional capital on favorable terms or at all.
•We have incurred indebtedness and may incur further indebtedness from time to time, which may be secured, including the Deed of Trust in connection with the credit facility we entered into with a banking syndicate comprised of National Bank of Canada, Societe Generale and Bank of Montreal.
•The significant risk and hazards associated with developing and operating any future mining operations, extensive regulation by the U.S. government as well as state and local governments.
•The need to obtain and maintain a variety of permits for mineral exploration and future mining operations.
•Changes in laws, rules or regulations, or their enforcement by applicable authorities.
•The failure of parties to contract with Ivanhoe Electric to perform as agreed.
•The impact of political, economic and other uncertainties associated with operating in foreign countries.
•The impact of health epidemics and other public health threats on the global economy.
In addition to the above summary of principal risks, you should carefully consider the more comprehensive list of risks discussed in this Annual Report under the section titled “Risk Factors.”
5
Part I
Item 1. Business
Overview
We are a technology-driven United States minerals exploration and development company with a focus on copper and other critical metals vital to electric transmission and generation, manufacturing, infrastructure development, technology, and national security. Our wholly owned assets are located in the United States. We operate exploration joint ventures and alliances in Saudi Arabia, Chile and the United States. We use our powerful Typhoon™ geophysical surveying system, together with advanced data analytics provided by our subsidiary, Computational Geosciences Inc. (“CGI”), to accelerate and de-risk the mineral exploration process in the search for new deposits of critical metals that may otherwise be undetectable by traditional exploration technologies. We believe the United States is significantly underexplored and has the potential to yield major new discoveries of critical metals.
We are committed to the establishment of strong relationships with our local communities and the responsible development of our projects by incorporating best practices for health, safety and environmental standards, water management, protection of local cultural heritage and biodiversity, and minimizing our environmental footprint.The liabilities and requirements associated with the laws and regulations related to these and other matters, including with respect to air emissions, water discharges and other environmental matters, may be costly and time-consuming and may restrict, delay or prevent commencement or continuation of exploration or production operations. We prioritize hiring from local communities.
Our United States Mineral Projects
As of the date of this annual report, we consider our sole material mineral project to be the Santa Cruz Copper Project in Arizona. The Santa Cruz Copper Project is a development project situated in a prolific mining region that hosts some of the largest copper mines in the United States. Santa Cruz is a copper project situated in a prolific mining region that hosts some of the largest copper mines in the United States. The Santa Cruz Copper Project encompasses approximately 26.0 square kilometers (~6,425 acres) on private land and includes associated water rights. The Santa Cruz Copper Project location provides excellent infrastructure, including access to rail, interstate highways, and electric transmission lines. On June 23, 2025, we announced the completion of the Preliminary Feasibility Study (the “PFS”) for the Santa Cruz Copper Project. The PFS confirmed the economic viability of an underground copper mining operation combined with a heap leach processing facility utilizing modern technologies and designed to produce copper cathode. The PFS projects that the Santa Cruz Copper Project may produce 1.4 million tonnes of copper cathode over a 23-year mine life. With a base case copper price of $4.25/lb, the Santa Cruz Copper Project has an estimated after-tax net present value of $1.4 billion at an 8% discount rate and an estimated internal rate of return of 20%. The initial project capital estimated in the PFS is $1.24 billion.
Following completion of the PFS for the Santa Cruz Copper Project, we are advancing detailed engineering, operational readiness, and permitting for a copper mining operation incorporating leading technologies to improve efficiencies and costs.
Our other mineral projects in the United States include the Tintic Project located in Utah (the “Tintic Project”), the Hog Heaven Copper-Silver-Gold Project located in Montana (the “Hog Heaven Project”), and the Gleeson Copper-Gold Project in Arizona (“the “Gleeson Project”).
The Tintic Project is an exploration project located 95 kilometers (“km”) south of Salt Lake City in a historically significant silver producing district that also produced significant amounts of copper and gold. We own a majority of the surface land and mineral rights constituting the Tintic Project and we have lease and option agreements in place to own the remaining surface land and mineral rights at the Tintic Project.
The Hog Heaven Project is located on private land approximately 80 km south-southwest of the town of Kalispell, Montana. It is in the historical Flathead Mining District, which consists of several high-sulfidation epithermal mineral deposits and prospects, as well as several historical mines, including the Flathead Mine.
The Gleeson Project is an exploration project located 75 km south-east of Tucson, Arizona in a historic mining district of the same name. We have staked mining claims on federal mineral rights, acquired several Arizona State Mineral Exploration Permits, and signed several option agreements with private landowners.
We also hold a portfolio of other exploration projects in the western United States. These include the BHP Alliance in Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, and Nevada (the “BHP Alliance”), the Bristol Project located in Nevada (the “Bristol Project”), and the Lomitas Negras, Globe-Miami and Perseverance Projects in Arizona (the “Lomitas Negras Project”, “Globe-Miami Projects” and “Perseverance Project”, respectively). The Globe-Miami Project includes the “Sleeping Beauty Project”, “Dragon’s Tail Project” and “Copper King Project”.
6
Map: United States Mineral Projects

Exploration Alliance with BHP Mineral Resources
In 2024, we established an exploration alliance (“Exploration Alliance”) with a subsidiary of BHP Group Limited (“BHP”) to search for critical minerals in the United States. The Exploration Alliance Agreement sets out the framework for us (acting through a wholly owned subsidiary) and BHP to explore mutually agreed “Areas of Interest” (“AOIs”) in the United States to identify projects within those AOIs that may become 50/50 owned joint ventures. The initial AOIs are in Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah. The Exploration Alliance is for a term of three years, which may be extended. BHP (through a wholly owned subsidiary) agreed to provide initial funding of $15 million, and any subsequent funding would be on a 50/50 basis. We have provided the Exploration Alliance with access to one of our new generation Typhoon™ units, as well as the machine learning algorithmic software and data inversion services of CGI. In April 2025, the Exploration Alliance completed its first survey using a Typhoon™ geophysical survey system at an AOI in Arizona. The first drilling commenced in this area of interest in October 2025.
Maaden Ivanhoe Electric Exploration and Development Limited Company
In 2023, we established an exploration joint venture (the “Joint Venture”) with the Saudi Arabian Mining Company (“Maaden”). The Joint Venture is owned 50/50 by Ivanhoe and Maaden and has an initial term of five years, which may be extended up to 10 years upon mutual agreement of the parties. The Joint Venture operates through a limited liability company established under Saudi Arabian law named Maaden Ivanhoe Electric Exploration and Development Limited Company (“Saudi JVCo”). Maaden has currently made available approximately 50,000 km2 of land under an exploration license (or license application) within Saudi Arabia for exploration by the Joint Venture, a portion of which is expected to be reduced in 2026 following completion of exploration activities. We initially contributed $66.4 million of the proceeds from the sale of our common shares to Maaden to initially fund Saudi JVCo and the Joint Venture, and we provided Saudi JVCo with a royalty-free license to use Typhoon™ within Saudi Arabia for mineral exploration. We will contribute $66.4 million of the proceeds from the sale of the Shares to fund Saudi JVCo and the Joint Venture, and will provide Saudi JVCo with a royalty-free license to use Typhoon™ within the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for the purpose of mineral exploration. The license will remain exclusive to the Joint Venture in Saudi Arabia and effective during the term of the Joint Venture. Saudi JVCo purchased three new generation Typhoon™ units from the Company’s former parent, I-Pulse, all of which have been delivered to the Joint Venture and are active in Saudi Arabia. The Joint Venture also entered into a services agreement with Computational Geosciences Inc. (“CGI”), our 94.3% owned subsidiary, pursuant to which CGI is responsible for the supply of the services for the analysis of data and processing of the full spectrum of geophysical datasets produced by the Typhoon™ geophysical survey systems. The Joint Venture commenced exploration activities in November 2023 and announced its first mineral
7
discovery at Al Amar in January 2025. The Joint Venture is currently conducting drilling activities in the Wadi Bidah area with drilling at other exploration areas planned for later in 2026.
Exploration Collaboration with Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile
On January 27, 2026, we entered into an exploration collaboration (the “Collaboration”) with Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (“SQM”) to explore for copper in northern Chile. SQM is one of Chile’s largest and oldest mining companies and with one of the largest portfolios of mining concessions in the country. The Collaboration establishes the framework for us and SQM to explore certain of SQM’s mining concessions, comprising a total of 2,002 km2 in northern Chile in areas of Caliche cover in the Atacama Desert. Caliche is a surface deposit of sediments cemented by salts, making it highly electrically resistive and impeding the penetration of low-power geophysical transmitters and their ability to detect underlying sulfide mineralization. Our Typhoon™ geophysical survey system generates a powerful, clean electrical charge that can penetrate the highly resistive Caliche cover to detect potential copper deposits beneath. The Collaboration will be funded by SQM with an initial commitment of $9 million. We are not required to provide any funding prior to the formation of a 50/50 joint venture. Upon identifying a qualifying copper deposit, we will have the option to acquire a 50% interest in the deposit and form a 50/50 joint venture with SQM by paying a price equal to twice SQM’s exploration expenditures to date. The exercise price will be paid to a new joint venture company and used for further exploration and other related activities. The permits listed are not meant to be all-inclusive and cover only the major permits required for the mine and processing facilities. Upon the formation of a joint venture, SQM will contribute the relevant mining concessions and associated exploration data. Thereafter, the joint venture will be funded pro rata by us and SQM. A “qualifying copper deposit” is any deposit with the potential for at least one million tonnes of contained copper or copper equivalent, as determined by an independent geologist. The Collaboration has an initial term of three years.
Other International Mineral Projects
Our other mineral projects outside of the United States are the Alacrán Project in Colombia (the “Alacrán Copper Project”) (owned through our approximate 60.8% interest in publicly traded company Cordoba Minerals Corp. (“Cordoba”)), the Ivory Coast Project (owned through our interest in publicly traded company Sama Resources Inc. and our 60.0% interest in a joint venture entity) in Ivory Coast, and the Pinaya Project in Peru. On May 8, 2025, Cordoba announced that it had entered into an agreement for the sale of the remaining 50% of the Alacrán Copper Project to a consortium of investors including JCHX Mining Management Co., Ltd. (“JCHX”), a 19.2% shareholder of Cordoba, for up to $128 million consisting of $88 million in cash on closing, $12 million in a deferred payment, and up to $28 million in a contingent payment. Cordoba shareholders approved the transaction at a meeting of shareholders held on September 15, 2025. On February 10, 2026, the agreement was amended to, among other things, provide for the full $128 million purchase price to be paid at closing and remove any post-closing payments, waive the closing condition of an Environmental Impact Assessment, add a new closing condition of JCHX shareholder approval, and extend the outside date to March 10, 2026. Cordoba has also agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to distribute to its shareholders the net proceeds after satisfying all liabilities and obligations, subject to required approvals, such that $10 million will remain in Cordoba.
Typhoon and Computational Geosciences
In addition to our portfolio of mineral projects, we own, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, patents to a proprietary exploration technology known as Typhoon™. We also own a 94.3% controlling interest in a data inversion business, CGI. CGI was founded in 2010 to commercialize innovative technology developed at the University of British Columbia, Canada to improve and enhance mineral exploration.
The Typhoon™ technology allows us to cost effectively and efficiently generate geophysical models of large-scale mineral deposits to depths of up to one and a half kilometers or more.The Typhoon™ technology allows us to cost effectively and efficiently generate geophysical images of large-scale mineral deposits to depths of one and a half kilometers or more. CGI software technology consists of sophisticated codes to process geophysical data and build three-dimensional (“3D”) subsurface models that could indicate the presence of various sulfide metals and minerals. The CGI software technology consists of sophisticated codes to process geophysical data and build 3D subsurface images that could indicate the presence of various metals and minerals. Typhoon™ is capable of energizing large volumes of rock to complete larger surveys through a combination of high voltage up to 10 kV, high power up to 100 kW and high current up to 200 amps. Typhoon™ can and has been used successfully to accelerate and de-risk the exploration process, enabling a higher frequency of mineral discovery and lowering total exploration costs.11Table of ContentsTyphoon™ can and has been used to successfully accelerate and de-risk the exploration process enabling a higher frequency of resource discovery and lowering total exploration costs. Typhoon™ has proven to be an important exploration tool during its deployment at our exploration projects. Typhoon™ has proven to be an important exploration tool during its deployment at Santa Cruz and Tintic.
8
Map: Current and historical deployment of Typhoon™ 

VRB Energy
We also have interests in grid scale energy storage technology utilizing vanadium redox flow batteries. We own a 90.0% interest in VRB Energy Inc. (“VRB Energy”), which itself owns 100% of VRB Energy USA Inc. (“VRB USA”), an Arizona-based developer of advanced grid-scale energy storage systems utilizing vanadium redox flow batteries for integration with renewable power sources. VRB Energy also has a 49% interest in VRB Energy System (Beijing) Co., Ltd, a joint venture in China (“VRB China Joint Venture”) with a subsidiary of privately held Shanxi Red Sun Co., Ltd. (“Red Sun”), which owns 51% of the VRB China Joint Venture. The VRB China Joint Venture manufactures, develops and sells vanadium redox flow batteries for Asian, African and Middle Eastern markets.
Mineral Projects
Our portfolio of highly prospective mineral projects is predominantly focused on copper and other metals vital to advanced manufacturing, infrastructure development, technology, and national security.
The Santa Cruz, Tintic and Hog Heaven Projects are situated in the high-quality copper producing jurisdictions of Arizona, Utah and Montana, respectively. According to the Fraser Institute’s Annual Survey of Mining Companies, Arizona, Utah and Montana rank as some of the most attractive copper mining investment jurisdictions compared to other major copper mining jurisdictions around the world. According to the Fraser Institute’s Annual Survey of Mining Companies, Utah and Arizona rank as some of the most attractive copper mining investment jurisdictions compared to other major copper mining jurisdictions around the world.

9
___________
Source: Fraser Institute 2024 Investment Attractiveness
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Throughout all of our properties, internal controls, including quality assurance and quality control (“QA/QC”) measures, are in place to ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of our exploration data and mineral resource and reserve estimates. Because mineral resource and reserve estimates depend on geological interpretation and statistical inferences or assumptions drawn from drilling and sampling analysis, there is a degree of uncertainty attributable to those estimates. These measures include written standard operating procedures and independent verifications of aspects such as drilling, surveying, sampling, assaying, data management, and database integrity. Appropriate documentation of QC measures and regular analysis of QC data is essential as a safeguard for project data and form the basis for the QA program implemented during exploration.
Analytical QC measures involve internal and external laboratory procedures implemented to monitor the precision and accuracy of the sample preparation and assay data. These measures are also important to identify potential sample sequencing errors and to monitor for contamination of samples.
We submit a blank, standard, or duplicate sample on every seventh sample. Sampling and analytical QA/QC protocols typically involve taking duplicate samples and inserting QC samples (certified reference material (CRM) and blanks) to monitor the assay results' reliability throughout the drill program.
Samples are securely shipped to reputable analytical laboratories with global quality management systems that meets all requirements of the international standards ISO/IEC 17025:2017 and ISO 9001:2015. The independent labs that we use have robust internal QA/QC program to monitor and ensure quality of assay and other analytical results.
10
United States
Santa Cruz Copper Project, Arizona, USA (the “Santa Cruz Project”)
References to the “Santa Cruz Copper Project Preliminary Feasibility Study” or “PFS” is to the “S-K 1300 Preliminary Feasibility Study & Technical Report Summary, Santa Cruz Copper Project, Arizona”, dated June 23, 2025 and current as of December 31, 2025. The PFS was prepared in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission S-K regulations (Title 17, Part 229, Items 601 and 1300 through 1305) by the following third-party qualified persons: Fluor Canada Ltd., BBA USA Inc. (“BBA”), Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc., Geosyntec Consultants, Inc., Haley & Aldrich, Inc., INTERA Incorporated, KCB Consultants Ltd., Life Cycle Geo, LLC, Met Engineering, LLC, Paterson & Cooke USA, Ltd., Stantec Consulting Services Inc., and Tetra Tech, Inc. None of the qualified persons is affiliated with the Company or any other entity that has an ownership, royalty, or other interest in the Santa Cruz Copper Project. The PFS and Technical Report Summary on the Santa Cruz Copper Project is included as Exhibit 96.1 hereto. Scientific and technical information in this section is based upon, or in some cases extracted from, the PFS.
Location, Infrastructure, and Access.Location, Infrastructure, Project Description, Location, and Access. Our development stage Santa Cruz Copper Project is located in Pinal County, Arizona, 11 km to the west of Casa Grande and approximately a one-hour drive, on paved roads, south of Phoenix. The Santa Cruz Copper Project and exploration areas encompass approximately 75.66 km2 of land. Santa Cruz was discovered in the 1970s but was undeveloped due to market conditions as well as fragmented title and ownership.Santa Cruz was discovered in the 1970s, but was undeveloped due to market conditions as well as fragmented title and ownership. The Santa Cruz Copper Project centroid is approximately -111.88212, 32.89319 (WGS84) in Township 6 S, Range 4E, Section 13, Quarter C.
11
Map: Location of the Santa Cruz Copper Project within the state of Arizona.

Title. The Santa Cruz Copper Project is 100% owned by Ivanhoe Electric through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Mesa Cobre Holding Corporation (“Mesa Cobre”).
In 2021, Ivanhoe Electric acquired 238 unpatented mining lode claims from Central Arizona Resources, LLC (“CAR”). In addition, Ivanhoe Electric acquired fee simple mineral title for two further land parcels: “CG100” and “Skull Valley”. In 2022, Ivanhoe Electric acquired the 0.08 km2 (20-acre) “Skull Valley” property from Skull Valley Capital, LLC in the southeastern area of the project and the 0.41 km2 (100.33-acre) “CG100” from CG 100 Land Partners LLC in the northeastern area of the project.
In 2023, Ivanhoe Electric acquired 16 Arizona State Land Department mineral exploration permits covering 27.95 km2 (~6,900 acres) of state mineral land. In 2024, Ivanhoe Electric exercised the agreement with D.R. Horton Phoenix East Construction, Inc. (DRH), granting Ivanhoe Electric, through Mesa Cobre, 100% of the mineral title for 26.0 km2 (~6,425 acres) of fee simple mineral estate, 39 federal unpatented mining lode claims (bringing the total claims controlled by Ivanhoe Electric to 277).
12
The total project area comprises fee simple land along with unpatented mining lode claims and Arizona State Land Department Mineral Exploration Permits. Annual renewal fees for the unpatented mining lode claims and mineral exploration permits have been made as required. The estimated annual cost of future payments to retain the unpatented mining claims is $55,400. The area of proposed mine activity lies on fee simple land. Mineral control is summarized in the table and figures below.
Map: Ivanhoe Electric Mineral Rights of the Santa Cruz Copper Project.

13
In 2022, Ivanhoe Electric acquired the surface rights to two land parcels: the 0.08 km2 (20-acre) Skull Valley property from Skull Valley Capital, LLC in the southeastern area of the project and a 0.41 km2 (100.33-acre) land parcel “CG100” from CG 100 Land Partners LLC in the northeastern area of project. In August 2024, Ivanhoe Electric acquired the surface title to three 0.04 km2 (10-acre) parcels located in various areas of the project along with the mineral rights from DRH. The majority of the surface rights for the Santa Cruz Copper Project were acquired in 2023. Surface rights are shown in the Figure below. Ivanhoe Electric acquired grandfathered irrigation rights and grandfathered Type 1 non-irrigation water rights in association with the private land purchased in 2023 and holds all necessary water rights for the life-of-mine plan envisaged in the PFS.
Map: Ivanhoe Electric Surface Rights of the Santa Cruz Copper Project.

14
There are nine royalty owners for the Santa Cruz, East Ridge, and Texaco deposits, as summarized in the table below. Each royalty has its own distinct property description as shown in the map below.
Table: Royalty Descriptions.
Map: Extent of Royalties

15
History. Copper mineralization, first discovered in the region in the 1960s by geologists from the American Smelting and Refining Company (“ASARCO”), led to extensive drill programs across the project area.
ASARCO conducted exploration efforts across the Casa Grande Valley and in 1964 the first hole was drilled on what is now the Santa Cruz Project. By May 1965, seventeen drill holes were completed without similar success, and ASARCO reduced its land position. Subsequent reviews in 1970-1971 deemed the Santa Cruz Project worth renewed exploration activity. Following the initiation of the Santa Cruz Joint Venture (“SCJV”) between ASARCO Santa Cruz, Inc. and Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc. in 1974, additional ground was acquired around the Santa Cruz North deposit. By this time, various joint ventures, as noted below, had staked considerable ground over and around what would eventually be the Casa Grande West (now Santa Cruz) deposit.
In 1973, David Lowell put together an exploration program called the Covered Area Project (“CAP”) that was funded first by Newmont Mining, then, in succession, by a joint venture between Newmont and Hanna Mining, then Hanna with Getty Oil Corp. and Quintana Corp.; though both Quintana and Newmont would pull out of the project before any discoveries were made. By 1974 over 120 holes were drilled at 20 projects across Southwestern Arizona, with a focus on the Santa Cruz system. Drilling under the CAP program continued through to 1977, at which point Hanna Mining took over as operator under a joint venture with operation funding from Getty Oil Corp. Between 1977 and 1982, Hanna-Getty advanced a tight spaced drill program that delineated an estimated 500 Mt of 1% Cu at Casa Grande West, and countless exploration holes in the surrounding Casa Grande Valley.
In 1986, the Bureau of Mines obtained Congressional approval and funding to study in situ copper mining. In 1988, the Santa Cruz deposit was selected for this research project sponsored by a joint venture program between landowners ASARCO Santa Cruz Inc. and Freeport McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc., and the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. The in-situ testing began in February 1996, but research funding was halted in October 1997 due to a change from Congress.
Ivanhoe Electric gained access to the land in August 2021 to start drill programs, completed a mineral resource estimate in 2022, an updated mineral resource estimate in early 2023, an initial assessment in September 2023, and a PFS in June 2025.
Property Condition and Stage of Development. The Santa Cruz Copper Project is a development stage project. No mining activity has taken place on the land constituting the Santa Cruz Copper Project. No mining activity has ever taken place on the land constituting the Santa Cruz Project. There is no mine in production at the Santa Cruz Copper Project. There is no mine in production at the project. There is currently no significant equipment, infrastructure or facilities at the Santa Cruz Copper Project, and no mine development or operating equipment at the project site.There is currently no significant equipment, infrastructure or facilities at the Santa Cruz Project, and no mine development or operating equipment at the project site.
Existing and past land uses in the Santa Cruz Copper Project area and immediately surrounding areas include agriculture, residential home development, light industrial facilities, and mineral exploration and development. 29Table of ContentsExisting and past land uses in the Project area and immediately surrounding areas include agriculture, residential home development, light industrial facilities, and mineral exploration and development. Some dispersed recreation occurs in the area. The climate is dry, and most of the Santa Cruz Copper Project area is flat, sandy, and sparsely vegetated. The climate is dry, and most of the Project area is flat, sandy, and sparsely vegetated. Portions of the Santa Cruz Copper Project area are in the 100-year flood plain. Within the Santa Cruz Copper Project area, approximately 85 acres of land located 1.2 km north of the intersection of N. Within the Project area, approximately 85 acres of land located 1.2 km north of the intersection of N. Spike Road and W. Clayton Road was used during an in situ leaching project in 1991.
We have a large private land package covering the Santa Cruz Copper Project area and area of known mineralization. The ability to operate on private land has the potential to reduce lengthy permitting timelines that result from federal permitting processes. The primary permits required to authorize the construction and operation of the Santa Cruz Copper Project are detailed below.
Permitting and encumbrances. The primary permits for the project will require state, county, and local authorizations. Several permits have been issued for exploration and construction activities, and additional permits have been submitted for construction activities. The remaining permit applications for construction and operations will be prepared and submitted as sufficient design and engineering information become available. Major federal, state and local permits/plans required for the project are listed in the table below.
16
Table: Permits Required for the Santa Cruz Copper Project.
17
Geological Setting, Mineralization and Deposit Types. The Santa Cruz Copper Project is situated within the Southwestern Porphyry Copper Belt, which is home to numerous productive copper deposits. Notable examples in Arizona include Mineral Park, Bagdad, Resolution, Miami-Globe, San Manuel-Kalamazoo, Ray, Morenci, Sierrita, Twin Buttes, and the historically significant Sacaton Mine. These deposits are part of the larger physiographical area known as the Basin and Range Province, which covers much of the southwestern United States.
The porphyry copper deposits in the Southwestern Porphyry Copper Belt are the result of igneous activity during the Laramide Orogeny, which occurred between 50 and 80 million years ago. This geological event was driven by the subduction of the Farallon Tectonic Plate beneath the North American Tectonic Plate, resulting in the formation of a magmatic arc and the development of associated porphyry copper systems.
The Project comprises four separate areas along a southwest-northeast corridor. These areas from southwest to northeast are known as the Southwest exploration area, the Santa Cruz deposit, the East Ridge deposit, and the Texaco deposit, all of which represent portions of one or more large porphyry copper systems separated by extensional Basin and Range normal faults. Each area has experienced variable periods of erosion, supergene enrichment, fault displacement, and tilting into their present positions.
Mineralization in the project area is divided into the following:
•Supergene copper oxide mineralization mainly consists of atacamite and chrysocolla, with smaller amounts of cuprous goethite, copper-bearing micas, tenorite, cuprite, copper wad, and native copper.
•Secondary supergene sulfide mineralization is dominantly chalcocite, which replaces hypogene sulfide.
•Primary hypogene sulfide mineralization consists of chalcopyrite and molybdenite hosted within quartz-sulfide stringers, veins, and breccias.
Exploration and Drilling. No exploration was completed in 2025. Sixteen sonic drill holes, totaling 1,055 meters, were completed as part of geotechnical development work for the box cut and decline as part of pre-development activities at the Santa Cruz Project. The below discussion is related to the exploration and drilling activities undertaken for the PFS.
Ivanhoe Electric has completed induced polarization geophysical surveys, including two dimensional, three dimensional, multichannel seismic, reprocessing of proprietary Typhoon™ three-dimensional perpendicular pole dipole induced polarization data, and ambient noise tomography in addition to an active three- dimensional seismic survey across the Santa Cruz and east ridge deposits. The geophysical datasets from these surveys were used to assist with geological interpretation and improved drill targeting.
A comprehensive surface ionic leach sampling program has also been completed across the project to assess in detecting copper mineralization at depth.
Ivanhoe Electric completed 149 infill drillholes totaling approximately 120,000 meters since the 2023 initial assessment to the date of the PFS, bringing the total to 194 drillholes and 156,427 meters of combined drilling for the Project since initiating exploration activity in 2021. Combined with historical drilling, Ivanhoe Electric has data for over 469 drillholes totaling 330,118 meters of combined drilling. The mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates included in the PFS are based on data from 329 drillholes totaling 279,164 meters of combined drilling.
Detailed core logging is performed by Ivanhoe Electric geologists through digital data input into MX Deposit. Data that are logged include lithology, alteration, mineralization, veining, petrophysical data, and geotechnical parameters, such as faults, joints, fractures, hardness, and rock quality (Q-system) parameters. Additional characterization fields such as rock colors, grain sizes, textures, and supergene weathering features were also captured.
Approximately 5,884 density measurements from 210 drillholes were measured for the Santa Cruz, East Ridge, and Texaco deposits.
Quality assurance and quality control for the Ivanhoe Electric drill programs consisted of inserting duplicates, blanks, and certified reference materials (standards) into the sample stream at set sampling intervals. BBA’s review of the data indicated no material issues.
A total of 70 km of geotechnical drillholes consisting of 83 historical and 184 modern drillholes informed geotechnical characterization of the Santa Cruz and East Ridge deposits. Historical drillholes were selected based on availability of rock quality designation data.
18
The groundwater flow model was calibrated and used to predict the residual passive inflows for the PFS mine plan. The predicted residual passive inflows resulting from the updated model, with mitigation measures of activated colloidal silica and cement grouting applied, indicate that the residual passive inflows for the first 10 years of the mine are at or below 6,000 gallons per minute (gal/min). From Years 11 through 25, the residual passive inflows in the updated model range from approximately 6,500 to 8,000 gal/min.
Data Verification. BBA personnel in the disciplines of geology, mineral resource estimation, mineral reserve estimation, mine planning and mine infrastructure visited the project site in 2024. During the visit, BBA personnel reviewed and verified data acquisition procedures with Ivanhoe Electric personnel, visited active drill sites, and performed several other verification checks to ensure data integrity.
Based on the data made available, BBA considers that a reasonable level of verification has been completed and that no material issues were identified from the programs. BBA’s opinion states that the geological data collection and quality assurance and control procedures used by Ivanhoe Electric are consistent with current industry practices and that the geological database is of suitable quality to support a mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation.
Metallurgical Testwork. Metallurgy and processing test work were directed by Met Engineering, LLC and conducted at McClelland Labs (MLI) in Sparks, Nevada, USA and at Blue Coast Research (BCR) in Parksville, British Columbia, Canada. Metallurgical testwork included the following:
•establishing copper recoveries, based on sequential coppers for chloride-assisted, weak-sulfuric acid, heap leaching of mineralized material at the Santa Cruz Copper Project.
•determining commercial operating parameters for heap leaching mineralized material at the Santa Cruz Copper Project, including salt usage, sulfuric acid usage, ore cure/agglomeration practices, leach cell cycle times for an on/off leach pad design, annual pregnant leach solution grades, and pregnant leach solution flow rate to solvent extraction.
A grade-recovery algorithm was developed based on sequential copper assays. For the life-of-mine processing, this equation produces a weighted average of 92.2% total copper recovery to cathode for leaching a 6-meter lift of ore crushed to 100% passing 9.5 mm for 180 days of irrigation utilizing an on/off leach pad.
There are no deleterious elements or factors that could have a significant effect on economic extraction of the copper in the mineralized material.
Mineral Resource Estimate. The mineral resources in this estimate were independently prepared, including estimation and classification, by BBA in accordance with the definition for mineral resources in S-K 1300 regulations. The in-situ mineral resource estimates for the Santa Cruz, East Ridge, and Texaco deposits, inclusive and exclusive of reserves, are presented in the tables below.
The Santa Cruz deposit has approximately 194,000 meters of drilling in 226 drillholes; East Ridge has approximately 49,000 meters of drilling in 62 holes; and Texaco has approximately 36,000 meters of drilling in 41 holes.
Geological domains were developed for the project based on alteration, lithological, and mineralogical characteristics, incorporating regional and local structural information. Normal faults separate the mineralization at the Santa Cruz, East Ridge, and Texaco deposits.
The Santa Cruz deposit was divided into several mineral domains: exotic domain, verde domain, leach cap, oxide domain, chalcocite enriched domain, and primary mineralization domain. The East Ridge deposit consists of a mix of oxide and chalcocite enriched domains. The Texaco deposit consists of all domains except for leach cap and exotic. The domains were further divided into subdomains based on individual grade profiles, which align with controls on mineralization. The following terms are assigned to the subdomains; these represent a local definition of the grade profile: high-grade, medium-grade, and low-grade.
Exploratory data analysis was conducted to determine the nature of element distribution and correlation of grades within individual lithological units, and to identify high-grade outlier samples. Capping was not applied to copper values as significant outliers were not identified. Samples were composited to 2-meter intervals. Variograms were completed by subdomain for each deposit.
The resource estimation methodology constrains the mineralization by using hard wireframe boundaries. Ordinary kriging was employed for the Santa Cruz deposit, and inverse distance squared was selected for the East Ridge and Texaco
19
deposits. Multiple search passes were used for each deposit. Search parameters were based on variography and continuity of mineralization.
Validation checks were completed on the mineral resource estimates. These included visual comparison of estimated grade to composite grade, domain conformity, swath plots, and comparisons to alternate estimation methods.
Indicated and inferred classification was applied to the Santa Cruz, East Ridge, and Texaco deposits based on BBA’s review that included geological understanding, continuity of mineralization, data quality, examination of drill spacing, visual comparison, kriging variance, distance to the nearest composite, and search pass, along with the search ellipsoid ranges. Collectively, this information was used to produce an initial classification script followed by manual wireframe application to further limit the mineral resource classification.
Mineral resources used commodity prices based on long-term analyst and bank forecasts. In the opinion of BBA, this price is generally aligned with pricing over the last one, three, and five years; forward-looking pricing from internationally recognized banks is appropriate for use in a mineral resource estimate. The commodity price considered three-year trailing averages.
20
Santa Cruz Mineral Resources
Table: In-Situ Mineral Resource Estimate Exclusive of Reserves for Santa Cruz, East Ridge & Texaco Deposits.
Notes on mineral resources: 1. The mineral resources in this estimate were independently prepared, including estimation and classification, by BBA USA Inc., and are reported in accordance with the definition for mineral resources in S-K 1300. 2. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. and in accordance with the definitions for Mineral Resources in S-K 1300. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. and in accordance with the definitions for Mineral Resources in S-K 1300. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 3. Mineral resources are reported in situ, exclusive of mineral reserves. 4. The mineral resources for Santa Cruz, East Ridge, and Texaco deposit were completed using Datamine Studio RM software. 5. The mineral resources are current at December 31, 2025. 6. Mineral resources constrained assuming underground mining methods for the Santa Cruz deposit are reported at an NSR cutoff of US$32.00 for heap leach and US$34.00 for concentrator; Texaco deposit is reported at a NSR cutoff of US$32.00 for heap leach and US$34.00 for concentrator; and East Ridge deposit is reported at a NSR cutoff of US$40.00 for longhole stoping and US$50.00 for drift and fill. The cutoff reflects the total operating costs to define reasonable prospects for economic extraction by conventional underground mining methods. Material from within mineable shape-optimized wireframes has been included in the mineral resource. All material within mineable shape-optimized wireframes has been included in the Mineral Resource. All material within mineable shape-optimized wireframes has been included in the Mineral Resource. Underground mineable shapes optimization parameters include a long-term copper price of US$4.00/lb, gold price of US$1,900/oz, and silver price of US$24.00/oz. Process costs of US$7.00 to US$9.00 per processed tonne; direct mining costs between US$22.00 to US$40.00 per processed tonne reflecting various mining method costs (leach, long hole or drift and fill), mining general and administration costs of US$2.63 per processed tonne, onsite processing costs between US$31.63 to US$49.63 per processed tonne, along with variable royalties between 5.01% to 6.96% NSR, and a mining recovery of 100%. 7. Mineral resources are estimated using metallurgical recoveries for heap leach of 96% for acid soluble copper, 83% for cyanide soluble copper, 22% for residual copper, 0% for gold and 0% for silver. Recoveries for concentrator are 0% for acid soluble copper, 90% for cyanide soluble copper, 90% for residual copper, 59% for gold, and 69% for silver. 8. Density was applied using weighted averages by deposit subdomain. 9. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade, and contained metal content. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade and contained metal content. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade and contained metal content.
Table: In-Situ Mineral Resource Estimate Inclusive of Reserves for Santa Cruz, East Ridge & Texaco Deposits.
Notes on mineral resources: 1. The mineral resources in this estimate were independently prepared, including estimation and classification, by BBA USA Inc., and are reported in accordance with the definition for mineral resources in S-K 1300. 2. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. and in accordance with the definitions for Mineral Resources in S-K 1300. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. and in accordance with the definitions for Mineral Resources in S-K 1300. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 3. Mineral resources are reported in situ, inclusive of mineral reserves. 4. The mineral resources for Santa Cruz, East Ridge, and Texaco deposit were completed using Datamine Studio RM software. 5. The mineral resources are current at December 31, 2025. 6. Mineral resources constrained assuming underground mining methods for the Santa Cruz deposit are reported at an NSR cutoff of US$32.00 for heap leach and US$34.00 for concentrator; Texaco deposit is reported at a NSR cutoff of US$32.00 for heap leach and US$34.00 for concentrator; and East Ridge deposit is reported at a NSR cutoff of US$40.00 for longhole stoping and US$50.00 for drift and fill. The cutoff reflects the total operating costs to define reasonable prospects for economic extraction by conventional underground mining methods. Material from within mineable shape-optimized wireframes has been included in the mineral resource. All material within mineable shape-optimized wireframes has been included in the Mineral Resource. All material within mineable shape-optimized wireframes has been included in the Mineral Resource. Underground mineable shapes optimization parameters include a long-term copper price of US$4.00/lb, gold price of US$1,900/oz, and silver price of US$24.00/oz. Process costs of US$7.00 to US$9.00 per processed tonne; direct mining costs between US$22.00 to US$40.00 per processed tonne reflecting various mining method costs (leach, long hole or drift and fill), mining general and administration costs of US$2.63 per processed tonne, onsite processing costs between US$31.63 to US$49.63 per processed tonne, along with variable royalties between 5.01% to 6.96% NSR, and a mining recovery of 100%. 7. Mineral resources are estimated using metallurgical recoveries for heap leach of 96% for acid soluble copper, 83% for cyanide soluble copper, 22% for residual copper, 0% for gold and 0% for silver. Recoveries for concentrator are 0% for acid soluble copper, 90% for cyanide soluble copper, 90% for residual copper, 59% for gold, and 69% for silver. 8. Density was applied using weighted averages by deposit subdomain. 9. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade, and contained metal content. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade and contained metal content. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade and contained metal content.
21
Factors That May Affect the Mineral Resource Estimate
Areas of uncertainty that may materially impact the mineral resource estimates are as follows:
•changes to long-term metal price assumptions
•changes to the input values for mining, processing, and general and administrative (G&A) costs to constrain the estimate
•changes to local interpretations of mineralization geometry and continuity of mineralized subdomains
•changes to the density values applied to the mineralized zones
•changes to metallurgical recovery assumptions
•changes in assumptions of marketability of the final product
•variations in geotechnical, hydrogeological, and mining assumptions
•changes to assumptions with an existing agreement or new agreements
•changes to environmental, permitting, and social license assumptions
•logistics of securing and moving adequate services, labor, and supplies could be affected by epidemics, pandemics, and other public health crises, or geopolitical influence.
22
The table below compares the Santa Cruz mineral resource estimates, exclusive of mineral reserves, as at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, and reports the net difference as a percentage.
Comparison to previous Mineral Resource Estimate
The current resource model iterations have changed significantly when compared to the iterations released in the initial assessment. Factors that have influenced changes in the resource are as follows:
•a portion of the Santa Cruz Indicated resource has been converted to reserves; see Mineral Reserve table;
•change in cut-off grade from IA to PFS due to change in metallurgical process, mining cost, increased copper price from $3.70/lb to $4.00/lb;
•significant addition of new drilling to all three deposits, with expansion drilling at Texaco contributing to overall resource growth;
•change in interpretation of deposits based on new information;
•understanding of structural influence on the deposit;
•discovery of historical data issues in East Ridge.
23
Mineral Reserve Estimate. Underground mineral reserves were estimated by BBA. Estimates were prepared for the Santa Cruz deposit, a portion of the East Ridge deposit, and the Verde domain located within the Santa Cruz deposit. The primary mining method for both deposits employs longhole stoping without pillars, utilizing a primary and secondary stoping sequence. Additionally, a few small lenses within the East Ridge deposit use a drift-and-fill mining method. Stopes will be backfilled with cemented rockfill and then all stopes will be backfilled after mining with paste backfill for the remainder of the mine life. Indicated mineral resources were converted to probable mineral reserves. Inferred mineral resources were not converted to mineral reserves; however, if inferred mineral resources fell within the mineral reserve designs, they were assumed to have zero grade.
The underground mine approach was designed using zones that were amenable to different mining methods based on geotechnical considerations, access requirements, deposit shape, orientation and grade, and mining depths. Waste or low-grade blocks in the stope shapes were treated as internal dilution. Mine designs were modified by including the capital and operating development needed to access the stopes, and the applicable infrastructure requirements.
Net smelter return (NSR) represents the gross revenue generated from the sale of a refined metal product (in this case, copper cathodes) after deducting all associated off-site costs. For a mine producing copper cathodes via heap leaching and SX/EW, the traditional "smelter" and "refining" charges inherent in concentrate sales are not applicable. Instead, the offsite deductions are specific to the direct sale of cathodes.
The primary metal produced at the Santa Cruz Copper Project is copper. While byproducts of gold and silver are present, the current heap leach SX/EW process does not recover these precious metals. As is common with polymetallic deposits, the cutoff value for mineral reserves is determined and expressed in terms of net smelter return value per tonne.
The NSR is calculated based on unit metal values, utilizing representative smelter contract terms, freight costs, and forecasted metal prices. The metal prices and metallurgical recovery rates used for NSR calculations are summarized in the table below. Operating cost for cutoff value calculations are summarized in the table below. Royalties are factored into each block of the mineral resource and mineral reserve model.
Mineral reserves are assessed using commodity prices derived from long-term forecasts from analysts and banks. According to BBA, this pricing generally reflects the trends observed over the past one, three, and five years, and the forward-looking prices from internationally recognized banks are deemed appropriate for mineral reserve estimates.
Table: NSR parameters.
Table: Operating costs for cutoff value calculations.
Indicated mineral resources were converted to probable mineral reserves. Inferred mineral resources were excluded from the mineral reserve estimate. Mineral reserves for the Santa Cruz Copper Project are estimated for the Santa Cruz deposit and a portion of the East Ridge deposit, as well as the Verde domain within the Santa Cruz deposit.
24
Mineral reserves are supported by a mine plan, engineering analysis, and modifying factors.
The point of reference for the mineral reserves is the point where the ore is delivered to the processing plant. Mineral reserves are reported on a 100% basis.
The mineral reserve estimate for the Santa Cruz Copper Project is shown in the table below.
25
Table: Santa Cruz Copper Project Mineral Reserve Estimate.
Notes: 1. The mineral reserves in this estimate are current to December 31, 2025 and were independently prepared, including estimation and classification, by BBA USA Inc. They are reported in accordance with the definitions for mineral reserves in S-K 1300. 2. The point of reference for the estimate is the point of delivery to the process facilities. 3. The mineral reserves for the Santa Cruz and East Ridge deposits were completed using Deswik mining software. Mineral reserves are defined within stope designs that are prescribed by rock mechanics, considering the specific characteristics of deposits, mineral domains, mining methods, and the mining sequence. Transverse longhole stoping is the optimal mining method with uppers and cut & fill methods used where appropriate. Mining will occur in blocks, extracting ore from the bottom upwards, with paste backfill providing ground support to sustain a production rate of 20,000 tonnes per day for the first 15 years of operation. 4. Mineral reserves are estimated at an NSR cutoff value of $43.95/t for longhole stoping and $60/t for longitudinal retreat stopes and drift and fill. The NSR values reflect the discrete metallurgical responses for each mineral reserve block using metallurgical recoveries for heap leach of 96% for acid soluble copper, 83% for cyanide soluble copper, 22% for residual copper. Underground mineable shapes optimization parameters include a long-term copper price of US$4.00/lb. 5. Mineral reserves account for mining loss and dilution. 6. Mineral reserves are a subset of the indicated mineral resource and do not include the inferred mineral resource. 7. Rounding, as required by the guidelines, may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade, and contained metal content. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade and contained metal content.
26
Factors That May Affect the Mineral Reserve Estimate. Factors that may affect the mineral reserve estimate include the following:
•changes to long-term metal price assumptions
•changes to metallurgical recovery assumptions
•changes to the input assumptions used to derive the mineable shapes applicable to the assumed underground and open pit mining methods used to constrain the estimates
•changes to the forecast dilution and mining recovery assumptions
•changes to the cutoff grades used to constrain the estimates
•variations in geotechnical (including seismicity), hydrogeological, mining, and processing recovery assumptions
•changes to environmental, permitting, and social license assumptions.
Comparison to previous Mineral Reserve Estimate. Mineral Reserves were estimated for the Santa Cruz Copper Project for the first time in 2025. No previous Mineral Reserves are available to compare.
Mining Methods. The Santa Cruz Copper Project is an undeveloped brownfield project where mineral reserves have been identified for two deposits: Santa Cruz and East Ridge.
The Santa Cruz deposit is located approximately 480 to 940 meters below the surface. Based on the deposit geometry and supporting geotechnical data, transverse underground longhole stoping has been selected as the most suitable mining method. Mining will be conducted in blocks, with ore being extracted from the bottom upward within each block while utilizing paste backfill to provide ground support. A sill pillar will be maintained between the blocks. The paste backfill is designed to be strong enough to allow adjacent filled stopes to be mined without requiring additional pillars.
The East Ridge deposit is situated to the northeast of the main Santa Cruz deposit, approximately 310 to 790 meters below the surface. It consists of multiple inclined tabular lenses and will be mined using a hybrid approach that combines longhole stoping and the drift-and-fill method, depending on the geometry of the orebody in each zone, followed by paste backfill and curing before the development of the next adjacent drift in the orebody.
Mine access will be provided through two decline drifts from the surface: one for main access and the other for a Railveyor system to handle materials. Ore will be transported from the stopes by load-haul-dump (LHD) equipment to an ore pass system, which will transfer the ore from a chute to a conveyor system. From the conveyor system, it will be loaded onto the Railveyor and brought to surface.
The Santa Cruz Copper Project encompasses three mining zones: Santa Cruz, Verde, and East Ridge (Figure below). The Santa Cruz zone is the primary production area and is structurally divided into northern and southern regions.
27
Figure. Mining Zones of Santa Cruz and East Ridge Deposits, View Looking North

The Santa Cruz Copper Project mine life is expected to be 23 years with construction from 2026 to 2028 followed by schedule production to 2051. The table below summarizes the production in the mine plan. The “Ore” column represents the total development and production ore for Santa Cruz, Verde, and East Ridge mining zones.
28
Table: Santa Cruz Scheduled Production Summary.
The figures below show a tonne-grade graph for production and includes estimated waste rock and tonnes of material mined over the life-of-mine from the orebodies and development, respectively.
29
Figure. Santa Cruz Tonne – Grade Graph

Figure. Santa Cruz Tonnes of Mined Material

The injection of activated colloidal silica to reduce water inflow within specific areas of underground development was evaluated by Geosyntec for the project. During initial decline development where the twin declines pass through the upper portion of the Gila conglomerate and other high hydraulic conductivity zones, standard ramp dewatering methods—in addition to methods like activated colloidal silica and cement grout injection are utilized to support underground development.
Recovery Methods. Process for the Santa Cruz Copper Project has been designed to cycle oxide and secondary sulfide ores through an on/off heap leach pad to produce a copper-rich pregnant leach solution (PLS) that will be processed in the onsite solvent extraction and electrowinning circuit for recovery.
The process designs were based on existing technologies and proven equipment. The process and refinery plant designs are based on the results of metallurgical testwork on the mineralized material at the Santa Cruz Copper Project. The designs are conventional.
The simplified overall process flow diagram is presented in the Figure below.
30
Figure. Simplified Process Flowsheet

Run-of-mine ore will be delivered to surface at a diameter of less than 20 cm via the Railveyor. Ore from underground will be either fed, via a surge hopper, to crushing or diverted and conveyed to the coarse ore stockpile for future use. Fine ore (undersize from the crushing circuit) will be trucked to the agglomeration drums where sulfuric acid and sodium chloride can be added to facilitate agglomeration and leaching.
Crushed and agglomerated ore will be delivered to the leach pad via a combination of haul truck and overland conveying and stacking equipment. The final mobile conveyor will feed two self-propelled indexing conveyors in series, which in turn will feed the self-propelled mobile radial stacker. The cells will be ‘retreat’ stacked by the radial stacker in a half-moon shape.
The on/off heap leach pad will be divided into seven cells with spacer strips between the cells effectively creating multiple leach pads and providing safety zones between the cells. The liner for the leach pad is comprised of a high-density polyethylene geomembrane overlaying a geosynthetic layer of clay overlaying prepared native foundation materials or grading fill.
Ore will be stacked at up to 22,000 t/d, and will take approximately 36 days to stack each cell at design production rate. Each of the cells will progress through cycles in sequence with each stacking cycle taking 36 days and an entire cell cycle taking 265 days.
Ore produced from the underground mine will be processed using a heap leach and solvent extraction and electrowinning flowsheet to produce London Metal Exchange grade copper cathode. The heap leaching process will take place on an on/off pad. Spent ore will be removed from the leach pad and processed for paste backfill or stacked on a spent ore pile. Approximately 50% of the spent ore will be processed for use in paste backfill. Operations will be conducted 24 hours per day, 365 days per year for approximately 26 years at a design stacking rate of up to 22,000 t/d.
31
Figure. Seven-Cell Heap Leach and Solution Management

The solvent extraction circuit design comprises two parallel trains. Each train will consist of two extraction stages, two wash stages, and one strip stage. The copper electrowinning tankhouse will comprise electrowinning cells with lead anodes and stainless-steel cathode blanks. Cathodes (copper electroplated onto stainless steel blanks) will be harvested manually using an overhead crane and bail. Cathodes will be stripped in an industry standard automated stripping machine and the washed blanks will be returned to the cells. Product cathode copper will be bundled, sampled, weighed, labeled, and shipped.
Infrastructure. The Santa Cruz Copper Project site surface infrastructure comprises the following:
•an open excavation 60-meter-deep “box cut” ramp for accessing a twin decline portal to the underground mine workings
•three ventilation shafts to facilitate air flows to the underground mine workings
•primary mine ventilation fans, hardware, and ducting to control ventilation to the underground mine workings
•refrigeration plant to control temperatures in the underground mine workings
•ventilation bore for refrigeration
•rock crushing process plant and temporary stockpiles
•two spent ore facilities; north and south pads
•on/off leach pad with associated collection ponds and mobile stacking
•solution extraction and electrowinning process facilities
•mobile cement batch plant facility
•paste backfill batch facility
•maintenance, and warehouse facilities
•first aid/rescue building
•multiple various ancillary outbuildings
32
•entry security shack and various visitor and project parking spaces
•equipment delivery and open laydown/storage area
•multiple improved and unimproved access roads
•piping and pumping systems for process and water services
•explosives storage facility
•high-voltage transmission line and substation
•environmental monitoring facilities
•emergency power generation facility
•solar power and battery storage facility.
Key infrastructure locations are shown on the Figure below.
Figure. Santa Cruz Site Plan

Power for the project will be provided from a combination of onsite renewable energy supply and utility grid supply. The goal of the mine development is to achieve a minimum of 70% of the energy supply from renewable sources including onsite photovoltaic solar generation built by a third-party developer in conjunction with a Power Purchase Agreement
33
(PPA) facilitated by local power provider Electrical District No. 3 (ED3) plus onsite battery energy storage system. The renewables facility was sized based on available area and to provide 40 MW of continuous power annually with over 90% load coverage.
The proposed onsite battery energy storage system consists of a lithium-ion system rated for 140 MW / 560 MWh. There is an additional opportunity to utilize the emerging vanadium redox flow battery technology. A percentage of the lithium-ion battery energy storage system could be replaced by a vanadium redox flow battery system. VRB USA is the holder of vanadium redox battery technology in the United States and is a wholly owned subsidiary of VRB Energy, a subsidiary that is 90%-owned and controlled by Ivanhoe Electric.
The Santa Cruz Copper Project will have an estimated operating load of 78.7 MW and a forecast annual consumption of between 580,000 and 690,000 MWh during peak production years.
Water supply for process operations will be sourced from existing grandfathered Type I non-irrigation rights and mine dewatering. Potable water will be trucked in from the city. Trucked water will be stored in a tank to service the surface facilities. Water management operations include systems of underground dewatering, water collection and conveyance facilities, water storage, water use, and various management options for discharge of excess water. Water not used for underground mining, the paste backfill plant, the process plant, and the on/off heap leach pad can be pumped to storage reservoirs. Rapid infiltration basins are used to capture non-contact stormwater runoff to prevent stormwater from coming into contact with mining operations. Testwork confirmed the extracted groundwater quality will be acceptable for irrigation use when applied to suitable crops (e.g., cotton, alfalfa, pasture grasses) commonly grown in the vicinity of the project. The water distribution system is designed to distribute water to agricultural end-users, without treatment, and includes a side-stream water treatment process that may be used if the extracted groundwater does not meet the standards defined by end-users.
Onsite accommodations facilities are neither required nor planned. Personnel will reside in nearby settlements including Casa Grande, Maricopa, the Phoenix metropolitan area, and Tucson, and will commute to site by vehicle. Parking, security, fencing, and a gatehouse are included in the design. The infrastructure buildings to be built on site include explosive magazine storage; cap magazine storage; core shack; process laboratory; security and main gate; fueling station; mine, plant operations building, changehouse, and mine dry; first aid and emergency rescue facilities; mining facility warehouse.
Market Studies and Contracts. Copper is a globally traded commodity that has established benchmark pricing in the form of exchanges such as the London Metals Exchange or Commodity Exchange Inc. The Santa Cruz Copper Project aims to produce copper cathode. Ivanhoe Electric plans to sell the copper in the United States.
Refined copper cathodes will be sold with reference to the prices on the Commodity Exchange or London Metals Exchange at an agreed-upon quotational period. An additional premium to the price will be negotiated with potential buyers. Factors affecting the premium will include the shape and chemical specification of the cathode, together with the geographical location of the delivery point in relation to where the cathode is going to be consumed.
This study uses a base copper price of $4.25 per pound, which is based on a review of the one-, three-, and five-year trailing averages, as well as consensus forecasts from major banks and a market study completed by Ocean Partners for Ivanhoe Electric.
Due to the shape, chemical composition, and origin point of the cathode, it is expected that a premium to the price will be negotiated with potential buyers that is marginally above the historical average. For financial modeling purposes, this premium is estimated at $0.14 per pound ($300 per tonne) (Ocean Partners, 2025).
The table below summarizes the one-, three-, and five-year trailing price for copper using the LME Grade A monthly average as well as consensus forecasts from the major banks (CIBC, 2025) and Ocean Partners (2025).
Table: Commodity Price Summary.
34
Notes: 1BBA, Metal Pricing_R00, June 2025. 2CIBC Consensus Commodity Prices – June 2025. 3Ocean Partners, April 2025. LME = London Metals Exchange.
At this time, no sales agreements or contracts have been executed with vendors, contractors, or manufacturers.
Environmental, Closure, and Permitting. Environmental studies have included examination of flora and fauna, threatened and endangered species, migratory birds, surface water mapping, cultural heritage, air quality, carbon intensity, surface water monitoring, groundwater monitoring, water quality, material characterization, and mine material environmental behavior.
Much of the property has been previously disturbed from its natural state. These disturbances include flood control features, such as the canal identified as the Santa Cruz Wash Canal, paved and unpaved roads, and agricultural practices. These disturbances have removed all potential natural surface water features that may have existed in this area. The only features within the property that possess characteristics of an ordinary high-water mark and may be potential Waters of the United States are the north branch of the Santa Cruz Wash and the constructed Santa Cruz Wash Canal.
The project is committed to responsible environmental management, with a particular focus on minimizing air quality impacts. The project is located within the West Pinal County PM10 (particulate matter emissions with a diameter less than 10 microns) nonattainment area. Accordingly, the project will take specific measures to control and effectively mitigate dust. These measures will be in alignment with both local and state requirements.
A groundwater monitoring program to continue collecting baseline water quality data was developed and implemented in October 2023. The objective of the monitoring plan is to establish a current baseline water quality profile for the site and help inform Ivanhoe Electric on best management practices for groundwater monitoring during and after mining operations.
The major permits for the project will require state, county, and local authorizations. Several of these permits have been issued for exploration activities and are in the process of being amended for project construction activities. Other permits for construction activities have been submitted and are currently under review by the agency or approved. The remaining permit applications for construction and operations will be prepared and submitted as sufficient design and engineering information become available.
The eventual closure and reclamation of the Santa Cruz Copper Project will be directed and regulated under two separate but interconnected regulatory programs in Arizona: the Arizona State Mine Inspector and the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. Both programs are well-established and statutes and rules are subject to licensing timeframes.
Once the facility has been sufficiently designed to advance to mine development and operation, Ivanhoe Electric will need to apply for and receive an Areawide Aquifer Protection Permit from the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and submit and receive approval from the Arizona State Mine Inspector for a mined land reclamation plan detailing the project closure approach. Related closure cost estimates for financial assurance must be submitted following approval and before facility construction and operation.
Although an operational mined land reclamation plan has not yet been developed for the project, a preliminary closure cost estimate has been developed. Based on the conceptual design plan in this report, the closure costs for the Santa Cruz Copper Project are estimated at $35 million.
In alignment with Ivanhoe Electric’s community engagement and partnership standards, the project is being developed with a well-defined strategy to establish and uphold the support of the surrounding communities. At present, the project has initiated outreach with Native American communities that have ancestral ties to the land. In addition, community outreach with local stakeholders, and community involvement and potential partnerships are actively being pursued and/or assessed.
Capital and Operating Cost Estimates
Capital Cost Estimate. For the Santa Cruz Copper Project, capital and operating costs were determined based on the mine plan and SX/EW plant design. The estimation process incorporated assessments of material and labor requirements derived from the design, analysis of the process flowsheet, and anticipated consumption of power and supplies.
Cost estimation is based on a combination of vendor and consumable quotes and an internal database. Approximately 80% of the capital estimate is based on detailed quotes with estimated labor installation. For the purposes of this study, initial capital expenditure is assumed to be costs incurred in 2026, 2027, and 2028. By the end of 2028, ore production from stopes has been established and the SX/EW plant has been installed to begin copper production. Additional mine and
35
plant capital costs are incurred from 2029 and 2050 to continue meeting mine ramp up and production demands and are included in sustaining capital costs.
Total life-of-mine capital costs are $2.36 billion: $1.24 billion in initial capital and $1.28 billion in sustaining capital. Capital costs are summarized in the table below.
Table: Estimated Capital Costs.
Note: Closure costs include land sales at the end of the life of mine. Totals may not sum due to rounding.
Operating Cost Estimate. Total life-of-mine operating costs are $3.95 billion, as summarized in the table below.
Table: Estimated Operating Costs.
Note: Totals may not sum due to rounding.
36
Economic Analysis. Based on the cash flow model, the after-tax financial model resulted in an IRR of 20.0% and an NPV of $1.4 billion using an 8% discount rate. The after-tax payback period, after start of operations, is 4.4 years. The pre-tax base case financial model resulted in an IRR of 22.0% and an NPV of $1.9 billion using an 8% discount rate. The book value of the Santa Cruz property and its associated plant and equipment as at December 31, 2025 was $177.8 million.
The Santa Cruz Copper Project contemplates average annual copper cathode production of approximately 72,000 tonnes for the first 15 years of copper production and the average annual production is approximately 35,000 tonnes for the remaining 8 years of the life of mine.
The total life of mine is 23 years at an average C1 cash cost of $1.32 per pound of copper and sustaining cash costs of $2.01 per pound of copper.
A variable cut-off grade strategy optimizes recovery in the early years and maximizes mine life in the later years of the mine plan.
The financial analysis summary is shown in the table below.
Table: Estimated Operating Costs.
37
Risks. The risks associated with the Santa Cruz Copper Project are generally those expected with underground mining operations and include the accuracy of the mineral resource and mineral reserve models, and/or operational impacts.
In addition, the noted factors that may affect the mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates include:
•The capital cost estimates at mines under development may increase as construction progresses. This may negatively affect the economic analysis that supports the mineral reserve estimates.
•The life-of-mine plan assumes that the project can be permitted based on envisaged timelines. If the permitting schedule is delayed, this could impact costs and proposed production.
•The long-term reclamation and mitigation of the Santa Cruz Copper Project are subject to assumptions as to closure timeframes and closure cost estimates. If these cannot be met, there is a risk to the costs and timing.
•Climate changes could impact operating costs and ability to operate.
•Political risk from challenges to the current state or federal mining laws.
Opportunities. Potential opportunities for the project include the following:
•Upgrade of some or all the inferred mineral resources to higher-confidence categories, with additional drilling and supporting studies, such that this higher confidence material could potentially be converted to mineral reserves.
•Optimizing the mine plan based upon market conditions. At present, the production stopes are dictated by their copper content based upon a flat long term copper price.
•Completing additional underground core diamond drilling and development within the ore, there could be a reason to increase the width and/or height of the stopes, if geotechnical factors allow.
•Ivanhoe Electric holds a significant ground package that retains significant exploration potential for new operations proximal to the current mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates, with the support of additional studies.
•Ongoing leach testwork will focus on optimizing leach conditions to maximize copper recovery from chalcocite and reduce heap leach pad capital costs and SX circuit capital costs.
•Simplification and optimization of the ore crushing circuit should provide for an opportunity to reduce plant capital costs.
•Use of two decades of South American knowledge and expertise at applying chloride-assisted leach technology to inform construction of the on/off heap leach pad.
•The low elevation profile of the heap leach pad (6-meter lift on/off pad) and the flat topographic terrain should provide cost saving opportunities to use low head type pumps for pregnant leach solution, raffinate, and organic pumping that can use less expensive materials of construction for pumps like fiberglass, bromo-butyl rubber-lined carbon steel (not applicable for organic) and HDPE compared to exotic metal pumps resistant to this corrosion environment such as tantalum and titanium.
•There is potential for a considerable positive impact to the operating cost estimate by optimizing the paste backfill recipe and reducing the binder requirements.
•There is potential to increase material handling and throughput, further optimizing the mine plan.
38
Conclusions. Under the assumptions presented in the PFS, the Santa Cruz Copper Project consists of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates that support a positive cash flow.
Recommendations. The recommended work programs to advance detailed engineering, operational readiness, permitting, and critical long-lead items total $22.4 million. The budget for recommended work is summarized in the table below.
Table: Proposed Reagent & Process Consumables.
Financing
Ivanhoe Electric’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Mesa Cobre, closed a two year senior secured multi-draw bridge facility of $200 million (the “Bridge Facility”) on December 12, 2025. The Bridge Facility is intended to support the development and construction of the Santa Cruz Copper Project. Outstanding amounts under the Bridge Facility will bear interest at our election, either at (i) the forward-looking term rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate administered by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“Term SOFR”) plus a margin of 5.0%, increasing by 0.5% on each of the 6th, 12th, and 18th month following the closing date, or (ii) the alternate base rate defined as the highest of (a) the rate of interest last quoted by The Wall Street Journal as the “prime rate” in the U.S., (b) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, and (c) one-month Term SOFR plus 1.00%, plus the Applicable ABR Rate (as defined below). Default interest is the applicable rate plus 2.00% per annum. “Applicable ABR Rate” means (i) until (and including) June 30, 2026, 4.00% per annum, (ii) from (but excluding) June 30, 2026 and until (and including) December 31, 2026, 4.50% per annum, (iii) from (but excluding) December 31, 2026 and until (and including) June 30, 2027, 5.00% per annum, and (iv) thereafter, 5.50% per annum. Interest is payable on the last business day of each fiscal quarter, beginning March 31, 2026. Mesa Cobre is permitted to make optional prepayments, and is required to make prepayments equal to the cash proceeds of any new indebtedness (other than permitted indebtedness). Mesa Cobre owes customary agent and arranger fees under fee letters and a commitment fee equal to 25% of the then Applicable SOFR Rate on the unused commitments, payable on each interest payment date.
In connection with the Bridge Facility, (i) Mesa Cobre entered into a security agreement with the Collateral Agent which granted a first priority lien on substantially all of its assets, subject to customary exceptions, (ii) Ivanhoe Electric guaranteed Mesa Cobre’s payment obligations pursuant to a guaranty agreement in favor of the Administrative Agent whereby Ivanhoe Electric agrees to maintain at all times a tangible net worth of not less than $225.0 million, (iii) Ivanhoe Electric pledged its shares of Mesa Cobre pursuant to a pledge agreement between Ivanhoe Electric and the Collateral Agent, and (iv) Mesa Cobre executed a deed of trust and assignment of rents in favor of the Collateral Agent with respect to Mesa Cobre’s real property rights.
39
Other Properties
At our other U.S. exploration projects, we advanced exploration work programs in 2025. At the Tintic Project, mapping and sampling campaigns were conducted in 2025 to refine precious metal rich replacement exploration concepts. At the Hog Heaven Project, detailed core scanning and analytical work, as well as additional ground magnetotelluric surveying has allowed for scoping of the next round of exploration concepts for future drilling. At the Gleeson Project, we conducted data compilation and land consolidation and began exploration drilling.
Tintic Project, Utah
The Tintic Project is located near the City of Eureka, approximately 95 km south of Salt Lake City, and can be accessed from U.S. Highway 6, approximately 30 km west of the Interstate 15 junction. As of December 31, 2025, Ivanhoe Electric holds various types of claims and leases through our wholly-owned subsidiary Tintic Copper & Gold Inc. (TCG) or other subsidiaries. Our holdings at the Tintic Project are comprised of 79.23 km2, consisting of patented claims, unpatented mining lode claims, Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Association (SITLA) mineral leases, Hardrock Prospecting Permits (HRPP) on Bankhead-Jones lands, and various patented claims subject to lease or lease and option agreements.
To retain an unpatented claim on federal land in the USA, a $200 maintenance fee per claim is due annually by September 1st. Based on the current landholding this amounted to $41,200 in annual payments for claim retention at the Tintic Project.
In 2025, certain lands on which TCG has valid unpatented mining claims were transferred to the State of Utah. The cost to maintain claims with the State of Utah is a $100 maintenance per claim, due by December 31 each year. Based on the current landholding this amounted to $29,200 in annual payments for claim retention. Based on our current landholding this would amount to $74,580 in annual payments for claim retention.
Ivanhoe Electric is a party to various lease and option agreements with land and mineral rights holders throughout the Project area. The estimated annual cost of lease payments is $189,000.
40
Map: Claims and leases at the Tintic Project.

41
Royalties. Significant portions of the patented and unpatented mining lode claims are subject to NSR royalty agreements, ranging between 1% and 4%, which would be payable upon production and sale of product, i.e., there are no advance royalties.
Map: Royalties at the Tintic Project.

The Tintic Project is an exploration stage project without Mineral Reserves or Mineral Resources. The Tintic Project is an exploration stage project without mineral reserves or mineral resources. There is no mine in production at the Tintic Project and no mining activity by us has ever taken place on the land constituting the Tintic Project.
There is currently no significant equipment, infrastructure or facilities at the Tintic Project, and no mine development or operating equipment at the project site. Historical mine equipment, shafts, and adits are ubiquitous throughout the area. There is no mining or operating infrastructure at the Tintic Project that would be intended to be used in future mine operations. There is no mining or operating infrastructure at the Tintic Project that would be intended to be used in future mine operations.
Exploration activities in 2025 included a surface mapping campaign over Sioux Peak, re-logging of several drill holes, and the generation of a drill program targeting carbonate replacement deposits.
42
Hog Heaven Project
The Hog Heaven Project in Montana is located on private land approximately 80 km south-southwest of the town of Kalispell, Montana. It is in the historical Hog Heaven District which consists of several high-sulfidation epithermal mineral deposits and prospects, as well as several historical mines, including the Flathead Mine. We believe the Hog Heaven District is underexplored at depth, with a substantial alteration footprint and multiple mineralized centers.
In 2021, we entered an earn-in agreement with Brixton Metals Corporation (“Brixton”). Brixton owns the Hog Heaven Project through its subsidiary Brixton USA, covering an area of 24.32 km2 through the following interests: 2.59 km2 of deeded fee simple land both surface and minerals and 14.06 km2 of fee simple mineral rights. The balance, 7.67 km2, is held via lease of three parcels owned by the Chester Company Ltd.
In 2024, Ivanhoe Electric leased a further 4,925 acres of private surface and mineral rights at the Hog Heaven Project from a private owner, advancing additional consolidation of the district and providing additional access to areas prospective for porphyry systems. This lease is effective for an initial 10 year term and can be extended by up to three consecutive ten-year terms.
Ivanhoe Electric’s estimated annual cost of future payments to retain the agreements is $137,680. One milestone payment of $1,000,000 is required in 2026 as part of the earn-in agreement with Brixton.
Figure: Hog Heaven plan map showing Ivanhoe Electric drill hole locations, historical mine workings, and historical drilling.

Exploration activities in 2025 included a magnetotelluric geophysical survey and relogging of core from the 2023-2024 drill program. A follow-up drill program is planned for 2026 to explore for porphyry copper mineralization at depth.
43
Gleeson Project
The Gleeson Project is an exploration stage project and comprises 268 unpatented federal lode claims, 10 Arizona State Land Department mineral exploration permits, four leases with option, one lease, and one parcel of fee simple land as of December 31, 2025, totaling 37.72 km2.
The Project is located within the historic Courtland-Gleeson mining district (actively mined from 1890-1957) in south-eastern Arizona, which comprises copper-gold-silver-zinc-lead carbonate-replacement deposits hosted in Paleozoic carbonate rocks, intruded by a series of Jurassic intrusions. Exploration is aimed at determining if porphyry copper and carbonate-replacement mineralization is present at depth adjacent to the known fault-displaced mineralization in the historic mining district. Mapping and sampling was progressed across private land within the historic mining district. Drilling is ongoing, having commenced in November 2025, with 1,496.63 meters drilled in two holes as of December 31, 2025.
BHP- Ivanhoe Electric Exploration Alliance (the “BHP Alliance”)
On May 7, 2024, we entered into an Exploration Alliance Agreement with BHP Mineral Resources Inc. (“BHP”) for the exploration of mutually agreed “Areas of Interest” in the United States to identify copper and other critical metal exploration opportunities within those Areas of Interest that may become 50/50 owned joint ventures. The initial Areas of Interest are in New Mexico, Arizona, and Utah.
The Exploration Alliance Agreement is for a term of three years, which may be extended upon mutual agreement. BHP has agreed to provide initial funding of $15 million, and any subsequent funding would be on a 50/50 basis. The Exploration Alliance Agreement contemplates two stages – a Project Generation Phase and a Joint Venture Phase. A subsidiary of Ivanhoe Electric will be the operator during the Project Generation Phase and the operator of a project in the Joint Venture Phase will be mutually agreed upon in the future. During the Project Generation Phase, the parties will conduct early-stage generative exploration activities in the six initial Areas of Interest. The goal of these initial activities is to identify and stake mineral rights within the Areas of Interest to form a project and/or acquire such mineral rights from third parties. For each Area of Interest, an Area of Interest LLC will be created to hold the applicable rights and engage in all early-stage exploration. A subsidiary of Ivanhoe Electric will initially own 100% of each Area of Interest LLC. If agreed by the parties, an Area of Interest will be progressed to the Joint Venture Phase, resulting in the creation of a Joint Venture with 50/50 ownership. The purpose of the Joint Venture Phase is to further explore and evaluate the exploration results to assess its technical and economic merit, and if agreed upon, to develop and operate a mine and associated infrastructure. Many of these companies currently have greater resources than we do to be able to identify and evaluate prospective mineral projects or titles, and often have greater financial resources to be able to pursue their acquisition. During the Joint Venture Phase, each Party will contribute pro rata to their respective interest in the Joint Venture in accordance with the applicable Joint Venture documents, with each party having the right to take any product from the Joint Venture in kind in proportion to its equity interest existing at the relevant time.
As of December 31, 2025, staking has occurred on one Area of Interest (AOI) in New Mexico and on one AOI in Arizona.
Ivanhoe Electric provided access to one of the new Generation 2 Typhoon™ systems and a 2D Typhoon™ survey was completed at an AOI in Utah and two 3D Typhoon™ surveys were completed on an AOI in Arizona.
Results from the 3D Typhoon™ survey have resulted in a drill program at the surveyed AOI in Arizona. As of December 31, 2025, approximately 1,600 m have been drilled. The drill program is planned to continue into 2026.
Bristol
The Bristol Project is an exploration stage project and comprises 353 unpatented federal lode claims in Nevada. The Project is hosted in Paleozoic quartzite, shale, and overlying carbonate rocks. The sedimentary sequence was intruded by Oligocene porphyry dikes associated with the western end of the Wah Wah-Tushar magmatic trend (Pioche-Marysvale mineral belt). Mineralization at surface consists of copper-lead-zinc carbonate replacement deposits hosted in Cambrian Carbonate rocks. Subsequent Tertiary extensional normal faulting has dissected and offset the mineral system. Exploration is aimed at determining if a productive porphyry copper-molybdenum-gold system is present at depth.
44
Lomitas Negras
The optioned Lomitas Negras Project is an exploration stage project and comprises four Arizona State Mineral Exploration Permits over covered basin, concealing Laramide age intrusive rocks prospective for porphyry copper deposits and related mineralization. The area shares some analogs to the nearby San Manuel-Kalamazoo porphyry district.
The Lomitas Negras Project is one of four projects optioned by Ivanhoe Electric from Bronco Creek Exploration Inc. in November 2025. The other projects are the Globe-Miami Projects described below. For each project, Ivanhoe Electric has the right to acquire 100% over an eight-year option period by making aggregate annual payments of up to $2.3 million, and cumulative aggregated exploration expenditures of up to $10.8 million in aggregate on all four optioned projects. Following completion of the payments at each project, Ivanhoe Electric has the right, but not the obligation, to exercise each option and acquire 100% of the relevant project. Ivanhoe Electric may also drop an option at any time without further payment.
Should an option be exercised and Ivanhoe Electric acquires the project, it will convey a 2.5% net smelter return royalty to Bronco Creek but will retain the right to buy-down up to 0.5% of each NSR for $4 million per project over staged payments prior to the commencement of commercial production. Ivanhoe Electric will also be required to make certain pre-production and project development milestone payments following exercise of an option and prior to commercial production.
Globe - Miami
Ivanhoe Electric has optioned three projects in the Globe-Miami area of Arizona: Sleeping Beauty, Dragon’s Tail, and Copper King.
Sleeping Beauty comprises 291 unpatented federal lode claims land and is hosted in Precambrian Granite overlain by late Precambrian sedimentary rocks variably intruded by diabase. These are overlain by Paleozoic carbonate rocks. Host rocks intruded by Laramide Age (64 Ma) stocks and porphyry dikes, with related copper (-molybdenum) mineralization. Exploration is aimed at determining if there is fault-displaced mineralization offset from the nearby Copper Cities deposit, owned by BHP.
Dragon’s Tail comprises 169 unpatented federal lode claims near the Resolution Copper Project, owned by Resolution Copper (A Rio Tinto and BHP Joint Venture). The Project is hosted in Proterozoic Apache Group supra-crustal rocks, diabase sills, and Paleozoic carbonates (same host rocks as the Resolution Copper deposit) overlain with post-mineral Tertiary volcanics. Exploration is aimed at determining if porphyry copper mineralization is present.
Copper King comprises 232 unpatented federal lode claims near the Resolution Copper Project, owned by Resolution Copper. As with Dragon’s Tail, the Project is hosted in Proterozoic Apache Group supra-crustal rocks, diabase sills, and Paleozoic carbonates (same host rocks as the Resolution Copper deposit) overlain with post-mineral Tertiary volcanics. Exploration is aimed at determining if porphyry copper mineralization is present.
45
International
Saudi Arabian Joint Venture
In 2023, Ivanhoe Electric and Maaden established a Saudi Arabian exploration Joint Venture (the “Joint Venture”) through the limited liability company, Saudi JVCo, to unlock the significant mineral potential in Saudi Arabia. The Joint Venture has at the date of this annual report exclusive access to explore approximately 50,000 km2 of underexplored land on the Arabian Shield that Maaden has made available to the Saudi JVCo.
Map: Location of the Ivanhoe Electric Maaden Joint Venture within the country of Saudi Arabia.

On September 2, 2025, the Company announced that Maaden had made available an additional 1,345 km2 of exploration licenses to the Joint Venture, including the Musayna’ah, La Huf, Mahd, and Baara Exploration Licenses.
The Musayna’ah Licenses, totaling 946 km2, encompass an area exhibiting the characteristics and widespread mineralization and alteration assemblages typical of iron oxide copper gold (IOCG) deposits. Exploration work by Maaden
46
has defined several large areas of highly anomalous copper in soil geochemistry, where earlier exploration drilling intersected widespread low-grade copper mineralization, and localized higher-grade domains associated with structures. Only a small portion of the approximately seven-kilometer-long main anomalous footprint has been explored.
The La Huf, Mahd, and Baara Exploration Licenses (the “Mahd Area Licenses”) comprise 399 km2 adjacent to Maaden’s Mahd Ad Dhahab gold mine, known as the “Cradle of Gold,” and which has been in production for over 3,000 years. Historical exploration by Maaden included shallow drilling primarily aimed at defining near-surface gold deposits, which intersected gold mineralization with associated copper and zinc. The licenses are prospective for additional precious and base metal mineralization beneath the limits of shallow historical drilling.
For full year 2025, the Joint Venture has completed approximately 933 square kilometers (1,270 square kilometers to date) of geophysical surveys using the Company’s advanced Typhoon™ system and drilled four holes totaling approximately 2,130 meters (16 holes for 10,461 meters to date) across the Al Amar Belt, and seven holes totaling 2,282 meters across the Wadi Bidah Belt. Drilling at Al Amar hit narrow intervals of low- to high-grade base and precious metals mineralization associated with Typhoon™-identified anomalies at depths of up to one kilometer.
For 2026, the Joint Venture plans to continue Typhoon™ surveying at the Wadi Bidah, Musayna’ah, and Mahd Licenses. The Joint Venture will also start large scale surveying in the new Dhiran licenses, which was awarded to the Joint Venture in the Ministry of Mines’ “Tender Round 9” process run in late 2025. The Dhiran licenses are the only exploration licenses owned by the Joint Venture and are not made available to the Joint Venture from Maaden. Surveying will also take place on the platform licenses, starting with Ar Rayn B. This surveying is in addition to ongoing geological work, geochemical sampling, ground gravity and ground magnetic surveying. Drilling is currently underway at the Wadi Bidah area, and is being planned for Bir Umq, Mussayna’ah, Dhiran and the Platform later in the year.
Ivory Coast Nickel-Copper Project, Ivory Coast (the “Ivory Coast Project”)
The Ivory Coast Project is located approximately 650 road km northwest of Abidjan, Ivory Coast. As of December 31, 2025, our 69.1% interest in the Ivory Coast Project was held through our 22.7% equity interest in Sama and our 60% interest in the SNC joint venture described below. As of December 31, 2022, our interest in the Ivory Coast Project was held through our 22.8% equity interest in Sama and our 30% interest in the Sama Nickel Corporation Inc. In 2024 we completed our 60% earn-in into SNC and as at December 31, 2025, we directly owned 60% of the joint venture entity SNC.
The Ivory Coast Project consists of four exploration permits and one exploration permit application owned by SNC, which is the joint venture vehicle in which we are partnering with Sama to advance the Ivory Coast Project, which cover a total of 839.03 km2 Two of the exploration permits are held in a 66 2/3 / 33 1/3 joint venture with Société pour le Développement Minier de la Côte d’Ivoire (SODEMI), a parastatal organization established by the Ivory Coast and which together cover 319 km2 of the Ivory Coast Project.
In April 2018, pursuant to an investment agreement, Sama granted to us a right to nominate to the Sama board of directors two (2) directors as long as our shareholding interest of Sama remains above 10% but less than 50%, and four (4) directors if our shareholding rises to greater than 50%. Mr. Quentin Markin and Mr. Terry Krepiakevich are our director representatives on the board of Sama.
The Mineral Resource estimate for the Ivory Coast Project is set forth below, under the heading “Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves”. Glen Kuntz, P. Geo., our non-independent Qualified Person, reviewed and confirmed that the estimate satisfied S-K 1300 standards and remained accurate as of December 31, 2025.
47
Map: Location of the Ivory Coast Project within the country Ivory Coast.

The 2025 exploration program included plans for 4,500 m of diamond drilling as well as updated environmental and social baseline studies to support Project advancement toward a mining permit application. Approximately 840 m of exploration drilling were completed at the Mossikro Prospect 10 km to the south-southwest of the existing mineral resources. Drilling was also conducted to the southwest of the Samapleu Extension Deposit. The remaining drilling is anticipated to take place in 2026.
48
Alacrán Copper-Gold Project, Colombia (the “Alacrán Project”)
On July 31, 2017, we (then HPX) entered into an investment agreement with Cordoba. Under that agreement, Cordoba granted us a right to nominate directors to its board of directors based on our pro rata interest in Cordoba. The investment agreement provides for our nominees to the Cordoba board to be reduced to less than a majority of the directors if our ownership interest in Cordoba is diluted to below 50%, with further proportional reductions thereafter. Assuming the board of Cordoba is comprised of seven directors and we hold a 50% or greater interest in Cordoba, we are entitled to nominate four directors, with at least one of such nominees being independent. Assuming the board of Cordoba is to be comprised of seven directors and we hold a 50% or greater interest in Cordoba, we are entitled to nominate four, with at least one of such nominees being independent. We owned 60.8% of Cordoba as of December 31, 2025 and had nominated four directors to the Cordoba board: Quentin Markin, Jordan Neeser, Glen Kuntz and Terry Krepiakevich.
On May 8, 2023, Cordoba closed on a strategic arrangement with JCHX, whereby JCHX, through a wholly owned subsidiary, acquired a 50% ownership interest in CMH Colombia S.A.S. (“CMH”), a company existing under the laws of Colombia, for aggregate consideration of $100 million. As of July 4, 2025, JCHX had paid $100 million pursuant to the terms of the arrangement, including the final payment of $20 million received after waiving the condition of the approval of an Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) by the relevant Colombian Government authority.
On May 8, 2025, Cordoba, signed a definitive Framework Agreement for the sale of the Company’s remaining 50% interest in the Alacrán Copper Project to a consortium of investors including JCHX (“JCHX Consortium”), a 19.2% shareholder of Cordoba, for up to $128 million, consisting of $88 million in cash on closing, $12 million in a deferred payment, and up to $28 million in a contingent payment depending on the copper price at the time of commercial production. The closing of the transaction was contingent upon the approval of the EIA.
On February 10, 2026, the agreement was amended to, among other things, provide for the full $128 million purchase price to be paid at closing and remove any post-closing payments, waive the closing condition of an Environmental Impact Assessment, add a new closing condition of JCHX shareholder approval, and extend the outside date to March 10, 2026. Cordoba has also agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to distribute to its shareholders the net proceeds after satisfying all liabilities and obligations, subject to required approvals, such that $10 million will remain in Cordoba.
Following the closing of the transaction, Cordoba will continue to be a publicly listed company on the TSX Venture Exchange and will undertake a search for new business development opportunities. The Company will continue to hold the majority of Cordoba’s shares. See “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Operations — There is no guarantee that the sale transaction will close or the payments due under the agreement for the sale of Cordoba’s remaining interest in the Alacrán Copper Project will be received.”
The Alacrán Project is situated in the municipality of Puerto Libertador, which is approximately 390 km northwest of Bogotá, and 160 km north of Medellín in Colombia, amongst 22 mining concessions owned by CMH or its affiliates, of which, 5 licenses are part of the Alacran Project. Cordoba conducted several exploration programs between 2012 and 2023, consisting of geological mapping, geochemical sampling, geophysical surveys, and various drilling campaigns, that supported the completion of the technical studies in 2019, 2022 and 2023, which marks the beginning of the development phase for the Alacran Project.
49
Map: Location of the Alacrán Project within the country of Colombia.

The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimate for the Alacrán Project is set forth below, under the heading “Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves”. Glen Kuntz, P. Geo., our non-independent Qualified Person, reviewed and confirmed that the projected economics and the Mineral Resource estimate satisfied S-K 1300 standards and remained accurate as of December 31, 2025. Colin Shaw, P.E., our non-independent Qualified Person, reviewed and confirmed that the Mineral Reserve estimate satisfied S-K 1300 standards and remained accurate as of December 31, 2025.
50
Pinaya Copper-Gold Project, Peru (the “Pinaya Project”).
The Pinaya Project is 100% owned by Ivanhoe Electric through Ivanhoe Electric’s subsidiary Kaizen Discovery Peru (Kaizen). Kaizen filed an NI 43-101 technical report for the Pinaya Project, titled “Pinaya Gold-Copper Project Technical Report” and which was prepared jointly by Brian Cole, P.Kaizen has filed an NI 43-101 technical report for the Pinaya Project, titled “Pinaya Gold-Copper Project Technical Report” and which was prepared jointly by Brian Cole, P. Geo, and Ronald Simpson, P.Geo,, with an effective date of April 26, 2016 (“Pinaya Technical Report”), which is available on SEDAR. Scientific and technical information in this section regarding the Pinaya Project is based upon, or in some cases extracted from, the Pinaya Technical Report.
The Mineral Resource estimate for the Pinaya Project is set forth below, under the heading “Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves”. Ronald G. Simpson, P.Geo., an independent Qualified Person, reviewed and confirmed that the Mineral Resource estimate satisfied S-K 1300 standards and remained accurate as of December 31, 2025.
Map: Location of the Pinaya Project within the country of Peru.

51
Summary
Our portfolio of mineral exploration projects and equity investments are summarized in the tables below.
Table: United States Mineral Exploration Projects as of December 31, 2025.
52
Table: International Mineral Exploration Projects as of December 31, 2025.
53
Mineral Project Obligations and Payments
As described above, for many of our mineral projects, we do not own the underlying mineral titles or rights but maintain an option or a right to acquire such titles or rights. Such options or rights may be held through an option arrangement, an earn-in, or through the payment of deferred consideration.
The table below summarizes the cash payments that may be made in respect of each project. Commitments that are non-discretionary are payments we are required to make. Payments that are discretionary are payments that we are not required to make, but if we fail to make the payment in the amounts and when due, we will lose the rights associated with the project.
Table: Mineral Project Obligations and Payments 2026 - 2032, as at December 31, 2025 ($ thousands).Table: Mineral Project Obligations and Payments 2023 – 2032 as at December 31, 2022 ($ thousands)Computational GeosciencesOverview.
54
Mineral Resources and Reserves
Below is a summary table of estimated in situ Mineral Resources as at December 31, 2025, which are presented on an attributable basis, exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
Below is a summary table of estimated in situ Mineral Reserves as at December 31, 2025, which are presented on an attributable basis.
1S-K Preliminary Feasibility Study & Technical Report Summary, Santa Cruz Copper Project, Arizona, dated June 23, 2025 • The mineral resources in this estimate were independently prepared, including estimation and classification, by BBA USA Inc., and are reported in accordance with the definition for mineral resources in S-K 1300. • Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. and in accordance with the definitions for Mineral Resources in S-K 1300. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. • Mineral resources constrained assuming underground mining methods for the Santa Cruz deposit are reported at an NSR cutoff of US$32.00 for heap leach and US$34.00 for concentrator; Texaco deposit is reported at a NSR cutoff of US$32.00 for heap leach and US$34.00 for concentrator; and East Ridge deposit is reported at a NSR cutoff of US$40.00 for longhole stoping and US$50.00 for drift and fill. The cutoff reflects the total operating costs to define reasonable prospects for economic extraction by conventional underground mining methods. Material from within mineable shape-optimized wireframes has been included in the mineral
55
resource. Underground mineable shapes optimization parameters include a long-term copper price of US$4.00/lb, gold price of US$1,900/oz, and silver price of US$24.00/oz. Process costs of US$7.00 to US$9.00 per processed tonne; direct mining costs between US$22.00 to US$40.00 per processed tonne reflecting various mining method costs (leach, long hole or drift and fill), mining general and administration costs of US$2.63 per processed tonne, onsite processing costs between US$31.63 to US$49.63 per processed tonne, along with variable royalties between 5.01% to 6.96% NSR, and a mining recovery of 100%. • Mineral resources are estimated using metallurgical recoveries for heap leach of 96% for acid soluble copper, 83% for cyanide soluble copper, 22% for residual copper, 0% for gold and 0% for silver. Recoveries for concentrator are 0% for acid soluble copper, 90% for cyanide soluble copper, 90% for residual copper, 59% for gold, and 69% for silver. BBA, our independent Qualified Person, reviewed and confirmed that the Mineral Resource estimates presented in the table above remained accurate as of December 31, 2025.
2Kaizen Discovery Inc. Copper‐equivalent grade estimate based on $2.84/lb copper and $1,236/oz gold. Mineral Resources are reported at cut‐off grades of 0.25 g/t Au and 0.3% Cu Equivalent and average metallurgical recoveries of 80%. Mineral Resources are reported at cut-off grades of 0.25 g/t Au for the GOSZ and 0.3% Cu Equivalent for the WPZ and NWPZ zones. Ronald G. Simpson, P.Geo., an independent Qualified Person, reviewed and confirmed that the Mineral Resource estimates presented in the table above satisfy S-K 1300 standards and remained accurate as of December 31, 2025.
3Sama Nickel Corporation Inc. Assumptions include NSR Cut-off grade of $16.34/t milled; long-term metal prices of $3.75/lb Cu, $8.70/lb Ni, and $1,690/oz Au; mining costs of $1.68/t Saprolite, $2.26/t Fresh, $0.05/t incremental and $0.09/t sustaining capital, $13.02/t milled processing cost, $.3.32/t milled G&A, treatment charge of $105/t Cu concentrate and $346/t concentrate Ni; and metallurgical recoveries varied based on concentration and grade. Glen Kuntz, P.Geo., our non-independent Qualified Person, reviewed and confirmed that the Mineral Resource estimates presented in the table above satisfy S-K 1300 and in footnote 4 standards remained accurate as of December 31, 2025.
4Sama Nickel Corporation Inc. The Mineral Resource Estimate includes an inferred estimate for the Sipilou Sud laterite deposit including 2,095,000 tonnes of laterite at 1.75% nickel and 0.05% cobalt at a cut-off grade of 1.10% nickel. The deposit has an estimated 37,000 tonnes of nickel and 1,000 tonnes of cobalt.
5Cordoba Minerals Corp. NI 43-101 Technical Report & Feasibility Study, Alacrán Project, in Colombia, Mineral Resource effective December 18, 2023 - NSR cut-off grade varied from $2.08/t to $9.88/t milled based on processing, and G&A costs as well as the recoveries in different unit, long term metal prices of $3.80/lb Cu, $1,690/oz Au, and $22.50/oz Ag. Glen Kuntz, P.Geo., our non-independent Qualified Person, reviewed and confirmed that the Mineral Resource estimates presented in the table above satisfy S-K 1300 standards remained accurate as of December 31, 2025. Cordoba entered into an agreement to sell its remaining 50% interest in the Alacrán Project on May 8, 2025, which was amended on February 10, 2026.
6Total inferred Mineral Resources include an inferred estimate for the Sama Nickel Corporation Inc. Sipilou Sud laterite deposit including 2,095,000 tonnes of laterite at 1.75% nickel and 0.05% cobalt at a cut-off grade of 1.10% nickel. The deposit has an estimated 37,000 tonnes of nickel and 1,000 tonnes of cobalt.
7S-K Preliminary Feasibility Study & Technical Report Summary, Santa Cruz Copper Project, Arizona, dated June 23, 2025 • The mineral reserves were independently prepared, including estimation and classification, by BBA USA Inc. They are reported in accordance with the definitions for mineral reserves in S-K 1300. • The point of reference for the estimate is the point of delivery to the process facilities. • Mineral reserves are defined within stope designs that are prescribed by rock mechanics, considering the specific characteristics of deposits, mineral domains, mining methods, and the mining sequence. Transverse longhole stoping is the optimal mining method with uppers and cut & fill methods used where appropriate. Mining will occur in blocks, extracting ore from the bottom upwards, with paste backfill providing ground support to sustain a production rate of 20,000 tonnes per day for the first 15 years of operation. • Mineral reserves are estimated at an NSR cutoff value of $43.95/t for longhole stoping and $60/t for longitudinal retreat stopes and drift and fill. The NSR values reflect the discrete metallurgical responses for each mineral reserve block using metallurgical recoveries for heap leach of 96% for acid soluble copper, 83% for cyanide soluble copper, 22% for residual copper. Underground mineable shapes optimization parameters include a long-term copper price of US$4.00/lb. • Mineral reserves account for mining loss and dilution. 6. Mineral reserves are a subset of the indicated mineral resource and do not include the inferred mineral resource. • BBA, our independent Qualified Person, reviewed and confirmed that the Mineral Resource estimates presented in the table above remained accurate as of December 31, 2025.
8Cordoba Minerals Corp. NI 43-101 Technical Report & Feasibility Study, Alacran Project, in Colombia, Mineral Reserve effective October 21, 2021 - Open pit cut-off value varied from $2.07/t to $10.26/t milled based on processing, and G&A costs as well as the recoveries in different units. Long term metal prices of $3.80/lb Cu, $1,690/oz Au, and $22.50/oz Ag. Colin Shaw, P.E., our non-independent Qualified Person, reviewed and confirmed that the Mineral Reserve estimates presented in the table above satisfy S-K 1300 standards remained accurate as of December 31, 2025. Cordoba entered into an agreement to sell its remaining 50% interest in the Alacran Project on May 8, 2025, which was amended on February 10, 2026.
56
Typhoon™
We own, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, patents to a proprietary exploration technology known as Typhoon™. When we reference “our” Typhoon™ technology, we mean the technology that is covered by patents owned by our wholly-owned subsidiary Geo27, Inc. When we reference “our” Typhoon™ technology, we mean the technology that is owned by our wholly-owned subsidiary Geo27, Inc. (“Geo27”). We also are the exclusive worldwide licensee of certain technology in the field of geological survey for mineral exploration from I-Pulse Inc. We also are the exclusive worldwide licensee of certain technology from I-Pulse Inc. (“I-Pulse”). I-Pulse is the parent of our predecessor company, HPX. I-Pulse is the parent of our predecessor company, High Power Exploration Inc.
Typhoon™ is the brand name for our proprietary electrical geophysical surveying transmitter, which can detect the presence of sulfide minerals containing copper, nickel, gold and silver, as well as water and oil (although the Company does not hold any rights to water and oil exploration). The technology was developed by I-Pulse to unlock exploration in areas where potential deposits are hidden by cover, where target depths exceed the range of conventional geophysical surveying systems, or where the scale and topography of an exploration target area prevents efficient and cost-effective conventional work. Typhoon™ allows us to potentially discover deposits otherwise thought to be undetectable through conventional survey methods and technology.
We own the issued patents shown below. These patents cover certain aspects of our Typhoon™ technology. The actual protection afforded by these patents varies depending on the scope of coverage of each individual patent as well as the availability of legal remedies in each jurisdiction.
We believe the following specifications differentiate Typhoon™ from conventional geophysical systems:
•high current that is adjustable according to the depth and scale of the exploration target;
•high voltages that are also adjustable to overcome near-surface resistance;
•the ability to transmit both electromagnetic and direct current signals;
•extremely clean signal, which yields a high signal to noise ratio in recorded data;
•the ability to synchronize with multiple types of data receivers, so that the user can choose the receiver system most appropriate for the exploration environment; and
•three deployment configurations, from a large containerized system to a smaller lightweight system that is helicopter portable.
57
Figure: Schematic of Typhoon™ at work.

We currently have four 1st Generation Typhoon™ units and six 2nd Generation Typhoon™ units, which allow us to evaluate multiple prospects at any given time. Three of the 2nd Generation units are owned by the Saudi JVCo and used under license. One 2nd Generation unit is dedicated to the Exploration Alliance with BHP. A second 2nd Generation unit is dedicated to the Collaboration with SQM.
The data processing and artificial intelligence software developed by our subsidiary CGI complements our Typhoon™ technology and represents the only software product that can efficiently process the full spectrum of geophysical data produced by Typhoon™.
Computational Geosciences
CGI is headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. It was founded in 2010 in order to capitalize on advanced software technology developed at the University of British Columbia that was designed to improve mineral exploration. The technology has undergone significant improvements over the years and extended its market reach into the oil & gas sector as well as geothermal and water exploration activities. As of December 31, 2025, we owned 94.3% of CGI’s outstanding shares while 5.6% are equally held by CGI’s two co-founders. As of December 31, 2022, we owned 94.3% of CGI’s outstanding shares while 5.6% are equally held by CGI’s two co-founders. CGI was co-founded by Livia Mahler B.Sc., MBA, who currently serves as a Senior Business Advisor, and Dr., MBA, who currently serves as CGI’s Chief Executive Officer, and Dr. Eldad Haber Ph.D., who currently serves as CGI’s Chief Technology Officer, and is a professor at the University of British Columbia.
CGI’s technology consists of sophisticated software codes and artificial intelligence tools (“AI”). The software codes are used to process geophysical data (including that generated by Typhoon™) in order to build accurate 3D subsurface images that indicate the presence of various metals and minerals, as well as hydrocarbons, geothermal sources, and water reservoirs. The AI tools use machine learning networks and proprietary deep-learning algorithms that analyze vast amounts of geoscientific data to generate prospectivity maps for greenfields and brownfields mineral exploration.
CGI provides fee-for-service and software licensing agreements to customers in the area of critical minerals, energy and water exploration. CGI provides fee-for-service and software licensing agreements to customers in the area of critical minerals, energy and water exploration. CGI’s services apply its geophysical data inversion codes on geophysical data (included that of Typhoon™) collected by third party data acquirers as well as other sources such as public or private libraries, in order to construct and refine 3D subsurface images.CGI’s services apply its geophysical data inversion codes on a geophysical data (included that of Typhoon™) collected by third party data acquirers as well as other sources such as public or private libraries, in order to construct and refine 3D subsurface images. These services help CGI’s customers in geophysical survey design through more accurately identifying potential resource targets for exploration while minimizing the operational footprint of those exploration activities. CGI also offers mineral prospectivity mapping services which are based on deep learning AI algorithms to help identify and rank prospective areas for critical minerals. In order to prepare diverse layers for AI algorithms, CGI uses unique tools such as data augmentation for sparse, unstructured data which enhance the results and provide critical knowledge of the subsurface for clients.
CGI applies its services not only to mineral projects but also to the global energy industry and in the search for underground water resources.52Table of ContentsCGI applies its services to not only mineral projects but also to the global energy industry and in the search for underground water resources. In the energy sector, CGI has independently developed and collaborated to deploy a real-time 3D inversion service for resistivity logging-while-drilling (“LWD”) data, significantly optimizing well placement and well
58
completion designs to maximize reservoir productivity. CGI is also able to monitor fluid substitution within reservoirs, whether for enhanced oil recovery or carbon capture and storage. With respect to the identification of underground water resources, CGI’s technology can also be deployed to predict prospective areas or delineate known water aquifers.
CGI does not patent its software codes. CGI does not patent its software codes. CGI owns, maintains and develops codes for magnetics, gravity, DC/IP and electromagnetics. CGI is actively engaged in research and development, and its staff regularly participate in international conferences as authors and co-authors of scientific papers.
CGI’s intention is to grow its client base in the mining and energy sectors for existing geophysical inversion and AI-based services in order to increase its revenue from third-party sources. CGI’s intention is to grow its client base in the mining sector for existing geophysical inversion and AI based services in order to increase its revenue from third party sources. CGI is actively working on enhancing geophysical inversion codes to improve the accuracy and efficiency of data quality control and to facilitate advanced inversion of Multiphysics datasets. On the AI front, CGI continues to improve the prospectivity mapping approach with new architectures and improved vector outputs. CGI is also building large geoscience databases from vast amounts of publicly available data in various countries and regions of the world in order to use these datasets to map minerals, water, geothermal and other targets. CGI competes with geophysical data processors, airborne and ground surveyors, off-shore surveyors, and AI service providers. These include companies such as TechnoImaging, LLC, Geotech Ltd., Quantec Geoscience, KoBold Metals, ALS (Geoanalytics), and VRIFY.
VRB Energy - Vanadium Redox Flow Technology
In October 31, 2024, VRB Energy, a 90% owned subsidiary of Ivanhoe Electric, closed on a transaction providing for the creation of a 49%/51% joint venture (“VRB Transaction”) between VRB Energy and China Energy Storage Industry Co., Ltd. (“Red Sun”), a subsidiary of privately held Shanxi Red Sun Co., Ltd. Following the VRB Transaction, VRB Energy owns a 49% interest in the joint venture (“VRB China Joint Venture”), which manufactures, develops and sells vanadium redox flow batteries for Asian, African and Middle Eastern markets.
VRB Energy is also growing and developing its 100% owned subsidiary, VRB USA, an Arizona-based business focused on the development and manufacture of advanced grid-scale energy storage systems utilizing vanadium redox flow batteries for integration with renewable power sources. VRB USA is currently progressing the build-out of a VRB assembly facility in Mesa, Arizona.
Pursuant to the VRB Transaction, the VRB China Joint Venture was to receive approximately $35.2 million from Red Sun in six tranches by the end of 2025, which was received as of September 30, 2025. In addition, pursuant to the agreement, VRB Energy was due to receive $20 million from Red Sun in two equal tranches, to be completed by June 30, 2025. On February 12, 2025, VRB Energy received the first tranche payment. The second tranche payment is overdue and VRB Energy sent Red Sun a demand letter for prompt payment of the amounts owing and is exploring its options for recourse.
The current commercial platform of both VRB China Joint Venture and VRB USA is the Third Generation Vanadium Redox Battery Energy Storage System (“Gen3 VRB-ESS”). The Gen3 VRB-ESS is a commercially validated system that presents a superior solution for grid-scale utility storage compared to existing lithium-ion batteries. We believe VRB-ESS® batteries deliver better levelized cost of storage with superior safety characteristics compared to lithium-ion battery systems. In 2023 VRB’s 1MW power module and 60kW cell stacks were certified to Underwriters Laboratories (“UL”) UL1973 product safety standards. UL 1973 is recognized as a global standard for commercially available battery energy storage.
The growing demand for renewable energy sources and for systems that can be developed quickly in response to rising demand from datacenters and large commercial and industrial customers is expected to drive the demand for long-duration, long-lasting, safe and reliable vanadium flow batteries as a superior solution to lithium-ion batteries for grid scale energy storage. We believe VRB-ESS® batteries are well-positioned to meet this growing demand as they can be charged and discharged over an almost unlimited number of cycles without wearing out and causing deterioration of the vanadium electrolyte, providing the lowest lifecycle cost of energy of any type of grid scale energy storage. In addition, VRB Energy’s proprietary water-based electrolyte is non-flammable and 100% reusable, presenting a safe solution for customers.
59
Figure: VRB-ESS® System Overview

60
Environmental, Health, and Safety Matters
We are committed to creating and enforcing a workplace environment that prioritizes the health and safety of our employees and partners, complies with laws and regulations, and establishes leading practices to promote environmental stewardship and responsible operating procedures. As part of that commitment, in 2024 our Board of Directors established a Health, Safety and Environmental Committee and adopted a Health, Safety and Environmental Policy to establish the framework to help us protect the health and safety of our employees and partners, minimize environmental impacts, and conduct business activities with respect and integrity. In 2025, the Health, Safety and Environmental Committee oversaw the Company’s key health, safety, environmental and social policies and related risks, opportunities and matters affecting the Company’s business.
We are required to comply with numerous environmental laws, regulations and permits in connection with exploration, construction and development work for our projects. We are focused on conducting our mining operations in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. We endeavor to conduct our mining operations in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
Human Capital
We promote the health, safety and well-being of our workforce and strive to further strengthen our commitment to promoting an inclusive and diverse workplace. We believe our workforce is the foundation of our success. Our Board of Directors oversees our policies and implementation programs that govern our approach to management of our human capital, with the HS&E and Compensation and Nominating Committees having oversight of human capital matters, including those relating to health and safety, executive recruitment, retention and development, pay equity, and inclusion and diversity.
As of December 31, 2025, Ivanhoe Electric and its subsidiaries had 286 full time employees. We consider our relationship with our employees to be strong. None of our employees are represented by a labor union or party to a collective bargaining agreement.
History
For a full discussion of the general development of the Company’s business, see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, which is incorporated by reference.
Corporate Information
We were incorporated in the State of Delaware in July 2020. Our principal executive offices are located at 450 E. Rio Salado Parkway, Suite 130, Tempe, Arizona, and our telephone number is (480) 656-5821. Our website address is ivanhoeelectric.com.
Available Information
We make available, free of charge, on our website at ivanhoeelectric.com our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to such reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. We do not incorporate the information on or accessible through our website into this Annual Report, and you should not consider any information on, or that can be accessed through, our website a part of this Annual Report or any other filing we make with the SEC.
All such reports are also available free of charge via EDGAR through the SEC website at www.sec.gov.
61
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following risks and uncertainties may have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, or stock price. You should consider these risks and uncertainties carefully, together with all of the other information contained in this Annual Report, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. The risks and uncertainties described below may not be the only ones we face. If any of the risks or uncertainties we face were to occur, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. This Annual Report also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of factors that are described below and elsewhere in this report. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
Risks Related to our Mining Businesses and the Mining Industry
We operate no mines, and the exploration and development of our mineral projects into mines is highly speculative in nature, may be unsuccessful, and may never result in the development of an operating mine.
We operate no mines. Mineral exploration and mine development are highly speculative in nature, involve many uncertainties and risks and are frequently unsuccessful.Mineral exploration and mine development are highly speculative in nature, involve many uncertainties and risks and are frequently unsuccessful. Few mineral properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines even if mineralization is identified. Most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable Ore deposits, and anticipated levels of recovery of Mineral Resources and mineral reserves, if any, may not be realized, nor may any identified mineral deposit ever be a commercially mineable (or viable) Ore Body which can be legally and economically exploited. Most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable Ore deposits, and anticipated levels of recovery of mineral resources and mineral 60Table of Contentsreserves, if any, may not be realized, nor may any identified mineral deposit ever be a commercially mineable (or viable) Ore Body which can be legally and economically exploited. Our exploration programs and activities may therefore not result in the discovery, development or production of a commercially viable Ore Body or mine. Currently, the Santa Cruz Copper Project and the Alacrán Project are our only projects with mineral reserves. As previously disclosed, the amended Cordoba agreement sets the outside date for the close on the sale of Cordoba’s remaining 50% of the Alacrán Project to March 10, 2026.
Even if mineralization is discovered, that mineralization may not be economic to mine. Significant time and expenditures are typically required to establish economic mineralization in the form of mineral reserves, to determine processes to extract the metals and, if required, to construct mining, processing, and tailing facilities and obtain the rights to the land and the resources (including capital) required to develop the mining operation. In addition, if we discover mineralization that becomes a mineral reserve, it will take several years to a decade or more from the initial phases of exploration until production is possible. During this time, the economic feasibility of production may change. As a result of these uncertainties, we may not be able to successfully develop a commercially viable producing mine.
Whether developing a producing mine is economically feasible will depend upon numerous additional factors, most of which are beyond our control, including the availability and cost of required development capital and labor, movement in the price of commodities, securing and maintaining title to mining tenements, as well as obtaining all necessary consents, permits and approvals for the development of the mine. The economic feasibility of mine development projects is based upon many factors, including the accuracy of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates; metallurgical recoveries; capital and operating costs; government regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting and environmental protection; and metal prices, which are highly volatile. The economic feasibility of mine development projects is based upon many factors, including the accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates; metallurgical recoveries; capital and operating costs; government regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, importing and exporting and environmental protection; and metal prices, which are highly volatile. Development projects are also subject to the successful completion of feasibility studies, issuance of necessary governmental permits and availability of adequate financing. Any of these factors may result in us being unable to successfully develop a commercially viable operating mine, needing to write-off part or all of our investment in our existing properties or needing to acquire additional properties. Any of these factors may result in us being unable to successfully develop a commercially viable operating mine.
We have no history of mineral production and may never engage in mineral production.
Many of our mineral projects are at the exploration stage and have never been mined by us nor have we produced any revenue from mining operations. All of our mineral projects are at the exploration stage and have never been mined by us nor have we produced any revenue from mining operations. We also have no operating history upon which to base estimates of future operating costs, capital spending requirements, site remediation or reclamation costs or asset retirement obligations. Our company has no experience in developing or operating a mine. We may never develop and produce minerals from a commercially viable Ore Body or mine.
62
We have a history of negative operating cash flows and net losses and we may never achieve or sustain profitability.
We have a history of negative operating cash flows and net losses. We expect to continue to incur negative operating cash flows and net losses until such time as one or more of our mineral projects or other businesses generate sufficient revenues to fund our continuing operations. Given our history of negative operating cash flows and net losses, and expected future negative operating cash flows from operating activities and net losses, we expect to fund our continuing operations through the issuance of common stock to the public or other investors.
We may never achieve or sustain profitability. In addition, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors that may adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and achieve or sustain profitability. Our failure to achieve or sustain profitability could depress our market value, could impair our ability to execute our business plan, raise capital, explore or develop our mineral projects or continue our operations, and could cause our stockholders to lose all or part of their investment.
The Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve calculations for our projects are only estimates and may not reflect the amount of minerals that may ultimately be extracted from those projects.The mineral resource calculations made at our material mineral projects and other projects are only estimates and may not reflect the amount of minerals that may ultimately be extracted from those projects.
Any figures presented for Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves in this Annual Report and those which may be presented in the future are and will only be estimates and depend on geological interpretation and statistical inferences or assumptions drawn from drilling and sampling analysis, which might prove to be materially inaccurate.Any figures presented for mineral resources in this Annual Report and those which may be presented in the future are and will only be estimates and depend on geological interpretation and statistical inferences or assumptions drawn from drilling and sampling analysis, which might prove to be materially inaccurate. There is a degree of uncertainty attributable to the calculation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves. There is a degree of uncertainty attributable to the calculation of mineral resources. Until Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves are actually mined and processed, the quantity of metal and grades are considered as estimates only and the estimated levels of metals contained within such Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates may not actually be produced. Until mineral resources are actually mined and processed, the quantity of metal and grades are considered as estimates only and the estimated levels of metals contained within such mineral resource estimates may not actually be produced.
The estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves is a subjective process that is partially dependent upon the judgment of the persons preparing the estimates.The estimation of mineral resources (as well as mineral reserves) is a subjective process that is partially dependent upon the judgment of the persons preparing the estimates. The process relies on the quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge, mining experience, statistical analysis of drilling results and industry practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly change when new information becomes available. Estimates of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves can also be affected by such factors as environmental permitting regulations and requirements, weather, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, the metallurgy of the mineralization forming the mineral deposit, unusual or unexpected geological formations and work interruptions.
Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates may change adversely and such changes may negatively impact the viability of developing a mineral project into a mine.
Estimated Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves may have to be recalculated based on changes in commodity prices, further exploration or development activity, loss or change in permits or actual production experience.Estimated mineral resources (and mineral reserves) may have to be recalculated based on changes in commodity prices, further exploration or development activity, loss or change in permits or actual production experience. Such changes could materially and adversely affect estimates of the volume or grade of mineralization, estimated recovery rates or other important factors that influence Mineral Resource estimates. The extent to which our Mineral Resources may ultimately be reclassified as mineral reserves depends on the demonstration of their profitable recovery and economic mineability. The extent to which our mineral resources may ultimately be reclassified as mineral reserves depends on the demonstration of their profitable recovery and economic mineability.
In addition, Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve estimates have been determined and valued based on assumed future metal prices, cut-off grades, and capital and operating costs that may prove to be inaccurate. Extended declines in the market price for minerals such as copper, gold, nickel and silver may render portions of our mineralization uneconomic and result in reduced reported volume and grades, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance, financial position and results of operations, as well as a reduction in the amount of Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves. Extended declines in the market price for minerals such as copper, nickel, vanadium, cobalt, platinum group elements, gold and silver may render portions of our mineralization uneconomic and result in reduced reported volume and grades, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance, financial position and results of operations, as well as a reduction in the amount of mineral resources. In addition, Inferred Mineral Resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and their economic and legal feasibility. You should not assume that any part of an Inferred Mineral Resource will be upgraded to a higher category or that any of the Mineral Resources will be reclassified as Mineral Reserves. In addition, it may not be possible to economically mine or process any of our Mineral Resources.
Material changes in Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves, if any, grades, stripping ratios or Recovery Rates may affect the economic viability of any project.Material changes in mineral resources, if any, grades, stripping ratios or Recovery Rates may affect the economic viability of any project. Our future growth and productivity will depend, in part, on our ability to successfully develop and maintain commercially mineable mineral deposits at our existing properties or identify and
63
acquire other commercially mineable mineral deposits, as well as on the costs of and results of continued exploration and potential development programs at our mineral projects.
Lack of reliability and inaccuracies of historical information could hinder our exploration plans.
We have relied on, and some disclosure in our technical reports is based, in part, upon historical data compiled by previous parties involved with our mining projects.We have relied on, and some disclosure in the Santa Cruz and Tintic Technical Reports is based, in part, upon historical data compiled by previous parties involved with our mining projects. To the extent that any such historical data is inaccurate or incomplete, our exploration plans may be adversely affected. To the extent that any of such historical data is inaccurate or incomplete, our exploration plans may be adversely affected.
The prices of the minerals for which we are principally exploring change on a daily basis, and a substantial or extended decline in the prices of these minerals could materially and adversely affect our ability to raise capital, conduct exploration activities, and develop or operate a mine.
Our business and financial performance will be significantly affected by fluctuations in the prices of the key minerals we are principally exploring for (copper, nickel, gold, cobalt, platinum group elements, and silver). The prices of these minerals are volatile, can fluctuate substantially, and are affected by numerous factors that are beyond our control, including prevailing interest rates and returns on other asset classes; expectations regarding inflation, monetary policy and currency values; speculative activities; governmental and foreign exchange rate decisions; decisions regarding the creation and disposal of mineral stockpiles; political and economic conditions; structural changes in demand including electrification; the availability and costs of metal substitutes; the location and the demand for products containing these key minerals; technological changes and changes in industrial processes, as well as economic slow-downs or recessions.
We cannot predict the effect of these factors on mineral prices. Significant and/or prolonged reductions in prices for these minerals would materially and adversely affect our ability to raise capital, and if not considered viable for exploration activities, would cause us to delay, halt or stop exploration and development activities altogether. If we are operating a producing mine at the time of such a reduction in prices, we would expect to suffer decreasing revenues and profitability which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition and may cause us to suspend or cease mining operations.
Significant and/or prolonged increase in prices for these minerals may decrease the demand for these minerals and increase the demand for substitute minerals. A fall in demand could also decrease the price for these minerals, thereby reducing the attractiveness of conducting exploration activities for these minerals. A fall in demand may also adversely affect our ability to raise capital and develop or operate a mine. In addition, an increase in worldwide supply, and consequent downward pressure on prices, may result over the longer term from increased mineral production from mines developed or expanded as a result of current metal price levels.
Title to surface and mineral rights within some of our projects may be uncertain or defective, and for certain of our projects, we do not own all of the mineral or surface rights
At certain of our projects we only own some of the mineral and surface rights. At the Tintic Project, the rights we do not own are held under option agreements or purchase agreements in respect of which title has not yet transferred to us. At the Tintic Project, five vendors continue to hold title to the remaining subsurface and surface rights, pending us making all required payments within the time required. At the Tintic Project, five vendors continue to hold title to the majority of subsurface and surface rights, pending us making all required payments within the time required. At Hog Heaven, the project is subject to an option to earn-in agreement with Brixton metals, and certain parcels on the project have surface and mineral rights under lease from other private parties. At Gleeson, we have four leases with option to purchase, and at the Globe-Miami and Lomitas Negras projects, we have option agreements with the right to acquire 100% of the projects over an eight-year option period by making annual payments and exploration expenditures. If we do not make all the option or purchase agreement payments when due, or fail to pay the total amount to the owners, we will lose our right to acquire the subsurface mineral or surface rights at these projects.
At times, the owners of mineral and surface rights may be unable or unwilling to fulfill their contractual obligations to us.At times, the owners of subsurface mineral and surface rights may be unable or unwilling to fulfill their contractual obligations to us. In addition, our option agreements and purchase agreements are often complex and may be subject to interpretation or uncertainties. The owners of mineral and surface rights and other counterparties may interpret our interests in a manner adverse to us. The owners of subsurface mineral and surface rights and other counterparties may interpret our interests in a manner adverse to us. For these or other reasons, we could be forced to expend resources or take legal action to enforce our contractual rights. We may not be successful in enforcing our contractual rights. We may also need to expend significant monetary and human resources to defend our position. Such disputes to enforce our contractual rights could have adverse effects on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
64
Title to our properties may also be challenged, and we may not have, or may not be able to obtain, all necessary surface rights to develop a property. An unknown title defect on any of our mineral projects (or any portion thereof) could adversely affect our ability to explore, develop and/or mine the projects and/or process the minerals that we mine in the future. In addition to termination, failure to make timely tenement maintenance payments and otherwise comply with applicable laws, regulations and local practices relating to mineral right applications and tenure could result in reduction or expropriation of entitlements.
Our indebtedness and grant of security interests in certain of our assets could adversely affect our business.
We have incurred indebtedness and may incur further indebtedness from time to time, which may be secured, including the Deed of Trust in connection with the credit facility we entered into with a banking syndicate comprised of National Bank of Canada, Societe Generale and Bank of Montreal Many of our mineral properties are in the exploration stage and we have no sources of revenue from which to pay indebtedness until they commence production. If we are unable to pay existing or future indebtedness when due, the holders will have rights against us, and in the case of secured indebtedness, the holders may potentially seize or sell the assets subject to the security interest. Any failure to timely meet our obligations under these instruments may adversely affect our assets, results of operations and future prospects.
Actual capital costs, operating costs, production and economic returns may differ significantly from those we have anticipated and future development activities may not result in profitable mining operations.
The actual operating costs at any mineral project that we are able to develop into an operating mine will depend upon changes in the availability and prices of labor, equipment and infrastructure, general inflation in the economy, variances in Ore recovery and mining rates from those assumed in any mining plan that may be generated, operational risks, changes in governmental regulation, including taxation, environmental, permitting and other regulations and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.The actual operating costs at any mineral project that we are able to develop into an operating mine will depend upon changes in the availability and prices of labor, equipment and infrastructure, variances in Ore recovery and mining rates from those assumed in any mining plan that may be generated, operational risks, changes in governmental regulation, including taxation, environmental, permitting and other regulations and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. Due to any of these or other factors, the operating costs at the Santa Cruz Copper Project or other projects may be significantly higher than those set forth in the PFS or any other Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility Study that we may ultimately prepare and use as a basis for construction of a mine. Due to any of these or other factors, the operating costs at any such future mine may be significantly higher than those set forth in the pre-feasibility or Feasibility Study we may ultimately prepare and will use as a basis for construction of a mine. As a result of higher capital and operating costs, production and economic returns may differ significantly from those set forth in such studies and any future development activities may not result in profitable mining operations.
We are or will be required to obtain, maintain and renew environmental, construction and mining permits, which is often a costly and time-consuming process and ultimately may not be possible to achieve.
Mineral exploration and mining companies, including ours, need many environmental, construction and mining permits, each of which can be time-consuming and costly to obtain, maintain and renew, and which become more numerous as activities advance from exploration to mine development and construction and finally to mining operations. To obtain, maintain and renew certain permits, we have been and may in the future be required to conduct environmental studies, and make associated presentations to governmental authorities pertaining to the potential impact of our current and future activities upon the environment and to take steps to avoid or mitigate those impacts. Permit terms and conditions can impose restrictions on how we conduct our activities and limit our flexibility in exploring our mineral projects and in how we may develop them into mines in the future.
Many of our permits are subject to renewal from time to time, and applications for renewal may be denied or the renewed permits may contain more restrictive conditions than our existing permits, including those governing impacts on the environment. We may be required to obtain new permits to expand our activities, and the grant of such permits may be subject to an expansive governmental review of our operations.
We may not be successful in obtaining all such permits, which could prevent us from commencing, continuing or expanding operations or otherwise adversely affect our business. Renewal of existing permits or obtaining new permits may be more difficult if we are not able to comply with our existing permits. Applications for permits, permit area expansions and permit renewals can also be subject to challenge by interested parties, which can delay or prevent receipt of needed permits. The permitting process can vary by jurisdiction in terms of its complexity and likely outcomes. The applicable laws and regulations, and the related judicial interpretations and enforcement policies change frequently, which can make it difficult for us to obtain and renew permits and to comply with applicable requirements. Accordingly, permits required for our activities may not be issued, maintained or renewed in a timely fashion or at all, may be issued or renewed upon conditions that restrict our ability to conduct our operations economically, or may be subsequently revoked. Any such
65
failure to obtain, maintain or renew permits, or other permitting delays or conditions, including in connection with any environmental impact analyses, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We are subject to environmental and health and safety laws, regulations and permits that may subject us to material costs, liabilities and obligations, including land reclamation and exploration restoration requirements.
We are subject to environmental, health and safety laws, regulations and permits in the various jurisdictions in which we operate, including those relating to, among other things, the removal and extraction of natural resources, the emission and discharge of materials into the environment, including plant and wildlife protection, remediation of soil and groundwater contamination, reclamation and closure of properties, including tailings and waste storage facilities, groundwater quality and availability, and the handling, storage, transport and disposal of wastes and hazardous materials.We are subject to environmental laws, regulations and permits in the various jurisdictions in which we operate, including those relating to, among other things, the removal and extraction of natural resources, the emission and discharge of materials into the environment, including plant and wildlife protection, remediation of soil and groundwater contamination, reclamation and closure of properties, including Tailings and waste storage facilities, groundwater quality and availability, and the handling, storage, transport and disposal of wastes and hazardous materials. Failure to comply with these environmental, health and safety requirements may expose us to litigation, fines or other sanctions, including the revocation of permits and suspension of operations. Failure to comply with these environmental requirements may expose us to litigation, fines or other sanctions, including the revocation of permits and suspension of operations. We expect to continue to incur significant capital and other compliance costs related to such requirements. These laws, regulations and permits, and the enforcement and interpretation thereof, change frequently and generally have become more stringent over time. If our noncompliance with such regulations were to result in a release of hazardous materials into the environment, such as soil or groundwater, we could be required to remediate such contamination, which could be costly. Moreover, noncompliance could subject us to private claims for property damage or personal injury based on exposure to hazardous materials or unsafe working conditions. In addition, changes in applicable requirements or stricter interpretation of existing requirements may result in costly compliance requirements or otherwise subject us to future liabilities. The occurrence of any of the foregoing, as well as any new environmental, health and safety laws and regulations applicable to our business or stricter interpretation or enforcement of existing laws and regulations, could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
We also could be liable for any environmental contamination at, under or released from our or our predecessors’ currently or formerly owned or operated properties or third-party waste disposal sites. Certain environmental laws impose joint and several strict liability for releases of hazardous substances at such properties or sites, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct. A generator of waste can be held responsible for contamination resulting from the treatment or disposal of such waste at any off-site location (such as a landfill), regardless of whether the generator arranged for the treatment or disposal of the waste in compliance with applicable laws. Costs associated with liability for removal or remediation of contamination or damage to natural resources could be substantial and liability under these laws may attach without regard to whether the responsible party knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of the contaminants. Accordingly, we may be held responsible for more than our share of the contamination or other damages, up to and including the entire amount of such damages. In addition to potentially significant investigation and remediation costs, such matters can give rise to claims from governmental authorities and other third parties, including for orders, inspections, fines or penalties, natural resource damages, personal injury, property damage, toxic torts and other damages.
Our costs, liabilities and obligations relating to environmental matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.
Our future capital and operating cost estimates at any of our mining projects may not be accurate.
The capital and operating cost estimates we may make in respect of our mineral projects that we intend to develop or ultimately develop into operating mines may not prove to be accurate. Capital and operating cost estimates are typically set out in Pre-Feasibility or Feasibility Studies and are based on the interpretation of geological data, cost of consumables, cost of capital, labor costs, transportation costs, mining and processing costs, anticipated climatic conditions, the costs of taxes, duties and royalties, permitting and restrictions or production quotas on exportation of minerals) and title claims, and other factors which may be considered at the time the estimates are made and will be based on information prevailing at that time. Capital and operating cost estimates are typically set 65Table of Contentsout in Feasibility Studies and are based on the interpretation of geological data, cost of consumables, cost of capital, labor costs, transportation costs, mining and processing costs, anticipated climatic conditions, the costs of taxes, duties and royalties, permitting and restrictions or production quotas on exportation of minerals) and title claims, and other factors which may be considered at the time the estimates are made and will be based on information prevailing at that time. Any of the following events, among the other uncertainties and risks described in this Annual Report, could affect the ultimate accuracy of such estimates:
•unanticipated changes in grade and tonnage of Ore to be mined and processed;
•incorrect data on which engineering assumptions are made;
•delays in construction schedules;
•delays in the ramp-up of the rate of operations;
66
•unanticipated transportation costs;
•the accuracy of major equipment and construction cost estimates;
•labor negotiations and labor availability;
•changes in government regulation, including regulations regarding greenhouse gas emissions;
•changes in the cost of consumables;
•changes in the general rate of inflation in the economy;
•changes in royalty, duty, and tax rates;
•permitting costs and requirements; and
•general demand for skilled labor, steel, cement, industrial equipment and other components required for mining, any of which could cause material and adverse changes to our future capital and operating costs.
We may face opposition from organizations that oppose mining which may disrupt or delay our mining projects.
There is an increasing level of public concern relating to the effects of both mineral exploration and mining on the natural landscape, in communities and on the environment.There is an increasing level of public concern relating to the effects of mining on the natural landscape, in communities and on the environment. Certain non-governmental organizations, community groups, public interest groups and reporting organizations (“NGOs”) that oppose resource development are vocal critics of the mining industry. Certain non-governmental organizations, public interest groups and reporting organizations (“NGOs”) that oppose resource development can be vocal critics of the mining industry. In addition, there have been many instances in which local community groups have opposed resource extraction activities, which have resulted in disruption and delays to the relevant operation, and in some cases halted development altogether. NGOs or local community organizations could direct adverse publicity against and/or disrupt and/or halt our operations in respect of one or more of our mineral properties regardless of our successful compliance with social and environmental best practices, due to political factors, activities of unrelated third parties on lands in which we have an interest, or our operations specifically. NGOs or local community organizations could direct adverse publicity against and/or disrupt our operations in respect of one or more of our properties, regardless of our successful compliance with social and environmental best practices, due to political factors, activities of unrelated third parties on lands in which we have an interest or our operations specifically. Any such actions and the resulting media coverage could have an adverse effect on our reputation and financial condition or our relationships with the communities in which we operate, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.
Our operations involve significant risks and hazards inherent to the mining industry.
Our operations involve the operation of large machines, heavy mobile equipment and drilling equipment. Hazards such as adverse environmental conditions, unusual or unexpected geological formations, metallurgical and other processing problems, industrial accidents, cave-ins, mechanical equipment failure, facility performance problems, fire and natural phenomena such as inclement weather conditions, excessive heat, floods, landslides and earthquakes are inherent risks in our activities. These hazards inherent to the mining industry can cause injuries or death to employees, contractors or other persons at our mineral projects, severe damage to and destruction of our property, plant and equipment, and contamination of, or damage to, the environment, and can result in the suspension of our exploration activities and future development and mine production activities. The occurrence of any of these events may delay, prevent, hinder or stop exploration and development activities altogether on any mineral project, and once in operation may cause mining activities to be suspended or cease altogether.
In addition, from time to time we may be subject to governmental investigations and claims and litigation filed on behalf of persons who are harmed while at our properties or otherwise in connection with our activities. To the extent that we are subject to personal injury or other claims or lawsuits in the future, it may not be possible to predict the ultimate outcome of these claims and lawsuits due to the nature of personal injury litigation. Similarly, if we are subject to governmental investigations or proceedings, we may incur significant penalties and fines, and enforcement actions against us could result in our being required to stop exploration and development activities or to close future mining operations. Similarly, if we are subject to governmental investigations or proceedings, we may incur significant penalties and fines, and enforcement actions against 66Table of Contentsus could result in our being required to stop exploration and development activities or to close future mining operations. If claims and lawsuits or governmental investigations or proceedings are ultimately resolved against us, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.
A significant portion of any future mining revenue from our operations is expected to come from a small number of mines.•A significant portion of any future revenue from our operations is expected to come from a small number of mines.
If and when we begin generating revenue from future mining operations, a significant portion of our revenue is expected to come from a small number of mines or even a single mine, which means that adverse developments at these properties could have a more significant or lasting impact on our results of operations than if our revenue was less concentrated.If and when we begin generating revenue from future mining operations, a significant portion of our revenue is expected to come from a small number of mines, which means that adverse developments at these properties could have a more significant or lasting impact on our results of operations than if our revenue was less concentrated.
67
Joint ventures and other partnerships in relation to our properties may expose us to risks.
We have in the past entered into, are currently party to, and may in the future enter into, joint ventures or similar arrangements, such as our current joint ventures and collaborations with Maaden, SQM, BHP, Sama, and Red Sun, or other arrangements with parties in relation to the exploration, development, and production of certain of the properties in which we have an interest. Joint ventures may allow our joint venture partners to take important actions without our approval or may require unanimous approval of the parties to the joint venture or their representatives for certain fundamental decisions, such as budgeting and capital expenditures, an increase or reduction of registered capital, merger, division, dissolution, amendments of constating documents, enforcement of intellectual property, litigation, the disposition of joint venture assets, and the pledge of joint venture assets, which means that each joint venture party may have a veto right with respect to such decisions, which could lead to a deadlock in the operations of the joint venture or partnership or our joint venture partner may be able to take actions with which we disagree. We may be unable to exert control over strategic decisions made in respect of such joint ventures or similar arrangements. Joint ventures and similar arrangements may also impose financial, operational and other requirements on each of the parties. Any failure of us or such other companies to meet our and their respective obligations or to provide additional funding when required, or any disputes with respect to the parties’ respective rights and obligations, could have a material adverse effect on the joint ventures or their business and, therefore, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial performance, cash flows and the price of our common stock.
We operate in a highly competitive industry.
The mining industry is highly competitive. Much of our competition is from larger, established mining companies with greater liquidity, greater access to credit and other financial resources, newer or more efficient equipment, lower cost structures, more effective risk management policies, more staff and equipment, and procedures and/or a greater ability than us to withstand losses. We also face competition from smaller mining companies looking to stake or acquire prospective mineral properties that we may also be seeking to acquire. Our competitors may be able to respond more quickly to new laws or regulations or emerging technologies, or devote greater resources to the expansion or efficiency of their operations than we can, or expend greater amounts of resources, including capital, in acquiring new and prospective mining projects. In addition, current and potential competitors may make strategic acquisitions or establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties. Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or alliances among current and new competitors may emerge and gain new or prospective properties or mines or significant market share to our detriment. Accordingly, it is possible that new competitors or alliances among current and new competitors may emerge and gain significant market share to our detriment. We may not be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors, and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Increases in demand for, and cost of, exploration, development and construction services and equipment may have a material adverse effect on our business.
The relative strength of metal prices in past years has encouraged increases in mineral exploration, development and construction activities around the world, which has resulted in increased demand for, and cost of, exploration, development and construction services and equipment. Increased demand for, and cost of, services and equipment could result in delays if services or equipment cannot be obtained in a timely manner due to inadequate availability, and may cause scheduling difficulties due to the need to coordinate the availability of services or equipment, any of which could materially increase project exploration, development and/or construction costs or could result in material delays or other operational challenges.
Failure to make mandatory payments required under earn-in, option and similar arrangements related to mineral projects may result in a loss of our opportunity and/or right to acquire an interest in such mineral projects.
We have interests in, or rights to acquire interests in, a number of mineral projects through earn-in arrangements, options and similar agreements with the owner of the mineral project. These arrangements typically require us to commit to meet certain expenditure requirements on the mineral project and/or to pay certain fees to the mineral project owner, each within specified time frames. These arrangements typically require us to commit to 67Table of Contentsmeet certain expenditure requirements on the mineral project and/or to pay certain fees to the mineral project owner, each within specified time frames. If we comply with the terms of such arrangements and make the required payments within the time periods required, we would then earn an interest in the project directly or in an entity that holds the legal title to the mineral project. Such arrangements are common in the mining industry and are often staged, with the company that is earning-in, earning an interest in the project at various stages and over various timeframes, resulting in a joint venture arrangement with the company that is the owner of the mineral project, or in some cases could result in the outright acquisition of the project from its owner. Such arrangements are common in the mining industry and are often staged, with the company that is earning-in earning an interest in the project at various stages and over various timeframes, resulting in a joint venture arrangement with the company that is the owner of the mineral project, or in some cases could result in the outright acquisition of the project from its owner.
68
If we do not make the required expenditures when contractually agreed, and if such failure occurs before earning any interest in a project, or if we otherwise fail to comply with the terms of such agreements, we may lose all of the expenditures and payments made to that time in respect of that mineral project and acquire no interest in such mineral project. If we do not make the required expenditures when contractually agreed after we have earned some interest in the project, we may lose the right to acquire any further interest and may be left with a minority interest in a mineral project that provides us with limited or few rights with respect to the exploration and development of that mineral project, and which may have limited resale value to a third party. Any such failure or occurrence could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects and may result in us forfeiting our right to acquire an interest, or a further interest, in mineral projects that may ultimately be determined to be viable commercial mining operations.
Suitable infrastructure may not be available for exploration or development of mineral properties or damage to existing infrastructure may occur.
Mining, processing, development and exploration activities depend on adequate infrastructure. Reliable roads, bridges, port and/or rail transportation, power sources, water supply and access to key consumables are important determinants for capital and operating costs. The lack of availability on acceptable terms or the delay in the availability of any one or more of these items could prevent or delay exploration, development or exploitation of our mineral projects. If adequate infrastructure is not available, the future mining or development of our projects may not be commenced or completed on a timely basis, or at all, the resulting operations may not achieve the anticipated production volume, and the construction costs and operating costs associated with the mining and/or development of our projects may be higher than anticipated. Shortages of water supply, critical spare parts, maintenance service and new equipment and machinery may materially and adversely affect our operations and development projects.
The presence or lack of water may adversely affect our future mining operations.
Any future mines that we develop will require the use of significant quantities of water for mining activities, processing and related auxiliary facilities. Water usage, including extraction, containment and recycling requires appropriate permits granted by governmental authorities.
In particular, many of our mineral projects are in the south-western portions of the United States, an area that has suffered from prolonged drought, dwindling water resources and growing conflict over the use of water resources. Our mining projects, if developed into operating mines, may not be able to source all the water needed for mining operations, and governments or regulatory authorities may determine to prioritize other commercial or industrial activities ahead of mining in the use of water.
Water may not be available in sufficient quantities to meet our future production needs and may not prove sufficient to meet our water supply needs. In addition, necessary water rights may not be granted and/or maintained. A reduction in our water supply could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. This and we have not yet obtained the water rights to support some of our potential development activities and our inability to obtain those rights could prevent us from pursuing those activities. We currently own no water rights and we have not yet obtained the water rights to support some of our potential development activities and our inability to obtain those rights could prevent us from pursuing those activities.
As well, underground mining operations often encounter groundwater and aquifers that complicate the development and operation of underground mines, including at the Santa Cruz Copper Project. The presence of such water often requires additional engineering and capital to safely develop the mine and to subsequently extract Ore from areas of water ingress and/or dewatering operations, which increases both the capital and operating costs of underground mine development and operation. The presence of water may therefore materially and adversely affect the costs of development and operating a mine.
An increase in prices of power and water supplies, including infrastructure, could negatively affect our future operating costs, financial condition, and ability to develop and operate a mine.
Our ability to obtain a secure supply of power and water at a reasonable cost at our mineral projects depends on many factors, including: global and regional supply and demand; political and economic conditions; problems that can affect local supplies; delivery; infrastructure, weather and climate conditions; and relevant regulatory regimes, all of which are outside our control. We may not be able to obtain secure and sufficient supplies of power and water at reasonable costs at
69
any of our mineral projects and the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our ability to develop and operate a mine, and on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends on developing and maintaining relationships with local communities and stakeholders.
Our ongoing and future success depends on developing and maintaining productive relationships with the communities surrounding our mineral projects, including local indigenous people who may have rights or may assert rights to certain of our properties, and other stakeholders in our operating locations. Local communities and stakeholders may be dissatisfied with our activities or the level of benefits provided, which may result in legal or administrative proceedings, civil unrest, protests, direct action or campaigns against us. Any such occurrence could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations, as well as our ability to commence or continue exploration or mine development activities.
The impacts of climate change may adversely affect our operations and/or result in increased costs to comply with changes in regulations.
Climate change is an international and community concern which may directly or indirectly affect our business and current and future activities. The continuing rise in global average temperatures has created varying changes to regional climates across the world and extreme weather events have the potential to delay or hinder our exploration activities at our mineral projects, and to delay or cease operations at any future mine. This may require us to make additional expenditures to mitigate the impact of such events which may materially and adversely increase our costs and/or reduce production at a future mine. Governments at all levels are amending or enacting additional legislation to address climate change by regulating, among other things, carbon emissions and energy efficiency, or where legislation has already been enacted, regulation regarding emission levels and energy efficiency are becoming more stringent. As a significant emitter of greenhouse gas emissions, the mining industry is particularly exposed to such regulations. Compliance with such legislation, including the associated costs, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and our ability to commence or continue our exploration and future development and mining operations.
Changing climate patterns may also affect the availability of water. If the effects of climate change cause prolonged disruption in the delivery of essential commodities then production efficiency may be reduced, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
In addition, climate change is perceived as a threat to communities and governments globally and stakeholders may demand reductions in emissions or call upon mining companies to better manage their consumption of climate-relevant resources. Negative social and reputational attention toward our operations may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. A number of governments have already introduced or are moving to introduce climate change legislation and treaties at the international, national, state/provincial and local levels. Regulations relating to emission levels (such as carbon taxes) and energy efficiency are becoming more stringent. If the current regulatory trend continues, this may result in increased costs at some or all of our mineral projects
Our subsidiary, Cordoba, is involved in lengthy litigation, which may adversely affect the value of our investment in it and its mineral projects.
Our subsidiary, Cordoba, is currently involved in two legal proceedings. The first is a criminal lawsuit filed by Cordoba in late 2018 and in January 2019 with the Colombian prosecutors against nine members of former Colombian management of a Cordoba subsidiary alleging breach of fiduciary obligations, abuse of trust, theft and fraud. This proceeding is ongoing. In the second proceeding, Cordoba (along with the National Mining Agency, Ministry of Mines and Energy, the local environmental authority, the Municipality of Puerto Libertador and the State of Cordoba) were served with a class action claim by individuals purporting to represent the Alacran Community — “Asociación de Mineros de El Alacrán” (“Alacran Community”). This class action seeks (i) an injunction against Cordoba´s operations in the Alacrán area and (ii) an injunction against the prior declaration by the authorities that the Alacran Community´s mining activities were illegal. The claim was initially filed with the Administrative Court of Medellín, which remanded the case to the Administrative Court of Montería, which contested it and submitted the case to the Council of State. The Council of State determined the Administrative Court of Montería as the competent tribunal, where the process is currently being conducted. The Administrative Court of Montería admitted the commencement of the class action on September 2021. The decision was challenged by Cordoba and other defendants and confirmed by the Court. Cordoba timely filed its: (i) response to the lawsuit and statement of defense; and (ii) opposition to the injunction requested by plaintiffs. The Court now should: (i) issue a decision on the injunction; and (ii) schedule date and time for the initial hearing. While the court
70
matters proceed, Cordoba will incur additional costs that will negatively impact its financial position. The litigation process is uncertain and it is possible that the second proceeding is resolved against Cordoba, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR VANADIUM BATTERY BUSINESSES
Our Vanadium battery businesses may be unable to obtain sufficient suitable feedstock for future vanadium electrolyte production and/or may be unable to find suppliers of vanadium electrolyte at cost effective prices.
Our vanadium battery businesses currently purchase certain key raw materials, such as feedstock, for our electrodes and a variety of other components from a limited number of third parties. Our current suppliers may be unable to satisfy our future requirements on a timely basis or at all. Moreover, the price and quality of purchased raw materials, including vanadium electrolyte, components and assembled batteries could fluctuate significantly due to circumstances beyond our control. Moreover, the price of purchased raw materials, components and assembled batteries could fluctuate significantly due to circumstances beyond our control. If we fail to secure a sufficient supply of key raw materials and components and we are unable to produce them in-house in a timely fashion, it could result in a significant delay in our manufacturing and shipments, which may cause us to breach our sales contracts with our customers. If we fail to secure a sufficient supply of key raw materials and components and we are unable to produce them 70Table of Contentsin-house in a timely fashion, it would result in a significant delay in our manufacturing and shipments, which may cause us to breach our sales contracts with our customers. If we are unable to source vanadium electrolyte at cost effective prices the willingness of customers to purchase our vanadium batteries may be limited. Furthermore, failure to obtain sufficient supply of these raw materials and components or produce them in-house at a reasonable cost could also harm our revenue and gross profit margins.
Developments in alternative technology may adversely affect the demand for vanadium battery products.Developments in alternative technology may adversely affect the demand for VRB’s battery products.
Significant developments in alternative energy storage technologies, such as fuel cell technology, advanced diesel, coal, ethanol or natural gas, or breathing batteries, may materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results in ways that we may not currently anticipate. Existing and other battery technologies, fuels or sources of energy may emerge as customers’ preferred alternatives to our battery products. Any failure by us to develop new or enhanced technologies or processes, or to react to changes in existing technologies, could materially delay our development and introduction of new and enhanced alternative products, which could result in decreased revenue and a loss of market share to our competitors. Our research and development efforts may not be sufficient to adapt to changes in alternative technology and we may not compete effectively with alternative systems if we are not able to source and integrate the latest technology into our battery products.
Our vanadium battery businesses may experience significant delays in the design, production and launch of its battery projects, which could harm our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
Our vanadium battery businesses’ research and development team is continually looking to improve its battery systems. Any delay in the financing, design, production and launch of new products could materially damage our brand, business, prospects, financial condition and operating results. There are often delays in the design, production and commercial release of new products, and to the extent we delay the launch because of the items identified above, our growth prospects could be adversely affected as we may fail to grow our market share, to keep up with competing products or to satisfy customers’ demands or needs.
Our vanadium battery businesses may be adversely affected by any technical limitations in our software and hardware systems
Our vanadium batteries rely on software and hardware, including software and hardware developed or maintained internally or by third parties that is highly technical and complex and will require modification and updates over the life of a battery. In addition, certain of our products depend on the ability of such software and hardware to store, retrieve, process and manage immense amounts of data. Our software and hardware may contain errors, bugs or vulnerabilities, and our systems are subject to certain technical limitations that may compromise our ability to meet the objectives. Some errors, bugs or vulnerabilities inherently may be difficult to detect and may only be discovered after the code has been released for external or internal use. Errors, bugs, vulnerabilities, design defects or technical limitations may be found within our software and hardware. Remediation efforts may not be timely, may hamper production, or may not be to the satisfaction of our customers. If we are unable to prevent or effectively remedy errors, bugs, vulnerabilities or defects in our software and hardware, we may suffer damage to our brand, loss of customers, loss of revenue or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.
71
Our vanadium battery joint venture in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) may be negatively impacted by laws and policies of the Government of the PRC or the state of PRC-United States relations.
A deterioration in the United States-PRC relationship, which may be evidenced by tariff and non-tariff barriers, lack of advancement on trade negotiations, domestic “buy local” policies, lack of business travel and business contact, and potentially sanctions or other barriers to commerce, may negatively affect our vanadium battery joint venture, business prospects, results of operations and cash flows. A continued deterioration in the United States-PRC relationship, which may be evidenced by tariff and non-tariff barriers, lack of advancement on trade negotiations, domestic “buy local” policies, lack of business travel and business contact, and potentially sanctions or other barriers to commerce, may negatively affect VRB’s business, business prospects, results of operations and cash flows. The joint venture also helps our United States business source equipment and components in China that are used in the United States. An increase in tariff and non-tariff barriers may significantly increase the cost of such equipment and components, or may prohibit their importation into the United States altogether. If we are unable to obtain such equipment and components at cost effective prices, our ability to assemble and sell vanadium batteries in the United States may be materially and adversely affected.
There is no assurance that Red Sun will satisfy its payment obligations to us in full or in a timely manner.
Pursuant to the VRB Transaction, we, through VRB Energy, are entitled to receive $20 million in cash from Red Sun payable in two equal tranches, which we plan to use for the growth and advancement of VRB USA. The first tranche payment was received, but the second tranche payment, which was payable by June 30, 2025, is overdue and VRB Energy sent a demand letter and is pursuing options for recourse. There can be no assurance that Red Sun will satisfy its remaining payment obligations to us in full or in a timely manner. Any delay, reduction or failure to make these payments would have an adverse effect on our plans for VRB USA, including our ability to advance the development of a manufacturing facility in the USA by VRB USA.
There is no guarantee that the sale transaction will close or the payment due under the agreement for the sale of Cordoba’s remaining interest in the Alacran Copper Project will be received.
Cordoba, our publicly listed and approximately 60.8% owned subsidiary, entered into an agreement to sell certain assets indirectly constituting Cordoba’s remaining 50% interest in the Alacran Copper Project, related exploration properties, and certain intercompany receivables, for consideration of $128 million. The closing of the transaction remains subject to conditions, including the receipt of JCHX shareholder approval. No assurance can be provided that the transaction will close and that we will receive the anticipated proceeds thereof.
RISKS RELATED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
If we are unable to successfully obtain, maintain, protect, enforce or otherwise manage our intellectual property and proprietary rights, we may incur significant expenses and our business may be adversely affected.
Our success and ability to compete depends in part upon the proprietary nature of, and protection for, our products, technologies, processes and know-how.Our success and ability to compete depend in part upon the proprietary nature of, and protection for, our products, technologies, processes and know-how.
The TyphoonTM technology we utilize in our exploration activities is based on patents owned by our subsidiary Geo27. In addition, we are also the exclusive worldwide licensee of certain legacy technology from I-Pulse and its affiliates, related to mineral exploration. Any failure by us or our licensor to establish, protect and enforce our intellectual property rights could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, as would any breach by the licensor of our license agreements.
In addition, our vanadium battery businesses rely on patents to establish and protect its intellectual property rights in the PRC, the United States and other jurisdictions. As a result, our vanadium battery businesses may be required to spend significant resources to monitor and protect their intellectual property rights. Litigation brought to protect and enforce its intellectual property rights could be costly, time-consuming and distracting to management and could result in the impairment or loss of portions of its intellectual property. Furthermore, efforts to enforce intellectual property rights may be met with defenses, counterclaims and countersuits attacking the validity and enforceability of its intellectual property rights. Furthermore, VRB’s efforts to enforce its intellectual property rights may be met with defenses, counterclaims and countersuits attacking the validity and enforceability of its intellectual property rights. In addition, competitors to our vanadium battery businesses may develop similar products that do not conflict with the vanadium battery businesses’ intellectual property rights, may design around their intellectual property rights or may independently develop similar or superior technology. Failure to establish, protect and enforce the intellectual property rights owned by the vanadium battery businesses could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Financial assurance must also be secured by means of a surety bond, certificate of deposit, cash deposit and corporate guarantee, to ensure that the funds are available to complete reclamation in the event of operator default.
72
We may be exposed to infringement or misappropriation claims by third parties, which, if determined adversely to us, could cause us to lose significant rights and to be unable to continue providing our existing product offerings.
Our success also depends largely on our ability to use and develop our technology and know-how without infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties. The validity and scope of claims relating to vanadium-based battery technology and TyphoonTM technology patents involve complex scientific, legal and factual questions and analysis and, therefore, may be highly uncertain, expensive and time-consuming. We may receive in the future notices that claim we or our customers using our products have misappropriated or misused other parties’ intellectual property rights, particularly as the number of competitors in our market grows and the functionality of products among competitors overlaps. We may receive in the future notices that claim we or our clients using our products have misappropriated or misused other parties’ intellectual property rights, particularly as the number of competitors in our market grows and the functionality of products among competitors overlaps. If we are sued by a third party that claims that our technology infringes its rights, the litigation, whether or not successful, could be extremely costly to defend, divert our management’s time, attention, and resources, damage our reputation and brand and substantially harm our business. Further, in some instances, our agreements with our customers include indemnification provisions under which we or our subsidiaries agree to indemnify such parties for losses suffered or incurred in connection with third party claims for intellectual property infringement. Further, in some instances, our agreements with our clients include indemnification provisions under which we or our subsidiaries agree to indemnify such parties for losses suffered or incurred in connection with third party claims for intellectual property infringement. The results of any intellectual property litigation to which we might become a party, or for which we are required to provide indemnification, may also require us to do one or more of the following:
•cease offering or using technologies that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;
•make substantial payments for legal fees, settlement payments or other costs or damages to the party claiming infringement, misappropriation or other violation of intellectual property rights;
•obtain a license to sell or use the relevant technology, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all; or
•redesign technology to avoid infringement, which may not be feasible.
Our failure to develop non-infringing technologies or license the intellectual property or the proprietary rights on a timely basis would harm our business, possibly materially. Protracted litigation could result in our customers, or potential customers, deferring or limiting their purchase or use of our products until resolution of such litigation. Parties making the infringement claim may also obtain an injunction that can prevent us from selling our products or using technology that contains the allegedly infringing materials. If we were to discover that our products violate third-party proprietary rights, we may be unable to continue offering our products on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, to redesign our technology to avoid infringement or to avoid or settle litigation regarding alleged infringement without substantial expense and damage awards. Any intellectual property litigation or proceeding could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operation and financial condition.
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESSES GENERALLY
We will require substantial capital investment in the future, and our inability to raise adequate capital could affect our ability to continue as a going concern.
We will require significant funding to continue our operations and advance our projects through exploration, the construction and operation of potential future mines. Our ability to raise additional capital, on timely and favorable terms or at all, will depend on various factors, including macroeconomic conditions, future commodity prices, our exploration success, and market conditions. Our ability to raise additional capital will depend on a range of factors such as macroeconomic conditions, future commodity prices, our exploration success, and market conditions among other factors. If these factors deteriorate, our ability to raise capital to fund ongoing operations and business activities could be significantly impacted. If these factors deteriorate, our ability to raise capital to fund ongoing operations and business activities, and service any outstanding indebtedness could be negatively impacted. If we cannot obtain adequate additional financing, we may have to substantially curtail our exploration and development activities or sell assets, which could materially and adversely affect our business plan. Inadequate financial resources could also raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Currency fluctuations may affect our results of operation and financial condition.
We pay for goods and services in a number of currencies, including the United States dollar, the Canadian dollar and other currencies. We also raise capital in United States dollars. Adverse fluctuations in these currencies relative to each other and relative to the currencies in which we incur expenditures could materially and adversely affect our financial position and the costs of our exploration and development activities. We do not engage in currency or commodity hedging activities.
Our insurance may not provide adequate coverage in the event of a loss.
73
Our business and activities are subject to a number of risks and hazards, including, but not limited to, adverse environmental conditions, metallurgical and other processing problems, industrial accidents, labor disputes, unusual or unexpected geological conditions, ground control problems, cave-ins, changes in the regulatory environment, mechanical equipment failure, facility performance problems, fires and natural phenomena such as inclement weather conditions, floods, landslides and earthquakes, and defective title. These risks could result in damage to, or destruction of, our mineral properties or production facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage, delays in exploration, mining or processing, increased production costs, asset write downs, monetary losses and legal liability.
Our property and liability insurance may not provide sufficient coverage for losses related to these or other hazards. Insurance against certain risks, including those related to defective title, environmental matters or other hazards resulting from exploration and production, is generally not available to us or to other companies within the mining industry. Insurance against certain risks, including those related to environmental matters or other hazards resulting from exploration and production, is generally not available to us or to other companies within the mining industry. Our current insurance coverage may not continue to be available at economically feasible premiums, or at all. In addition, we do not carry business interruption insurance relating to our properties. Any losses from these events may cause us to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.
We are dependent on the leadership of our executive management team and key employees.
Our exploration activities and any future mine development, as well as the construction and operation of a mine depend to a significant extent on the continued service and performance of the executive management team.Our exploration activities and any future mine development, as well as the construction and operation of a mine depend to a significant extent on the continued service and performance of Robert Friedland, the Company’s founder and Executive Chairman, and the executive management team. We depend on a relatively small number of key officers and consultants, and we currently do not have, and do not intend to, purchase key-person insurance for these individuals. Departures by our executive management team could have a negative impact on our business, as we may not be able to find suitable personnel to replace departing management on a timely basis, or at all. The loss of Robert Friedland, our founder and Executive Chairman, or any member of our senior management team could impair our ability to execute our business plan and could, therefore, have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the international mining industry is very active and we are facing increased competition for qualified personnel in all disciplines and areas of operation. We may not be able to attract and retain personnel to sufficiently staff our development and operating teams.
Our directors and officers may have conflicts of interest as a result of their relationships with other mining companies that are not affiliated with us.
Robert Friedland and some of our other directors and officers are also, or may also become, directors, officers and stockholders of other companies, including companies that are similarly engaged in the business of developing and exploiting natural resource properties. Consequently, there is a possibility that our directors and officers may have conflicts of interest from time to time. To the extent that such other companies may participate in ventures in which we may participate in, or in ventures which we may seek to participate in, our directors and officers may have a conflict of interest in negotiating and concluding terms respecting the extent of such participation. In all cases where our directors and officers have an interest in other companies, such other companies may also compete with us for the acquisition of mineral property investments.
We may have difficulty recruiting and retaining employees.
Recruiting and retaining qualified personnel is critical to the success of exploration activities and to future mine development and mine operations. The number of persons skilled in acquisition, exploration and development of mining projects is limited and competition for qualified persons is intense. As our business activity grows, we will require additional key financial, administrative, geologic and mining personnel as well as additional operations staff. We may not be successful in attracting, training and retaining qualified personnel as competition for persons with these skill sets increases. If we are not successful in attracting, training and retaining qualified personnel, we may have inadequate staffing to advance all of our exploration activities and to conduct mine development activities, or such activities may be reduced or delayed, which could have an adverse material impact on our prospects, business, results of operations and financial condition.
Any acquisitions we make may not be successful or achieve the expected benefits.
74
We regularly consider and evaluate opportunities to acquire assets, companies and operations, including prospective mining projects or properties. We may not be able to successfully integrate any acquired assets, companies or operations, and prospective mining projects or properties that we acquire may not develop as anticipated. Acquisition transactions involve inherent risks, including but not limited to:
•inaccurate assessments of the value, strengths, weaknesses, contingent and other liabilities and potential profitability of acquisition candidates;
•inability to exploit identified and anticipated operating and financial synergies;
•unanticipated costs;
•diversion of management attention from existing business;
•potential loss of our key employees or key employees of any business acquired;
•unanticipated changes in business, industry or general economic conditions that affect the assumptions underlying the acquisition;
•decline in the value of acquired properties, companies or securities;
•inability to maintain our financial and strategic focus while integrating the acquired business or property;
•inability to implement uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies at the acquired business, as appropriate; and
•to the extent that we make an acquisition outside of markets in which we have previously operated, inability to conduct and manage operations in a new operating environment.
As we do not have significant cash flow from operations and do not expect to have significant cash flow from operations in the foreseeable future, any such acquisitions will be funded by cash raised in equity financings or through the issuance of new equity or equity-linked securities. Equity issuances also may result in dilution of existing stockholders. If we were to incur debt to finance an acquisition, the requirement to repay that debt may lead us to issue additional equity to repay the debt, all in the absence of positive cash flow. Any such developments may materially and adversely affect our financial position and results of operations.
If future acquisitions are significant, they could change the scale of our business and expose us to new geographic, political, operating and financial risks.77Table of ContentsIf future acquisitions are significant, they could change the scale of our business and expose us to new geographic, political, operating and financial risks. In addition, each acquisition involves a number of risks, such as the diversion of our management team’s attention from our existing business to integrating the operations and personnel of the acquired business, possible adverse effects on our results of operations and financial condition during the integration process, our inability to achieve the intended objectives of the combination and potential unknown liabilities associated with the acquired assets.
Our information technology systems may be vulnerable to cyber-attack or other disruption, which could place our systems at risk for data loss, operational failure or compromise of confidential information.Our information technology systems may be vulnerable to disruption, which could place our systems at risk for data loss, operational failure or compromise of confidential information.
We rely on various information technology systems. These systems remain vulnerable to disruption, damage or failure from a variety of sources, including, but not limited to, errors by employees or contractors, computer viruses, cyber-attacks, including phishing, ransomware, and similar malware, misappropriation of data by outside parties, and various other threats. Techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to or sabotage our systems are under continuous and rapid evolution, and we may be unable to detect efforts to disrupt our data and systems in advance. Breaches and unauthorized access carry the potential to cause losses of assets or production, operational delays, equipment failure that could cause other risks to be realized, inaccurate recordkeeping, or disclosure of confidential information, any of which could result in financial losses and regulatory or legal exposure, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We may incur material losses relating to cyber-attacks or other information security breaches in the future. Our risk and exposure to these matters cannot be fully mitigated because of, among other things, the evolving nature of these threats. As such threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to modify or enhance any protective measures or to investigate and remediate any security vulnerabilities.
We may be subject to claims and legal proceedings that could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We may be subject to claims or legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of business activities. These matters may result in litigation which can distract management from our business or have an
75
unfavorable resolution, which could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Risks Related to our Mining Businesses and the Mining Industry--Our subsidiary, Cordoba, is involved in lengthy litigation, which may adversely affect the value of our investment in it and its mineral projects”.
We are subject to the risk of labor disputes, which could adversely affect our business.
We may experience labor disputes in the future, including protests, blockades and strikes, which could disrupt our business operations and have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We may not be able to maintain a satisfactory working relationship with our employees in the future.
Our activities and business could be adversely affected by the effects of health epidemics and other public health threats, pandemic, in regions where we conduct our business operations.Our activities and business could be adversely affected by the effects of health epidemics, including the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, in regions where we conduct our business operations.
Our business and exploration activities could be adversely affected by health epidemics or pandemics. Federal, state, and local governments may implement various mitigation measures at various times to address a pandemic, including travel restrictions, border closings, restrictions on public gatherings, shelter-in-place restrictions and limitations on non-essential business. Federal, state, and local governments have implemented various mitigation measures at various times since the pandemic began, including travel restrictions, border closings, restrictions on public gatherings, shelter-in-place restrictions and limitations on non-essential business. Some of these actions may halt, hinder, delay or slowdown our exploration activities or future development of mining operations, or increase our costs to conduct such activities. Disruptions in the financial markets as a result of a pandemic could make it more difficult for us to access the capital markets in the future. Disruptions in the financial markets as a result of the worsening of the COVID-19 pandemic could make it more difficult for us to access the capital markets in the future.
RISKS RELATED TO GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS AND INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
We have subsidiaries, mineral projects, investments or other activities in the United States, the PRC, Chile, Colombia, Peru, Ivory Coast, Saudi Arabia and other countries where the governments extensively regulate operations and assets, imposing significant actual and potential costs on us.
Our business activities and assets are is subject to increasingly strict laws and regulation by federal, state and local authorities in the jurisdictions in which we have subsidiaries, mineral projects, investments or other activities, including the United States, the PRC, Chile, Colombia, Peru, Ivory Coast, Saudi Arabia and other countries. These laws and regulations include, without limitation, those related to tax; employment; benefits; health and safety; the environment; exports/imports; national security; price and foreign exchange controls; anti-corruption; land use; mine permitting and licensing requirements; exploration and drilling activities; reclamation and restoration of properties after mining is completed; management of materials generated by mining operations; dealing with local or disadvantaged communities; possible state intervention; and storage, treatment and disposal of wastes and hazardous materials, among other things.
The liabilities and requirements associated with the laws and regulations related to these and other matters, including with respect to air emissions, water discharges, archaeological and other environmental matters, may be costly and time-consuming and may restrict, delay or prevent commencement or continuation of exploration.The liabilities and requirements associated with the laws and regulations related to these and other matters, including with respect to air emissions, water discharges and other environmental matters, may be costly and time-consuming and may restrict, delay or prevent commencement or continuation of exploration or production operations. development or production operations. We may not have been or may not be at all times in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations in all jurisdictions. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of cleanup and site restoration costs and liens, the issuance of injunctions to limit or cease operations, the suspension or revocation of permits or authorizations and other enforcement measures that could have the effect of limiting or preventing production from our operations. We may incur material costs and liabilities resulting from claims for damages to property or injury to persons arising from our operations. If we are pursued for sanctions, costs and liabilities in respect of these matters, our exploration activities or mining operations and, as a result, our financial performance, financial position and results of operations, could be materially and adversely affected. If we are pursued for sanctions, costs and liabilities in respect of these matters, our mining operations and, as a result, our financial performance, financial position and results of operations, could be materially and adversely affected.
Any new legislation or administrative regulations or new judicial interpretations or administrative enforcement of existing laws and regulations that would further regulate and tax the mining industry may also require us to change activities significantly or incur increased costs, or even potentially halt or cease activities entirely. Such changes could have a material adverse effect on our prospects, our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our activities outside of the United States are subject to additional political, economic and other uncertainties not necessarily present for activities taking place within the United States.
We have mineral projects, investments or other activities outside the United States, in the PRC, Chile, Colombia, Peru, Ivory Coast, Saudi Arabia and other countries. Some of these countries are less developed economically and politically than the United States, and have historically been more politically or socially unstable than the United States, including with respect to civil unrest and significant civil strife (including violent insurrections). These countries are less developed economically and politically than the United States, and have historically been more politically or socially unstable than the United States, including with respect to civil unrest and significant civil strife (including violent insurrections). We are also subject to the risks of
76
deteriorating relations between or among the countries in which we operate. As such, our activities in these countries are subject to significant risks not necessarily present in the United States and additional risks inherent in exploration and resource extraction by foreign companies. Our exploration and future development and production activities in these countries are therefore subject to heightened risks, many of which are beyond our control. These risks include:
•the possible unilateral cancellation or forced re-negotiation of contracts and licenses;
•unfavorable or arbitrary changes in laws and regulations;
•arbitrary royalty, tariff and tax increases;
•claims by governmental entities or indigenous communities;
•expropriation or nationalization of property;
•political instability (including civil strife, insurrection and potentially civil war);
•significant fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
•currency controls;
•local ownership requirements;
•social and labor unrest, organized crime, hostage taking, terrorism and violent crime;
•uncertainty regarding the enforceability of contractual rights and judgments;
•other risks arising out of foreign governmental sovereignty over areas in which our mineral properties are located; and
•disputes or deterioration of relations between and among countries may adversely affect the political, economic, social and other factors to which we are subject.
Local economic conditions also can increase costs and adversely affect the security of our activities and the availability of skilled workers and supplies. Higher incidences of criminal activity and violence in the area of some of our properties could adversely affect our ability to operate in an optimal fashion or at all, and may impose greater risks of theft and higher costs, which could adversely affect results of operations and financial condition.
Acts of civil disobedience are not uncommon in some of these countries.Acts of civil disobedience are not uncommon in Colombia, Peru, Ivory Coast and Papua New Guinea. Mining companies have been targets of actions to restrict their legally-entitled access to mining concessions or property. Such acts of civil disobedience often occur with no warning and can result in significant direct and indirect costs. We may experience disruptions in the future, which could adversely affect our business and our exploration and development activities.
Tariff announcements and other developments in international trade policies and regulations could adversely affect our operations and outlook.
As a U.S.-based mining company with operations internationally, including operations and business activities in various countries including Canada and China, we are sensitive to changes in international trade policies and regulations. In 2025, the U.S. President announced various tariff plans that included the imposition of U.S. tariffs on various countries for products such as steel and aluminum. Additional tariff actions may be taken by the U.S. and foreign governments. We are unable to predict the ultimate result and duration of any tariff actions by the U.S. government, or countermeasures that may be taken by other nations.
We cannot assure you that the imposition of tariffs or other changes in trading policies, potential trade wars, or uncertainties in international trading policies and regulations will not adversely impact our operations, particularly given our presence across multiple jurisdictions. If such tariffs apply to, or new tariffs may be imposed on, products or equipment we may need to source and import our costs could increase accordingly. For example, VRB USA anticipates importing equipment and electrolyte from China, and these tariffs are expected to increase VRB USA’s costs. Any further increases in tariffs imposed on products imported from China could result in additional cost increases for VRB USA. Tariffs could have a general inflationary effect, which could increase the cost of our U.S. exploration activities. If we decide to develop our U.S. mineral properties in the future, tariffs could increase our development costs and capital expenditures, which may affect the projected economics of our projects.
77
Recent tariff actions have resulted in market uncertainty and volatility. Continued market uncertainty or volatility, or any broader economic challenges resulting from adverse developments in internal trade policies, could adversely affect the price of our stock, our ability to raise additional capital or the prices of the metals that we hope to produce, should we develop any of our mineral projects.
Our subsidiary Cordoba operates in a jurisdiction, Colombia, which has heightened security risks.
Colombia is home to South America’s largest and longest running insurgency. The situation may become unstable and may deteriorate in the future into violence, including kidnapping, gang warfare, homicide and/or terrorist activity. Any such actions may generally disrupt supply chains and business activities in Colombia, and discourage qualified individuals from being involved with Cordoba’s operations. Our operations may be impacted as a result, and our ability to advance Alacran Project may be delayed or halted altogether. Our operations may be impacted as a result, and our ability to advance the San Matias project may be delayed or halted altogether. This may include the inability to access the project site, as well as damage to property and injury or death to our personnel. Any such events could have a material adverse effect on Cordoba’s business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Illegal mining activities may negatively impact our ability to explore, develop and operate some mineral projects.
Artisanal and illegal miners are present at the Alacran Project in Colombia (owned directly by Cordoba) and the Pinaya Project in Peru.Artisanal and illegal miners are present at the San Matias Project in Colombia (owned directly by Cordoba) and the Pinaya Project in Peru (owned directly by our subsidiary, Kaizen). As these companies further explore and advance these projects towards production, they must enter into discussions with illegal miners operating at the projects. As these companies further explore and advance these projects towards production, each must enter into discussions with illegal miners operating at the projects. There is a risk that such illegal miners may oppose activities at the Alacran Project or the Pinaya Project and this may result in a disruption to the planned development and/or mining and processing operations, all of which may have an adverse effect on our investment in these projects. There is a risk that such illegal miners may oppose Cordoba’s or Kaizen’s proposed operations and this may result in a disruption to the planned development and/or mining and processing operations, all of which may have an adverse effect on our investment in Cordoba and/or Kaizen. In addition, illegal miners have extracted metals from both projects in a manner that does not meet health and safety or environmental standards. Accidents may occur and may range from minor to serious, including death. While all formal steps are taken to notify the authorities when illegal miners operate in an unsafe manner, illegal miners may advance within close proximity to our contemplated mine sites or trespass on them, which may disrupt exploration and development activities, and may result in increased costs to address the presence of such illegal miners. While each company takes all formal steps to notify the authorities when illegal miners operate in an unsafe manner, illegal miners may advance within close proximity to our contemplated mine sites or trespass on them, which may disrupt exploration and development activities, and may result in increased costs to address the presence of such illegal miners.
Our foreign mining projects and investments are subject to risk typically associated with operating in foreign countries.
In general, our foreign mining projects and investments are subject to the risks typically associated with conducting business in foreign countries. These risks may include, among others: labor disputes; invalidation of governmental orders and permits; corruption; uncertain political and economic environments; sovereign risk; war; civil disturbances and terrorist actions; arbitrary changes in laws; the failure of foreign parties to honor contractual relations; opposition to mining from environmental or other non-governmental organizations; limitations on foreign ownership; limitations on the repatriation of earnings; limitations on minerals and commodity exports; instability due to economic under-development; inadequate infrastructure; and increased financing costs. In addition, the enforcement of our legal rights may not be recognized by any foreign government, or by the court system of a foreign country. These risks may limit or disrupt our activities, restrict the movement of funds, or result in the deprivation of mining-related rights or the taking of property by nationalization or expropriation without fair compensation. The occurrence of events associated with these risks could have a material and adverse effect on our mineral projects, business and activities, the viability our foreign operations and investments, and could have a material and adverse effect on our future cash flow, earnings, results of operations and financial condition.
Uncertainty in governmental agency interpretation or court interpretation and the application of applicable laws and regulations in any jurisdictions where we operate or have investments could result in unintended non-compliance.
The courts in some of the jurisdictions in which we operate may offer less certainty as to the judicial outcome of legal proceedings or a more protracted judicial process than is the case in more established economies such as the United States. Businesses can become involved in lengthy court cases over simple issues when rulings are not clearly defined, and the poor drafting of laws and excessive delays in the legal process for resolving issues or disputes compound such problems. Accordingly, we could face risks such as:
•greater difficulty in obtaining effective legal redress in the courts of such jurisdictions, whether in respect of a breach of law or regulation, or in an ownership dispute;
•a higher degree of discretion on the part of governmental authorities, which leads to greater uncertainty;
•the lack of judicial or administrative guidance on interpreting applicable rules and regulations;
•inconsistencies or conflicts between and within various laws, regulations, decrees, orders and resolutions; or
78
•relative inexperience of the judiciary and courts in such matters.
Enforcement of laws in some of the jurisdictions in which we operate may depend on and be subject to the interpretation of such laws by the relevant governmental authorities, and such authority may adopt an interpretation of an aspect of local law that differs from the advice that has been given to us by local lawyers or even by the relevant local authority itself.80Table of ContentsEnforcement of laws in some of the jurisdictions in which we operate may depend on and be subject to the interpretation of such laws by the relevant governmental authorities, and such authority may adopt an interpretation of an aspect of local law that differs from the advice that has been given to us by local lawyers or even by the relevant local authority itself on a prior occasion. In addition, there may be limited or no relevant case law providing guidance on how courts would interpret such laws and the application of such laws to our contracts, joint ventures, licenses, license applications or other legal arrangements. Thus, contracts, joint ventures, licenses, license applications or other legal arrangements may be adversely affected by the actions of government authorities and the effectiveness of and enforcement of such arrangements in these jurisdictions. In some of the jurisdictions in which we operate, the commitment of local businesses, government officials and agencies and the judicial system to abide by legal requirements and negotiated agreements may be more uncertain and may be susceptible to revision or cancellation, and legal redress may be uncertain or delayed. These uncertainties and delays could have a material adverse effect on our business and activities, as well as our results of operations and financial condition.
Proposed changes to United States federal mining and public land law could impose, among other things, royalties and fees paid to the United States government by mining companies and royalty holders.
Periodically, members of the United States Congress have introduced bills which would supplant or alter the provisions of The General Mining Law of 1872 which governs the disposition of metallic minerals on lands owned by the federal government. Some of our mineral properties occur on unpatented mining claims located on United States federal lands. There have been recent proposals to amend the United States mining law to impose a royalty on the production of select hardrock minerals, such as silver, gold and copper, from U.S. federal lands, and a reclamation fee on production from federal and other lands.
Any such proposal, if enacted by the United States Congress, could substantially increase the cost of holding mining claims and could reduce our revenue from unpatented mining claims, and to a lesser extent, on other lands in the United States. Moreover, such legislation could significantly impair the ability of our properties to develop Mineral Resources on unpatented mining claims. Although at this time we are not able to predict what royalties and fees may be imposed in the future, the imposition of such royalties and fees could adversely affect the potential for development of such mining claims and the economics of existing operating mines. Passage of such legislation may result in a material and adverse effect on our profitability, results of operations, financial condition and the trading price of our common stock.
We are subject to, and may become liable for any violations of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws.
Our operations are governed by, and involve interactions with, various levels of government in foreign countries. We are required to comply with anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) and similar laws where we have activities. These laws generally prohibit companies and company employees from engaging in bribery or other prohibited payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. The FCPA also requires companies to maintain accurate books and records and internal controls. As we have certain subsidiaries, mineral projects and investments and other activities in other countries, including Chile, Colombia, Peru, Ivory Coast, Saudi Arabia and the PRC, there is a risk of potential FCPA violations.
In recent years, there has been a general increase in both the frequency of enforcement and the severity of penalties under such laws, resulting in greater scrutiny and punishment to companies convicted of violating anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws. A company may be found liable for violations by not only its employees, but also by its contractors and third-party agents. Our internal procedures and policies may not always be effective in ensuring that we, our employees, contractors or third-party agents will comply strictly with all such applicable laws. If we become subject to an enforcement action or we are found to be in violation of such laws, this may have a material adverse effect on our reputation and may possibly result in significant penalties or sanctions, and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Changes to United States and foreign tax laws could adversely affect our results of operations.
We are subject to tax in the United States and foreign jurisdictions. Current economic and political conditions make tax laws and their interpretation subject to significant change in any jurisdiction. We cannot predict the timing or significance of future tax law changes in the United States or other countries in which we do business. If material tax law changes are enacted, our future effective tax rate, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely impacted. Further, tax authorities, now or in the future, may periodically conduct reviews of our tax filings and compliance. Those reviews could result in adverse tax consequences and unexpected financial costs and exposure.
79
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK
Future sales and issuances of our common stock or rights to purchase common stock, including pursuant to warrants or our equity incentive plans, could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause the price of our common stock to decline.
In the future, we may sell common stock, convertible securities, or other equity securities in one or more transactions at prices and in the manner we determine from time to time. We also issue securities to employees and directors pursuant to our equity incentive plans. If we sell common stock, convertible securities, or other equity securities in subsequent transactions, or common stock is issued pursuant to warrants or equity incentive plans, our investors’ holdings may be materially diluted. If we sell common stock, convertible securities, or other equity securities in subsequent transactions, or common stock is issued pursuant to equity incentive plans, our investors’ holdings may be materially diluted. In addition, new investors in such subsequent transactions could gain rights, preferences, and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock.
If a substantial number of our shares of common stock are sold, or it is perceived that they will be sold, in the public market, the market price of our common stock could decline.If a significant amount of our shares of common stock are sold, or it is perceived that they will be sold, in the public market, the market price of our common stock could decline.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares of common stock intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of our common stock. Most of our outstanding shares of common stock can be sold at any time pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act, or pursuant to registration statements that we have filed or agreed to file to permit the resale of such shares. We have also registered all shares of common stock that we may issue under our equity compensation plans or that are issuable upon exercise of outstanding options or other equity awards. Therefore, these shares can be freely sold in the public market. Therefore, these shares can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance and, once vested, subject to volume limitations applicable to our affiliates. If significant amounts of our shares are sold, or if it is perceived that they will be sold, in the public market, the market price of our common stock could decline.
If securities or industry analysts either do not publish research about us or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about us, our business or our market, or if they change their recommendations regarding our common stock adversely, the trading price or trading volume of our common stock could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will be influenced in part by the research and reports that securities or industry analysts may publish about us, our business, our market, or our competitors. If one or more of these analysts initiate research with an unfavorable rating or downgrade our common stock, provide a more favorable recommendation about our competitors or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our common stock price would likely decline. If any analyst who may cover us were to cease coverage of us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the trading price or trading volume of our common stock to decline.
Maaden holds certain top-up rights that could lead to further dilution or adversely affect our stock price.
We have granted Maaden the right to purchase additional shares of common stock to maintain its 8.1% stock ownership position in the event of any issuances of common stock by us (the “Maaden Top-Up Right”). Maaden may exercise this right each time we issue shares (or securities convertible into shares) for cash as part of an equity financing transaction and in certain other circumstances. Ma’aden may exercise this right (the “top-up right”) upon the first occurrence after such dilution event in which we issue shares (or securities convertible into shares) for cash as part of an equity financing transaction.
In the event that Maaden does not exercise the Maaden Top-Up Right, the ownership threshold for purposes of Maaden Top-Up Right will be reduced to its ownership level after giving effect to the dilutive issuance. In the event that Ma’aden does not exercise its top-up right, the ownership threshold for purposes of the top-up right will be reduced to its ownership level after giving effect to the dilutive issuance. The Maaden Top-Up Right will expire on July 6, 2028. To the extent the Maaden Top-Up Right is exercised, such exercise would cause dilution to our shareholders. Any decision by Maaden not to exercise Maaden Top-Up Right could adversely affect the price of our common stock.
The price of our common stock may be volatile and fluctuate substantially, which could result in substantial losses for purchasers of our common stock.
Our stock price is volatile. The stock market in general has experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. The market price for our common stock may be influenced by many factors, including: the failure to identify Mineral Resources or Mineral Reserves at our properties; the failure to achieve production at any of our mineral properties; the lack of mineral exploration success; the actual or anticipated changes in the price of commodities we are seeking to discover and mine, namely copper, nickel, vanadium, cobalt, platinum group elements, gold and silver; changes in market valuations of similar companies; changes in technology and demand for
80
minerals; the success or failure of competitor mining companies; changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of debt; sales of common stock by us, our executive officers, directors or principal stockholders, or others; changes in regulatory requirements and the political climate in the United States, and other jurisdictions where we have activities, including Canada, Colombia, Peru, Ivory Coast, Saudi Arabia and the PRC; litigation involving us, our general industry or both; the recruitment or departure of key personnel; our ability to control our costs; accidents at mining projects, whether owned by us or otherwise; cyber-attacks or cyber-breaches; natural disasters, terrorist attacks, and acts of war, including the large-scale invasion of Ukraine by Russia; general economic, industry and market conditions, such as the impact of pandemics, on our industry and market conditions, or the occurrence of other epidemics or pandemics; and the other factors described in this “Risk Factors” section.
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class- action litigation has often been instituted against that company. Any lawsuit to which we are a party, with or without merit, may result in an unfavorable judgment. We also may decide to settle lawsuits on unfavorable terms. Any such negative outcome could result in payments of substantial damages or fines, damage to our reputation or adverse changes to our offerings or business practices. Such litigation may also cause us to incur other substantial costs to defend such claims and divert management’s attention and resources. Furthermore, negative public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments could have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.
The market price of our common stock is subject to fluctuations and may not reflect our long-term value at any given time, and we may be subject to securities litigation as a result.
The price of our common stock is likely to be significantly affected by a variety of factors and events including short-term changes to our financial condition or results of operations as reflected in our quarterly financial statements. Other factors unrelated to our performance that may have an effect on the price of our common stock include the following: (i) the extent of analytical coverage available to investors concerning our business may be limited if investment banks with research capabilities do not follow our securities; (ii) lessening in trading volume and general market interest in our securities may affect an investor’s ability to trade significant numbers of our common stock; (iii) the size of our public float may limit the ability of some institutions to invest in our securities; and (iv) a substantial decline in the price of our common stock that persists for a significant period of time could cause our securities to be delisted from the NYSE American or the TSX, further reducing market liquidity.
As a result of any of these factors, the market price of our common stock is subject to fluctuations and may not accurately reflect our long-term value at any given point in time. Securities class action litigation has often been brought against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. We may be the target of similar litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and damages and divert management’s attention and resources.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and second amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult.•Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated by-laws contain provisions that may make a take over of the Company more difficult.
Certain provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and second amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult, including the following:
•our amended and restated certificate of incorporation requires that amendments to certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amendments to our second amended and restated bylaws generally require the approval of at least majority of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock;
•our stockholders are only able to take action at a meeting of stockholders and are not able to take action by written consent for any matter;
•our amended and restated certificate of incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting;
•vacancies on our Board of Directors are able to be filled only by our Board of Directors and not by stockholders;
•a special meeting of our stockholders may only be called by the chairperson of our Board of Directors or our Chief Executive Officer, as applicable, or a majority of our Board of Directors;
•restrict the forum for certain litigation against us to Delaware or the federal courts of the United States, as applicable;
•our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and shares of which may be issued without further action by our stockholders; and
81
•advance notice procedures apply for stockholders to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring matters before an annual meeting of stockholders.
Moreover, Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company. Section 203 imposes certain restrictions on mergers, business combinations and other transactions between us and holders of 15% or more of our common stock.
These provisions, alone or together, could discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of our company. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for stockholders to elect directors of their choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions they desire, any of which, under certain circumstances, could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.
Our Board of Directors is authorized to issue and designate shares of our preferred stock in additional series without stockholder approval.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes our Board of Directors, without the approval of our stockholders, to issue 50,000,000 shares of our preferred stock, subject to limitations prescribed by applicable law, rules and regulations and the provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, as shares of preferred stock in series, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. The powers, preferences and rights of these additional series of preferred stock may be senior to or on parity with our common stock, which may reduce its value.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation designates specific state or federal courts as the exclusive forum for certain litigation that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for any state law claims for:
•any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf;
•any action asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees to us or our stockholders;
•any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to the DGCL, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our second amended and restated bylaws; or
•any action asserting a claim that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine (the “Delaware Forum Provision”).
The Delaware Forum Provision does not apply to any causes of action arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. Further, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States are the sole and exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act (the “Federal Forum Provision”). In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock is deemed to have notice of and consented to the Delaware Forum Provision and the Federal Forum Provision; provided, however, that stockholders cannot and will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.
The Delaware Forum Provision and the Federal Forum Provision in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation may impose additional litigation costs on stockholders in pursuing any such claims. Additionally, these forum selection clauses may limit our stockholders’ ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that they find favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees, which may discourage the filing of lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and employees, even though an action, if successful, might benefit our stockholders. In addition, while the Delaware Supreme Court ruled in March 2020 that federal forum selection provisions purporting to require claims under the Securities Act be brought in federal court are “facially valid” under Delaware law, there is uncertainty as to whether other courts will enforce our Federal Forum Provision. In addition, while the Delaware Supreme Court ruled in March 2020 that federal forum selection provisions purporting to require claims 84Table of Contentsunder the Securities Act be brought in federal court are “facially valid” under Delaware law, there is uncertainty as to whether other courts will enforce our Federal Forum Provision. If the Federal Forum Provision is found to be unenforceable, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters. The Federal Forum Provision may also impose additional litigation costs on stockholders who assert that the provision is not enforceable or invalid. The Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the federal district courts of the United States may also reach different judgments
82
or results than would other courts, including courts where a stockholder considering an action may be located or would otherwise choose to bring the action, and such judgments may be more or less favorable to us than our stockholders.
We do not currently intend to pay dividends on our common stock and consequently, the ability to achieve a return on investment will depend on appreciation in the price of our common stock.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. We do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance our business. In addition, Delaware law may impose requirements that may restrict our ability to pay dividends to holders of our common stock. As a result, stockholders must rely on sales of their shares of common stock after price appreciation as the only way to realize any future gains on their investment. The payment of any future dividends, if any, will be determined by our Board of Directors in light of conditions then existing, including our earnings, financial condition and capital requirements, business conditions, corporate law requirements and other factors.
If we are unable to implement and maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports.
As a public company, we are required to implement and maintain internal controls over financial reporting and to report any material weaknesses in such internal controls. There is no guarantee we will maintain effective internal controls in the future.
If during the evaluation and testing process, we identify one or more material weaknesses in the design or effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting or determine that existing material weaknesses have not been remediated, our management will be unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective. Even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, our independent registered public accounting firm may conclude that there are material weaknesses with respect to our internal controls or the level at which our internal controls are documented, designed, implemented, or reviewed. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the valuation of our common stock could be adversely affected. If we are unable to assert that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, or when required in the future, if our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to express an opinion as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investors may 86Table of Contentslose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports and the valuation of our common stock could be adversely affected.
Non-U.S. holders may be subject to United States federal income tax on gain on the sale or other taxable disposition of our common stock.
Because we hold significant United States real property interests, we believe we are a “United States real property holding corporation” for United States federal income tax purposes. As a result, a non-U.S. holder generally will be subject to United States federal income tax with respect to any gain on the sale or other taxable disposition of our common stock (and will be required to file a United States federal income tax return for the taxable year of such sale or other taxable disposition), unless our common stock is regularly traded on an established securities market and such non-U.S. holder did not actually or constructively hold more than 5% of our common stock at any time during the shorter of (a) the five-year period preceding the date of the sale or disposition of such common stock or (b) the non-U.S. holder’s holding period for such common stock. Additionally, a purchaser of our common stock generally will be required to withhold and remit to the Internal Revenue Service fifteen percent (15%) of the purchase price paid to such non-U.S. holder unless, at the time of such sale or other disposition, any class of our stock is regularly traded on an established securities market or any other exception to such withholding applies.
We believe that our common stock currently is regularly traded on an established securities market. However, no assurance can be given in this regard and no assurance can be given that our common stock will remain regularly traded in the future. However, no assurance can be given that our common stock will remain regularly traded in the future. Non-U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the consequences of disposing of our common stock.
A significant number of the members of our Board of Directors and executive officers and certain of the experts named in this Annual Report are non-U.S. residents, and you may not be able to enforce civil liabilities against these persons.
Although Ivanhoe Electric is incorporated under the DGCL, a significant number of the members of our Board of Directors and executive officers and certain of the experts named in this Annual Report are non-U.S. residents, and certain assets of such persons are located outside the United States. As a result, you may not be able to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons or to enforce, in U.S. courts, against these persons or their assets, judgments of U.S. courts predicated upon any civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal or state securities laws. In addition, you may not be able to enforce certain civil liabilities predicated upon U.S. federal or state securities laws in non-US jurisdictions
83
against us, our directors and executive officers and certain of the experts named in this Annual Report or the assets of such persons.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 1C.Item 1A. Cybersecurity
Recently Filed
Click on a ticker to see risk factors
| Ticker * | File Date |
|---|---|
| OVV | an hour ago |
| ACVA | an hour ago |
| USB | an hour ago |
| BWXT | an hour ago |
| MAT | an hour ago |
| AXSM | an hour ago |
| CAKE | an hour ago |
| NOVT | an hour ago |
| BDN | an hour ago |
| RIG | an hour ago |
| RYN | an hour ago |
| LPLA | an hour ago |
| KTOS | an hour ago |
| KWR | 2 hours ago |
| LAZ | 2 hours ago |
| PRA | 2 hours ago |
| BLBX | 2 hours ago |
| MAN | 2 hours ago |
| DEA | 2 hours ago |
| ERIE | 2 hours ago |
| COUR | 2 hours ago |
| MMLP | 2 hours ago |
| MAX | 2 hours ago |
| WEN | 2 hours ago |
| PRK | 2 hours ago |
| TRMK | 2 hours ago |
| BOOM | 2 hours ago |
| APLE | 2 hours ago |
| GLDD | 2 hours ago |
| ORIC | 2 hours ago |
| CCI | 2 hours ago |
| AGNC | 2 hours ago |
| TARS | 2 hours ago |
| SMMT | 2 hours ago |
| FBIN | 2 hours ago |
| CINF | 2 hours ago |
| LZ | 2 hours ago |
| EKSO | 2 hours ago |
| FRPT | 2 hours ago |
| VVX | 2 hours ago |
| IVR | 2 hours ago |
| VRE | 2 hours ago |
| RNA | 2 hours ago |
| CL | 2 hours ago |
| SAH | 2 hours ago |
| SEIC | 2 hours ago |
| UVSP | 2 hours ago |
| KEY | 3 hours ago |
| WTS | 3 hours ago |
| D | 6 hours ago |