Quiver Quantitative

Risk Factors Dashboard

Once a year, publicly traded companies issue a comprehensive report of their business, called a 10-K. A component mandated in the 10-K is the ‘Risk Factors’ section, where companies disclose any major potential risks that they may face. This dashboard highlights all major changes and additions in new 10K reports, allowing investors to quickly identify new potential risks and opportunities.

View risk factors by ticker

Search filings by term

Risk Factors - CMTL

-New additions in green
-Changes in blue
-Hover to see similar sentence in last filing

Item 1A. - Risk Factors, and other filings with the SEC.

Business Segments

We operate two core businesses: Satellite and Space Communications and Allerium, each of which we believe are serving end markets themselves undergoing a period of long-term growth, reinvestment and rapid technological change. Our Satellite and Space Communications segment is one of a limited number of U.S.-based providers of satellite modems and high-power amplifiers, a market leader in troposcatter technologies, and serves some of the world’s largest defense contractors and allied foreign governments, as well as multiple U.S. government agencies, including branches of the U.S. Armed Forces, U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”) and U.S. Space Force (“USSF”), among others. Our Allerium segment is a leading provider of next generation 911 (“NG-911”) infrastructure and solutions for state and local governments and telecommunication carriers.

Financial information about our business segments is provided in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (13) Segment Information included in Part II - Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The markets and key technologies for each segment are further described below.

Satellite and Space Communications Segment

Overview

Our Satellite and Space Communications segment operates in a market that has undergone a significant transformation in recent years, driven by an increase in global defense spending, rising geopolitical tensions and rapid development of new satellite systems, including commercial non-geostationary orbit ("NGSO") systems like Amazon Kuiper, SpaceX Starlink, Eutelsat OneWeb and SES O3B mPower. These next-generation communications systems rely on the type of sophisticated communications equipment this segment designs, manufactures and supports, including modems, amplifiers, frequency converters and associated software. We are strategically positioned in this evolving landscape, with an innovative product portfolio, a strong U.S.-based manufacturing presence and a proven track record serving the U.S. government, a number of international governments and a variety of established and emerging commercial customers.

The U.S. Space Force ("USSF") Commercial Space Strategy and the U.S. Department of Defense ("DoD") Combined Joint All Domain Command and Control ("CJADC2") approaches to prioritizing capabilities which deliver innovation at the speed of relevance align well with our Satellite and Space Communications business’ next-generation digital solutions. Today, only a limited number of companies, including Comtech, can serve the complex needs of the U.S. and other governments and meet this demand.

The DoD’s satellite communications (“SATCOM”) strategy is also increasingly focused on integrating commercial innovation into its architecture. This includes leveraging commercial capabilities for the majority of wideband communication needs, while retaining government-owned, specialized systems for protected communications. This hybrid approach is supported by increased funding, a new acquisition strategy and centralized procurement through the Commercial Satellite Communications Office (“CSCO”).

Comtech’s software-defined platforms, multi-orbit capabilities and security-hardened solutions are well aligned with this strategy. We believe our ability to rapidly adapt to mission needs, in combination with our U.S.-based manufacturing, trusted supply chain and proven track record, positions us as a key enabler of the DoD’s shift toward a more flexible, resilient and commercially integrated SATCOM architecture.

In addition to aligning with evolving U.S. defense strategies, our Satellite and Space Communications segment benefits from a strategically balanced mix of commercial and government customers. We serve a diverse base that spans U.S. and international defense agencies, global satellite operators and emerging commercial SATCOM ventures. This diversification across customer types and geographies helps mitigate risk, enhances resilience to market fluctuations, and positions the segment for sustained growth. We believe this well-distributed customer portfolio strengthens our ability to scale innovation, respond to dynamic mission requirements, and capture opportunities in both established and emerging global markets.

Our Satellite and Space Communications segment is organized into four technology areas: satellite modem and amplifier technologies, troposcatter technologies, cybersecurity training (formerly, government services) and space components and antennas.

Satellite Modem and Amplifier Technologies

We believe we are a leading provider of satellite earth station modems, solid-state amplifiers ("SSPAs"), frequency converters and traveling wave tube amplifiers ("TWTAs"). Our product portfolio includes a wide range of advanced, software-defined satellite modems and high-performance SSPAs and TWTAs and associated frequency conversion hardware, supported by robust network management software. We hold strong positions in high-throughput modem markets, including cellular backhaul, defense, commercial LEO and MEO satellite networks, as well as the nascent market to support 5G non-terrestrial networks ("NTN"), a sector that could grow in the coming years.

In fiscal 2025, we announced the launch of our new Digital Common Ground (“DCG”) portfolio of modems, designed to enable the U.S. DoD and coalition partners to move to digitized, hybrid satellite network architectures. Built on our proven SATCOM modem portfolio, DCG modems are designed and built at Comtech’s headquarters in Chandler, AZ and support both commercial and government satellite operations on a common, software-defined platform that can be rapidly reconfigured to address evolving mission needs.

We believe our DCG portfolio is one of the first product lines on the market today offering robust access to multi-orbit capabilities across commercial and purpose-built networks. The DCG product line is also one of the first to be Digital Intermediate Frequency Interoperability (“DIFI”) compliant, adhering to DoD and coalition communications standards to enable seamless information flow between services, a key tenet of CJADC2. The DCG product line offers industry leading performance, through multi-gigabit throughput at launch. In addition, we incorporate modern cybersecurity design principles at every level across our DCG product line, ranging from a trusted supply chain to a thoughtful software upgrade lifecycle, including in-field updates. We believe the technologies incorporated into our DCG product line create a meaningful competitive advantage for us.

We also provide rugged, highly efficient, and reliable high-power amplifiers ("HPAs") for commercial and military applications around the world. These HPAs support mission-critical communications accross air, land and sea, including fixed traditional and direct-to-home broadcast, mobile news gathering, transportable and flyaway systems, secure high data rate communications and broadband SATCOM access. Our HPA portfolio includes configurations that are formally qualified for aircraft use, currently supporting both retrofit and linefit installations. We offer solutions across GEO, MEO and LEO orbits and across a range of frequency bands, including C, X, Ku, Ka, Q and V bands, aligning with anticipated demand in higher, less crowded frequencies.

Troposcatter Technologies

We believe we are a world leader in the design and supply of troposcatter equipment. We have designed, manufactured, and delivered troposcatter systems for well over fifty years. We have significantly advanced the capabilities of our Troposcatter Family of Systems (“FoS”), delivering a next-generation, software-defined solution that represents a thousand-fold performance increase over prior generations of equipment.

Our next-generation Troposcatter terminals have been selected by the U.S. Army, the Marines and international defense organizations to support the tactical communications needs. While our traditional customer base has been military and defense agencies, advances in mobility and performance opened new commercial markets, including oil and gas, utilities, marine and rail sectors.

Simultaneously, the defense landscape is evolving. For years, U.S. and allied forces mostly engaged in actions against unconventional adversaries with less advanced technology. Today, the rise of state-based threats and near peer adversaries with advanced technologies is reshaping defense strategies. This shift increases demand for sophisticated communications solutions procured from trusted, domestic providers and creates a natural upgrade cycle for legacy systems deployed globally. Our Multi-Path Radio ("MPR") capability has enabled troposcatter to be deployed in compact, mobile systems, including unmanned vehicles.

We’re optimistic about the long-term potential of our Troposcatter FoS. We believe we offer one of the most advanced and capable solutions in the industry, with a set of newly-developing end markets that we anticipate will position us for sustained growth.

Cybersecurity Training

We provide mission-critical, high-security cyber training to U.S. government customers, both at customer sites and through our in-house development capabilities. Our competitive advantages include proprietary methods for administration and student management, a proven track record through multiple renewal cycles on a key U.S. government program and deep, trusted customer relationships.

We see expansion opportunities across multiple branches of the U.S. government, driven by a heightened focus on cybersecurity threats and workforce readiness. We are also leveraging our extensive library of cybersecurity training programs to serve state and local governments, as well as private sector enterprises. To enhance scalability and accessibility, we are expanding our student and administration portal capabilities through hosted SaaS delivery models.

Space Components and Antennas

For over 45 years, we have been recognized as an industry leader and global supplier of high-reliability space components, engineering services and supply chain management, supporting selection of space-qualified parts for satellite and launch vehicle tracking systems. Our solutions are geared toward critical U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration ("NASA") programs (such as Artemis) and several international space and defense agencies.

Our engineers are not only involved in product design, but also collaborate closely with customers to develop and test electronic parts specifications that ensure capability, reliability and radiation tolerance to specific mission/project requirements. This includes both individual component services and full Electrical, Electronic, and Electromechanical (“EEE”) part supply.

We also lead and conduct failure analysis investigations, assist with manufacturing and issue resolution at the source and support reporting and sell-off processes with customers and their primes including the Japanese Space Exploration Agency (“JAXA”) and NASA. Our quality engineering team assures that all products received from suppliers and test facilities are fully compliant with mission specifications prior to shipment.

To further support our customers’ needs, we have expanded our service offerings to include kitting to customer bill of materials, with direct shipments to designated contract manufacturers.

Within the SATCOM market, we are a leading provider of components that support the mission requirements of LEO, MEO and GEO SATCOM and tracking requirements, offering a host of high-performance single-band and multi-band feed solutions. We also supply maritime antenna solutions that are fielded by foreign governments. Our antenna portfolio includes a range of apertures, including support for large systems and complex multi-band antenna and feed systems.

Satellite and Space Communications: Key Markets and Growth Drivers

As noted previously, the Satellite and Space Communications segment operates in large and expanding global markets, supported by multiple long-term growth drivers. These include technology upgrade cycles, modernization initiatives and increased demand for resilient communications infrastructure from both government and enterprise customers. The deployment of new, large satellite constellations, the proliferation of connected devices, persistent geopolitical tensions, and increased government agency and defense spending are expected to drive sustained investment in SATCOM infrastructure. We believe we are well-positioned to capitalize on this demand through sales of our market-leading next-generation satellite ground infrastructure technologies that can be used with the thousands of new LEO, MEO and large HTS satellites that are expected to be deployed over the next several years, and our advanced troposcatter systems.

Examples of end-market applications that are driving long-term demand for our communication technologies include:

•Government and Military Satellite Communications: Government users rely on high-speed connectivity in a variety of conditions throughout the world to provide real time information sharing, including Situational Awareness (“SA”), dissemination of Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (“ISR”) information, and communications. Our communications solutions provide command and control and satellite networking capabilities that support U.S. and allied government initiatives for assured and resilient communications capabilities, as well as supporting interoperability objectives, including CJADC2 objectives.

•New LEO, MEO and HTS Satellites: Thousands of new satellites in orbit or scheduled for launch over the next several years, according to announcements by Amazon Kuiper, Eutelsat OneWeb, SpaceX Starlink, Telesat Lightspeed and Viasat, which we believe will lead to increasingly complex satellite networks. As service providers work to offer connectivity to these high-speed, high-bandwidth satellites and expand their networks to handle the demand for new LEO, MEO and HTS applications, we believe our networking platforms, and our solid-state amplifiers will ultimately be incorporated into many new installations and equipment upgrades. We continue to provide modems and amplifiers to existing LEO and MEO communications satellite providers and expect to see growth in imaging satellites alongside commercial imaging constellations, including conventional, thermal and hyperspectral.

•5G NTN and Satellite-Based Cellular Backhaul: Demand for satellite-based cellular backhaul is anticipated to continue to grow as next-generation cellular networks continue to deploy to developing regions of the world, including those that are unserved or underserved by terrestrial infrastructure due to access or challenging geography. We also anticipate growth in demand for deployment of 3rd Generation Partnership Project ("3GPP") 5G NTN capabilities, which several of our next-generation products have been developed with the intention to support.

•Troposcatter Family of Systems: U.S. and allied defense strategies are shifting focus to threats from organized, better equipped and higher technology adversaries, placing a premium on sophisticated communications technology from trusted, onshore providers. Comtech’s Troposcatter Family of Systems (“FoS”) delivers a next-generation, software-defined solution that represents a thousand-fold performance increase over prior generations of equipment. Further, constant innovation means Comtech’s latest generation of equipment can be packed into two small cases, offering significant mobility improvements. Our next-generation troposcatter terminals have been chosen by the U.S. Army, the U.S. Marines and defense organizations overseas to support the tactical communications requirements of our allies. Additionally, we see multiple opportunities for non-defense applications, including oil and gas, utilities, marine and rail industry use.

Satellite and Space Communications: Customer Base

Our customer base for the Satellite and Space Communications segment includes a diverse mix of government and commercial organizations worldwide, with whom we have longstanding, trusted relationships. These include leading system and network integrators in the global satellite, mobile cellular, defense, broadcast and aerospace industries, as well as the U.S. federal government (including the U.S. Army, Air Force, Marine Corps and Navy), U.S. state and local governments and allied foreign governments. For fiscal 2025, approximately 55.1% of the segment’s sales are derived from U.S. government and related agency contracts. Representative customer categories include:

•The U.S. Army, U.S. Marine Corps, U.S. Navy, prime contractors to the U.S. Armed Forces, NATO and foreign governments (i.e., ministries of defense), as well as the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command and NASA

•Domestic and international defense customers, as well as prime contractors and system suppliers such as Airbus, Lockheed Martin Corporation, L3Harris Technologies, Inc., Northrop Grumman Corporation, RTX Corp., Thales, The Boeing Company and Viasat Inc.

•Commercial end-customers include Bharat Electronics, Ditel, Kai Networks, Ovzon, JAXA, Mitsubishi Electric, SED Systems (a division of Calian Ltd.), SES S.A. and Speedcast International Limited

•Satellite systems integrators, wireless and other communication service providers, and broadcasters, such as DIRECTV LLC

•Aviation industry, such as the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") and system integrators such as Collins Aerospace, an RTX Business

•Oil companies such as Shell Oil Company and PETRONAS

This well-diversified customer base across sectors and geographies enhances our resilience, reduces dependency on any single market and positions the segment for long-term growth.

Allerium Segment

Rebranding to Allerium

During fiscal 2025, we launched the rebranding of our Terrestrial and Wireless Networks segment to "Allerium," a fusion of “all” and “continuum.” Allerium is a name we believe symbolizes the seamless connection, collaboration, reliability and empowerment that we are focused on delivering to public safety professionals and essential service providers. Allerium reflects a brand rooted in experience, driven by innovation and built for those who protect our communities. As the composition of this reportable operating segment has not changed, this rebrand serves to clarify our go-to-market strategy under a single identity, which we believe reaffirms our commitment to delivering successful outcomes when it matters most. The rebrand strengthens market recognition, enhances customer trust and positions the business for sustained growth. Allerium underscores our focus on long-term value creation by improving brand equity, expanding customer reach and enabling more efficient go-to-market execution. It also increases visibility within key public safety and network markets, sectors defined by trust, reliability and innovation. While the rebrand has changed, our mission has not: to serve those who protect our communities, with technology that performs when every connection counts.

Overview

Our Allerium segment is a leading provider of next generation 911 (“NG-911”) infrastructure and solutions for state and local governments and carriers. From the moment a 911 call is made, Comtech provides highly reliable solutions that contribute to emergency calls being processed instantly, with proper routing to first responders. Our solutions include feature-rich data sets (such as: precise location information, text messaging, photos, videos, real-time call transcription and translation), putting first responders in the best possible position to make decisions when every second counts. Our customers are the businesses, communities and governments that need to implement and improve 911 infrastructure in the U.S., as well as mobile network operators ("MNOs") in the U.S. and abroad that have a need to determine subscriber location within a network or to facilitate messaging services. According to the 2024 Next Generation 911 report published by Frost & Sullivan, a leading third-party research firm, we were the second leading NG-911 primary contract holder, with an estimated market share of 22.1% and a population coverage of nearly 60 million. We have primary contracts with multiple states and counties across the U.S., which we believe positions us as a leader in public safety communication and location technologies.

The Allerium segment is organized into three service areas: next generation 911 and call delivery, call handling solutions and trusted location and messaging solutions.

Next Generation 911 and Call Delivery

In addition to 911 call routing, we provide systems integration, geospatial location information, satellite and location infrastructure terminals, and linkage to NG-911 Emergency Services IP Networks ("ESInet"). We also offer what we believe are best-in-class 911 call handling solutions. We believe state and local governments need to upgrade existing legacy networks, location technologies, and call handling systems to modern NG-911 systems infrastructure, including 911 text messaging services, advanced data, real-time photos, and other types of information sharing over IP networks.

As the U.S., Canada and Australia broadly adopt upgraded NG-911 and call handling solutions, we believe that other countries will follow similar technology and telecommunications advancements. Our public safety and location technology solutions have been deployed since 2006 and are utilized by domestic MNOs, as well as internationally, to provide reliable device location determination for public safety and commercial applications. Many of our technologies, such as positioning, mapping and text messaging are embedded in our public safety and location offerings to help address mapping, routing and geolocations. Our solutions address Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") mandates for emergency services as they relate to location delivery by supporting precise caller location. Our text messaging platforms are used by wireless carriers to provide short messaging services (“SMS”) to their end-customers, as well as being used to communicate with 911 public safety answering points ("PSAP").

Call Handling Solutions

Guardian is our state-of-the-art call handling solution, which provides an integrated call and text-to-and-from 911 solution on a unified platform. The solution provides a flexible user interface, adapts to varying customer environments and preferences, provides powerful call conferencing capabilities, enhanced reporting capabilities and offers geospatial 911 location call display directly from a customized map. Because of its advanced features, it allows us to offer an immediate upgrade path to existing and new customers and has expanded our presence in the public safety solutions market with more than 700 PSAPs and emergency call centers installed in 5 countries.

The Guardian platform includes an integrated cloud-based texting solution we call Guardian Messenger, which provides call takers / dispatchers with the ability to collect, process and share previously unavailable live incident information such as text, photos, and video via SMS and multimedia messaging services (“MMS”), from one integrated desktop. The Guardian platform also offers a cloud-based reporting and analytics solution we call Guardian Insights, designed to assist emergency call center directors to know their operations, so they can better plan and manage resources and workloads.

We are investing in product enhancements for our Guardian platform, which include developing Allerium Mira, our cloud-based emergency call handling, analytics and cyber security solution that we are targeting for launch in fiscal 2026. We have also increased our “911-as-a-Service" offering, deploying hosted 911 call centers solutions across numerous states and regions in the U.S. and provinces in Canada, starting with locations where we have existing NG-911 networks.

Trusted Location and Messaging Solutions

We provide technologies that enable mobile network operators (“MNOs”) and government agencies to deliver accurate location information, reliable text messaging and geo-targeted public alerts. As MNOs continue their digital transformation, we believe demand will increase for situational awareness capabilities built on advanced mapping and geo-services. Our solutions support device location, network messaging and emergency communications across 2G through 5G environments, helping customers meet regulatory requirements and maintain essential connectivity services. For our installed base, we also provide ongoing operational support, including system administration, optimization, configuration management and maintenance services that ensure performance and continuity.

Our SmartResponse® cloud-based solution offers a common operational picture to PSAPs and first responders, enabling an effective data-driven response for security agencies and first responders by providing a holistic information environment for them. This new solution offers streaming live feeds from traffic cameras at and near incident locations, and accesses caller information like past residences, criminal history or next-of-kin information at the tap of a button. Offering a bird's-eye view of integrated data, the SmartResponse® solution empowers first responders to ensure appropriate resources are on the scene and to better serve the public in emergency situations.

Allerium: Key Markets and Growth Drivers

We are a leading provider of modern public safety and location technologies. Our next generation solutions enable rich, multimedia information to be delivered alongside 911 calls and situational awareness data. Also, our E-911 and NG-911 call routing solutions allow global wireless carriers and voice over the Internet ("VoIP") carriers, as well as legacy telecommunications carriers, to deliver emergency communications and rich situational awareness data to public safety emergency call centers nationwide. When someone attempts an emergency communication, or a device or artificial intelligence ("AI") technology detects an emergency, our technologies access the user or device’s location information from wireless, VoIP, or satellite networks and location databases, and route the emergency details to the assigned public safety jurisdiction. Today, we provide public safety and location technologies to many U.S. telecommunication carriers, the largest being Verizon (for which we provide 911 call routing via cellular and wireline service). We believe we service a significant portion of the carrier market for 911 cellular call routing applications, along with one other leading competitor. With the advent of new AI-powered wearable devices, cameras and vehicle telematics, we believe there will be increasing opportunities to expand our service offerings globally.

In addition to our growth in core 911 services, any expansion of 988 networks in the future across the U.S. could have a positive impact on our business. 988 services provide free and confidential support for people in distress, suicide prevention and crisis resources. While the opportunities to expand into 988 services are evolving more slowly than anticipated, we believe we are uniquely positioned to expand our 911 services to mitigate some of the core challenges the 988 network is currently experiencing with area code specific call routing. By connecting 988 services with our proven 911 infrastructure, we believe that location services critical to dispatch personnel can be improved for 988 call responses.

Growth of 5G networks, new network-based positioning technologies, as well as AI are expected to create expanding opportunities for the application of our mobile location services, as multiple verticals, including the Public Safety, Transportation, Manufacturing, Healthcare and Retail industries, advance in their respective digital transformations. As these industries increasingly rely on data from connected devices, we expect our services can facilitate their use of location information in real-time to enhance existing business processes and outcomes, as well as end user experiences. We believe end-market applications such as worker’s safety in high-risk areas, smart manufacturing and autonomous driving would benefit enormously from new precision-positioning techniques. Also, MNOs can now provide even more advanced location-based services, in addition to existing connectivity solutions.

Examples of end-market applications that are driving long-term demand for our Allerium technologies include:

•Emergency Communication Solution (“ECS”): Our ECS solution provides mobile, VoIP, landline, satellite and other originating service providers ("OSP") a single, simplified interface to submit emergency service requests from their users and devices. Our ECS solution provides location verification services, address validation and translation and next-step routing for emergency communications and texts as additional data useful for an emergency responder. This solution provides a trusted, standards-compliant path to PSAPs that adheres to FCC reporting and delivery requirements, taking this burden and complexity off of our OSP customers.

•Next Generation Core Services (“NGCS”): Our NGCS services implement and manage the NG-911 ESInet consistent with National Emergency Number Association, or NENA, i3 standards. We hold primary statewide contracts in Arizona, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Washington. We also hold direct contracts in counties in Texas (North Central Texas), Illinois (Northern Illinois Next Generation Alliance) and Missouri (St. Louis County). As such, we believe that we are a leader in public safety communication and location technologies.

•Mobile Location Center (“MLC”): Our location technology solutions are embedded in the networks of many MNOs worldwide. We enable the determination of a mobile device’s geospatial position in a variety of environments, leveraging a wide range of signals including GPS, GNSS and multiple cellular positioning technologies ranging from 2G through 5G mobile networks. For our installed base of systems, we provide ongoing operational support, including administration of system components, system optimization, configuration management and maintenance services, including tracking customer support issues, troubleshooting and developing and installing maintenance releases.

In addition, we are developing, and expect to launch in fiscal 2026, our Allerium Mira solution, a multi-tenant, scalable, cloud-agnostic service offering that is purpose-built for the future of public safety. This solution gives agencies a flexible and secure alternative to traditional on-premise systems, with the scalability to grow as their needs evolve. Allerium Mira is being designed to ensure responders can engage with the public on any channel. Its modern, microservices-based design is intended to simplify deployment and ongoing management for agencies. Paired with our NGCS solution, Allerium Mira is expected to enable agencies to unlock more of the network’s potential, delivering smarter, faster, and more resilient emergency responses.

Allerium: Customer Base

Our Allerium segment serves numerous customers, primarily in North America and Australia, with whom we have cultivated longstanding relationships, including state and local governments, and a number of the largest telecommunication companies in the world. Representative customer categories include:

•U.S. state and local governments, such as the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the states of Arizona, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Ohio, South Carolina, and Washington, and North Central Texas Emergency Communications District, the Northern Illinois Next Generation Alliance and St. Louis County, Missouri.

•Telecommunication companies, such as AT&T Inc., Bell Mobility, Inc., Comcast Corp., Nokia Corp., Rogers Communications Canada Inc., TELUS Communications Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Vodafone Public Limited Co.

•Telephone companies and federal, provincial, and local governments in Australia, Canada, Cayman Islands and New Zealand.

More Information and Where to Find It

Our Internet website is www.comtech.com, at which you can find our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), including investor letters, press releases, annual reports, quarterly reports, current reports, and any amendments to those filings. We also make announcements regarding company developments and financial and operating performance through our blog, Signals, at www.comtech.com/signals. We also use our website to disseminate other material information to our investors (on the Home Page and in the "Investor Relations" section).

We also use social media channels to communicate with customers and the public about our Company, our products, services, and other issues, and we use social media and the Internet to communicate with investors, including information about our stockholder meetings. Information and updates about our Annual Meetings will continue to be posted on our website at www.comtech.com in the "Investors" section.

None of the information on our website, blog or any other website identified herein is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K and such information should not be considered a part of this Form 10-K.

Transformation Plan

On January 13, 2025, we announced an expanded plan to transform our business (herein after referred to as our "transformation plan"). Our transformation plan includes, but is not limited to, the initiatives set forth below:

•improve corporate governance;

•strengthen executive leadership;

•upgrade talent in key positions;

•reinvigorate corporate culture that emphasizes transparency, empowerment and accountability;

•align accountability throughout the organization;

•optimize cash flow including disciplined working capital management;

•invest in next-generation solutions for our customers' expanding and emerging needs;

•enhance operational efficiency;

•streamline product lines with a focus on strategic, higher operating margin products;

•improve production efficiency;

•reduce cost structures;

•enhance customer satisfaction;

•improve contractual terms with customers and vendors;

•improve capital structure through amended and improved terms with creditors and reduction of principal and interest amounts due; and

•explore strategic alternatives for our various businesses and product lines, including the potential sale or divestiture of assets or business lines.

Elements of our transformation plan related to our operations have resulted in:

•On November 7, 2023, we completed the divestiture of our solid-state RF microwave high power amplifiers and control components product line, which was included in our Satellite and Space Communications segment, pursuant to a stock sale agreement entered into on October 11, 2023 (the "PST Divestiture"). Net proceeds from the PST Divestiture in fiscal 2024 were $33.2 million and used in part to repay a portion of our outstanding debt at the time, as well as to fund working capital needs.

•We have undertaken a detailed evaluation of our Satellite and Space Communications segment's product portfolio to identify further opportunities to divest, separate and/or rationalize businesses or facilities that are not core to our go-forward focus. Consistent with this effort, in our fourth quarter of fiscal 2024, we made the decision to exit our underperforming operations in Basingstoke, United Kingdom. Such operations were established in connection with the fiscal 2020 acquisition of CGC Technology Limited. Taking into consideration the significant ongoing investment, as well as unfavorable contract terms on prospective antenna sales, we concluded such operations would not generate an attractive return on invested capital and made the decision to exit these operations. Furthermore, we conducted an intensive review of our product portfolio to focus future investment on our most strategic, high-margin revenue opportunities within the Satellite and Space Communications segment. Upon completion of such review, we recorded a non-cash charge of $11.4 million within Cost of Sales on our Consolidated Statement of Operations, primarily related to the write down of inventory during the first quarter of fiscal 2025 associated with approximately 70 products within our satellite ground infrastructure product line that were discontinued.

•We implemented multiple reductions in force throughout our organization and in all our segments. Inclusive of actions taken in August 2025 (i.e., the start of our fiscal 2026), such reductions approximated 23% of our workforce as of July 31, 2024, or approximately $47.0 million in annualized labor costs. Related to these activities, in fiscal 2025, we recorded $3.6 million of severance costs within Selling, General and Administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

•In September 2025, we initiated a process to further optimize our operations within our Satellite and Space Communications segment. Such actions include reducing our facility footprint and migrating the manufacturing of certain products to our Chandler, Arizona facility. We expect these actions to take place primarily in the first half of fiscal 2026 and result in approximately $3.0 million of annualized cost savings.

There can be no assurance that our plans will result in acquisitions, divestitures or other strategic changes or outcomes. Also, while anticipated to improve our profitability in future periods, such actions may result in near-term restructuring charges.

Sales, Marketing and Customer Support

Sales and marketing strategies include direct sales through sales, marketing and engineering personnel, indirect sales through independent representatives, value-added resellers, and sales through a combination of the foregoing. We devote resources to evaluating and responding to requests for proposals by governmental agencies around the world and, as needed, we employ the use of specialized consultants to develop our proposals and bids.

We intend to continue to expand international marketing efforts, as needed, by engaging additional independent sales representatives, distributors and value-added resellers and by establishing foreign sales offices. In addition, we expect to leverage our relationships with larger companies (such as prime contractors to the U.S. government and large mobile wireless operators) to market our technology solutions. In fiscal 2026, we expect to continue expanding our social media and Internet presence and further developing an updated marketing and branding strategy, such as the transition of our Terrestrial and Wireless Networks segment to the new Allerium brand.

We are pre-qualified as an approved vendor for certain government contracts. We collaborate in sales efforts under various arrangements with integrators. Our marketing efforts also include advertising, public relations, speaking engagements and attending and sponsoring industry conferences.

Our management, technical and marketing personnel establish and maintain relationships with customers. Our sales strategies include a commitment to providing ongoing customer support for our systems and equipment. This support involves providing direct access to engineering staff or trained technical representatives to resolve technical or operational issues.

Our products and services in many of our product lines have long sales cycles. Once a product is designed into a system, customers may be reluctant to change the incumbent supplier due to the extensive qualification process and potential redesign required in using alternative sources.

Sales by geography and customer type, as a percentage of related net sales, are as follows:

Sales to U.S. government customers include sales to the DoD, intelligence and civilian agencies, as well as sales directly to or through prime contractors.

Domestic sales include sales to commercial customers, as well as to U.S. state and local governments. For fiscal 2025 and 2024, except for the U.S. government, there were no customers that represented more than 10% of consolidated net sales. For fiscal 2023, included in domestic sales are sales to a top tier mobile network operator ("MNO"), which were 10.6% of consolidated net sales.

International sales for fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023 (which include sales to U.S. domestic companies for inclusion in products that are sold to international customers) were $105.1 million, $115.9 million and $132.1 million, respectively. When we sell internationally, we denominate most of our contracts in U.S. dollars. Some of our sales to international customers are paid for by letters of credit or on an open account. From time to time, some of our international customers may require us to provide performance guarantees.

Except for the U.S., no individual country (including sales to U.S. domestic companies for inclusion in products that are sold to a foreign country) represented more than 10% of consolidated net sales for fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023.

Backlog

Our backlog as of July 31, 2025 was $672.1 million (of which $177.4 million was attributed to the Satellite and Space Communications segment and $494.7 million was attributed to the Allerium segment). We estimate that a substantial portion of the backlog as of July 31, 2025 will be recognized as sales during the next twenty-four month period, with the rest thereafter. Such estimate could be impacted by our transformation plan discussed throughout this Form 10-K.

At July 31, 2025, 69.6% of our backlog consisted of orders for use by U.S. commercial customers, 12.1% consisted of U.S. government contracts, subcontracts and government funded programs and 18.3% consisted of orders for use by international customers (including sales to U.S. domestic companies for inclusion in products that will be sold to international customers).

Our backlog is defined as orders (sometimes also referred to herein as bookings) that we believe to be firm. Backlog that is derived from U.S. government orders relates to U.S. government contracts that have been awarded, signed and funded. Backlog for our U.S. government customers also includes amounts appropriated by Congress and allotted to the contract by the procuring government agency. Such backlog does not include the value of options that may be exercised in the future on multi-year contracts, nor does it include the value of additional purchase orders that we may receive under indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity ("IDIQ") contracts or basic ordering agreements. In some cases, such as contracts received from large U.S. based telecommunication companies, our backlog may include the value of customer authorizations to proceed or may be computed by multiplying the most recent month’s contract or revenue by the months remaining under the existing long-term agreements, which we consider to be the best available information for anticipating revenue under those agreements. When we acquire a company with existing contracts, we only record bookings for those contracts that meet our definition. Almost all of the contracts in our backlog (including firm orders previously received from the U.S. government) are subject to modification, cancellation at the convenience of the customer, or for default in the event that we are unable to perform under the contract.

A significant portion of the backlog from our U.S. commercial customers relates to large, multi-year contracts to provide state and local governments (and their agencies) with 911 public safety and location technology solutions. Although the contracts themselves represent legal, binding obligations of these governments, funding is often subject to the approval of budgets (for example, on an annual or bi-annual basis).

There can be no assurance that our backlog will result in actual revenue in any particular period, or at all, or that any contract included in backlog will be profitable. There is a higher degree of risk in this regard with respect to unfunded backlog. The actual amount and timing of any revenue is subject to various contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. The actual recognition of revenue on contracts included in backlog may never occur or may change because a program schedule could change, a customer may not follow up with order details (e.g., delivery instructions), fluctuations in currency exchange rates after an order is placed could cause our products to become too expensive for a foreign customer, a customer’s program could be canceled, a contract could be reduced, modified or terminated early due to changes in a customer’s priorities, funding may not be included in future budgets, actual indirect rates being reimbursed on U.S. government contracts may ultimately be less than those indirect rates included in our initial proposals, or an option that we had assumed would be exercised is not exercised. As a result of these contingencies, we may adjust our backlog if we determine that such orders are no longer firm and/or funded. In addition to adjustments from these types of contingencies, variations in backlog from time to time are attributable, in part, to changes in sales mix, the timing of contract proposals, the timing of contract awards, delivery schedules on specific contracts, new bookings obtained through acquisitions or reductions due to divestitures or other restructuring type activities. A large majority of the solutions in our satellite ground infrastructure technologies product line within our Satellite and Space Communications segment operate under short lead times. Backlog in both our Satellite and Space Communications segment and Allerium segment has been, and could be, highly influenced by the nature and timing of orders received from federal, state and local governments and defense-related agencies, causing such orders to be subject to unpredictable funding, deployment and technology decisions by such customers. As a result, we believe our backlog and orders, at any point in time, are not necessarily indicative of the total sales anticipated for any future period.

For more information about risks pertaining to our backlog, see the discussion of our Transformation Plan discussed above, as well as those risks outlined in Item 1A – Risk Factors under Part I of this Form 10-K.

Research and Development

We have established leading technology positions in our fields through internal and customer-funded research and development activities.

Internal research and development expenses are reported as research and development expenses for financial reporting purposes and were $17.4 million, $24.1 million and $48.6 million in fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, representing 3.5%, 4.5% and 8.8% of total consolidated net sales, respectively, for these periods. Customer-funded research and development activities relate to the adaptation of our basic technology to specialized customer requirements which is recoverable under contracts and is reflected in net sales with the related costs included in cost of sales. Certain of our government customers also contract with us from time to time to conduct research on telecommunications software, equipment and systems. During fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, we were reimbursed by customers for such activities in the amounts of $22.8 million, $23.0 million and $14.0 million, respectively.

In addition to the recent increases in customer-funded research and development activities, in fiscal 2025 and 2024, we also experienced an increase in engineering efforts related to cost to fulfill contract assets and internal use software. In both fiscal 2025 and 2024, we capitalized $2.9 million for cost to fulfill contract assets. In fiscal 2025 and 2024, we capitalized $3.9 million and $3.8 million, respectively, for internal use software. As a result of these trends and the impact of reductions in force actioned in fiscal 2025 and 2024, our research and development expenses for financial reporting purposes significantly decreased as compared to historical periods.

During fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, we incurred $0.3 million, $4.1 million and $3.8 million, respectively, of strategic emerging technology costs for next-generation satellite technology to advance our solutions offerings to be used with new broadband satellite constellations. A significant portion of these costs related to our steerable antenna operations in Basingstoke, United Kingdom, which we wound down in fiscal 2025. Future costs, if any, will be reported as part of our ongoing research and development activities and not added back to our Adjusted EBITDA.

Intellectual Property

We rely upon trade secrets, technical know-how, continuing technological innovation and, with respect to certain key technologies, patents to develop and maintain our competitive position. The products we sell require significant engineering design and manufacturing expertise. For technological capabilities that are not protected by patents or licenses, we generally rely on the expertise of our employees and our learned experiences in both the design and manufacture of our products and the delivery of our services.

Some of our key Satellite and Space Communications segment technology is protected by patents that are significant to protecting our proprietary technology. We have been issued several U.S. patents relating to forward error correction technology that is utilized in our Turbo Product Code or TPC enabled satellite modems. We do not expect that upon expiration of these patents, our future results will be negatively impacted.

We have dozens of patents worldwide relating to wireless location services, text messaging, GPS ephemeris data, emergency public safety data routing, electronic commerce and other areas. To-date, our strategy has been to avoid offensive and defensive patent litigation and focus on building meaningful partnerships with other companies through direct licensing, cross licensing, and other forms of agreements. We do not believe that any single patent or group of patents, patent application or patent license agreement is material to our operations.

We have filed additional patent applications for certain apparatus and processes we believe we have invented covering key features of location services, wireless text alerts, SMS Center, mobile-originated data and E911 network software. There is no assurance that any patent application will result in a patent being issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or other patent offices, nor is there any guarantee that any issued patent will be valid and enforceable. Additionally, foreign patent rights may or may not be available or pursued in any technology area for which U.S. patent applications have been filed.

Almost all the products and services we sell to the U.S. government include technology and other technical know-how that we have internally developed. In past instances where we have provided government-purpose rights, to our knowledge, the U.S. government has not exercised any of these rights. To the extent that we have provided or will provide government-purpose rights in the future, we believe that given the rapidly changing nature of our technology, our future success will depend primarily on the technical competence and creative skill of our personnel, rather than any contractual protection.

Competition

Our businesses are highly competitive and are characterized by rapid technological change. Some of our competitors are substantially larger, have significantly greater financial, marketing, research and development, technological and operating resources and broader product lines than we have. Other companies are developing new technologies and the shift towards open standards such as IP-based satellite networks will likely result in increased competition. A significant technological breakthrough by others, including new companies, our existing competitors and our customers, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Some large defense-based companies have subsidiaries or divisions that compete against us in one or more business segments. In addition, new and potential competitors are always emerging. Certain of our customers, such as prime contractors who currently outsource their engineering and manufacturing requirements to us, have technological capabilities in our product areas and could choose to replace our products with products they develop. In some cases, we partner or team with companies (both large and mid-tier) to compete against other teams for large defense programs. In some cases, these same companies may be among our competitors.

Listed below, in alphabetical order, are some of our competitors in each of our two business segments:

Satellite and Space Communications – Advantech Co., Ltd., Aethercomm Inc. (acquired by Frontgrade Technologies, a portfolio company of Veritas Capital), Agilis Satcom, AMERGINT Technologies, Inc. (acquired by ARKA), Amkom Design Group Inc., AnaCom, Inc., Codan Limited, Communications and Power Industries (also referred to as "CPI"), Datum Systems, Inc., dB Control Corp. (a subsidiary of HEICO Corp.), Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd., General Dynamics Corporation, Hughes Network Systems, LLC (a subsidiary of EchoStar), Kratos Defense and Security Solutions (Including Kratos RT Logic and Avtec Systems, Inc.), L3Harris Technologies, Inc., Mission Microwave Technologies, LLC, ND Satcom GmbH, Novelsat LTD, Paradise Datacom Ltd. (a subsidiary of Teledyne Technologies Inc.), Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Safran Defense and Space, Inc., ST Engineering iDirect, Inc. (including Newtec), Starlink Services, LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of SpaceX), Terrasat Communications Inc., TrellisWare Technologies, Inc., Ultra Intelligence and Communications and ViaSat, Inc.

Allerium – AT&T Inc., Atos, Axon Enterprise, Inc., Bandwidth.com, Carbyne, Central Square Technologies, 8x8, Inc., Everbridge, Inc. (acquired by Thoma Bravo), Hexagon AB, Immersive Labs, INdigital (acquired by Novacap), Intersec, Intrado Life & Safety, Inc., Invictus Apps, Inc. d/b/a PREPARED (acquired by Axon), LM Ericsson, Lumen Technologies, Inc. (formerly CenturyLink, Inc.), Mobilaris AB, Mobile Arts AB, Motorola Solutions, Inc., NGA911, NextNav, Inc., Nokia Networks (a subsidiary of Nokia Corporation), Polaris Wireless, RapidDeploy Inc. (acquired by Motorola Solutions), RapidSOS, Rave Mobile Safety (acquired by Motorola Solutions), Sinch AB (Inteliquent), Synergem Technologies, SS8, TomTom N.V., Versaterm Public Safety Inc., WestTel and Zetron.

We believe that competition in all our markets is based primarily on technology innovation, product performance, reputation, delivery times, customer support and price. Due to our proprietary know-how, we believe we can develop, produce and deliver products and services on a cost-effective basis faster than many of our competitors.

Corporate Responsibility and Sustainability

We recognize the need for driving corporate responsibility within our organization, throughout our supplier network and in our communities. To drive this responsibility, we will continue to target effective corporate governance, ethical behavior in the workplace and social responsibility, while also updating and enhancing this focus with initiatives, such as: refreshing the roles and responsibilities of the committees of our Board of Directors to ensure oversight of compliance, risks, and best practices; and enhancing our company-wide People Strategy to continue to foster and promote workplace talent and employee engagement.

Human Capital

Our employees and our culture are regarded as keys to our success to retain top talent, boost productivity and align with our company’s mission. Our comprehensive people strategy continues to focus on developing a meaningful plan to enhance our employees’ experience and promote people-centric policies. We are passionate about building impactful employee engagement through a variety of programs, initiatives, and other opportunities. As part of this strategy, we are providing a foundation for a workplace where employees feel they belong, their views are valued, and they are empowered to pursue opportunities that drive their professional passion. Our People Strategy is also focused on meeting our strategic recruitment initiatives, developing and promoting talent, supporting competitive benefits and wellness programs, and emphasizing the importance of our employees’ health, safety and wellness.

Fostering Engagement

We believe that a positive, welcoming environment leads to greater involvement and connection to the organization which foster a sense of proactive belonging, a key component for achieving a sustainable impact. At the heart of our approach is the intentional act of bringing people together across social, cultural and experiential gaps. By creating opportunities for provocative thinking and meaningful experiences, we are able to challenge assumptions that disrupt our innate habits of thinking and behaving. We strive for an environment where all employees feel that they belong, are accepted, included, respected and supported as individuals.

We expect our employees and contractors to foster authentic connections and cultivate hospitable spaces. Our policy promotes equal employment opportunities without discrimination or harassment on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, age, disability, or any other status protected by law. Our senior leadership team drives these efforts across the enterprise to cultivate a strong culture of inclusivity.

At least once per month we organize an event or engagement where employees are encouraged to participate to celebrate our workforce and our communities. Events include National Pet Day, Men’s Health Awareness, Breast Cancer Awareness Month, and Autism Awareness Month, among others. In fiscal 2025, we also commemorated "Honor Week” by spotlighting our veteran employees and recognizing their accomplishments.

Our recent progress coupled with leadership style changes has inspired a reinvigorated corporate culture that emphasizes transparency, empowerment and accountability, in which employees are increasingly taking pride in contributing to our collective success, which has enhanced morale, employee retention and performance. We are working to build stronger employee connections through several new initiatives. Strong communication is the key to providing the foundation for an engaged workforce. Company news, employee opportunities, company initiatives and events are communicated through our company-wide intranet and monthly segment town hall meetings. We also implemented company-wide town hall meetings, at least quarterly, which are led by our Chief Executive Officer and senior leadership team. These meetings have been well-received by employees, reinforcing transparent communication and a feeling of inclusion and a forum to "have a voice." We continued our "Meet the Team" series, profiling one employee each month in a monthly article released on our intranet and we also launched the “MORE” program (which stands for "Moments of Recognition Every Day") to showcase our appreciation for our employees' contributions and successes. Specifically, MORE provides an opportunity to publicly recognize Employee and Manager of the Month winners (winners are personally notified by our CEO each month), service awards and other segment success celebrations.

Developing and Retaining Talent

To meet and execute our strategic business goals, we are committed to ensuring that our employees find their careers at Comtech filled with purpose, growth and fulfillment. We are focused on sourcing, attracting and retaining top talent, including those with engineering, science and technical backgrounds. We continuously review the skillsets required to meet our customers’ needs and reflect this review in our recruitment efforts. To promote this initiative, we use a variety of recruiting platforms aimed at attracting talent of various backgrounds and cultures and professional connections,. We aim to create personalized development plans during our talent, promotion and succession planning.

We value employee development at all career stages and performance levels. We continuously invest in programs, benefits and resources to foster the personal and professional growth of our colleagues. We provide ongoing training and career development opportunities by offering courses through Comtech University, our online learning management system, and offer job-specific training to promote and develop advancement within the organization and to enhance skills. In fiscal 2025, we added several required trainings to provide awareness of and foster compliance with key Company policies.

We value exceptional employees who make a difference to the communities where we operate. In addition to spotlighting employee achievements through our communication channels, we recognize employees who go the extra mile with our annual “Above and Beyond” award showcasing volunteerism in local communities.

At July 31, 2025, we had 1,385 employees (including temporary employees and contractors), 820 of whom were engaged in production and production support, 323 in research and development and other engineering support and 242 in marketing and administrative functions, including sales, accounting and finance, tax and information technology. None of our U.S. employees are represented by a labor union. Of our total employees, 281 are based outside of the U.S., including 159 in Canada and 93 in India. We believe our employee relations are good.

Safety and Wellness

We strive to maintain a robust health, safety and wellness program to ensure a healthy work environment, promote workforce resiliency and enhance business value. We encourage employee participation to identify opportunities for improvement and review and monitor our performance with safety committees at our local sites. Local safety committees identify safety programs and ensure completion of all training and target learning objectives.

All employees and their households have access to an employee assistance program, as well as a health advocate program to help with all aspects of benefits, family life, financial concerns legal issues and transition to retirement. Assistance is available 365 days per year, 24 hours per day. This year employees had an opportunity to participate in several wellness events as a company-wide challenge.

We rigorously review our benefit and compensation plans to maintain competitive packages that reflect the wellness needs of our workforce and the marketplace as part of our financial wellness initiatives. These programs include a 401(k) plan, comprehensive health packages and welfare benefits, among many others. We support pay equity for all employees within the same geographic area, experience level and performance standards. To support this initiative, at the start of fiscal 2025, we rolled out our job architecture program to provide simplicity and clarity on roles (levels, titles, scope), mobility (visibility into potential career paths), alignment (of roles with organizational goals and objectives) and equity (a framework designed to support fair compensation practices).

Environment

We are committed to reducing our environmental impact across our value chain, including in the design of our products, operation of our facilities and procurement of materials. We are also committed to maintaining compliance with the various global environmental regulations that are applicable to our business segments, including with the respect to the waste and emissions generated at our facilities. Our Board of Directors is responsible for the oversight of our environmental efforts, and the management of climate-related issues is overseen by our Chief Legal Officer.

We seek to increase efficient usage of building space and we offer our employees incentives to promote greener commuting options through rideshare programs.

We are committed to providing a workplace which values the health, safety, and well-being of our employees, contractors and visitors to our facilities, complying with Environment, Health and Safety ("EHS") legal requirements, and minimizing EHS risk. In fiscal 2025, we continued to support our EHS goals of engaging employees at all levels of the organization in the prevention of work-related injuries and illnesses, reducing environmental impacts and fostering a culture of continuous improvement.

U.S. Government Contracts and Security Clearances

The U.S. government operates on an October-to-September fiscal year. Generally, in February of each year, the President of the United States presents to the U.S. Congress ("Congress") the proposed budget for the upcoming fiscal year and from February through September of each year, the appropriations and authorization committees of Congress review the President’s budget proposals and establish the funding levels for the upcoming fiscal year. Once these levels are enacted into law, the Executive Office of the President administers the funds to the agencies. Thereafter, we can receive orders pursuant to sole-source or competitively awarded contracts, which we describe below.

The U.S. government may be unable to complete its budget process before the end of any given government fiscal year and when the fiscal budget is not approved in a timely manner, the U.S. government is required either to shut down or be funded pursuant to a "continuing resolution" that authorizes agencies of the U.S. government to continue operations but does not authorize new spending initiatives, either of which could result in reduced or delayed orders or payments for products and services we provide.

Sole-source contracts are generally awarded to a single contractor without a formal competition when a single contractor is deemed to have an expertise or technology superior to that of competing contractors or when there is an urgent need by the U.S. government that cannot wait for a full competitive process. Potential suppliers compete informally through research and development and marketing efforts. Competitively-bid contracts are awarded based on a formal proposal evaluation established by the procuring agency and interested contractors prepare bids. Competitively-bid contracts are awarded after a formal bid and proposal competition among suppliers.

The U.S. government has a stated policy direction to reduce the number of sole-source contract awards across all procuring agencies. In addition, the U.S. government is increasing the use of multiple-award IDIQ contracts to increase its procurement options. IDIQ contracts allow the U.S. government to select a group of eligible contractors for the same program. When the government awards IDIQ contracts to multiple bidders under the same program, a company that has already competed to be selected as a participant in the program must subsequently compete for individual delivery orders. As a result of this U.S. government shift toward multiple award IDIQ contracts, we expect to face greater competition for future U.S. government contracts and, at the same time, greater opportunities for us to participate in program areas that we do not currently participate in.

As a U.S. government contractor and subcontractor, we are subject to a variety of rules and regulations, such as the Federal Acquisition Regulation ("FAR"). Individual agencies can also have acquisition regulations. For example, the DoD implements the FAR through the U.S. Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (commonly known as "DFARS"). For certain Federal government entities, the FAR regulates the phases of any product or service acquisition, including: acquisition planning, competition requirements, contractor qualifications, protection of source selection and vendor information, and acquisition procedures. In addition, the FAR addresses the allowability of supplier costs, while Cost Accounting Standards address how those costs can be allocated to contracts. The FAR also subjects suppliers to audits and other government reviews. These reviews cover issues such as cost, performance and accounting practices relating to our contracts. The government may challenge a supplier's costs and fees or require corrective actions which can delay programs and increase our costs. Suppliers are also required to comply with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual for the handling of classified materials and programs and is administered by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (“DCSA”). Suppliers who do not comply with these various regulations may lose and/or become ineligible for facility security clearances and/or participation in classified and non-classified programs.

Under firm fixed-price contracts, we perform for an agreed-upon price and we can derive benefits from cost savings, but bear the risk of cost overruns. Our cost-reimbursable type contracts typically provide for reimbursement of allowable costs incurred plus a negotiated fee. Cost-plus-incentive-fee orders typically provide for sharing with the U.S. government savings accrued from orders performed for less than the target costs and costs incurred in excess of targets up to a negotiated ceiling price (which is higher than the target cost), and for the supplier to carry the entire burden of costs exceeding the negotiated ceiling price.

In fiscal 2025, $151.3 million or 30.3% of our consolidated net sales were to the U.S. government (including sales to prime contractors to the U.S. government). Of this amount, firm fixed-price and cost-reimbursable type contracts (including fixed-fee, incentive-fee and time and material type contracts) accounted for $96.7 million and $54.6 million, respectively.

Regulatory Matters

In addition to the rules and regulations that pertain to us as a U.S. government contractor and subcontractor, we are also subject to a variety of local, state and federal governmental regulations.

Our products that are incorporated into wireless communications systems must comply with various government regulations, including those of the FCC. Our products are also subject to European Union directives related to the recycling of electrical and electronic equipment.

Our international sales are subject to U.S. and foreign regulations such as the Arms Export Control Act, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ("IEEPA"), the International Traffic in Arms Regulations ("ITAR"), the Export Administration Regulations ("EAR") and the trade sanctions laws and regulations administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC"), the Department of Commerce ("DoC") , the Department of State and their foreign counterparts as well as other applicable laws relating to trade, export controls and foreign corrupt practices, the violation of which could adversely affect our operations. We must comply with all applicable export control laws and regulations of the U.S. and other countries. Certain of our products and systems may require licenses from U.S. government agencies for export from the U.S. or other countries, and some of our products are not permitted to be exported. We cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain necessary export licenses, and such failure would materially adversely affect our operations. In addition, in certain cases, U.S. and foreign export controls also severely limit unlicensed technical discussions, such as discussions with any persons who are not U.S. citizens or permanent residents. As a result, in cases where we may need an export license, our ability to compete against a non-U.S. domiciled foreign company that may not be subject to the same U.S. laws may be materially adversely affected. In addition, we are subject to the FCPA and other local laws that generally bar bribes or unreasonable gifts to foreign governments or officials. A violation of any of the regulations enumerated above could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In the past, we have self-reported violations of export control laws or regulations to the U.S. Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls ("DDTC"), DoC, OFAC and their foreign counterparts. In addition, we have made various commitments to U.S. government agencies that oversee trade and export matters that we will maintain certain policies and procedures including maintaining a company-wide Office of Trade Compliance and conducting ongoing internal assessments and reporting any future violations to those agencies.

Our financial reporting, corporate governance, public disclosure and compliance practices are governed by laws such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, and rules and regulations issued by the SEC. The SEC has adopted rules which require, among other things, public companies to conduct certain inquiries to determine whether or not Conflict Minerals (as that term is defined in the SEC rules) that are necessary to the functionality of their manufactured products or their product's production processes originated in a Covered Country (as that term is defined in the SEC rules) and ultimately file a report with the SEC. Conflict Minerals are widely used in many industries, including the telecommunications industry and almost all of our products include component parts purchased from third-party suppliers and we must rely heavily on information received from suppliers to determine the origin of those materials. We have implemented a due diligence program consistent with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development guidelines to collect information concerning the country of origin of Conflict Minerals and in that regard, have adopted a policy that requires our suppliers (both public and private) to commit to a code of conduct relating to the responsible sourcing of minerals and to establish a policy to reasonably assure that the products they manufacture do not contain Conflict Minerals that originated in a Covered Country. Efforts to comply with this SEC rule have resulted in additional costs to us and, we believe, to our suppliers. As such, the availability of raw materials used in our operations could be negatively impacted and/or raw material prices could increase. Further, if we are unable to certify that our products are conflict free, we may face challenges with our customers, which could place us at a competitive disadvantage and could harm our reputation.

Laws and regulations have been enacted that affect companies conducting business on the Internet, including the European General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR"). The GDPR imposes certain privacy related requirements on companies that receive or process personal data of residents of the European Union that are currently different than those in the U.S. and include significant penalties for non-compliance. Similarly, there are several legislative proposals in the U.S., at both the federal and state level, that could impose new obligations in areas affecting our business, such as liability for personal data protection. In addition, some countries are considering or have passed legislation implementing data protection requirements or requiring local storage and processing of data or similar requirements that could increase the cost and complexity of delivering our services. Our costs to comply with the GDPR as well any other similar laws and regulations that emerge may negatively impact our business.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following describes major risks to our business and should be considered carefully. Any of these factors could significantly and negatively affect our business, prospects, financial condition, or operating results, which could cause the trading prices of our equity securities to decline. The risks described below are not the only risks we may face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or risks that we currently consider immaterial, could also negatively affect us.

Summary of Risk Factors

The following is a summary of the principal risks that could significantly and negatively affect our business, prospects, financial conditions, or operating results. For a more complete discussion of the material risks facing our business, please see below:

Global Risks

•New and ongoing challenges relating to current supply chain constraints, including for satellite ground station and troposcatter components, and impacts from inflation and any new or increased tariffs on imports and other trade restrictions, could adversely impact our revenue, gross margins and financial results.

•If global economic business and political conditions deteriorate as compared to the current environment, it could have a material adverse impact on our business outlook and our business, operating results and financial condition.

•We have significant operations in locations which could be materially and adversely impacted in the event of a terrorist attack and government responses thereto or significant disruptions (including natural disasters) to our business.

•Ongoing instability and conflicts in global markets, including in Ukraine, the Gaza Strip, Israel, Lebanon and other countries in the Middle East and Asia, and the attending possibility of economic sanctions, have created and may continue to create economic and political disruption that could adversely impact our revenue, gross margins and financial results.

Transformation Plan Risks

•We may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of our strategic and operational initiatives, or those benefits may take longer to realize than expected.

•

Business Risks

•Our cash and liquidity projections may not materialize as anticipated.

•Our business outlook is difficult to forecast and operating results are subject to significant fluctuations and are likely to be volatile.

•Our backlog is subject to customer cancellation or modification and such cancellations or modifications could result in a decline in sales and increased provisions for excess and obsolete inventory.

•

•Contract cost growth on our firm fixed-price contracts exposes us to reduced profitability and the potential loss of future business and other risks.

•Our business is highly dependent on the budgetary decisions of our government customers.

•Our contracts with the U.S. government are subject to unique business, commercial and government audit risks.

•Our dependence on sales to international customers exposes us to unique business, commercial and export compliance audit risks.

•A change in our relationship with our large wireless carrier customers could have a material adverse effect.

•A change by wireless carrier partners in the pricing and other terms by which they offer our products to their end-customers could have a material adverse affect.

•Disputes with our subcontractors or key suppliers or their inability to deliver on a timely basis, could cause delays in our shipments.

•Our estimates regarding future warranty obligations may change based on a variety of factors, impacting future cost of revenue.

Strategic Growth Risks

•We face a number of risks relating to the expected long-term growth of our business.

•Loss of our executive officers or other key personnel or other changes to our management team could disrupt our operations and growth plans or harm our business.

•We must service the debt and maintain compliance with various covenants under a credit facility that imposes restrictions on our business.

•Divestitures of portions of our business in the course of carrying out our transformation plan and reshaping our product portfolio could prove difficult to carve out, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value or adversely affect operating results or the market price of our common stock.

•Our investments in recorded goodwill and other intangible assets have been impaired and may be further impaired as a result of future business conditions, a deterioration of the global economy or if we change our reporting unit structure for any reason.

Cybersecurity Risks

•We could be negatively impacted by a system failure, breach, attack or intrusion of our IT networks or those we operate for certain customers, or third-party data center facilities, servers and related systems.

•The measures we have implemented to secure information we collect and store or enable access to may be breached.

Legal, Regulatory and Litigation Risks

•Changes in U.S. federal, state and local and foreign tax law could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

•Our U.S. federal, state and local and foreign tax returns are subject to audit and a resulting tax assessment or settlement could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

•We may be subject to environmental liabilities.

•The success of our business is dependent on compliance with FCC rules and regulations and similar foreign, state and local laws and regulations.

•Regulation of the mobile communications industry and VoIP is evolving, and unfavorable changes or our failure to comply with existing and potential new legislation or regulations could harm our business and operating results.

•Ongoing compliance with the provisions of securities laws, related regulations and financial reporting standards could unexpectedly materially increase our costs and compliance related expenses.

•Indemnification provisions in our contracts could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

•We are, from time to time, and could become a party to additional litigation or subject to claims. Additionally, we may become subject to government investigations, which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

•Protection of our intellectual property is limited and pursuing infringers of our patents and other intellectual property rights can be costly.

•Third parties may claim we are infringing their intellectual property rights and we could be prevented from selling our products, or suffer significant litigation expense, even if these claims have no merit.

Competitive Risks

•All of our business activities are subject to rapid technological change, new entrants, the introduction of other distribution models and long development and testing periods, each of which may harm our competitive position.

•Our business is highly competitive, we are reliant upon the success of our partners, and some of our competitors have significantly greater resources than we do, which could result in a loss of customers, market share and/or market acceptance.

•We rely upon various third-party companies and their technology to provide services to our customers.

•Because our software may contain defects or errors, and our hardware products may incorporate defective components, our sales could decrease if these defects or errors adversely affect our reputation or delay shipments of our products.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

•Our stock price is volatile.

•Future issuances of our shares of common stock could dilute a stockholder's ownership interest in Comtech and reduce the market price of our shares of common stock.

•Actions of activist stockholders could impact the pursuit of our business strategies and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and/or share price.

•Provisions in our corporate documents and Delaware law could delay or prevent a change in control of Comtech.

Global Risks

New and ongoing challenges relating to current supply chain constraints, including for satellite ground station and troposcatter components, and impacts from inflation and any new or increased tariffs on imports and other trade restrictions, could adversely impact our revenue, gross margins and financial results.

The global supply chain for certain raw materials and components, including those used in our satellite ground station and troposcatter equipment, has experienced significant strain in recent periods. The constrained supply environment has adversely affected, and could further affect, availability and lead times of raw materials and components, thereby impeding our ability to meet customer demand in circumstances where we cannot timely secure supply of components that meet our quality standards. Even when raw materials and components are available, they often come with higher prices reflecting an imbalance between supply and demand, as well as inflationary pressures affecting global markets.

The effects of inflation and labor challenges have caused, and we expect will continue to cause further delays in the supply chain. Despite our attempts to mitigate the impact on our business, constrained supply chain conditions have and are expected to continue to adversely impact our costs of goods sold and may impact the timing and amount of revenue we realize. In our recent past, we experienced disruptions in our supply chain relating to later-than-expected delivery of certain key components from several suppliers that adversely impacted our revenues. In addition, supply chain issues have affected the quality of the components we receive, which in some cases caused such components to not meet our specifications.

In addition, the U.S. recently implemented further changes to trade policies, including adding new or modifying existing tariffs on imports, in some cases significantly. The impact of these tariffs is subject to a number of factors, including the effective date and duration of such tariffs, changes in the amount, scope and nature of the tariffs in the future, any retaliatory responses to such actions that the target countries may take and any mitigating actions that may become available. Although some of these tariffs have been paused or reduced, there is significant uncertainty as trade negotiations are ongoing and outcomes are unpredictable. Tariffs and any retaliatory actions, if implemented, could significantly increase the cost of our products and result in lower demand for our products, delivery delays, and terminations of orders by customers. The uncertainty in the trade environment may also contribute to broader macroeconomic and financial market weakness and volatility, such as inflationary pressures affecting interest rates and volatility in the stock market affecting the price of our common stock. While we continue to evaluate the potential impact of the new tariffs on our business, given the volatility and uncertainty regarding the scope and duration of such tariffs and other aspects of U.S. and foreign government trade policies, their ultimate impact on our operations and financial results remains uncertain.

These single source components, which include items such as RF filters and custom fiber connectors are in limited supply with very long lead times. In some cases, we have now depleted our stock inventory and we are on waiting lists to obtain additional components. We continue to seek new suppliers and inventory elsewhere. In light of current challenges in the supply chain, we may not be able to qualify alternate suppliers for our components timely, or at all.

Heading into fiscal 2026, we have a significant portion of our anticipated revenues in funded backlog.

If global economic business and political conditions deteriorate as compared to the current environment, it could have a material adverse impact on our business outlook and our business, operating results and financial condition.

For example, many of our international end-customers are in emerging and developing countries that are subject to sweeping economic and political changes. Many governments around the world are under pressure to reduce their spending. From time to time, global oil and natural gas prices have been volatile and have significantly impaired the ability of certain of our government customers in the oil and gas producing regions of the world to invest in telecommunications products and infrastructure. Additionally, from time to time, the relative strength of the U.S. dollar against many international currencies has negatively impacted the purchasing power for many of our international end-customers because most of our sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. We generate significant sales from many emerging and developing countries and any such reduced purchasing power of our customers could adversely impact our sales and backlog.

If credit in financial markets outside of the U.S. remains difficult to obtain, our international customers and suppliers may find it difficult to obtain financing, which could result in a decrease in, or cancellation of, orders for our products and increased transaction costs (e.g., insurance, performance bonds). Volatility of financing conditions may cause our customers to be reluctant to spend funds required to purchase our solutions and could cause their projects to be postponed or canceled. In addition, if an adverse economic environment and lack of financing results in insolvencies for our customers, it would adversely impact the recoverability of our accounts receivable and/or inventories which would, in turn, adversely impact our results of operations.

We believe that the current global economic business environment is unstable and sudden negative changes could result in the immediate suppression of end-market demand for many of our products such as satellite ground station technologies and other short lead-time products. The timing, impact, severity and duration of these conditions are difficult to predict. If U.S. or global economic conditions deteriorate, or political conditions become unstable, or additional economic sanctions are imposed on some of our end-customers, it could adversely impact our business in a number of ways. In the past, our businesses have been negatively affected by uncertain economic environments in the overall market and, more specifically, in the telecommunications sector. Our customers have reduced their budgets for spending on telecommunications equipment and systems and in some cases postponed or reduced the purchase of our products and systems. In the future, our customers may again reduce their spending on telecommunications equipment and systems which would negatively impact our business. If this occurs, it would adversely affect our outlook, net sales, profitability and the recoverability of our assets, including intangible assets such as goodwill.

We have significant operations in Arizona, Florida, California, Washington State, Maryland and other locations which could be materially and adversely impacted in the event of a terrorist attack and government responses thereto or significant disruptions (including natural disasters) to our business.

Terrorist attacks, the U.S. and other governments' responses thereto, and threats of war could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, our 911 hosted location-based services and satellite teleport services operations depend on our ability to maintain our computer equipment and systems in effective working order, and to protect our systems against damage from fire, natural disaster, terrorist attack, power loss, telecommunications failure, sabotage, unauthorized access to our system or similar events.

Any unanticipated interruption or delay in our operations or breach of security could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our property and business interruption insurance may not be adequate to compensate us for any losses that may occur in the event of a terrorist attack, threat, system failure or a breach of security. Insurance may not be available to us at all or, if available, may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms.

We currently, and intend to continue to, operate a high-volume technology manufacturing center located in Arizona. A terrorist attack or similar future event may disrupt our operations or those of our customers or suppliers and may affect the availability of materials needed to manufacture our products or the means to transport those materials to manufacturing facilities and finished products to customers. If a natural disaster or other business interruption occurred with respect to our high-volume technology manufacturing center, we do not have immediate access to other manufacturing facilities and, as a result, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. The loss of our facility in Arizona would have a negative impact on our production capability and we would incur unexpected costs and lost revenue associated with our inability to meet our contractual commitments.

We design and manufacture our over-the-horizon microwave equipment and systems in Florida, where major hurricanes have occurred in the past, and amplifiers in Santa Clara, California, an area close to major earthquake fault lines. We maintain operations in Maryland near a U.S. Navy facility which may be more prone to a terrorist attack. Our operations in these and other locations (such as in our high-volume technology manufacturing center located in Arizona), could be subject to natural disasters or other significant disruptions, including hurricanes, tornadoes, typhoons, tsunamis, floods, earthquakes, fires, water shortages, other extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics, acts of terrorism, power shortages and blackouts, telecommunications failures, and other natural and man-made disasters or disruptions.

We cannot be sure that our systems will operate appropriately if we experience hardware or software failures, intentional disruptions of service by third parties, an act of God or an act of war. A failure in our systems could cause delays in transmitting data, and as a result we may lose customers or face litigation that could involve material costs and distract management from operating our business.

In the event of any such disaster or other disruption, we could experience disruptions or interruptions to our operations or the operations of our suppliers, distributors, resellers or customers; destruction of facilities; and/or loss of life, all of which could materially increase our costs and expenses and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The U.S. government and other nations have imposed significant restrictions on most companies’ ability to do business in Russia. It is not possible to predict the broader or longer-term consequences of this conflict, which could include further sanctions, embargoes, regional instability, geopolitical shifts, adverse effects on macroeconomic conditions, security conditions, currency exchange rates and financial markets. Such geo-political instability and uncertainty could have a negative impact on our ability to sell to, ship products to, collect payments from, and support customers in certain regions based on trade restrictions, embargoes, export control law restrictions, and logistics restrictions including closures of air space, and could increase the costs, risks and adverse impacts from these new challenges. We may also be the subject of increased cyber-attacks as a result of the conflict.

As a result of the economic sanctions against Russia, we stopped accepting new orders in Russia and wound down our Russian operations in fiscal 2024. We intend to repatriate proceeds from former operations in Russia as permitted by law; however, our ability to do so may be negatively impacted by continuing sanctions against Russia, as well as by the laws within Russia.

As a result of this conflict, from time to time since February 2023, we believe that certain customers (including the U.S. government, Ukraine and neighboring countries) paused procurement and deployment of satellite and troposcatter communication systems, and instead began purchasing war-fighting equipment. Additionally, funding for opportunities with other customers that we expected to book and ship has also been shifted to other programs and/or temporarily delayed as a result of changes in defense spending priorities.

The U.S. Government's budget deficit, as well as a breach of the debt ceiling, could have an adverse impact on our operations.

Our sales to government customers are highly dependent on the U.S. defense budget, which in turn is driven by an annual appropriation by Congress. DoD budgets are driven by factors that are outside our control (such as economic conditions, administration policy shifts within the Executive branch and geopolitical events). Any one or combination of these factors may adversely impact our operations, resulting in a decline of sales and operating income.

Transformation Plan Risks

We may fail to realize all of the anticipated benefits of our strategic and operational initiatives, or those benefits may take longer to realize than expected.

We are continuing to execute a plan to transform Comtech through the exploration of strategic alternatives for our various businesses and product lines, the pursuit of further portfolio-shaping opportunities to enhance profitability, efficiency and focus, and the implementation of additional operational initiatives to both achieve profitable results from operations, as well as to align our go-forward cost structure with our future state business. Moreover, we may not realize any or all of the anticipated benefits from our pursuit of these initiatives, and related transactions could in fact adversely affect our business. Our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of our transformation plan will depend, to a large extent, on our ability to continue to focus on, and to achieve, more predictable growth related to our remaining business. Some of the anticipated benefits may not occur for a significant period of time. The outcome of these initiatives and the related transactions may not enhance long-term stockholder value as anticipated.

Many of these factors will be outside of our control and any one of them could result in increased costs, including restructuring charges, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and diversion of management’s attention, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our management team has spent, and continues to spend, a significant amount of time and effort focusing on our transformation plan. This diversion of attention may have an adverse effect on the conduct of our business, and, as a result, on our financial condition and results of operations, particularly if the time it takes to complete our transformation plan is protracted. A loss of key personnel or material erosion of employee morale could have a materially adverse effect on our ability to meet customer expectations, thereby adversely affecting our business and results of operations. The failure to retain or attract members of our management team and other key personnel could impair our ability to execute our strategy and implement operational initiatives, thereby having a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Likewise, we could experience losses of customers who may be concerned about our long-term viability.

Business Risks

Our cash and liquidity projections may not materialize as anticipated.

In fiscal 2025, 2024 and 2023, we reported operating losses of $139.1 million, $79.9 million and $14.7 million, respectively, and net cash used in operating activities of $8.3 million, $54.5 million and $4.4 million, respectively. Of such amounts, $17.6 million was drawn on the Revolver Loan at both dates.

At July 31, 2025, October 31, 2025 and November 7, 2025, our available sources of liquidity totaled $47.0 million, $51.0 million and $50.3 million, respectively, which includes qualified cash and cash equivalents of $37.4 million, $41.4 million and $40.7 million, respectively, and the remaining available portion of the Revolver Loan of $9.6 million as of each such date.

As of the issuance date, we expect cash and cash equivalents and cash flows from both operating and financing activities to be our principal sources of liquidity. We also believe these sources of liquidity will be sufficient to fund our operating and cash commitments for investing and financing activities over the next year beyond the issuance date.

During fiscal 2025 and through the issuance date, we have taken the following actions, and implemented the following plans, to improve our operational and financial performance, enhance our liquidity and financial condition and ability to meet our financial covenants contained in our credit facilities:

•Engaged in portfolio-shaping opportunities to enhance profitability, efficiency and focus, including the elimination of legacy solutions that were not contributing meaningfully to net sales and or gross profits;

•Prioritized efforts to complete low or no margin non-recurring engineering contracts in order to accelerate our migration to higher volume and higher margin manufacturing related orders with improved cash conversion cycles;

•Developed and launched new products and services around differentiated technology and solutions;

•Improved operating profitability by entering into, or renegotiating, sales or service contracts with more favorable pricing and payment terms;

•Reduced our cost structure to better align operating expenses with revenue expectations, including facility and headcount rationalization and optimization;

•Through new leadership and improved accountability and process disciplines implemented throughout the organization, reduced our investments in working capital (e.g., accounts receivable and inventory), as well as capital expenditures; and

•Through a series of capital injections, aggregating $100.0 million in the form of subordinated debt, and amendments to our credit facilities: (i) significantly reduced senior debt and related cash interest payments due under our Credit Facility; (ii) increased the available portion of our Revolver Loan; (iii) deferred the scheduled repayment of a portion of the Term Loan and the scheduled payment of certain fees due under the Credit Facility; (iv) suspended testing of our Net Leverage Ratio, Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio and Minimum EBITDA covenants under our credit facilities until January 31, 2027; and (v) reduced the minimum quarterly average liquidity requirement under our credit facilities.

Our ability to meet future anticipated liquidity needs over the next year beyond the issuance date will largely depend on our ability to execute on our operational strategy, generate positive cash inflows from operations, maximize our borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility and or secure outside capital.

Based on the foregoing, over the next year beyond the issuance date, we believe that we will: (i) be able to generate sufficient positive cash inflows and maximize our borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility to continue as a going concern, and (ii) comply with the covenants contained in our credit facilities. However, our ability to do so may also be affected by general economic, financial and other factors which are beyond our control. As such, there can be no assurances that our plans will be successful or that our projections will materialize.

Our business outlook is difficult to forecast and operating results are subject to significant fluctuations and are likely to be volatile.

Historically, our business outlook is difficult to forecast and backlog (sometimes referred to herein as orders or bookings), net sales and operating results may vary significantly from period to period due to a number of factors including: the impact of strategic alternatives and portfolio reshaping; sales mix; fluctuating market demand; price competition; delayed collections from customers; new product introductions by us or our competitors; customer bankruptcies; changing customer partnering procurement strategies; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; unexpected changes in the timing of delivery of components or subsystems; the financial performance and impact of acquisitions or divestitures; new accounting standards; political instability; regulatory developments; changes in income tax rates or tax credits; the price and expected volatility of our stock (which will impact, among other items, the amount of stock-based compensation expense we may record); perceptions of our financial condition and ability to continue as a going concern; general global economic conditions, and the impact of natural disasters or global pandemics, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

We have experienced, and will experience in the future, significant fluctuations in bookings, net sales and operating results from period to period. For example, a sudden change in global economic or political conditions could have an immediate impact on a large portion of our net sales, a large amount of which are derived from products such as satellite ground station technologies, amplifier products and mission-critical technologies that generally have short order and lead times. Similarly, sales of certain of our public safety and location technologies are subject to sudden changes in wireless carrier procurement strategies, including decisions to sole-source such solutions or to perform such solutions internally. As a result, bookings and backlog related to these solutions are extremely sensitive to short-term fluctuations in customer demand.

In addition, a large portion of our consolidated net sales are derived in part from large U.S. federal and state government programs or large foreign government opportunities that are subject to lengthy sales cycles (including funding requirements) and are therefore difficult to predict.

Our backlog is subject to customer cancellation or modification and such cancellations or modifications could result in a decline in sales and increased provisions for excess and obsolete inventory.

We currently have a backlog of orders, mostly under contracts that our customers may modify or terminate. Almost all of the contracts in our backlog (including firm orders previously received from the U.S. government) are subject to cancellation at the convenience of the customer or for default in the event that we are unable to perform under the contract. For some contracts, where we are a subcontractor (and not the prime contractor), the U.S. government could terminate the prime contractor for convenience without regard for our performance as a subcontractor.

In some cases, such as contracts received from large U.S. based telecommunication companies, our backlog is computed by multiplying the most recent month’s contract or revenue by the months remaining under the existing long-term agreements, which we consider to be the best available information for anticipating revenue under those agreements. Also, a significant portion of the backlog from our U.S. commercial customers relates to large, multi-year contracts to provide state and local governments (and their agencies) with public safety and location technology solutions. Funding of these contracts is often subject to the approval of budgets (for example, on an annual or bi-annual basis). Although funding for these multi-year contracts are dependent on future budgets being approved, we include the full estimated value of these large, multi-year contracts in our backlog given the critical nature of the services being provided and the positive historical experience of our state and local government customers passing their respective budgets.

There can be no assurance that our backlog will result in actual revenue in any particular period, or at all, particularly during periods of economic instability. Nor can there be any assurance that any contract included in backlog will be profitable. The actual amount and timing of any revenue is subject to various contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. The actual recognition of revenue on contracts included in backlog may never occur or may change because a program schedule could change; a customer may not follow up with order details (e.g., delivery instructions), fluctuations in currency exchange rates after an order is placed could cause our products to become too expensive for a foreign customer; a customer’s program could be canceled, a contract could be reduced, modified or terminated early due to changes in a customer’s priorities; funding may not be included in future budgets; actual indirect rates being reimbursed on U.S. government contracts may ultimately be less than those indirect rates included in our initial proposals; or an option that we had assumed would be exercised is not exercised.

We record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on historical and projected usage trends and other factors, including the consideration of the amount of backlog we have on hand at any particular point in time. If orders in our backlog are canceled or modified, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we may have understated the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory. In the future, if we determine that our inventory is overvalued, we will be required to recognize such costs in our financial statements at the time of such determination. Any such charges could be materially adverse to our results of operations and financial condition.

As of July 31, 2025, we had $90.7 million of contract assets recorded in Accounts Receivable, Net on our Consolidated Balance Sheet, commonly referred to as unbilled receivables. Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, such contract assets generally result from timing differences between (a) when we must recognize revenue on contracts based on our activities to satisfy performance obligations related to products that have no alternative use and for which we have the right to payment in the event of a contract termination, and (b) when we can invoice our customers under the terms of those associated contracts (i.e., which is often based on our successful achievement of a milestone, such as an acceptance test or physical delivery of a product). Unbilled receivables remain at risk for collection due to several factors, including but not limited to our inability to meet invoicing milestones, customer contracts being terminated for default or actual indirect rates on cost reimbursable contracts ultimately being less than those rates estimated for revenue recognition purposes.

Contract cost growth on our firm fixed-price contracts, including most of our government contracts, cost reimbursable type contracts and other contracts that cannot be justified as an increase in contract value due from customers exposes us to reduced profitability and the potential loss of future business and other risks.

A substantial portion of our products and services are sold under firm fixed-price contracts. Firm fixed-price contracts inherently have more risk than flexibly priced contracts, particularly if they involve non-recurring engineering efforts that are not yet proven. This means that we bear the risk of unanticipated technological, manufacturing, supply or other problems, price increases or other increases in the cost of performance. Future events could result in either upward or downward adjustments to those estimates which could negatively impact our profitability. Operating margin could be materially adversely affected when contract costs that cannot be billed to the customer are incurred. This cost growth can occur if initial estimates used for calculating the contract price were incorrect, if estimates to complete increase or if we encounter unanticipated growth in research and development activity to support our firm fixed-price development contracts. To a lesser extent, we provide products and services under cost reimbursable type contracts which carry the entire burden of costs exceeding a negotiated contract ceiling price. Also, if contract costs grow beyond our or our customer's expectations, we may not be awarded future anticipated orders from customers related to their longer-term production needs.

The cost estimation process requires significant judgment and expertise. Reasons for cost growth may include unavailability and productivity of labor, the nature and complexity of the work to be performed, the effect of change orders, the availability of materials, the effect of any delays in performance, availability and timing of funding from the customer, natural disasters, and the inability to recover any claims included in the estimates to complete. A significant change in an estimate on one or more programs could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our business is highly dependent on the budgetary decisions of our government customers, including the U.S. government (including prime contractors to the U.S. government), and changes in the U.S. government’s fiscal policies or budgetary priorities may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

During our fiscal years ended July 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, sales to the U.S. government (including sales to prime contractors to the U.S. government) were $151.3 million, $182.3 million and $172.0 million, or 30.3%, 33.7% and 31.3% of our consolidated net sales, respectively. In addition, 12.1% of our existing backlog consists of orders related to U.S. government contracts and our Business Outlook depends, in part, on significant new orders from the U.S. government, which undergoes extreme budgetary pressures from time to time.

We rely on U.S. government spending on our communication solutions, and our receipt of future orders depends in large part on continued funding by the U.S. government for the programs in which we participate. These spending levels are not generally correlated with any specific economic cycle, but rather follow the cycle of general public policy and political support for this type of spending. Government contracts are conditioned upon the continuing availability of congressional appropriations and Congress’ failure to appropriate funds, or Congress’s actions to reduce or delay spending on, or reprioritize its spending away from, U.S. government programs which we participate in, could negatively affect our results of operations. Because many of the items we sell to the U.S. government are included in large programs realized over a period of several years, it is difficult, if not impossible, to determine specific amounts that are or will be appropriated for our products and services. As such, our assessments relating to the impact of changes in U.S. government spending may prove to be incorrect.

Further, elections have introduced increased regulatory and economic uncertainty, including shifts in the spending priorities of the U.S. presidential administration and Congress and what challenges budget reductions will present for us and our industry generally. For example, in January 2025, President Trump announced an executive order establishing the Department of Government Efficiency, or "DOGE," to reform federal government processes and reduce expenditures. The U.S. government has and may continue to implement initiatives focused on efficiencies, affordability and cost reductions, such as those pursued by the DOGE, which may impact the availability of funding for U.S. government customers as a result of the elimination of departments and personnel. Changes in federal policy by the executive branch and regulatory agencies may occur over time through the new presidential administration’s and/or Congress’s policy and personnel changes, which could lead to changes involving the defense industry. However, the nature, timing and economic and political effects of such potential changes remain highly uncertain. Any future changes in U.S. policy and the response of the U.S. to global geopolitical developments could affect us in substantial and unpredictable ways. At this time, it is unclear whether and how any future changes or uncertainty surrounding future changes will adversely affect our operating environment and, therefore, demand for our products, our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The federal debt limit in the U.S. continues to be actively debated as plans for long-term national fiscal policy are discussed. Continued uncertainty around the approval by Congress of future budgets and/or increases in the debt ceiling of the U.S. on a timely basis could delay or result in the loss of contracts for the procurement of our products and services and we may be asked or required to continue to perform for some period of time on certain of our U.S. government contracts, even if the U.S. government is unable to make timely payments. A decrease in U.S. government spending, the elimination or curtailment of a material program in which we are involved, or changes in payment patterns of our customers as a result of changes in U.S. government spending could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In October 2025, the U.S. federal government entered a shutdown due to a lapse in appropriations, resulting from a failure by Congress to pass a budget or continuing resolution. The shutdown has led to the suspension of non-essential government operations and services, delays in contract awards and renewals and interruptions in agency communications and decision-making processes. Consequently, the ongoing U.S. federal government shutdown has further heightened uncertainty. Prolonged or repeated shutdowns may result in delayed contract awards, delayed payments and adverse impacts on our results of operations and or cash flows. We may experience related supply chain delays, disruptions or other problems associated with financial constraints faced by our suppliers and subcontractors. All of the aforementioned conditions and factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, cost cutting, efficiency initiatives, reprioritization, other affordability analyses, and changes in budgetary priorities by our governmental customers, including the U.S. government, could adversely impact our operating segments.

Our contracts with the U.S. government are subject to unique business, commercial and government audit risks.

We depend on the U.S. government for a significant portion of our revenues. Our contracts with the U.S. government are subject to unique business and commercial risks, including:

•protest following an award by an unsuccessful bidder, resulting in a stop-work order;

•unexpected contract or project terminations or suspensions;

•unpredictable order placements, reductions, accelerations, delays or cancellations;

•higher than expected final costs, particularly relating to software and hardware development, for work performed under contracts where we commit to specified deliveries for a fixed-price; and

•unpredictable cash collections of unbilled receivables that may be subject to acceptance of contract deliverables by the customer and contract close out procedures, including government audit and approval of final indirect rates.

Although we take steps to mitigate our risk with respect to contracts with the U.S. government, we may not be able to do so in every instance for any of the following reasons, among others:

•Our U.S. government contracts can easily be terminated by the U.S. government - Our U.S. government contracts and subcontracts can be terminated by the U.S. government for its convenience or upon an event of default by us.

•Our U.S. government contracts are subject to funding by the U.S. Congress - Our U.S. government contracts are conditioned upon the continuing approval by Congress of the necessary funding. Congress usually appropriates funds for a given program on a fiscal year basis even though contract performance may take more than one year. Consequently, at the beginning of a major program, the contract may not be fully funded, and additional monies are normally committed to the contract only if, and when, appropriations are made by Congress for future fiscal years. Delays or changes in funding can impact the timing of awards or lead to changes in program content. We obtain certain of our U.S. government contracts through a competitive bidding process. There can be no assurance that we will win additional contracts or that actual contracts that are awarded will ultimately be profitable.

•Failure to comply with government contractor obligations can result in adverse consequences for us - As a supplier to the U.S. government, we must comply with numerous regulations, including those governing security, contracting practices and classified information. Failure to comply with these regulations and practices could result in fines being imposed against us, civil or criminal penalties, termination of contracts, our suspension for a period of time from eligibility for bidding on, or for award of, new government contracts, or other adverse consequences. If we are disqualified as a supplier to government agencies, we would lose most, if not all, of our U.S. government customers and revenues from sales of our products would decline significantly.

•Our employees may not be able to obtain and maintain the required security clearances for the facilities in which we perform sensitive government work - Certain of our U.S. government contracts require our employees to maintain various levels of security clearances, and we are required to maintain certain facility security clearances. If we cannot maintain or obtain the required security clearances for our facilities and our employees, or obtain these clearances in a timely manner, we may be unable to perform certain U.S. government contracts. Further, loss of a facility clearance, or an employee’s failure to obtain or maintain a security clearance, could result in a U.S. government customer terminating an existing contract or choosing not to renew a contract. Lack of required clearances could also impede our ability to bid on or win new U.S. government contracts. This could damage our reputation and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, all of our U.S. government contracts can be audited by the Defense Contract Audit Agency ("DCAA") and other U.S. government agencies, and we can be subject to penalties arising from post-award contract audits (sometimes referred to as a Truth in Negotiations Act or "TINA" audit), cost audits in which the value of our contracts may be reduced or increased costs to implement corrective actions. If costs are found to be improperly allocated to a specific contract, those costs will not be reimbursed, and any such costs already reimbursed would be required to be refunded. Although we record contract revenues based upon costs we expect to realize upon final audit, we cannot predict the outcome of any such future audits and adjustments, and we may be required to materially reduce our revenues or profits upon completion and final negotiation of audits. Negative audit findings could also result in termination of a contract, forfeiture of profits, suspension of or refund of payments, fines and suspension or debarment from U.S. government contracting or subcontracting for a period of time.

Our dependence on sales to international customers exposes us to unique business, commercial and export compliance risks.

Sales for use by international customers (including sales to U.S. companies for inclusion in products that will be sold to international customers) represented approximately 21.0%, 21.5% and 24.0% of our consolidated net sales for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and we expect that international sales will continue to be a significant portion of our consolidated net sales for the foreseeable future. These sales expose us to certain risks, including barriers to trade, declining trade relations, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates (which may make our products less price-competitive), political, legal, social and economic instability, exposure to public health epidemics, availability of suitable export financing, tariff regulations and other U.S. and foreign regulations that may apply to the export of our products. Some of our business partners also have international operations and are subject to the risks described above. Even if we are able to successfully manage the risks of international operations, our business may be adversely affected if our business partners are not able to successfully manage these risks. Although we take steps to mitigate our risk with respect to international sales, we may not be able to do so in every instance for any of the following reasons, among others:

•We may not be able to continue to structure our international contracts to reduce risk - We attempt to reduce the risk of doing business in foreign countries by seeking subcontracts with large systems suppliers, contracts denominated in U.S. dollars, advance or milestone payments and irrevocable letters of credit in our favor. However, we may not be able to reduce the economic risk of doing business in foreign countries in all instances. In such cases, billed and unbilled receivables relating to international sales are subject to increased collectability risk and may result in significant write-offs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, foreign defense contracts generally contain provisions relating to termination at the convenience of the government.

•We rely on a limited number of international sales agents - In some countries, we rely upon one or a small number of sales agents, exposing us to risks relating to our contracts with, and related performance of, those agents. We attempt to reduce our risk with respect to sales agents by establishing additional foreign sales offices where it is practical and by engaging, where practicable, more than one independent sales representative in a territory. It is our policy to require all sales agents to operate in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. Violations of any of these laws, rules or regulations, and other business practices that are regarded as unethical, could interrupt the sales of our products and services, result in the cancellation of orders or the termination of customer relationships, and could damage our reputation, any of which developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

•We must comply with all applicable export control laws and regulations of the U.S. and other countries - Certain of our products and systems may require licenses from U.S. government agencies for export from the U.S., and some of our products are not permitted to be exported. In addition, in certain cases, U.S. export controls also severely limit unlicensed technical discussions, such as discussions with any persons who are foreign nationals. As a result, in cases where we may need a license, our ability to compete against a non-U.S. domiciled foreign company that may not be subject to the same U.S. laws may be materially adversely affected. U.S. laws and regulations applicable to us include the Arms Export Control Act, the IEEPA, the ITAR, the EAR and the trade sanctions laws and regulations administered by the U.S. Treasury Department's OFAC. We are also subject to similar restrictions in other countries. Additionally, changes in regulatory requirements which could restrict our ability to deliver services to our international customers, including the addition of a country to the list of sanctioned countries under the IEEPA or similar legislation could negatively impact our business. For the fiscal years ended July 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, we conducted no business with states designated as sponsors of terrorism.

•We must comply with the FCPA and similar laws elsewhere - We are subject to the FCPA and other foreign laws prohibiting corrupt payments to government officials, which generally bar bribes or unreasonable gifts to foreign governments or officials. Violations of these laws or regulations could result in significant sanctions, including disgorgement of profits, fines, criminal sanctions against us, our officers, our directors, or our employees, more onerous compliance requirements, more extensive debarments from export privileges or loss of authorizations needed to conduct aspects of our international business. A violation of any of the regulations enumerated above could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These laws also require that we keep accurate books and records and maintain internal controls and compliance procedures designed to prevent any such actions. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, agents, or subsidiaries will not commit acts that violate these laws for which we may be ultimately held responsible.

•We must maintain a company-wide Office of Trade Compliance - In the past, we have self-reported violations of export control laws or regulations to the U.S. Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls ("DDTC"), Department of Commerce ("DoC"), OFAC and similar regulatory authorities in the jurisdictions where we have operations, including His Majesty's Revenue & Customs ("HMRC") in the U.K. We have a pending self-disclosure with the DDTC regarding exports of certain variants of our modems, as further described in "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (14)(a) - Commitments and Contingencies - Legal Proceedings and Other Matters - U.S. Export Matter" included in "Part II - Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," included in this Form 10-K. In addition, we have made various commitments to U.S. government agencies that oversee trade and export matters and have committed that we will maintain certain policies and procedures including maintaining a company-wide Chief Trade Compliance Officer and Office of Trade Compliance and conducting ongoing internal assessments and reporting of any future violations to those agencies. Even though we take precautions to avoid engaging in transactions that may violate U.S. export control laws or regulations and their foreign counterparts, including trade sanctions, those measures may not be effective in every instance. If it is determined that we have violated export control laws or regulations or trade regulations in any jurisdictions, civil and criminal penalties could apply, and we may suffer reputational harm.

•We are subject to future export compliance audits - We continue to implement policies and procedures to ensure that we comply with all applicable export control laws and regulations. We may be subject to future compliance audits that uncover improper or illegal activities that would subject us to material remediation costs, civil and criminal fines and/or penalties and/or an injunction. In addition, we could suffer serious reputational harm if allegations of impropriety were made against us. Each of these outcomes could, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. The absence of comparable restrictions on competitors in other countries may adversely affect our competitive position. In addition, in order to ship our products into and implement our services in some countries, the products must satisfy the technical requirements of that particular country. If we were unable to comply with such requirements with respect to a significant quantity of our products, our sales in those countries could be restricted, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

•We may be affected by current and future impositions of tariffs and trade restrictions - The U.S. has continued to adjust its trade policies in recent years, including adding new or modifying existing tariffs on imports, in some cases significantly, and other restrictive trade policies. Although some of these tariffs have been paused or reduced, there is significant uncertainty as trade negotiations are ongoing and outcomes are unpredictable. Our inability to effectively manage the negative impacts of U.S. and foreign trade policies, including, in connection with our business with customers outside of the U.S. or with newly sanctioned entities could adversely affect our business and financial results.

A change in our relationship with our large wireless carrier customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Although we have a long history of providing services to many of our wireless carrier partners, a change in purchasing or procurement strategies by a wireless carrier partner could result in the loss of business from that partner. Additionally, from time to time, we routinely perform services without a multi-period contract while we negotiate new and extended contract terms and pricing. These negotiations are complex and may take long periods of time. Even when we successfully negotiate a multi-period contract, our wireless carrier contracts provide for terminations with notice and provide a mechanism for the wireless carrier to renegotiate lower fees and/or change services. Fee pressure from these carriers is constant and ongoing. Thus, even when we obtain a multi-period contract term, our revenues could be suddenly and materially reduced.

From time to time, competitors offer technology that has functionality similar to ours for free, under different business models. Competition from such free offerings may reduce our revenue and harm our business. If our wireless carrier partners or our competition can offer such technology to their subscribers or customers for free, they may elect to cease their relationships with us, alter or reduce the manner or extent to which they market or offer our services or require us to substantially reduce our subscription fees or pursue other business strategies that may not prove successful for us and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If our wireless carrier partners change the pricing and other terms by which they offer our products to their end-customers or do not continue to provide our services at all or renegotiate lower fees with us, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be suddenly and materially adversely affected.

We generate a significant portion of our revenue from customers that are wireless carriers. In addition, a portion of our revenue is derived from subscription fees that we receive from our wireless carrier partners for end-users who subscribe to our service on a standalone basis or in a bundle with other services. Future revenue will depend on the pricing and quality of those services and subscriber demand for those services, which may vary by market, and the level of subscriber turnover experienced by our wireless carrier partners. If subscriber turnover increases more than we anticipate, our financial results could be materially adversely affected.

Poor performance in or disruptions of the services included in our advanced communication solutions could harm our reputation, delay market acceptance of our services and subject us to liabilities (including breach of contract claims brought by our customers and third-party damages claims brought by end-users). Our wireless carrier agreements and certain customers require us to meet specific requirements, including operational uptime requirements or be subject to penalties.

If we are unable to meet contractual requirements with our wireless carrier partners, they could terminate our agreements or we may be required to refund a portion of monthly subscriptions fees they have paid us.

Disputes with our subcontractors or key suppliers or their inability to deliver on a timely basis, could cause delays in our shipments.

Our subcontractors and key suppliers are essential members of our team. Nevertheless, we may occasionally have commercial disputes with them (e.g., over the quality, timeliness or cost of their products or payment patterns in connection with rendered goods and services). Suppliers may also take steps to revise payment terms (e.g., by requiring payment in advance of delivery or payment milestones) that may negatively impact the anticipated timing of components required for the assembly of our products or services rendered in support of our programs. Additionally, our subcontractors and suppliers may experience financial difficulties which may impact their ability to execute against their contractual commitments and delay or otherwise disrupt deliveries. In such instances, we may not receive the components or subsystems for which we have contracted. Taken together, each of the risks set forth herein may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

External events outside our control may disrupt our supply chain. Natural disasters, pandemics, extreme weather conditions, legislative or regulatory changes may all impact the performance of our supplier base. Our subcontractors and suppliers may also, in turn, be unable to maintain the quality of the materials they receive from their respective suppliers.

Our reliance on a single partner to source critical parts (i.e., where we are unable to develop a critical redundant source of supply) may impair our ability to produce and deliver our products. This negative impact could be even greater where we are required to comply with sourcing requirements within our U.S. government contracts regarding the purchase of counterfeit or otherwise non-compliant parts or materials. In some instances, where we rely on supplier certifications of compliance with these laws and regulations, an improper or incomplete certification may adversely impact our production capability.

Our estimates regarding future warranty obligations may change based on a variety of factors, impacting future cost of revenue.

The solutions we provide customers are complex. We cannot ensure that our extensive testing of our solutions will detect all defects. Quality issues reported by our customers for products covered under warranty could adversely impact our reputation and negatively affect our operating results. If significant warranty obligations arise due to reliability or quality issues arising from such defects, our reputation and operating results could be negatively impacted.

Strategic Growth Risks

We face a number of risks relating to the expected long-term growth of our business. Our business and operating results may be negatively impacted if we are unable to manage this growth.

Our business is uniquely subject to certain risks related to its long term growth. These risks include:

•We may not be ultimately successful in transformation activities - Carrying out our transformation plan, including portfolio reshaping, is a complex undertaking. Additionally, in the course of evaluating our portfolio, we may determine that one or both of our reporting units has an estimated fair value below its carrying value and conclude that goodwill in such reporting unit is impaired.

•The loss of key technical and/or management personnel in the course of restructuring could adversely affect our business - Carrying out our transformation plan, including portfolio reshaping, will require the continued contributions of key technical and management personnel. The management skills that have been appropriate for us in the past may not continue to be appropriate if we grow and diversify. Filling new positions may be difficult in the current competitive labor market. Moreover, many of our key and technical management personnel would be difficult to replace and are not subject to employment or non-competition agreements. We currently have research and development employees in areas that are located a great distance away from our U.S. headquarters and some work out of their respective homes. Managing remote product development operations is difficult and we may not be able to manage the employees in these remote centers successfully. Our expected growth and future success will depend, in large part, upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified engineering, sales and marketing personnel. Competition for such personnel from other companies, academic institutions, government entities and other organizations is intense. Although we believe that we have been successful to date in recruiting and retaining key personnel, we may not be successful in attracting and retaining the personnel we will need to grow and operate profitably, especially in the current competitive labor market.

•We may not be able to improve our processes and systems to keep pace with anticipated growth - The future growth of our business may place significant demands on our managerial, operational, production and financial resources. In order to manage that growth, we must be prepared to improve and expand our management, operational and financial systems and controls, as well as our production capabilities. We also need to continue to recruit and retain personnel and train and manage our employee base. We must carefully manage research and development capabilities and production and inventory levels to meet product demand, new product introductions and product and technology transitions. If we are not able to timely and effectively manage our growth and maintain the quality standards required by our existing and potential customers, it could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.g.

•Our markets are highly competitive and there can be no assurance that we can continue to compete effectively - The markets for our products are highly competitive. There can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to compete successfully on price or other terms, or that our competitors will not develop new technologies and products that are more effective than our own. We expect the DoD’s increased use of commercial off-the-shelf products and components in military equipment will encourage new competitors to enter the market. Many of our competitors have financial, technical, marketing, sales and distribution resources greater than ours. We continue to see requests for proposals from large wireless carriers for sole-source solutions and have responded to several such requests. In order to induce retention of existing customer contracts and obtain business on a sole-source basis, we may ultimately agree to adjust pricing on a retroactive basis. If our sole-source proposals are rejected in favor of a competitor’s proposal, it could result in the termination of existing contracts, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

•We may not be able to obtain sufficient components to meet expected demand - Our dependence on component availability, government furnished equipment, subcontractors as key suppliers and the core manufacturing expertise of our high-volume technology manufacturing center located in Arizona exposes us to risk. Although we obtain certain components and subsystems from a single source or a limited number of sources, we believe that most components and subsystems are available from alternative suppliers and subcontractors. During the past several years, as a result of overall increased industry-wide demand, lead times for many components have increased as well as freight costs. In addition, threats of or actual tariffs, disruptions in shipping vessels having access to normal trade routes and/or unexpected port closures could limit our ability to obtain certain parts on a cost-effective basis, or at all. A significant interruption in the delivery of such items could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Similarly, if our high-volume technology manufacturing center located in Arizona is unable to produce sufficient product or maintain quality, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

•Our ability to maintain affordable credit insurance may become more difficult - In the normal course of our business, we purchase credit insurance to mitigate some of our domestic and international credit risk. Although credit insurance remains generally available, upon renewal, it may become more expensive to obtain or may not be available for existing or new customers in certain international markets and it might require higher deductibles than in the past. If we acquire a company with a different customer base, we may not be able to obtain credit insurance for those sales. As such, there can be no assurance that, in the future, we will be able to obtain credit insurance on a basis consistent with our past practices.

Loss of our executive officers or other key personnel or other changes to our management team could disrupt our operations and growth plans or harm our business.

We depend on the efforts of our executive officers and certain key personnel. Any unplanned turnover or our failure to develop an adequate succession plan or business continuity plan for one or more of our executive officers, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), or other key positions could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

On January 13, 2025, we announced that Mr. Kenneth Traub was appointed to serve as our President and CEO, in addition to his role as our Chairman. The loss or limited availability of the services of one or more of our executive officers or other key personnel, or our inability to recruit and retain qualified executive officers or other key personnel in the future, could, at least temporarily, have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. Leadership transitions can be inherently difficult to manage, and an inadequate transition may cause disruption to our business and growth plans, including to our relationships with our customers and employees.

We have indebtedness outstanding under a Credit Facility and Subordinated Credit Facility, and may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. We may not be able to service our debt obligations in the future and we must maintain compliance with various covenants that impose restrictions on our business.

On June 17, 2024, we entered into a senior credit facility with a syndicate of lenders, which was subsequently amended on October 17, 2024, March 3, 2025 and July 21, 2025 (the "Credit Facility"). The Credit Facility consists of a term loan and an asset-based revolver loan. As of July 31, 2025 and November 7, 2025, total borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility were $133.9 million and $135.0 million, respectively. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (8) Credit Facility included in Part II - Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for more information.

On October 17, 2024, we entered into a subordinated credit facility with the existing holders of our convertible preferred stock, which was subsequently amended on March 3, 2025 and July 21, 2025 (the “Subordinated Credit Facility”). As of July 31, 2025 and November 7, 2025, total borrowings outstanding under the Subordinated Credit Facility were $100.1 million and $101.5 million, respectively. Such amount does not include the $25.7 million make-whole amount associated with the $65.0 million portion of the Subordinated Credit Facility. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (9) Subordinated Credit Facility included in Part II - Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for more information.

If we do not have sufficient funds to repay our debt obligations when due, either at maturity or sooner under certain circumstances, it may be necessary to refinance our debt through additional debt or equity financings. If, at the time of any such refinancing, prevailing interest rates or other factors result in higher interest rates on such refinancing, increases in interest expense could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Failure to comply with covenants could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could accelerate our repayment obligations and permit the agents under our Credit Facility to enforce on the collateral pledged to the secured parties thereunder. The Subordinated Credit Facility includes a cross-default provision, whereby a default under the Credit Facility constitutes a default under the Subordinated Credit Facility. Our substantial debt obligations could impede, restrict or delay the implementation of our business strategy or prevent us from entering into transactions that would otherwise benefit our business. For example:

•we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flows for other purposes, including but not limited to business development efforts, capital expenditures, dividends (to the extent applicable) or strategic acquisitions;

•if we are not able to generate sufficient cash flows to meet our substantial debt service obligations or to fund our other liquidity needs, we may have to take actions such as selling assets or raising additional equity or reducing or delaying capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions, investments and joint ventures, restructuring our debt and other capital-intensive activities;

•we may not be able to fund future working capital, capital investments and other business activities;

•we may not be able to make certain other distributions;

•we may become more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in our business or a worsening of general economic or industry-specific conditions; and

•our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry may be limited, thereby placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less indebtedness.

Moreover, we may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future to fund acquisitions or to fund other activities for general business purposes. If additional new debt is added to the current or planned debt levels, or if we are unable to obtain financing on favorable terms, the related risks that we now face could intensify. A substantial increase in our indebtedness could also have a negative impact on our credit ratings. In this regard, failure to maintain our credit ratings could adversely affect the interest rate available to us in future financings, as well as our liquidity, competitive position and access to capital markets, including for bonding requirements. Any decision regarding future borrowings will be based on the facts and circumstances existing at the time, including market conditions and our credit ratings.

Divestitures of portions of our business in the course of carrying out our transformation plan and reshaping our product portfolio could prove difficult to carve out, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value or adversely affect operating results or the market price of our common stock.

As part of our transformation plan, we are exploring strategic alternatives for our various business and product lines, including the potential sale or divestiture of assets or businesses.

Future divestitures may result in the use of significant amounts of cash, increases to amortization expense and future write-offs of assets including intangibles. Divestiture related activities also involve risks that include failing to:

•obtain competitive bids for our assets;

•accurately forecast the financial impact of the transaction, including accounting charges and transaction expenses;

•support products and services, research and development, sales and marketing and other operations during the pendency of disposition activity;

•retain key management personnel and other key employees; or

•retain customers.

Divestiture activity could also:

•divert management’s attention away from the operation of our businesses;

•result in significant goodwill and intangibles write-offs in the event a disposition negatively impacts our future results of operations and or cash flows;

•increase expenses, including transaction expenses associated with the disposition;

•result in contract termination liabilities with customers and or vendors; or

•result in insolvencies of the entities being divested.

There can also be no assurance that such activity will not adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Our investments in recorded goodwill and other intangible assets could be impaired as a result of future business conditions, a deterioration of the global economy or if we change our reporting unit structure for any reason.

As of July 31, 2025, goodwill recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet aggregated $204.6 million. Additionally, as of July 31, 2025, net intangibles recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet aggregated $173.1 million. See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (15) Long-lived Assets, Including Goodwill and Note (16) - Intangible Assets included in Part II - Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data for more information, including a discussion of recent impairments recognized in our Satellite and Space Communications segment.

Goodwill

For purposes of reviewing impairment and the recoverability of goodwill and other intangible assets, our Satellite and Space Communications and Allerium segments each constitute a reporting unit, as such term is defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 350 "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other," and we must make various assumptions in determining their estimated fair values. We may, in the future, change the way we define our reporting units, which would require us to perform a goodwill impairment test and possibly record impairment charges.

In accordance with FASB ASC 350, "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other," we perform a goodwill impairment analysis at least annually (in the first quarter of each fiscal year), unless indicators of impairment exist in interim periods. If we fail the quantitative assessment of goodwill impairment ("quantitative assessment"), we would be required to recognize an impairment loss equal to the amount that a reporting unit's carrying value exceeded its fair value; however, any loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

On August 1, 2025 (the first day of fiscal 2026), we performed our annual quantitative assessment using market participant assumptions to determine if the fair value of each of our reporting units with goodwill exceeded its carrying value. Ultimately, based on our quantitative evaluation, we determined that our Satellite and Space Communications and Allerium reporting units had estimated fair values in excess of their carrying values of at least 19.9% and 7.3%, respectively, and concluded that our goodwill was not impaired and that neither of our two reporting units was at risk of failing the quantitative assessment.

It is possible that, during the remainder of fiscal 2026 or beyond, business conditions (both in the U.S. and internationally) could deteriorate from the current state, our current or prospective customers could materially postpone, reduce or even forgo purchases of our products and services to a greater extent than we currently anticipate, or our common stock price could further fluctuate. A significant decline in our customers' spending that is greater than we anticipate or a shift in funding priorities may also have a negative effect on future orders, sales, income and cash flows and we might be required to perform a quantitative assessment during fiscal 2026 or beyond.

In any event, we are required to perform the next annual goodwill impairment analysis on August 1, 2026 (the start of our fiscal 2027). If our assumptions and related estimates change in the future, or if we change our reporting unit structure or other events and circumstances change (e.g., a sustained decrease in the price of our common stock (considered on both absolute terms and relative to peers)), we may be required to record impairment charges when we perform these tests, or in other future periods.

Net Intangibles with Finite Lives

Similar to goodwill, we also assess the recoverability of the carrying value of our long-lived assets, including identifiable intangible assets with finite useful lives, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset or asset group to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or asset group. If the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset or asset group. Based on our fiscal 2025 assessment, we believe that the carrying values of our net intangible assets were recoverable as of July 31, 2025. Any impairment charges that we may record in the future could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

Cybersecurity Risks

We could be negatively impacted by a system failure, lack of or failure of redundant system components, security breach through cyber-attack, cyber intrusion or otherwise, by other significant disruption of our IT networks or those we operate for certain customers, or third-party data center facilities, servers and related systems. If any such events occur, we may have to reimburse our customers for damages that they may have incurred, pay contract penalties, or provide refunds.

We face risks of cybersecurity threats ranging from, ransomware and denial-of-service, to attacks from more advanced and persistent, highly organized adversaries, including nation state actors, which target the defense industrial base and other critical infrastructure sectors. Our cybersecurity management team, also referred to as “InfoSec,” manages our overall information security strategy. InfoSec partners closely with our Technology, Innovation & Cyber Committee of the Board of Directors to oversee and manage cybersecurity-related risks. Nevertheless, similar to all companies in our industry, we are under constant cyber-attack and are subject to an ongoing risk of security breaches and disruptions of our IT networks and related systems, including third-party data center facilities, whether through actual breaches, cyber-attacks (including ransomware) or cyber intrusions via the Internet, malware, computer viruses, attachments to e-mails, persons inside our organization or persons with access to systems inside our organization. We also maintain databases with private information regarding our customers and our employees. Actual security breaches or disruption, particularly through cyber-attack or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, have increased in recent years and have become more complex. Our IT networks and systems, as well as third-party data center facilities, have been and, we believe, will continue to be under constant attack. We face an added risk of a security breach or other significant disruption to certain of our equipment used on some of our customers' IT networks and related systems which may involve managing and protecting information relating to public safety agencies, wireless carriers as well as national security and other sensitive government functions. Many of our systems have, or are required to have, system redundancies and back-up; in some cases, we may not have sufficient redundancy and/or redundancy and/or back-ups may fail. We may incur significant costs to prevent and respond to system failures, failure of redundant system components, actual breaches, cyber-attacks and other systems disruptions.

As a communications company, and particularly as a government contractor and a provider of public safety and location technologies (including 911 hosted systems), we face a heightened risk of a security breach or disruption from actual breaches, cyber-attacks and other threats to gain unauthorized access to our and our customers’ proprietary or classified information on our IT networks, third-party data center facilities and related systems and to certain of our equipment used on some of our customers' IT networks and related systems. These types of information, IT networks and related systems are critical to the operation of our business and essential to our ability to perform day-to-day operations, and, in some cases, are critical to the operations of certain of our customers. There can be no assurance that our security efforts and measures will be effective or that actual security breaches or disruptions will not be successful or damaging. Techniques used in such breaches and cyber-attacks are constantly evolving and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected. In some cases, the resources of foreign governments may be behind such attacks. Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, and thus it is virtually impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk.

A security breach or other significant disruption (including as a result of a lack of redundancy and/or failure of such redundancy) involving these types of information, IT networks and related systems could, among other things:

•Disrupt the proper functionality of these networks, data center facilities and systems and therefore our operations and/or those of certain of our customers;

•Result in the unauthorized access to, and destruction, loss, theft, misappropriation or release of proprietary, confidential, sensitive or otherwise valuable information of ours or our customers, including employee information and trade secrets, which others could use to compete against us or for disruptive, destructive or otherwise harmful purposes and outcomes;

•Compromise national security and other sensitive government functions;

•Require significant management attention and resources to remedy the damage that results and delay progress on other business objectives;

•Require us to make payments to our customers to reimburse them for damages, pay them penalties or provide refunds; and

•Damage our reputation with our customers (particularly agencies of the U.S. government) and the public generally.

In addition, the cost of continually defending against cyber-attacks and actual breaches has increased in recent years and future costs and any or all of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, as vulnerability standards evolve, our customers may attempt to pass along development and certification costs to us even following the deployment of our products, which may negatively impact our financial performance.

The measures we have implemented to secure information we collect and store or enable access to may be breached, which could cause us to breach agreements with our partners and expose us to potential investigation and penalties by authorities and potential claims for contract breach, product liability damages, credits, penalties or termination by persons whose information was disclosed.

We take reasonable steps to protect the security, integrity and confidentiality of the information we collect and store and to prevent unauthorized access to third-party data to which we enable access through our products, but there is no guarantee that inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure will not occur or that third parties will not gain unauthorized access despite our efforts. If such unauthorized disclosure or access does occur, we may be required to notify regulators, customers and persons whose information was disclosed or accessed under existing and proposed laws. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and are often not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative measures. In the event of such disclosure, we also may be subject to claims of breach of contract, investigation and penalties by regulatory authorities and potential claims by persons whose information was disclosed. If there is a security breach or if there is an inappropriate disclosure of any of these types of information, we could be exposed to investigations, litigation, fines and penalties. Remediation of and liability for loss or misappropriation of end user or employee personal information could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Even if we were not held liable for such event, a security breach or inappropriate disclosure of personal, private or confidential information could harm our reputation and our relationships with current and potential customers and end users. Even the perception of a security risk could inhibit market acceptance of our products and services. We may be required to invest additional resources to protect against damage caused by any actual or perceived disruptions of our services. We may also be required to provide information about the location of an end user’s mobile device to government authorities, which could result in public perception that we are providing the government with intelligence information and deter some end users from using our services. Any of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Legal, Regulatory and Litigation Risks

Changes in U.S. federal, state and local and foreign tax law could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

The laws, rules, and regulations dealing with U.S. federal, state and local and foreign income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury Department, as well as similar agencies of international governments. Changes to tax laws (which changes may have immediate and/or retroactive application) could adversely affect us or holders of our common stock. In recent years, many changes have been made to applicable tax laws, such as those caused by the recent enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in the U.S. ("OBBBA"), and changes are likely to continue to occur in the future. It cannot be predicted whether, when, in what form, or with what effective dates, new tax laws may be enacted, or regulations and rulings may be enacted, promulgated or issued under existing or new tax laws, which could result in an increase in our tax liability or require changes in the manner in which we operate in order to minimize or mitigate any adverse effects of changes in tax law or in the interpretation thereof.

Our U.S. federal, state and local and foreign tax returns are subject to audit and a resulting tax assessment or settlement could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Significant judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes.

The final determination of tax examinations and any related litigation could be materially different than what is reflected in historical income tax provisions and accruals.

Our U.S. federal income tax returns for fiscal 2022 through 2025 are subject to potential future Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") audit. None of our state income tax returns prior to fiscal 2021 are subject to audit. Although adjustments relating to past audits of our federal and state income tax returns were immaterial, a tax assessment or settlement for other periods or other jurisdictions that may be selected for future audit could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

We may be subject to environmental liabilities.

We engage in manufacturing and are subject to a variety of local, state and federal laws and regulations relating to the storage, discharge, handling, emission, generation, manufacture and disposal of toxic or other hazardous substances used to manufacture our products. We are also subject to the Restriction of Hazardous Substance ("RoHS") directive which restricts the use of lead, mercury and other substances in electrical and electronic products. The failure to comply with current or future environmental requirements could result in the imposition of substantial fines, suspension of production, alteration of our manufacturing processes, cessation of operations or reputational damage that could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the handling, treatment or disposal of hazardous substances by us or our predecessors may have resulted, or could in the future result, in contamination requiring investigation or remediation, or lead to other liabilities, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The success of our business is dependent on compliance with FCC rules and regulations and similar foreign, state and local laws and regulations.

Many of our products are incorporated into wireless communications systems that must comply with various U.S. government regulations, including those of the FCC, as well as similar state, local and international laws and regulations. As a result, our business faces increased risks including the following:

•We must obtain various licenses from the FCC - We operate FCC licensed teleports that are subject to the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, or the FCC Act, and the rules and regulations of the FCC. We cannot guarantee that the FCC will grant renewals when our existing licenses expire, nor are we assured that the FCC will not adopt new or modified technical requirements that will require us to incur expenditures to modify or upgrade our equipment as a condition of retaining our licenses. We may, in the future, be required to seek FCC or other government approval if foreign ownership of our stock exceeds certain specified criteria. Failure to comply with these policies could result in an order to divest the offending foreign ownership, fines, denial of license renewal and/or license revocation proceedings against the licensee by the FCC, or denial of certain contracts from other U.S. government agencies.

•We are dependent on the allocation and availability of frequency spectrum - Adverse regulatory changes related to the allocation and availability of frequency spectrum and in the military standards and specifications that define the current satellite networking environment, could materially harm our business by: (i) restricting development efforts by us and our customers, (ii) making our current products less attractive or obsolete, or (iii) increasing the opportunity for additional competition. The increasing demand for wireless communications has exerted pressure on regulatory bodies worldwide to adopt new standards and reassign bandwidth for these products and services. The reduced number of available frequencies for other products and services and the time delays inherent in the government approval process of new products and services have caused, and may continue to cause, our customers to cancel, postpone or reschedule their installation of communications systems including their satellite, over-the-horizon microwave, or terrestrial line-of-sight microwave communication systems. This, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our sales of products to our customers. Changes in, or our failure to comply with, applicable laws and regulations could materially adversely harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

•Our future growth is dependent, in part, on developing NG-911 compliant products - The FCC requires, among other things, that certain location information be provided to network operators for public safety answering points when a subscriber makes a 911 call. Technical failures, greater regulation by federal, state or foreign governments or regulatory authorities, time delays or the significant costs associated with developing or installing improved location technology could slow down or stop the deployment of our mobile location products. If deployment of improved location technology is delayed, stopped or never occurs, market acceptance of our products and services may be materially adversely affected. Because we rely on some third-party location technology instead of developing all of the technology ourselves, we have little or no influence over its improvement. The technology employed with NG-911 services generally anticipates a migration to internet-protocol ("IP") based communication. Since many companies are proficient in IP-based communication protocols, the barriers to entry to providing NG-911 products and services are lower than for traditional switch-based protocols. If we are unable to develop unique and proprietary solutions that are superior to and/or more cost effective than other market offers, our 911 business could get replaced by new market entrants, resulting in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

•Under the FCC’s mandate, our 911 business and emerging 988 opportunities are dependent on state and local governments - Under the FCC’s mandate, wireless carriers are required to provide 911 services only if state and local governments request the service. As part of a state or local government’s decision to request 911, they have the authority to develop cost recovery mechanisms. However, cost recovery is no longer a condition to wireless carriers’ obligation to deploy the service. If state and local governments do not widely request that 911 services be provided or we become subject to significant pressures from wireless carriers with respect to pricing of 911 services, our 911 business would be harmed and future growth of our business would be reduced.

The 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline has seen both growth and challenges as it continues to be rolled out across the U.S. The U.S. federal government has allocated funding to this initiative, earmarked for expanding services, including regional call centers and crisis intervention teams. This funding is aimed at distributing emergency-type communications more efficiently, by providing a direct response for mental health crises.

However, despite these efforts, the system is still far from fully optimized. Challenges include staffing shortages, particularly for behavioral health professionals, and the need for technological improvements, like geo-routing to better connect callers with the appropriate local services. Some states are also exploring sustainable funding models, such as implementing 988 surcharges similar to those used for 911 services, to ensure long-term viability.

At the U.S. federal level, the 988 Implementation Act introduced in 2023 seeks to expand access further by requiring health insurance plans to cover crisis services and addressing gaps in care for populations like those on Medicare. This law is expected to enhance the reach and effectiveness of the lifeline by building out a more comprehensive mental health response infrastructure tailored to each community’s needs.

Despite these advancements, experts note that the system will take years to fully optimize as it contends with both logistical and workforce challenges across the country. Some local initiatives, like those in Michigan, are already seeing increased call volumes and struggling to keep pace with the demand, particularly for youth mental health services.

Regulation of the mobile communications industry and VoIP is evolving, and unfavorable changes or our failure to comply with existing and potential new legislation or regulations could harm our business and operating results.

As the mobile communications industry continues to evolve, we believe greater regulation by federal, state or foreign governments or regulatory authorities is likely and we face certain risks including:

•We must adhere to existing and potentially new privacy rules - We believe increased regulation is likely in the area of data privacy, and laws and regulations applying to the solicitation, collection, processing or use of personal or consumer information could affect our customers’ ability to use and share data, potentially reducing our ability to utilize this information in the resale of certain of our products. In order for mobile location products and services to function properly, wireless carriers must locate their subscribers and store information on each subscriber’s location. Although data regarding the location of the wireless user resides only on the wireless carrier’s systems, users may not feel comfortable with the idea that the wireless carrier knows and can track their location. Carriers will need to obtain subscribers’ permission to gather and use the subscribers’ personal information, or they may not be able to provide customized mobile location services which those subscribers might otherwise desire. If subscribers view mobile location services as an annoyance or a threat to their privacy, that could reduce demand for our products and services and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Over the past several years, there have been a number of laws and regulations enacted that affect companies conducting business on the Internet, including the European General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR"). The GDPR imposes certain privacy related requirements on companies that receive or process personal data of residents of the European Union that are currently different than those in the U.S. and include significant penalties for non-compliance. Similarly, there are a number of state privacy laws, as well as legislative proposals in the U.S., at both the federal and state level, that could impose new obligations in areas affecting our business, such as liability for personal data protection. In addition, some countries are considering or have passed legislation implementing data protection requirements or requiring local storage and processing of data or similar requirements that could increase the cost and complexity of delivering our services. Our costs to comply with the GDPR as well any other similar laws and regulations that emerge may negatively impact our business.

•We may face increased compliance costs in connection with health and safety requirements for mobile devices - If wireless handsets pose health and safety risks, we may be subject to new regulations and demand for our products and services may decrease. Media reports have suggested that certain radio frequency emissions from wireless handsets may be linked to various health concerns, including cancer, and may interfere with various electronic medical devices, including hearing aids and pacemakers. Concerns over radio frequency emissions may have the effect of discouraging the use of wireless handsets, which would decrease demand for our services. In recent years, the FCC and foreign regulatory agencies have updated the guidelines and methods they use for evaluating radio frequency emissions from radio equipment, including wireless handsets. In addition, interest groups have requested that the FCC investigate claims that wireless technologies pose health concerns and cause interference with airbags, hearing aids and other medical devices. There also are some safety risks associated with the use of wireless handsets while driving. Concerns over these safety risks and the effect of any legislation that may be adopted in response to these risks could limit our ability to market and sell our products and services, which could negatively impact our business, consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

•The regulatory environment for VoIP services is developing - The FCC has determined that VoIP services are not subject to the same regulatory scheme as traditional wireline and wireless telephone services. If the regulatory environment for VoIP services evolves in a manner other than the way we anticipate, our 911 business would be significantly harmed and future growth of our business would be significantly reduced. For example, the regulatory scheme for wireless and wireline service providers requires those carriers to allow service providers such as us to have access to certain databases that make the delivery of a 911 call possible. No such requirements exist for VoIP service providers, so carriers could prevent us from continuing to provide VoIP 911 service by denying us access to the required databases.

Ongoing compliance with the provisions of securities laws, related regulations and financial reporting standards could unexpectedly materially increase our costs and compliance related expenses.

Because we are a publicly traded company, we are required to comply with provisions of securities laws, related regulations and financial reporting standards. Because securities laws, related regulations and financial reporting standards pertaining to our business are relatively complex, our business faces increased risks including the following:

•Our costs will likely increase as a result of our identification of material weaknesses within our control environment - Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC rules, we are required to furnish a report of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls as part of our Form 10-K. Our independent registered public accountants are required to attest to and provide a separate opinion. To issue our report, we document our internal control design and the testing processes that support our evaluation and conclusion, and then we test and evaluate the results. See Part II - Item 9A Controls and Procedures for information related to the material weaknesses that we identified as of July 31, 2025. There can be no assurance that we will be able to remediate the material weaknesses that we have identified, or maintain all of the controls necessary for continued compliance. There likewise can be no assurance that we will be able to retain sufficient skilled finance and accounting personnel, especially in light of the increased demand for such personnel among publicly traded companies.

•Stock-based compensation accounting standards could negatively impact our stock - Since our inception, we have used stock-based awards as a fundamental component of our employee compensation packages. We believe that stock-based awards directly motivate our employees to maximize long-term stockholder value and, through the use of long-term vesting, encourage employees to remain with us. We apply the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, which requires us to record compensation expense in our statement of operations for employee and director stock-based awards using a fair value method. We adopted FASB ASU No. 2016-09 which modified certain aspects of ASC 718, including the requirement to recognize excess tax benefits and shortfalls in the income statement. The ongoing application of this standard will have a significant effect on our reported earnings, and could adversely impact our ability to provide accurate guidance on our future reported financial results due to the variability of the factors used to estimate the value of stock-based awards (including long-term performance shares which are subject to the achievement of three-year goals which are based on several performance metrics). The ongoing application of this standard could impact the future value of our common stock and may result in greater stock price volatility.

Also, as further discussed in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (1) - Summary of Significant Accounting and Reporting Policies included in Part II - Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, included in this Form 10-K, the accounting rules and regulations that we must comply with are complex and are continually changing in ways that could materially impact our financial statements. We must comply with these new rules on a go-forward basis. Because of the uncertainties of the estimates, judgments and assumptions associated with new accounting standards, as well as with any future guidance or interpretations related to them, we may incur additional costs and cannot provide any assurances that we will be able to comply with such complex rules.

Our costs to comply with the aforementioned and other regulations continue to increase and we may have to add additional accounting staff, engage consultants or change our internal practices, standards and policies which could significantly increase our costs to comply with ongoing or future requirements. In addition, the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC ("Nasdaq") routinely changes its requirements for companies, such as us, that are listed on Nasdaq. These changes (and potential future changes) have increased and may increase our legal and financial compliance costs, including making it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance or maintain our current liability coverage. We believe that these new and proposed laws and regulations could make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our Board of Directors, particularly to serve on our Audit Committee, and qualified executive officers.

Our management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of July 31, 2025 due to material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results in a timely manner, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and materially and adversely affect our business and financial results.

After consultation with our independent registered public accounting firm, we concluded that we did not design and maintain an effective control environment commensurate with our financial reporting requirements based on the criteria in the COSO framework, as we lacked a sufficient complement of resources with an appropriate level of knowledge and experience to establish effective process and controls. This control environment material weakness contributed to other material weaknesses within our system of internal control over financial reporting at the control activity level, where we did not design and implement effective control activities, including controls related to: revenue, inventory, other assets, contract liabilities, and complex accounting matters and transactions (including debt, convertible preferred stock and related embedded derivatives).

An international component of our Allerium segment also had ineffective controls. Specifically, we did not design and maintain effective general information technology controls (“GITCs”) and business process controls in the following areas: (i) user access controls to ensure appropriate segregation of duties and to adequately restrict user and privileged access to financial applications, programs and data to appropriate company personnel; (ii) program change management controls to ensure that changes to information technology (“IT”) programs and data affecting financial applications and underlying accounting records are properly identified, tested, authorized and implemented with appropriate segregation of duties; and (iii) business process controls to ensure that journal entries were not amended prior to posting, as the enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system which the international component operates did not restrict approvers from changing journal entries prior to posting. While no material misstatements were identified with respect to this international component in fiscal 2025, these deficiencies impact control activities over all financial statement account balances, classes of transactions and disclosures and contributed to the potential for there to have been material misstatements within the international component. Such international component accounted for 5.7%, 4.1% and 3.3% of our consolidated total assets and 7.6%, 5.9% and 4.6% of our consolidated net sales as of and for the three fiscal years ended July 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

If we identify any new material weaknesses in the future, any such newly identified material weakness could limit our ability to prevent or detect a misstatement of our accounts or disclosures that could result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements. In such case, we may be unable to maintain compliance with securities law requirements regarding timely filing of periodic reports in addition to applicable stock exchange listing requirements, investors may lose confidence in our financial reporting and our stock price may decline as a result. We cannot assure you that the measures we have taken to date, or any measures we may take in the future, will be sufficient to avoid potential future material weaknesses.

Indemnification provisions in our contracts could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In the ordinary course of business, we include indemnification provisions in certain of our customer contracts. Pursuant to these agreements, we have agreed to indemnify, hold harmless and reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, including but not limited to losses related to third-party intellectual property claims. Some customers seek indemnification under their contractual arrangements with us for claims and other costs associated with defending lawsuits alleging infringement of patents through their use of our products and services, and the use of our products and services in combination with products and services of other vendors.

In some cases, we have agreed to assume the defense of the case. In others, we will negotiate with these customers in good faith because we believe our technology does not infringe the cited patents or due to specific clauses within the customer contractual arrangements that may or may not give rise to an indemnification obligation. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential amount we may spend under these agreements due to the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement.

Our assessments related to indemnification provisions are based on estimates and assumptions that have been deemed reasonable by management, but that may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause us to change those estimates and assumptions. Therefore, it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements in a future period.

We are, from time to time, and could become a party to additional litigation or subject to claims, including product liability claims, current and former employee claims, government investigations and other proceedings that could cause us to incur unanticipated expenses and otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We are, from time to time, involved in commercial disputes and civil litigation relating to our businesses.

Our agreements with customers may require us to indemnify such customers. Direct claims against us or claims against our customers may relate to defects in or non-conformance of our products, or our own acts of negligence and non-performance. Occasionally, we are called upon also to provide information in connection with litigation involving other parties or government investigations. Product liability and other forms of insurance are expensive and may not be available in the future.

We cannot be sure that we will be able to maintain or obtain insurance coverage at acceptable costs or in sufficient amounts or that our insurer will not disclaim coverage as to a future claim. In many cases, we are unable to obtain insurance and are self-insured. Any such claim, including any out of pocket payments we are required to make and the costs of the defense against such claim, could result in material costs and have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

For additional information related to these lawsuits, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - Note (14)(a) - Commitments and Contingencies - Legal Proceedings and Other Matters included in Part II - Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, included in this Form 10-K.

Protection of our intellectual property is limited and pursuing infringers of our patents and other intellectual property rights can be costly.

Our businesses rely, in large part, upon our proprietary scientific and engineering know-how and production techniques. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark, service mark, trade secret and unfair competition laws, restrictions in licensing agreements, confidentiality provisions and various other contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property and related proprietary rights, but these legal means provide only limited protection. We cannot guarantee that our issued and acquired patents will be upheld if challenged by another party. Additionally, with respect to any patent applications which we have filed, we cannot guarantee that any patents will be issued as a result of these applications.

The departure of any of our key management and technical personnel, the breach of their confidentiality and non-disclosure obligations to us or the failure to achieve our intellectual property objectives could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our ability to compete successfully and achieve future revenue growth will depend, in part, on our ability to protect our proprietary technology and operate without infringing upon the rights of others. We may fail to do so. In addition, the laws of certain countries in which our products are or may be sold may not protect our products or intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S.

Our ability to protect our intellectual property rights is also subject to the terms of future government contracts. We cannot assure you that the federal government will not demand greater intellectual property rights or restrict our ability to disseminate intellectual property. We are also a member of standards-setting organizations and have agreed to license some of our intellectual property to other members on fair and reasonable terms to the extent that the license is required to develop non-infringing products.

Pursuing infringers of our proprietary rights could result in significant litigation costs, and any failure to pursue infringers could result in our competitors utilizing our technology and offering similar products, potentially resulting in loss of a competitive advantage and decreased revenues. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, existing patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws afford only limited protection. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to the same extent as do the laws of the U.S. Protecting our know-how is difficult especially after our employees or those of our third-party contract service providers end their employment or engagement. Attempts may be made to copy or reverse-engineer aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Accordingly, we may not be able to prevent the misappropriation of our technology or prevent others from developing similar technology. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. The costs and diversion of resources could significantly harm our business. If we fail to protect our intellectual property, we may not receive any return on the resources expended to create the intellectual property or generate any competitive advantage based on it.

Third parties may claim we are infringing their intellectual property rights and we could be prevented from selling our products, or suffer significant litigation expense, even if these claims have no merit.

Our competitive position is driven in part by our intellectual property and other proprietary rights. Third parties, however, may claim that we, our products, operations or any products or technology we obtain from other parties are infringing their intellectual property rights, and we may be unaware of intellectual property rights of others that may impact some of our assets, technology and products.

From time to time our customers are parties to allegations of intellectual property infringement claims based on our customers’ incorporation and use of our products and services, which may lead to demands from our customers for us to indemnify them for costs in defending those allegations. Any litigation regarding patents, trademarks, copyrights or intellectual property rights, even those without merit, and the related indemnification demands of our customers, can be costly and time consuming, and divert our management and key personnel from operating our business. The complexity of the technology involved, and inherent uncertainty and cost of intellectual property litigation increases our risks. If any third party has a meritorious or successful claim that we are infringing its intellectual property rights, we may be forced to change our products or enter into licensing arrangements with third parties that may include payment of a reasonable royalty, which may be costly or impractical. This also may require us to stop selling our products as currently engineered, which could harm our competitive position. We also may be subject to significant damages or injunctions that prevent the further development and sale of certain of our products or services and may result in a material loss of revenue.

As a result, we could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open-source software.

We may face infringement claims in connection with our use of artificial intelligence and machine learning within our product development, testing, and deployment, or other business functions. Such claims may arise in the context of both third-party litigation and regulatory exposure from use of third-party content contained in generation results from large-language models or other algorithmic results or outcomes that are utilized in our products or services without required attribution or permission. Such claims, if successful, may combine to (a) make it more costly for us to apply artificial intelligence and machine learning within our business, (b) lead to regulatory fines or penalties, (c) result in payments of monetary damages, or (d) require us to alter our product offerings or business practices.

Competitive Risks

All of our business activities are subject to rapid technological change, new entrants, the introduction of other distribution models and long development and testing periods each of which may harm our competitive position, render our product or service offerings obsolete and require us to continuously develop technology and/or obtain licensed technology in order to compete successfully.

We are engaged in business activities characterized by rapid technological change, evolving industry standards, frequent new product announcements and enhancements, and changing customer demands. The introduction of products and services or future industry standards embodying new technologies and approaches could render any of our products and services obsolete or non-competitive. The emergence of low Earth orbit ("LEO") satellite operators such as Starlink, OneWeb and Project Kuiper, have driven significant changes in the way communications equipment is procured, and may further disrupt our markets. The introduction of optical communications technology, including from satellite to satellite and satellite to ground, as well as potential offerings for satellite / cellular direct connectivity, may impact our future business. The successful execution of our business strategy is contingent upon wireless network operators launching and maintaining mobile location services, our ability to maintain a technically skilled development and engineering team, our ability to create new network software products and adapt our existing products to rapidly changing technologies, industry standards and customer needs. As a result of the complexities inherent in our product offerings, new technologies may require long development and testing periods. Additionally, new products may not achieve market acceptance or our competitors could develop alternative technologies that gain broader market acceptance than our products. If we are unable to develop and introduce technologically advanced products that respond to evolving industry standards and customer needs, or if we are unable to complete the development and introduction of these products on a timely and cost effective basis, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition or could result in our technology becoming obsolete.

New entrants seeking to gain market share by introducing new technology and new products may make it more difficult for us to sell our products and services and could create increased pricing pressure, reduced profit margins, increased sales and marketing expenses, or the loss of market share or expected market share, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For example, many companies are developing new technologies and the shift towards open standards will likely result in increased competition and some of our products may become commoditized as a result.

Our Allerium segment provides various technologies that are utilized on mobile devices. Applications from competitors for location-based or text-based messaging platforms may be preloaded on mobile devices by original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, or offered by OEMs directly. Increased competition from providers of location-based services which do not rely on a wireless carrier may result in fewer wireless carrier subscribers electing to purchase their wireless carrier’s branded location-based services, which could harm our business and revenue. In addition, these location-based or text-based services may be offered for free or on a one-time fee basis, which could force us to reduce monthly subscription fees or migrate to a one-time fee model to remain competitive. We may also lose end users or face erosion in our average revenue per user if these competitors deliver their products without charge to the consumer by generating revenue from advertising or as part of other applications or services.

We may not have the financial or technological resources to keep pace with such changes and developments or be successful in our research and development and we may not be able to identify and respond to technological improvements made by our competitors in a timely or cost-effective fashion. Any delays could result in increased costs of development or redirect resources from other projects. In addition, we cannot provide assurances that the markets for our products, systems, services or technologies will develop as we currently anticipate. The failure of our products, systems, services or technologies to gain market acceptance could significantly reduce our net sales and harm our business.

Our business is highly competitive, we are reliant upon the success of our partners, and some of our competitors have significantly greater resources than we do, which could result in a loss of customers, market share and/or market acceptance.

Our business is highly competitive. We will continue to invest in research and development for the introduction of new and enhanced products and services designed to improve capacity, data processing rates and features. We must also continue to develop new features and to improve functionality of our software. Research and development in our industry is complex, expensive and uncertain. We believe that we must continue to dedicate a significant amount of resources to research and development efforts to maintain our competitive position. If we continue to expend a significant amount of resources on research and development, but our efforts do not lead to the successful introduction of product and service enhancements more quickly than our competitors that are competitive in the marketplace, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Several of our potential competitors are substantially larger than we are and have greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. In particular, larger competitors have certain advantages over us which could cause us to lose customers and impede our ability to attract new customers, including: larger bases of financial, technical, marketing, personnel and other resources; more established relationships with wireless carriers and government customers; more funds to deploy products and services; and the ability to lower prices of (or not charge any price for) competitive products and services because they are selling larger volumes. Furthermore, we cannot be sure that our competitors will not develop competing products, systems, services or technologies that gain market acceptance in advance of our products, systems, services or technologies, or that our competitors will not develop new products, systems, services or technologies that cause our existing products, systems, services or technologies to become non-competitive or obsolete, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

In some cases, our wireless partners may have different objectives, or our distributors may not be successful. If we are not successful in doing so, we may not be able to achieve our long-term business goals.

We rely upon various third-party companies and their technology to provide services to our customers and if we are unable to obtain such services at reasonable prices, or at all, our gross margins and our ability to provide the services of our wireless applications business could be materially adversely affected.

We rely on various third-party companies and their technology in our business. Risks from our reliance with these third parties include:

•The loss of mapping and third-party content - The wireless data services provided to our customers are dependent on real-time, continuous feeds from map data, points of interest data, traffic information, gas prices, theater, event and weather information from vendors and others. Any disruption of this third-party content from our satellite feeds or backup landline feeds or other disruption could result in delays in our subscribers’ ability to receive information. We obtain this data that we sell to our customers from companies owned by current and potential competitors, who may act in a manner that is not in our best interest. If our suppliers of this data or content were to enter into exclusive relationships with other providers of location-based services or were to discontinue providing such information and we were unable to replace them cost effectively, or at all, our ability to provide the services of our wireless applications business would be materially adversely affected. Our gross margins may also be materially adversely affected if the cost of third-party data and content increases substantially.

•Third-party data centers or third-party networks may fail - Many products and services of our advanced communication solutions, in particular our public safety and location technology solutions, are provided through a combination of our servers, which are hosted at third-party data centers, and on the networks, as well as within the data centers of our wireless carrier partners. Our business relies to a significant degree on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of the third-party data centers, customer data centers, and cloud providers we use. Network failures, disruptions or capacity constraints in our third-party data center facilities or in our servers maintained at their location could affect the performance of the products and services of our wireless applications and 911 business and harm our reputation and our revenue. The ability of our subscribers (or those of our customers) to receive critical location and business information requires timely and uninterrupted connections with our wireless network carriers. Any disruption from our satellite feeds or backup landline feeds could also result in delays in our subscribers’ ability to receive information.

•We must integrate our technologies and routinely upgrade them - We may not be able to upgrade our location services platform to support certain advanced features and functionality without obtaining technology licenses from third parties. Obtaining these licenses may be costly and may delay the introduction of such features and functionality, and these licenses may not be available on commercially favorable terms, or at all. Problems and delays in development or delivery as a result of issues with respect to design, technology, licensing and patent rights, labor, learning curve assumptions, or materials and components could prevent us from achieving contractual obligations. In addition, our products cannot be tested and proven in all situations and are otherwise subject to unforeseen problems. The inability to offer advanced features or functionality, or a delay in our ability to upgrade our location-based services platform, may materially adversely affect demand for our products and services and, consequently, have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

•We rely upon "open-source" software - We have incorporated some types of open-source software into our products, allowing us to enhance certain solutions without incurring substantial additional research and development costs. Thus far, we have encountered no unanticipated material problems arising from our use of open-source software. However, as the use of open-source software becomes more widespread, certain open-source technology could become competitive with our proprietary technology, which could cause sales of our products to decline or force us to reduce the fees we charge for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Because our software may contain defects or errors, and our hardware products may incorporate defective components, our sales could decrease if these defects or errors adversely affect our reputation or delay shipments of our products.

Products as complex as ours are likely to contain undetected errors or defects, especially when first introduced or when new versions are released. Software products, such as our 911 call handling software solutions, must meet stringent customer technical requirements and we must satisfy our warranty obligations to our customers. Our hardware products are also subject to warranty obligations and integrate a wide variety of components from different vendors.

Our products including software may not be error or defect free after delivery to customers, which could damage our reputation, cause revenue losses, result in the rejection of our products or services, divert development resources and increase service and warranty costs, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

Our stock price is volatile.

The stock market in general and the stock prices of technology-based companies, in particular, experience extreme volatility that often is unrelated to the operating performance of any specific public company. The market price of our common stock has fluctuated significantly in the past and is likely to fluctuate significantly in the future as well. Factors that could have a significant impact on the market price of our stock include, among others:

•strategic transactions, such as acquisitions and divestitures by us and our competitors;

•our ability to successfully integrate and manage acquisitions or unwind and manage divestitures;

•our issuance of potentially dilutive equity or equity-type securities;

•our issuance of debt or refinancing our debt;

•our ability to successfully access equity and debt capital markets;

•future announcements concerning us or our competitors;

•shareholder activism involving our common stock, board of directors or corporate governance;

•receipt or non-receipt of substantial orders for products and services;

•quality deficiencies in services or products;

•results of technological innovations and new commercial products;

•changes in our own outlook or recommendations of securities analysts;

•government regulations;

•changes in the status or outcome of government audits;

•proprietary rights or product or patent litigation;

•changes in U.S. government policies;

•changes in economic conditions generally, particularly in the markets we serve;

•changes in securities market conditions, generally;

•changes in prevailing interest rates;

•changes in the status of litigation and legal matters (including changes in the status of export matters);

•cyber attacks;

•energy blackouts;

•acts of terrorism or war;

•inflation or deflation;

•rumors or allegations regarding our financial disclosures or practices;

•our ability to timely file documents required by the SEC within prescribed time periods; and

•global pandemics.

Shortfalls in our sales or earnings in any given period relative to the levels expected by securities analysts could immediately, significantly and adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

Future issuances of our shares of common stock could dilute a stockholder's ownership interest in Comtech and reduce the market price of our shares of common stock.

In addition to potential issuances of our shares of common stock associated with acquisitions, in the future, we may issue additional securities to raise capital. We may also acquire interests in other companies by using a combination of cash and our common stock or just our common stock. We may also issue securities convertible into our common stock. Any of these events may dilute a stockholder's ownership interest in Comtech and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.

Actions of activist stockholders could impact the pursuit of our business strategies and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and/or share price.

Our Board of Directors and executive management value constructive input from investors, regularly engage in dialogue with our stockholders, and are committed to acting in the best interests of all of our stockholders. However, there is no assurance that certain shareholders will not conduct activist campaigns that may not align with our business strategies or what the Board of Directors believes is in the best interest of all of our stockholders, and may be costly to us and distracting to our Board of Directors and executive management.

In September 2024, shareholders Fred Kornberg, Michael Porcelain and Oleg Timoshenko (the "Investor Group") nominated eight candidates to stand for election at our fiscal 2024 annual meeting of stockholders. On November 17, 2024, we entered into a Cooperation Agreement with the Investor Group, the terms of which are described in the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 18, 2024. In September 2025, we provided notice to the Investor Group regarding our intention to renominate Michael Hildebrandt at our fiscal 2025 annual meeting of stockholders, thus extending the Cooperation Agreement until 30 days prior to the director nomination deadline for our fiscal 2026 annual meeting of stockholders.

Provisions in our corporate documents and Delaware law could delay or prevent a change in control of Comtech.

We have taken a number of actions that could have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a merger, acquisition or divestiture involving Comtech that our stockholders may consider favorable.

For example, the employment contract with our CEO and agreements with other of our executive officers provide for substantial payments in certain circumstances or in the event of a change of control of Comtech. In the future, we may adopt a stockholder rights plan which could cause substantial dilution to a stockholder, and substantially increase the cost paid by a stockholder who attempts to acquire us on terms not approved by our Board of Directors.

In general, this statute provides that, except in certain limited circumstances, a corporation shall not engage in any "business combination" with an "interested stockholder" for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. A "business combination" includes mergers, asset sales and other transactions resulting in a financial benefit to the interested stockholder. Subject to certain exceptions, for purposes of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, an "interested stockholder" is a person who, together with affiliates, owns, or within three years did own, 15% or more of the corporation's voting stock. This provision could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of Comtech.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY

Cybersecurity Risk Management Strategy and Program

We identify and assess material risks from cybersecurity threats predominantly through the work of our Information Security (“InfoSec”) team as part of our enterprise risk management (“ERM”) process. Our ERM process is designed to identify and evaluate the full range of significant risks to Comtech. As part of our ERM program, our functional and operations departments identify and manage enterprise risks on an annual cycle. The process consists of structured reviews, discussions, and mitigation planning, and includes risks identified by our cybersecurity functions.

The cybersecurity ERM process is administered by InfoSec with input from each business segment and function. InfoSec continually monitors material cybersecurity risks facing Comtech, including cybersecurity threats and threats to our internal systems, our products, services and programs for customers, and our supply chain.

To manage and remediate cybersecurity risks identified as part of our ERM process and to manage emerging cybersecurity threats in real time; we have implemented a Managed Detection and Response system that supports the Security Operations Center. We are a member of the DoD Defense Industrial Base Collaborative Information Sharing Environment and the National Defense Information Sharing and Analysis Center. These organizations share real-time cybersecurity threat information and best practices in protecting, detecting and recovering from cybersecurity threats.

As a government contractor, we must comply with extensive cybersecurity regulations, including the DFARS related to adequately safeguarding controlled unclassified information and reporting cybersecurity incidents to the DoD. The policies and controls we have implemented to date reflect our adherence to these requirements and have been assessed by external organizations, including industry partners.

During fiscal year 2025 and through the date of this filing, based on the information available, we did not identify any risks from cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any previous cybersecurity incidents (as such terms are defined in Item 106(a) of Regulation S-K), that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our business strategy, results of operations or financial condition. Please see Cybersecurity Risks under Item 1A - Risk Factors under Part I of this Form 10-K for more information about risks to us from cybersecurity threats.

Enterprise Cybersecurity

Our enterprise cybersecurity program aligns with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) standards, among others, and includes processes and controls for the deployment of new IT systems by us and controls over new and existing systems operation. We monitor and conduct regular testing of these controls and systems, including vulnerability management through active discovery and testing to regularly assess patching and configuration status. In addition, we require our employees and contract workers to complete annual cybersecurity training, and we regularly conduct simulated phishing and cyber-related communications.

Cybersecurity for U.S. Government Authorized Systems

Our information technology systems used in connection with programs for the U.S. government align with the NIST standard and meet the requirements of 32 CFR Part 117 (National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual or "NISPOM") and other applicable U.S. government guidance. The program includes authorizations and assessments of new and existing IT systems by our customers. We monitor use on these systems, including vulnerability management through patching and configuration. In addition, we restrict user access and require authorized users to complete additional user and cybersecurity training.

Third Party Service Providers

We engage third party service providers to expand the capabilities and capacity of our cybersecurity program, including for design, monitoring and testing of the program’s risk prevention and protection measures and process execution, including incident detection, investigation, analysis and response, eradication and recovery.

Management of Third-Party Risks

Our suppliers, subcontractors and third-party service providers are subject to cybersecurity obligations and controls as aligned with DFARS and U.S. Federal Acquisition Regulations (“FARS”) requirements. We are making strides to ensure suppliers, subcontractors and third-party service providers are knowledgeable and aligned with DFARS and FARS requirements. We are also developing an enhanced program for our suppliers, subcontractors, and third-party service providers to agree to cybersecurity-related contractual terms and conditions of purchase to ensure their commitment to the mandates. Many of these contractors, suppliers or third parties are also subject to regulatory requirements in mandatory government procurement clauses, including those contained in the DFARS and FARS, which obligate adherence to a generally accepted cybersecurity framework, such as NIST, and occasional assessment of their implementation of cybersecurity controls as a condition of contract award or during contract performance. Finally, we require these third parties to notify us of cybersecurity incidents that impact us.

Program Assessment

We continuously evaluate and seek to improve and mature our cybersecurity processes and controls. Our cybersecurity program is regularly assessed through management self-evaluations and ongoing monitoring procedures to evaluate our program effectiveness, including vulnerability management through active discovery and testing to validate patching and configuration. As cybersecurity threats are continuously evolving, we also periodically engage with third parties to perform maturity assessments of our program to identify potential risk areas and improvement opportunities. This includes assessment of our overall program, policies and processes, compliance with regulatory requirements and an overall assessment of key vulnerabilities. We use these assessments to supplement our own evaluation of the overall effectiveness of our program and target improvement areas. Several external organizations also evaluate our enterprise cybersecurity program, including the U.S. Defense Contract Management Agency ("DCMA") and Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certificate or "CMMC" Third Party Assessment Organization. Moreover, some of our products are audited or reviewed for regulatory compliance certification pursuant to the relevant DoD risk management framework.

Board Oversight and Management’s Role

Our Board of Directors has primary oversight responsibilities for enterprise cybersecurity risks. The Technology, Innovation, and Cyber Committee of the Board of Directors also reviews enterprise cybersecurity risks in connection with its oversight of cybersecurity and compliance risks. Our cybersecurity risk management team leads our enterprise cybersecurity program and is responsible for assessing and managing enterprise cybersecurity risks.

Our cybersecurity risk management team regularly updates the Technology, Innovation and Cyber Committee and Board of Directors on cybersecurity risks as they relate to our information and operational technology systems and our suppliers and partners, as well as provides regular updates on enterprise cybersecurity incidents and key defenses and mitigation strategies. Additionally, our cybersecurity risk management team regularly monitors and leads efforts to address and remediate, as appropriate, enterprise cybersecurity events, threats, and activities, including with respect to incidents, protection vulnerabilities, software update needs and lifecycle status.

Recently Filed

Click on a ticker to see risk factors

Ticker *	File Date
RMR	8 hours ago
FC	8 hours ago
TDG	8 hours ago
PCYO	8 hours ago
ROK	10 hours ago
EVOH	13 hours ago
CMTL	2 days, 8 hours ago
TEL	2 days, 8 hours ago
EMR	2 days, 8 hours ago
BEN	2 days, 10 hours ago
TSN	2 days, 16 hours ago
SKLZ	6 days, 7 hours ago
KRUS	6 days, 7 hours ago
V	6 days, 8 hours ago
DEVS	1 week ago
QCOM	1 week ago
CHSCP	1 week ago
TRXA	1 week, 5 days ago
AAPL	1 week, 5 days ago
PSMT	1 week, 6 days ago
RFL	2 weeks ago
ODYY	2 weeks ago
CLEV	2 weeks ago
SSGC	2 weeks ago
PURE	2 weeks ago
HMMR	2 weeks ago
UNF	2 weeks ago
RYES	2 weeks ago
GBX	2 weeks, 1 day ago
ZDGE	2 weeks, 1 day ago
SMPL	2 weeks, 1 day ago
KMFG	2 weeks, 1 day ago
AZO	2 weeks, 2 days ago
AYI	2 weeks, 2 days ago
WDFC	2 weeks, 2 days ago
VGES	2 weeks, 5 days ago
VRDR	2 weeks, 6 days ago
LNN	2 weeks, 6 days ago
MSM	2 weeks, 6 days ago
IIIN	2 weeks, 6 days ago
MAYS	2 weeks, 6 days ago
WGO	3 weeks ago
FDS	3 weeks ago
PENG	3 weeks, 1 day ago
LEEN	3 weeks, 1 day ago
ENFY	3 weeks, 1 day ago
DHAI	3 weeks, 2 days ago
LMMY	3 weeks, 5 days ago
JBL	3 weeks, 5 days ago
CMC	3 weeks, 6 days ago

OTHER DATASETS

House Trading

Dashboard

Corporate Flights

Dashboard

App Ratings

Dashboard

Strategies

Alerts

Browse Data

Risk Factors Dashboard

View risk factors by ticker

Search filings by term

Risk Factors - CMTL

-New additions in green
-Changes in blue
-Hover to see similar sentence in last filing

Recently Filed

OTHER DATASETS

House Trading

Corporate Flights

App Ratings

TRADE SMARTER

TRADE SMARTER

Strategies

Alerts

Browse Data

Risk Factors Dashboard

View risk factors by ticker

Search filings by term

Risk Factors - CMTL

-New additions in green-Changes in blue-Hover to see similar sentence in last filing

Recently Filed

OTHER DATASETS

House Trading

Corporate Flights

App Ratings

TRADE SMARTER

TRADE SMARTER

-New additions in green
-Changes in blue
-Hover to see similar sentence in last filing