Risk Factors Dashboard

Item 1A. “Risk Factors”, and expressed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), could cause actual results and developments to be materially different from those expressed in or implied by such statements. Our business and operations are subject to substantial risks, which increase the uncertainty inherent in the forward-looking statement contained in this Annual Report. In addition, historic results of our research and development (“R&D”) activities, technology platforms, manufacturing capabilities, commercial operations, products, services, strategic collaborations and other business initiatives do not guarantee that future research, technological developments, commercial activities or market experience will produce similar results or outcomes. Also, historic results referred to in this Annual Report may be interpreted differently in light of additional research, technological developments, commercial experience, regulatory developments, market and geopolitical conditions or other subsequently available information. The forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of this filing, and except as required by law we undertake no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

Overview

We are a biotechnology company leveraging our proprietary 3D cell expansion platform, which is supported by an in-house, industrial-scale cell manufacturing facility and operates in accordance with Good Manufacturing Practice (“GMP”) standards on a self-declared basis. Our platform is designed to enable scalable, cost-efficient and reproducible expansion of human, plant and animal cells and supports cell-based products, services, therapeutics and related technologies across two primary application areas: (i) Human Health and Longevity and (ii) Foodtech and Bio-Farming.

We were incorporated in Nevada on May 11, 2001. Pluri Inc. has a wholly owned subsidiary, Pluri Biotech Ltd. (“Pluri Biotech”), which is incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel.

In January 2020, Pluri Biotech established a wholly owned subsidiary, Pluristem GmbH, which is incorporated under the laws of Germany.

In November 2021, Pluri Biotech established a new subsidiary, Ever After Foods, which is incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel. Pluri Biotech holds approximately 69% of Ever After Foods’ issued and outstanding shares.

In March 2024 Pluri Biotech established a wholly owned subsidiary, Coffeesai, which is incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel.

On April 28, 2025, the Company completed an acquisition of approximately 79% of the equity in Kokomodo, which is currently held as majority owned Israeli subsidiary of Pluri Biotech.

In November 2025, Pluri Biotech established a wholly owned subsidiary, Cellav™, which is incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel.

Our operations are dedicated to the research, development, manufacturing and commercialization of cell-based products, therapeutics and related technologies across two primary application areas: (i) Human Health and Longevity and (ii) Foodtech and Bio-Farming, as set forth below:

Our proprietary 3D cell expansion platform is the technological and manufacturing foundation for both business areas, designed to enable scalable, cost-efficient and reproducible production of cell-based products. It uses a synthetic scaffold to create a 3D environment in which adherent or non-adherent cells can grow in a tissue-like setting, and our automated manufacturing process is intended to support monitored, controlled and consistent production of high-quality cell products at scale. We also developed PluriMatrix, an industrial-scale cell manufacturing system built on this platform, to support commercially relevant cell production volumes.

HUMAN HEALTH AND LONGEVITY

This key business application includes our human-cell programs and services, comprised of cell therapy and immunotherapy product candidates, our PluriCDMO™ development and manufacturing services, and our regenerative aesthetics, wellness and longevity activities conducted through Cellav™.

CELL THERAPY

We use our proprietary 3D cell expansion platform in the field of regenerative medicine to develop placenta-based cell therapy product candidates and technologies. Cell therapy is an established field within regenerative medicine, and the characteristics and properties of cells vary depending on tissue source and growth conditions. The human placenta, the source of our PLX and MAIT cells, provides a reservoir of stromal and immune cells that supports our development of both regenerative medicine and immunotherapy product candidates. The human placenta, the source of our PLX and MAIT cells, provides a unique reservoir of stromal and immune cells representing a groundbreaking approach in the field of cell therapy. Our PLX cells are placenta-derived, mesenchymal-like adherent stromal cells expanded ex vivo using our 3D platform. PLX, cells are placenta-derived, mesenchymal-like adherent stromal cells that are expanded ex vivo. They are designed to be administered off-the-shelf, without blood or tissue matching or additional manipulation prior to administration, and are believed to release therapeutic proteins in response to the patient’s condition. Our PLX product candidates include PLX-PAD, composed of maternal mesenchymal stromal cell, or MSC-like cells, originating from the placenta, and PLX-R18, composed of fetal MSC-like cells originating from the placenta.

Our clinical development activities currently include PLX-PAD and PLX-R18 product candidates, which have been tested in clinical studies in the United States, Europe and Israel. PLX-PAD was tested for acute muscle injuries following hip fracture, acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19, Graft versus Host Disease(“GvHD”), and peripheral artery disease, including intermittent claudication and critical limb ischemia. PLX-PAD was tested as a treatment for several indications: acute muscle injuries following hip fracture, acute respiratory distress syndrome, due to Coronavirus Disease (“COVID-19”), GvHD, and peripheral artery disease, including intermittent claudication, and critical limb ischemia (“CLI)”. PLX-PAD is also being developed for mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis as part of the PROTO program, an international collaboration led by Charité Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (“Charité”), and the related clinical study was approved by the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (“PEI”) in June 2025. PLX-R18 was tested in a Phase I trial for incomplete recovery following hematopoietic cell transplantation and was developed under the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) Animal Rule regulatory pathway for Acute Radiation Syndrome (“ARS”), including prior work with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”), the U.S. Department of Defense’s (“DoD”) Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute (“AFRRI”) and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (“USUHS”). In April 2025, NIAID terminated its contract for the Government’s convenience, which we believe reflected broader federal budgetary and administrative adjustments and was not related to performance issues on our part.

On December 20, 2023, we entered into an agreement assigning the joint patent rights to develop Pluri’s PLX cells in the treatment of cocaine addiction to Bar-Ilan University Research and Development Company Ltd. (“BIRAD”), the commercial arm of Bar-Ilan University. Under the agreement, Bar-Ilan University, through BIRAD, received the right to further develop and commercialize PLX cells as a cocaine anti-addiction product, and we are entitled to 20% revenue sharing from future sales of the product for anti-addiction. Under the agreement, Bar-Ilan University via BIRAD will receive the right to further develop and commercialize PLX cells as a cocaine anti-addiction product, and Pluri is entitled to 20% revenue sharing from future sales of the product for anti-addiction.

In March 2025, we entered into an exclusive collaboration agreement with Hemafund, a Ukrainian umbilical cord blood bank with clinical and research laboratories and facilities specializing in cell preservation and cryostorage. The collaboration aims to establish a strategic initiative for stockpiling, local distribution and potential clinical advancement of our PLX-R18 cell therapy as a countermeasure for Hematopoietic ARS, (“H-ARS”), in Ukraine. The collaboration aims to establish a strategic initiative for e stockpiling, local distribution, and potential clinical advancement of our PLX-R18 cell therapy as a countermeasure for Hematopoietic Acute Radiation Syndrome, or H-ARS, in Ukraine. Such collaboration is currently not active.

Immunotherapy

In May 2024, we launched a novel allogeneic immunotherapy platform utilizing placental MAIT cells designed to address solid tumors, an area where effective treatments remain insufficient. MAIT cells are a distinct type of unconventional immune T cells with characteristics that include cytotoxic activity and a low alloreactivity profile. We believe placental MAIT cells, together with our research, development and manufacturing capabilities, may support the development of cell therapy products and applications, with potential advantages over conventional T cells. In October 2024, we announced IIA funding for our collaboration with BIRAD to support the continued development of MAIT cells for the treatment of solid tumors, and in March 2026, the IIA approved a second year of funding for such collaboration.

Cell Therapy Regulatory and Clinical Affairs Strategy

Our cell therapy development strategy is to maintain open and frequent discussions with regulators, as appropriate, from preclinical development through more advanced regulatory stages. We have applied this strategy in interactions with regulatory authorities, including the FDA, the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), Germany’s PEI and other European national competent authorities, the Israeli Ministry of Health (“MOH”), Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (“PMDA”) and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (“MFDS”) of South Korea. We utilize this strategy in working with the FDA, the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), Germany’s PEI as well as other European national competent authorities, the Israeli Minister of Health (“MOH”), Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (“PMDA”) and also the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (“MFDS”) of South Korea. Our current active cell therapy regulatory engagement is primarily focused on the PROTO program for PLX-PAD in mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis, including the clinical study approved by Germany’s PEI in June 2025.

Cell Therapy Collaborations

U.S. Department of Defense

In August 2017, we announced that a pilot study of our PLX-R18 cell therapy was initiated by the DoD. The study examined the effectiveness of PLX-R18 as a treatment for ARS prior to, and within the first 24 hours of exposure to radiation. In July 2019, we presented positive results from a series of studies of our PLX-R18 cell therapy product conducted by the DoD.

Charité / Horizon Europe PROTO Program

In September 2022, we announced that a €7.5 million non-dilutive grant from the European Union’s Horizon Europe program was awarded to PROTO, an international collaboration led by Charité. The PROTO project is intended to support the development of novel interventional strategies for knee osteoarthritis, including a Phase I clinical study of our PLX-PAD cells for the treatment of mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis. Approximately €500,000 (approximately $540,000) of the grant was allocated to us, and through June 30, 2026, we received approximately $449,000 in cash under the PROTO program.

In June 2025, the clinical study was approved by Germany’s PEI, and the study was initiated in January 2026. The study is being conducted at Charité as part of the PROTO consortium, under the leadership of Professor Tobias Winkler, Principal Investigator, at the Berlin Institute of Health Center of Regenerative Therapies, the Julius Wolff Institute and Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery.

In November 2025, we entered into an agreement with Charité governing the execution of the Phase I study of PLX-PAD for the treatment of mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis, and the allocation of rights in potential joint inventions arising from the study. Under the agreement, each party retains ownership of its pre-existing intellectual property, while certain project results arising from the use of PLX-PAD in knee osteoarthritis may be jointly owned by the parties. Subject to the terms of the agreement, Charité assigns or licenses to us certain rights in joint results, joint inventions and related pseudonymized data necessary for the further development and commercialization of PLX-PAD for osteoarthritis. If a regulatory-approved PLX-PAD-containing product for the treatment of osteoarthritis is commercialized, Charité is entitled to receive a 2% royalty on net sales for a period of eight years from first commercial sale and may also be entitled to receive 4% of certain license income received by us, excluding royalties on net sales.

Government Regulation - Pharma

The development, manufacturing, and future commercialization of our cell therapy product candidates are subject to the laws and regulations of governmental authorities in the United States, the European Union, Israel, and other potential markets, including Japan and South Korea.

In the United States and the European Union, the FDA and the EMA, respectively, must approve products prior to marketing. Furthermore, various governmental statutes and regulations also govern or influence testing, manufacturing, safety, labeling, storage and record keeping related to such products and their marketing. Governments in other countries may have similar requirements for testing and marketing.

The process of obtaining these approvals and the subsequent compliance with appropriate statutes and regulations require the expenditure of substantial time, resources and money. There can be no assurance that our product candidates will ultimately receive marketing approval, or, if approved, will be reimbursed by public and private health insurance.

There are several stages every drug undergoes during its development process. Among these are:

●

Performance of nonclinical laboratory and animal studies to assess a drug’s biological activity, to identify potential safety concerns, and to characterize and document the product’s chemistry, manufacturing controls, formulation, and stability. In accordance with regulatory requirements, nonclinical safety and toxicity studies are conducted under Good Laboratory Practice, requirements to ensure their quality and reliability;

●

The manufacture of the product according to GMP regulations and standards;

●

Conducting adequate and well-controlled human clinical studies in compliance with Good Clinical Practice (“GCP”) to establish the safety and efficacy of the product for its intended indication; and

●

Potential post-marketing clinical testing and surveillance of the product after marketing approval, which can result in additional conditions on the approvals or suspension of clinical use.

Approval of a drug for clinical studies in humans and approval of marketing are sovereign decisions of states, made by national, or, in case of the European Union, international regulatory competent authorities.

The Regulatory Process in the United States:

In the United States, our product candidates are subject to regulation as a biological product under the Public Health Service Act and the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The FDA, regulating the approval of clinical studies and marketing applications in the United States, generally requires the following steps prior to approving a new biological product for use either for clinical studies or for commercial sale:

●

Submission of an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) Application, which must become effective before clinical testing in humans can begin;

●

Obtaining approval of Institutional Review Boards (“IRBs”) of research institutions or other clinical sites to introduce the drug candidate into humans in clinical studies;

●

FDA may grant approval for EAP prior to the completion of clinical studies, in order to allow access for the investigational drug, for patients that are excluded from the study;

●

FDA may grant priority review status to expedite the Biologics License Application (“BLA”) review process. Obtaining a Fast Track designation allows access to the request of priority review;

●

Submission of a BLA for marketing authorization of the product, which must include adequate results of pre-clinical testing and clinical studies;

●

Submission of BLA with a proof of efficacy that is based only on animal studies is feasible in instances where human efficacy studies cannot be conducted because the conduct of such studies would not be ethical or feasible (such as H-ARS). In these cases, approval can be based on well controlled animal studies conducted under the FDA Animal Rule;

●

FDA review of the BLA in order to determine, among other things, whether the product is safe and effective for its intended uses; and

●

FDA inspection and approval of the product manufacturing facility at which the product will be manufactured.

Certain states, including Florida and Utah, have enacted laws that authorize the administration or use of certain stem cell therapies that have not been approved by the FDA, subject to specified eligibility, informed-consent, physician oversight, manufacturing, and other requirements. These laws may provide a state-law pathway for the therapeutic use of qualifying stem cell products within those states; however, they do not constitute FDA approval, nor do they authorize interstate commercial distribution, or establish a federal marketing authorization for any such product.

The Regulatory Process in Europe:

In the European Union, our investigational cellular products are regulated under the Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products regulation, a regulation specific to cell and tissue products. Additionally, as of January 31, 2022, the Clinical Trials Regulation harmonizes the submission, assessment and supervision processes of clinical trials in the European Union. This European Union regulation requires:

●

Filing a Central Clinical Trial Application utilizing the Clinical Trials Information System, and obtaining an assessment and approval;

●

Obtaining approval of local and central ethics committees as required to test the investigational product into humans in clinical studies

●

Conducting adequate and well-controlled clinical studies to establish the safety and efficacy of the investigational product for its intended use; and

●

Since our investigational cellular products are regulated under the Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product regulation, the application for marketing authorization to the EMA is mandatory within the 28 member states of the European Union. The EMA is expected to review and approve the Marketing Authorization Application.

Clinical Studies

Typically, in the United States, as well as in the European Union, clinical development involves a series of clinical studies from early, small scale, Phase I studies to late-stage large, Phase III studies, although the phases may overlap. Phase I, clinical studies are conducted in a small number of healthy volunteers, or patients with the disease or condition. These studies are designed to provide information about product safety and dosage by gathering information on the interaction of the drug with the human body, its side effects as well as early preliminary information on effectiveness.

Phase II clinical studies are conducted in a homogenous group of patients afflicted with the specific target disease, to explore preliminary efficacy, optimal dosages and confirm the safety profile. In some cases, an initial study is conducted in patients to assess both preliminary efficacy and preliminary safety and patterns of drug metabolism and distribution, in which case it is referred to as a Phase I/II study. Phase III clinical studies, sometimes known as pivotal studies, are generally large-scale, multi-center, controlled studies conducted with a heterogeneous group of patients afflicted with the target disease, aiming to provide statistically significant support for efficacy, as well as safety and potency. The Phase III studies are considered confirmatory for establishing the efficacy and safety of the drug and are critical for approval. In some circumstances, a regulatory agency may require Phase IV, or post-marketing studies in case additional information needs to be collected after the drug is on the market.

During all phases of clinical development, regulatory agencies require extensive monitoring and auditing of all clinical activities, clinical data and clinical study sites investigators to minimize risks and ensure high quality and integrity of the collected data. The sponsor of a clinical study is required to submit an annual safety report to the relevant regulatory agencies, in which serious adverse events are reported, and to submit in an expedited manner any individual serious adverse events that are suspected of being related to the tested drug and are unexpected with its use. An agency may, at its discretion, re-evaluate, alter, suspend, or terminate the clinical study based upon the data that have been accumulated to that point and its assessment of the risk/benefit ratio to the patient.

Competition - Regenerative medicine

The regenerative medicine field is characterized by intense competition, as global and local pharma players are becoming more engaged in the cell therapy field based on the advancements made in clinical studies and due to the favorable regenerative medicine legislation in certain regions. We face competition from both allogeneic and autologous cell therapy companies, academic, commercial and research institutions, pharmaceutical companies, biopharmaceutical companies, and governmental agencies. Some of the clinical indications we currently have under development are also being investigated in preclinical and clinical programs by others.

According to the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine’s July 2026 Report, there were 1,806 active cell and gene therapy developers worldwide, including 1,031 developing cell therapies and 729 developing gene-modified cell therapies and cell-based immuno-oncology (GMCT and CBIO), with 1,712 ongoing clinical trials in Phases I–III registered globally, of which 355 trials were in solid tumors (Source: ARM Q2 2026 Sector Snapshot and Sector Data, July 2026 Report).

In the global market (excluding China), while most allogeneic cell therapies remain in the preclinical stage, approximately 20 allogeneic Chimeric Antigen Receptor (“CAR”)-T therapy products being studied for solid tumors have advanced into clinical stages. Notable examples include Adicet Bio’s allogeneic CD70-CAR gamma-delta T cells, Poseida’s Allogenic MUC1-CAR Tscm cells, Fate’s allogeneic MICA/B-CAR T cells, and MD Anderson’s TROP2-CAR NK cells (Source: GlobalData; Clinicaltrial.gov).

While there are hundreds of companies in the regenerative medicine space globally, there are multiple participants in the cell therapy field based in the United States, Europe, Japan, Korea, and Australia. Among other things, we expect to compete based upon our IP portfolio, our in-house manufacturing efficiencies and capabilities, and the potential efficacy of our products. Our ability to compete successfully will depend on our continued ability to attract and retain experienced and skilled executives, scientific and clinical development personnel, to identify and develop viable cellular therapeutic candidates and exploit these products commercially and keep expanding and improving our unique technological capabilities.

REGENERATIVE AESTHETICS, WELLNESS AND LONGEVITY

In November 2025, we established Cellav™, a wholly owned subsidiary focused on developing regenerative skin and hair solutions using our proprietary 3D cell expansion technology. Cellav develops, manufactures and markets skin care and cosmetic products and cell-derived ingredients, including exosomes and cell ingredients (human or plant-derived), conditioned media for integration into third-party formulations and for use in professional and consumer skincare and haircare products. These products and ingredients are also offered as finished, ready-to-sell products, professional kits or consumable products.

During calendar year 2026, Cellav completed the development and U.S. cosmetic product listings of two professional regenerative aesthetic products, Regenativo+ and Placento+, supporting a planned commercial launch in the United States. Cellav also completed the cosmetic regulatory registration and notification process for Regenativo+ in the United Kingdom through the UK Cosmetic Product Notification portal, enabling commercial marketing of the product in the UK. These regulatory and product-listing milestones support Cellav’s transition from product development toward commercialization and its ongoing commercial discussions with distributors, clinic networks and strategic partners in the United States, the United Kingdom and additional international markets. Collectively, these collaborations and regulatory milestones reflect continued progress in applying our proprietary technology platform across multiple industries and in advancing selected subsidiaries toward potential development, commercialization and distribution opportunities.

Government Regulations - Aesthetic Products

Through Cellav, we develop cosmetic and professional aesthetic products and ingredients that may be subject to applicable cosmetic product regulatory requirements in the jurisdictions in which they are marketed or intended to be marketed. These requirements may include, as applicable, product safety assessments, ingredient restrictions, labeling requirements, claims substantiation, product notification or registration, responsible-person obligations, manufacturing practices, adverse-event reporting and post-market surveillance.

During calendar year 2026, Cellav completed U.S. cosmetic product listings for its Regenativo+ and Placento+ products and completed the applicable cosmetic product notification process for Regenativo+ in the United Kingdom through the UK Cosmetic Product Notification portal. Regenativo+ is a plant-derived product, and Placento+ is a placenta-derived formulation; both products are intended for topical professional aesthetic use. Cellav is pursuing commercialization opportunities for these products through discussions with distributors, aesthetic clinics and other potential commercial partners in the United States, the United Kingdom and other international markets.

Competition - Aesthetics, Wellness and Longevity

Through Cellav, we participate in the competitive and rapidly evolving markets for aesthetics, wellness and longevity products, including skincare, aesthetics, consumer health, biotechnology and regenerative products. We compete with established companies and emerging participants, including companies developing or commercializing products based on exosomes, cell-derived ingredients, plant-derived ingredients, conditioned media, bioactive formulations and other technologies. Competition in these markets is based on a range of factors, including product performance, scientific support, product quality and safety, regulatory compliance, manufacturing capabilities and scale, distribution relationships, brand recognition, customer experience and pricing. Our competitors include companies with greater financial, commercial, manufacturing, research and development, regulatory and marketing resources, as well as direct-to-consumer brands and providers of aesthetic, wellness and longevity products and services. The markets for aesthetics, wellness and longevity products are global and include significant activity in North America, Europe and Asia. Participants in these markets include multinational consumer-products, pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical-aesthetics companies, as well as specialized skincare, wellness and direct-to-consumer brands, many of which are headquartered in the United States, Europe and Asia. Competitive dynamics may vary by product category, applicable regulatory requirements, distribution channels and local consumer preferences.

PLURICDMO™

In-House Clinical Manufacturing

We maintain an in-house capability for clinical cell manufacturing at our GMP-grade facility in Haifa, Israel, operational since February 2013 and previously approved for the production of PLX-PAD and PLX-R18 for clinical use by multiple regulatory authorities, including the FDA, EMA, MFDS, PMDA, and the MOH. The facility was approved by the MOH for a Phase III PLX-PAD trial and received GMP certification and manufacturer-importer authorization, which remained valid through March 2023. In addition, the facility was inspected by a European Union Qualified Person in December 2024, confirming compliance with current GMP requirements for the purposes of the PROTO clinical trial.

The facility continues to operate in alignment with current GMP standards and principles under a self-declared compliance framework. We remain committed to maintaining rigorous quality and regulatory practices consistent with applicable GMP principles.

In January 2024, we launched a business division offering cell therapy manufacturing services as a CDMO: PluriCDMO™. PluriCDMO™ offers cell therapy development and manufacturing expertise to companies from early preclinical development, through late-stage clinical trials and commercialization, with a mission to deliver high-quality, essential therapies to patients, as well as other services. PluriCDMO™ offers CDMO for cell therapy manufacturing expertise to companies from early preclinical development, through late-stage clinical trials and commercialization, with a mission to deliver high-quality, essential therapies to patients, as well as other services. Through PluriCDMO™, we have entered into several commercial agreements with clients for development and manufacturing services.

Since 2024, our CDMO business has offered manufacturing, process development and related services to pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. PluriCDMO™ leverages more than 15 years of our experience in GMP manufacturing, proprietary 3D cell expansion technologies, highly skilled team and flexible 4400 square meter purpose-built facilities to support cell therapy development and manufacturing from preclinical stages through clinical trials and potential commercial supply, including on-site analytical testing, method development, gap assessment, method transfer and validation, and support through audited third-party vendors.

In August 2026, Pluri Biotech received ISO 13485:2016 certification for contract manufacturing services as a contract manufacturing organization for companies engaged in the manufacturing and development of medical devices, further supporting PluriCDMO™’s quality infrastructure and enhancing our ability to support customers operating in regulated life sciences environments. Our CDMO business may be subject to additional regulations, depending on the services we provide to companies under such business division.

Competition - CDMO

We compete in the cell therapy CDMO services with several companies like Lonza Group AG, AGC Biologics A/S and Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. for outsourced services from development to manufacturing in biotechnology and pharmaceutical cell-based products. The majority of our competitors are large service providers with multiple offerings for different technologies, range of dosage form capabilities and medicine products. The competition is driven by geographic location, technological capabilities, operational capacity, manufacturing expertise, and price. The competition is driven by geographic location, technological capabilities, operational capacity, manufacturing expertise, and price.

While there are multiple competitors that compete in the CDMO services arena, we have a few competitors that compete in advanced stages of cell therapy clinical trials and can provide access to state-of-the-art manufacturing efficiency and capabilities. Our ability to compete successfully will depend on our continued ability to attract and retain customers, support clinical development, identify new opportunities and keep expanding our unique know-how, technology and manufacturing capabilities. Our ability to compete successfully will depend on our continued ability to attract and retain customers, support clinical development, identify new opportunities and keep expanding our unique know-how, technology and manufacturing capabilities.

FOODTECH AND BIOFARMING

We are involved in several initiatives that apply our 3D cell expansion technology in the FoodTech and Biofarming market, including collaborations focused on bioactive carrier and biostimulant delivery, sustainable vegetable production, and plant-cell activities in coffee and cacao through Coffeesai and Kokomodo, respectively.

In October 2023, we entered into a proof-of-concept (“POC”) collaboration with ICL Group Ltd. (“ICL”), a global specialty minerals company, through its Open Innovation program, to evaluate the potential of our technology to enhance the delivery of biostimulants in agriculture. The initial phase of the collaboration was focused on exploring the use of plant-derived bioactive compounds in combination with our proprietary platform to improve crop resilience and yield under abiotic stress conditions. The initial phase of the collaboration focused on exploring the use of plant-derived bioactive compounds in combination with our proprietary platform to improve crop resilience and yield under abiotic stress conditions. In December 2024 and March 2026, we signed amendments extending the POC collaboration with ICL, reflecting continued mutual interest in further developing and validating the underlying technology for agricultural applications. In December 2024, we signed an agreement to extend the collaboration with ICL, which reflects a continued mutual interest in further developing and validating the underlying technology for agricultural applications.

In March 2024, we announced an expansion of our intellectual property portfolio with a patent approval from the Israel Patent Office relating to our proprietary 3D bioreactor technology for plant-cell cultivation. The patent has also been granted in the United States, and related patent applications are pending in several additional jurisdictions.

In July 2024, we announced the signing of a €1 million POC agreement with a leading international agriculture corporation (the “POC Party”) with a goal to enhance the global sustainable vegetable supply. This strategic POC agreement is intended to boost the global vegetable product supply, streamline supply chains, and combat global climate change while ensuring a natural and more sustainable future for agriculture. The result of the planned collaboration has the potential to minimize environmental impact and foster greater food security, as well as to build a better agronomic and environmentally friendly infrastructure, bringing sustainable, high-quality solutions to the market. Pursuant to this POC agreement, the POC Party will provide its know-how and other IP rights related to vegetable products while the Company will provide its know-how and other IP rights related to its proprietary 3D cell expansion technology to develop a solution aimed at increasing the global vegetable products supply. Currently, we are in discussions with the POC Party to evaluate potential opportunities for further collaboration following the completion of Phase II.

Coffeesai - In March 2024, we established Coffeesai Ltd., a wholly owned Israeli subsidiary focused on developing cultivated, cell-cultured coffee., an Israeli subsidiary focused on developing cultivated, cell-cultured coffee. Coffeesai leverages our 3D cell expansion technology and controlled, scalable bioprocesses to develop cultivated coffee products intended to address demand for sustainable, high-quality coffee production at scale, including challenges facing the traditional coffee industry such as climate-related crop instability, supply chain disruptions and environmental impact. Coffeesai has been engaged in a POC project relating to the development of a coffee beverage using its technology platform. Following the successful demonstration of the potential application of Coffeesai’s technology to coffee production, current efforts are focused on optimizing the bioprocess and downstream processing to further enhance the flavor and aroma characteristics of the resulting beverage.

Kokomodo - On April 28, 2025, we completed the acquisition of approximately 79% of the equity in Kokomodo (held as a majority owned subsidiary of our wholly owned subsidiary, Pluri Biotech). Kokomodo, an Israeli company, is an innovative agfood startup developing cellular agriculture technology for the sustainable production of cacao. Kokomodo, an Israeli company, is an innovative agfood startup pioneering the sustainable production of cacao using cellular agriculture technology. Instead of relying on traditional tropical farming, Kokomodo cultivates real cacao directly from plant cells in controlled environments, such as bioreactors, making climate-resilient cacao accessible year-round on a global scale. Founded in 2024, Kokomodo aims to transform the cacao industry, reducing environmental impact while ensuring a steady, high-quality supply for chocolate and related products.

During fiscal year 2026, Kokomodo continued the development of its cell-cultured cacao platform through research and industry collaborations. During that period, Kokomodo collaborated with Cargill under a POC Co-Financing Instrument of the food innovation community of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (“EIT”), an EU body, to evaluate the functionality, sensory performance and scalability of its cell-cultured cacao ingredients for potential food applications; participated as a consortium member in the COCO-AI project, a Horizon Europe-funded initiative focused on advancing AI-enabled plant cell culture technologies for sustainable cocoa production; and collaborated with CSM Ingredients S.r.l, a global ingredients research and production company focused on food and bakery ingredient solutions, through the Generate Program 2025 in connection with the development of sustainable cacao ingredients for commercial applications.

Ever After Foods - In 2022, we announced the establishment of a joint venture with Tnuva Food Industries - Agricultural Cooperative in Israel Ltd. (“Tnuva”), Ever After Foods, incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel. The purpose of the joint venture is to develop and commercialize scalable production technologies for cultivated meat, supporting the development of a wide range of cultivated meat products by industry partners. The purpose of the venture is to develop and commercialize scalable production technologies for cultivated meat, supporting the development of a wide range of cultivated meat products by industry partners.

Leveraging Pluri’s technology, Ever After Foods has advanced a business-to-business (“B2B”) platform intended to enable food producers to manufacture cultivated protein products efficiently and at commercially relevant scale. Ever After Foods has demonstrated the production of muscle and fat tissues from various animal cells and seeks to support cultivated meat and seafood production through its proprietary technology platform and strategic collaborations.

In June 2024, Ever After Foods entered into a share purchase agreement with Tnuva and certain other international strategic investors, pursuant to which Ever After Foods issued and sold ordinary shares in a private placement offering for aggregate gross proceeds of $10 million. As part of the offering, we invested $1.25 million. In addition, Pluri Biotech and Ever After Foods executed an Amended and Restated Technology License Agreement, dated June 12, 2024, which amended the parties’ existing license agreement dated February 23, 2022, to expand the scope of the license to include fish and seafood. In addition, Pluri Biotech and Ever After Foods executed an Amended and Restated Technology License Agreement, dated June 12, 2024 (the “Amended License”). Following the closing of that offering, Pluri Biotech held approximately 69% of Ever After Foods. Following the closing of the Offering, our wholly owned subsidiary, Pluri Biotech, holds approximately 69% of Ever After Foods. This private placement offering was intended to support Ever After Foods’ B2B technology platform and its development as a technology enabler for cultivated protein production.

In February 2025, Ever After Foods announced a strategic collaboration with Bühler Group (“Bühler”), a global provider of food processing technologies, to jointly advance scalable cultivated meat production systems for the food industry. The collaboration is intended to combine Bühler’s engineering and market access capabilities with Ever After Foods’ proprietary edible packed-bed (EPB™) bioreactor platform to support commercial-scale cultivated meat production systems. The collaboration aims to combine Bühler’s engineering and market access capabilities with Ever After Foods’ proprietary edible packed-bed (EPB™) bioreactor platform to deliver commercial-scale cultivated meat production systems specifically designed for the food industry. The parties intend to develop and deploy manufacturing equipment that enables food producers to produce cultivated meat at reduced cost and at volumes suitable for market entry. The parties intend to develop and deploy manufacturing equipment that enables food producers to efficiently produce cultivated meat at significantly reduced cost and at volumes suitable for market entry.

On August 12, 2026, Ever After Foods entered into a share purchase agreement to acquire Fishway BV, a Belgium-based biotechnology company engaged in development-stage research relating to aquatic cell biology, cell lines and animal-component-free media for potential use in the cultivated protein industry (the “Fishway Acquisition”). The Fishway Acquisition is intended to support Ever After Foods’ strategy by expanding complementary research capabilities and establishing a corporate presence in Europe. The Fishway Acquisition closed on August 18, 2026, and following its completion, our indirect ownership interest in Ever After Foods, held through Pluri Biotech, was reduced to approximately 58%, reflecting dilution to all Ever After Foods’ shareholders as a result of the Fishway Acquisition.

Government Regulations - FoodTech

Regulators around the world are in the process of developing or implementing a regulatory approval process for cultivated meat. Although some companies have recently received regulatory approval for their cultivated meat products in the United States, Israel and Singapore cultivated meat is not yet generally commercially available. However, technologies like the one being developed by Ever After Foods are anticipated to facilitate the scaling up of cultivated meat production. In general, cultivated meat production is subject to extensive regulatory laws and regulations. In the United States, the FDA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), are in the process of developing guidance and regulations applicable to cultivated meat.

In the cultivated plant-based initiatives (e.g., coffee, cacao), we are working with an external regulatory consultant to evaluate the technical and scientific requirements for determining whether our cultured coffee product is Generally Recognized as Safe (“GRAS”), under section 201(s) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), and FDA’s implementing regulations (21 C., coffee, cacao), we are working with an external regulatory consultant to evaluate the technical and scientific requirements for determining whether our cultured coffee product is Generally Recognized as Safe, or GRAS, under section 201(s) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, and FDA’s implementing regulations (21 C. F.R. § 170.30). If the plant-based cultivated products (including all components) are determined to be GRAS in accordance with U.S. FDA requirements, it will be exempt from the definition of “food additive” in section 201(s) of the FDCA and can therefore be lawfully marketed as a food in the United States without the need to obtain a premarket authorization from the FDA.

Competition - FoodTech

Our FoodTech operations operate in a competitive and evolving industry that includes cultivated meat and cultivated protein companies, plant cell culture companies, bioprocess equipment suppliers, bioreactor developers, scaffold technology providers, and established producers of plant-derived ingredients, flavors, and other food products. Industry development is being driven by advances in biotechnology, increased focus on sustainability, and efforts to develop more efficient and environmentally responsible alternatives to traditional agricultural and food-production methods.

Ever After Foods is developing a proprietary technology platform designed to support natural cell growth for cultivated protein applications, including cultivated meat. Unlike certain conventional approaches that adapt cells for growth in stirred-tank bioreactors, Ever After Foods’ technology is designed to enable production at lower cost and greater scale. We believe that this technology, together with our capabilities in aquatic cell biology and animal-component-free media development, experienced personnel, and strategic relationships with industry participants, may provide us with a competitive advantage in the cultivated food market.

Our plant-based FoodTech operations are advancing two principal product streams: cell-cultured coffee through Coffeesai and cell-cultured cacao and cocoa-derived ingredients through Kokomodo. These businesses operate in distinct but related markets characterized by evolving technology, early-stage commercialization, and growing demand for sustainable and resilient ingredient supply chains.

Coffeesai operates in the emerging cell-cultured coffee market, which includes participants such as California Cultured, Inc., Food Brewer AG, Another Food Pte. Ltd., and Atomo Foods, Inc., among others. We believe that Coffeesai’s integration of scale-up technology, proprietary bioprocessing capabilities, and scientific expertise may support an efficient, cost-effective, and sustainable production model. We also believe that potential partnerships across the coffee value chain may enhance Coffeesai’s ability to develop and commercialize its products.

Kokomodo operates in the developing market for cell-cultured cacao and cocoa-derived ingredients. Participants in this market include Celleste Bio Ltd. Current participants in this space include Celleste Bio Ltd. , California Cultured, Inc., and Food Brewer AG, among others. These companies are seeking to develop alternatives or supplements to conventional cacao cultivation in response to concerns relating to climate impact, supply volatility, and ethical sourcing., and Food Brewer AG, all of which aim to develop alternatives to conventional cacao cultivation in response to growing concerns about climate impact, supply volatility, and ethical sourcing. More broadly, competitors in our plant-based Foodtech markets include companies focused on plant cell culture for specialty ingredients, as well as established producers of plant-derived compounds and flavors, including DSM-Firmenich AG and Givaudan International SA.

We believe that our ability to compete successfully across our Foodtech operations will depend on continued innovation, the performance and scalability of our production systems, our ability to protect and improve our proprietary technologies, the availability of sufficient capital and strategic partnerships, regulatory developments, and our ability to develop products that meet customer, consumer, and commercial requirements. We may face competition from companies with greater financial resources, broader product portfolios, more established customer relationships, and greater manufacturing, regulatory, and commercialization capabilities than we have.

Intellectual Property

We recognize that our success depends, in part, on securing our intellectual property, and therefore we are committed to protecting our technology and product candidates through patents and other means, as outlined below.

We are the sole owner of 149 issued patents, and approximately 57 pending patent applications, including 5 applications that have been allowed but not yet granted, in the United States, Europe, China, Japan and Israel, as well as in additional countries worldwide, including countries in the Far East and South America (in calculating the number of issued patents, each European patent validated in multiple jurisdictions was counted as a single patent).

Based on the well-established understanding that the characteristics and therapeutic potential of a cell product are largely determined by their source, the methods, and conditions used during their culture, our patent portfolio includes various types of claims that protect the unique aspects of our technology.

Our multi-national patent portfolio and pending applications include claims directed at:

●

our proprietary 3D cell expansion methods for adherent cells, including placental stromal cells;

●

our proprietary 3D cell expansion methods for plant cells;

●

our proprietary 3D cell expansion methods for suspension cells, including immune cells;

●

composition of matter claims covering the expanded cells;

●

therapeutic and cosmetic use of PLX cells for a broad range of indications; and

●

devices and methods related to cell-culture, harvesting, thawing and formulation, as well as cell therapies employing unmodified and engineered placenta-derived MAIT cells for the treatment of various diseases.

Through our development of adherent stromal cell-based products, we have built expertise and proprietary know-how, establishing robust procedures for the manufacturing of clinical-grade PLX cells in our facilities. Leveraging this foundation, we have expanded our capabilities to include the handling and expansion of suspension cells including immune cells, thereby broadening our platform in cellular therapies. Certain elements of our manufacturing process are protected by issued patents and pending applications. In parallel, we safeguard proprietary aspects of our technology, trade secrets and know-how, maintained through confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, contractors, manufacturers and advisors. These agreements typically include provisions to protect confidential information, restrict material use and require the assignment of inventions developed in the course of such engagement.

The following table outlines our key patents and patent applications. It is not intended to represent a legal assessment of claims, scope, enforceability or limitations. In certain instances, a jurisdiction may appear under both “pending” and “granted” status within a single patent family, reflecting the existence of continuation or divisional applications filed in parallel with a granted patent.

The expiration dates of these patents, based on filing dates, range from 2027 to 2046. Actual expiration dates will be determined according to extensions received based on the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-417), commonly known as the “Hatch-Waxman” Act, which permits extensions of pharmaceutical patents to reflect regulatory delays encountered in obtaining FDA market approval. The Hatch-Waxman Act is based on a U.S. federal law and therefore only relevant to U.S. patents.

There is a risk that our patents will be invalidated, and that our pending patent applications will not result in issued patents. We also cannot be certain that we will not infringe on any patents that may be issued to others. See “Risk Factors – The patent approval process is complex, and we cannot be sure that our pending patent applications or future patent applications will be approved.”

Our Patent Portfolio

Employees

As of June 30, 2026, we employed a total of 92 full-time employees and 21 part-time employees, of whom 73 full-time employees and 14 part-time employees are engaged in cell research, development, and manufacturing including clinical and regulation affairs.

EIB Financing Agreement

In April 2020, we and our subsidiaries, Pluri Biotech and Pluristem GmbH, entered into a finance agreement with EIB, providing for non-dilutive funding of up to €50 million, payable in three tranches (the “EIB Loan”). In June 2021, we received the first tranche in the amount of €20 million, which represents the only amount disbursed under the EIB finance agreement, as the initial funding period expired on December 31, 2022, and no additional funds were made available thereunder.

The €20 million loan bears annual interest at a rate of 4% and was repayable on June 1, 2026, with interest payable together with the principal. As of June 30, 2026, accrued interest amounted to approximately €4.1 million. As of June 30, 2025, the interest accrued was in the amount of approximately €3.27 million. In addition to the interest, the EIB is entitled to royalty payments, pro-rated to the amount disbursed from the EIB Loan, on our consolidated revenues from fiscal year 2024 through fiscal year 2030, at rates of up to 2.3% on consolidated revenues below $350 million, 1.2% on consolidated revenues between $350 million and $500 million, and 0.2% on consolidated revenues exceeding $500 million. In addition to the interest payable, the EIB is also entitled to royalty payments, pro-rated to the amount disbursed from the EIB Loan, on our consolidated revenues beginning in the fiscal year 2024 up to and including its fiscal year 2030, in an amount equal to up to 2.3% of our consolidated revenues below $350 million, 1.2% of our consolidated revenues between $350 million and $500 million and 0.2% of our consolidated revenues exceeding $500 million. As of June 30, 2026, accrued royalties amounted to $9 thousand. As of June 30, 2025, we had an accrued royalty in the amount of $12 thousand. On April 21, 2026, we received a notice from the EIB that the EIB is reserving its rights under the finance agreement while discussions with the EIB regarding potential resolution of the EIB Loan remain ongoing. On May 28, 2026, the EIB confirmed to us that while the parties remain engaged in constructive discussions, and without prejudice to any of the EIB’s rights and remedies, no enforcement action was contemplated by the EIB.

On August 17, 2026, we were notified by the EIB that its relevant committee had approved, subject to certain conditions, a proposed sale of the EIB Loan not involving the Company as purchaser, on terms agreed with a third-party purchaser who may be a related party. The completion of such sale remains subject to, among other things, execution of definitive legal documentation and completion of the EIB’s review process and other conditions. If the proposed sale is completed, the Company intends to seek to reach an arrangement with the purchaser regarding the settlement of the purchased loan, which may include the conversion of all or a portion of the outstanding loan amount into equity of the Company. Any such arrangement would be subject to negotiation with the purchaser and the receipt of all required corporate and other approvals. Until the proposed sale is finalized and any subsequent arrangement with the purchaser is agreed and approved, there can be no assurance as to the outcome of these discussions or the timing or terms of any resolution, or that the EIB will continue to refrain from exercising remedies available to it under the finance agreement, that any sale of the EIB Loan will be completed, that any settlement or conversion arrangement will be entered into or consummated, or as to the timing, structure, accounting treatment or financial statement impact of any such transaction.

Available Information

Additional information about us is available on our website at www.pluri-biotech.com. Information contained on, or accessible through, our website is not incorporated by reference into, and should not be considered part of this Annual Report. Under the “Financial Reports” and “SEC Filings” subsections of the “Investors” section on our website, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“the Exchange Act”), are available as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. Our reports filed with the SEC are also made available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The following Corporate Governance documents are also posted on our website under the “Governance” subsection of the “Investors” section: Trading Policy, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Anti Bribery and Corruption and Anti Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Compliance Policy, Clawback Policy and the Charters for each of the Committees of our Board of Directors (the “Board”).

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the following information about these risks, together with the other information contained in this Annual Report before making an investment decision. Our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected as a result of any of the following risks. The value of our securities could decline as a result of any of these risks. You could lose all or part of your investment in our securities. Some of the statements in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” are forward-looking statements. The following risk factors are not the only risk factors facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Summary of Risk Factors

Our business is subject to a number of risks, including risks that may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These risks are discussed more fully below and include, but are not limited to, risks related to:

●

we have a history of losses and have not generated significant revenues to date. While revenues may increase, we expect to experience future losses and do not foresee generating significant or steady revenues in the immediate future;

●

we may need to raise additional capital to meet our business requirements in the future, and such capital raising may be costly or difficult to obtain and could dilute our shareholders’ ownership interests, and such offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of our common shares may cause the price of our publicly traded shares to decline;

●

our independent registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph relating to our ability to continue as a going concern in its report on our audited financial statements included in this Annual Report. The financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might result if we are unable to continue as a going concern;

●

we may become subject to claims by much larger and better funded competitors enforcing their IP rights against us or seeking to invalidate our IP or our rights thereto;

●

there are inherent risks in the manufacturing of our product candidates, including meeting relevant high regulatory standards, the failure of which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and the value of our business;

●

if we are unable to obtain and maintain IP protection covering our products and technology, others may be able to utilize our IP, which would adversely affect our business;

●

we are an international business, and we are exposed to various global and local risks that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations;

●

the market prices of our common shares are subject to fluctuation and have been and may continue to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses for investors;

●

we anticipate being subject to fluctuations in currency exchange rates because a significant portion of our business is conducted outside the United States and we are exposed to currency exchange fluctuations in other currencies such as the New Israeli Shekel (“NIS”) and the Euro;

●

restrictions contained in the EIB Finance Agreement may restrict our ability to conduct certain strategic initiatives;

●

limitations we may face relating to the grants we have received from the IIA may impact our plans and future decisions;

●

if there are significant shifts in the political, economic and military conditions in Israel and its neighboring countries, it could have a material adverse effect on our business relationships and profitability;

●

it may be difficult for investors in the United States to enforce any judgments obtained against us or some of our directors or officers;

●

cybersecurity incidents may have an adverse impact on our business and operations;

●

recent increasing global inflation could affect our ability to purchase materials needed for manufacturing and could increase the costs of our future product;

●

we have a limited operating history in the field of FoodTech, aesthetics, longevity and wellness and CDMO to date and our prospects will be dependent on our ability to meet several challenges;

●

there are risks relating to our CDMO business, including financial risks associated with contracts that could be terminated, changed or delayed, risk related to products that might not gain market approval and risk related to providing timely services to customers in a highly competitive industry in which we operate;

●

our FoodTech endeavors involve significant risks, including the lengthy and complex research and development process associated with cultivated meat, cultivated food and related cell-based food technologies; evolving governmental regulations applicable to cultivated meat, cell-based food products and related technologies; potential changes in consumer preferences and acceptance of such products; and the fact that our business and market potential in these areas, including cultivated meat, cell-based coffee and other FoodTech applications, remain unproven, with limited visibility into market, regulatory and consumer trends that may emerge and affect our business;

●

our longevity, wellness and aesthetics products may not achieve market acceptance, and we have limited operating and commercialization history in this business. Regulatory uncertainty and the potential for differing product classifications could subject these products to additional requirements and adversely affect our ability to commercialize them; and

●

we could fail to regain compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rules and to maintain the listing of our common shares on Nasdaq, which could harm the liquidity of our shares and our ability to raise capital or complete a strategic transaction.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our independent registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph relating to our ability to continue as a going concern in its report on our audited financial statements included in this Annual Report. The financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might result if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

As indicated in the independent auditor’s report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. Our recurring operating losses and negative cash flow raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As of June 30, 2026, our cash balances (cash and cash equivalents, short-term bank deposits, restricted cash and restricted bank deposits) totaled to $8,851,000. According to management estimates, we only have sufficient resources to meet our operating obligations for a period of less than three months from the issuance date of the consolidated financial statements. To sustain operations beyond this period, we will require additional capital to sustain operations. There can be no assurance that such financing will be available on favorable terms, or at all.

If we are unable to secure additional capital, we may need to implement cost-containments measures, such as reducing discretionary expenditures and streamlining operations. While these actions may provide temporary relief, they could also delay key initiatives and negatively affect our business outlook.

We may need to raise additional financing to support the research, development and manufacturing of our cell-based products in the future, but we cannot be sure we will be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us when needed. If we are unable to obtain additional financing to meet our needs, our operations may be adversely affected or terminated.

We will need to raise significant additional capital in the future. Although we were successful in raising capital in the past, our current financial resources are limited, and may not be sufficient to finance our operations until we become profitable, if that ever happens.

We will need to raise additional funds in order to satisfy our working capital and capital expenditure requirements. Therefore, we are dependent on our ability to sell our common shares for funds, receive grants, enter into collaborations and licensing deals or to otherwise raise capital. Any sale of our common shares in the future could result in dilution to existing shareholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common shares.

Also, we may not be able to raise additional capital in the future to support the development and commercialization of our products, which could result in in a significant decline in the value of our common shares or the loss of all or a portion of an investment in our common shares.

Our likelihood of profitability depends on our ability to license and/or develop and commercialize our products based on our technology, which is currently in the development stage. If we are unable to complete the development and commercialization of our cell-based products and CDMO services successfully, or are unable to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals, our likelihood of profitability will be limited severely.

We are engaged in the business of developing cell-based products. We have not realized a profit from our operations to date and there is little likelihood that we will realize any profits in the short or medium term. Any profitability in the future from our business will be dependent upon successful commercialization of our regenerative aesthetics, wellness and longevity activities, cell-based services and products and/or licensing of our products, which will require additional research and development. Any profitability in the future from our business will be dependent upon successful commercialization of our cell-based products and/or licensing of our products, which will require additional research and development.

If our cell therapy product candidates do not prove to be safe and effective in clinical trials, we will not obtain the required regulatory approvals. If we fail to obtain such approvals, we may not generate sufficient revenues to continue our business operations.

Even after granting regulatory approval, the FDA, the EMA, and regulatory agencies in other countries continue to regulate marketed products, manufacturers and manufacturing facilities, which may create additional regulatory barriers and burdens. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, manufacturer or facility, may result in restrictions on the product or manufacturer, including a withdrawal of the product from the market.

We have not generated significant or consistent revenues to date, which raises doubts with respect to our ability to generate revenues in the future.

We have a limited operating history in our business of commercializing cell-based products and cell technology, and we have not generated material revenues to date. It is not clear whether we will generate material revenues or whether we will generate material revenues in the future. We cannot give assurances that we will be able to generate any significant revenues or income in the future. There is no assurance that we will ever be profitable.

Failure to reach an agreement with the EIB about the repayment of the EIB Loan could adversely affect our financial condition and liquidity.

On April 30, 2020, we and our subsidiaries, Pluri Biotech Ltd. and Pluristem GmbH, entered into the EIB Finance Agreement for a loan in the amount of up to €50 million in the aggregate, subject to certain milestones being reached, receivable in three tranches. During June 2021, we received the first and final tranche in the amount of €20 million. During June 2021, we received the first tranche in the amount of €20 million. The amount received was due to be repaid on June 1, 2026, and bears annual interest of 4% to be paid together with the principal amount of the loan. As of June 30, 2026, the interest accrued was in the amount of approximately €4.1 million. In addition to the interest payable, the EIB is also entitled to royalty payments, pro-rated to the amount disbursed from the EIB Loan, on our consolidated revenues beginning in the fiscal year 2024 up to and including its fiscal year 2030, in an amount equal to up to 2.3% of our consolidated revenues below $350 million, 1.2% of our consolidated revenues between $350 million and $500 million and 0.2% of our consolidated revenues exceeding $500 million. As of June 30, 2026, we had an accrued royalty in the amount of $9 thousand.

We maintained discussions with the EIB with the objective of reaching a mutually agreed resolution regarding the EIB Loan. The EIB confirmed that during such discussion period, and while discussions remain ongoing, the EIB is not contemplating any enforcement action, all without prejudice to any of its rights and remedies. On August 17, 2026, we were notified by the EIB that its relevant committee had approved, subject to certain conditions, a proposed sale of the EIB Loan not involving the Company as purchaser, on terms agreed with a third-party purchaser, who may be a related party. Completion of such sale remains subject to, among other things, execution of definitive legal documentation and completion of the EIB’s review process and other conditions. If the proposed sale is completed, the Company intends to seek to reach an arrangement with the purchaser regarding the settlement of the purchased loan, which may include the conversion of all or a portion of the outstanding loan amount into equity of the Company. Any such arrangement would be subject to negotiation with the purchaser and the receipt of all required corporate and other approvals. Until the proposed sale is finalized and any subsequent arrangement with the purchaser is agreed and approved, there can be no certainty as to the outcome of the discussions, or that the EIB will continue to refrain from exercising remedies available to it under the finance agreement, or any assurance that any sale of the EIB Loan will be completed, that any settlement or conversion arrangement will be entered into or consummated, or as to the timing, structure, accounting treatment or financial statement impact of any such transaction.

If we fail to resolve, on acceptable terms, our obligations in respect with the EIB about the repayment of the EIB Loan, our financial condition and liquidity would be materially affected and could materially adversely affect our ability to continue as a going concern.

Because most of our officers and directors are located in non-U.S. jurisdictions, you may have no effective recourse against the management for misconduct and may not be able to enforce judgment and civil liabilities against our officers, directors, experts and agents.

Most of our directors and officers are nationals and/or residents of countries other than the United States, and all or a substantial portion of their assets are located outside the United States.

As a result, it may be difficult to enforce within the United States any judgments obtained against our officers or directors, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States or any U.S. state.

While we may seek partners for licensing deals, joint ventures, partnerships, and direct sale of our products in various industries, there is no guarantee we will be successful in doing so.

To date, we have focused our efforts primarily in the regenerative medicine field, in the FoodTech field, in the CDMO field, and in regenerative aesthetics, wellness and longevity activities, but we may seek partners for licensing deals, joint ventures, partnerships, and direct sale of our products or use of our technology in various industries. Licensing deals, joint ventures and partnerships in new fields involve numerous risks, including the potential integration of our technology and products in various new ways, which may or may not be successful. Such projects may require significant funds, time and attention from management and other key personnel. In addition, as we do not have experience in areas outside of the regenerative medicine field and limited experience in the FoodTech, CDMO and regenerative aesthetics, wellness and longevity activities, we may lack the personnel to properly lead such initiatives. In addition, as we do not have experience in areas outside of the regenerative medicine field and limited experience in the food tech, CDMO and agriculture fields, we may lack the personnel to properly lead such initiatives. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in finding the relevant partners to fund and market our cell-based products.

Changes in U.S. trade policy and tariffs may have an adverse impact on our business.

Our business involves the importation of certain raw materials, components, and finished goods essential for our cell expansion platform and related applications. Changes in U.S. trade policy, including the imposition of new tariffs or modifications to existing trade agreements, could affect our supply chain, increase costs, and impact our financial performance. For the year ended June 30, 2026, we estimate that the impact of tariffs currently imposed on our imports was not material. However, we are unable to estimate the impacts of any future tariffs that may be enacted. While we actively monitor trade developments and assess potential impacts, the evolving nature of trade policies makes it challenging to predict the full extent of these effects. We may not be able to mitigate all adverse consequences, which could include increased production costs, delays in product development, or reduced margins.

Risks Related to Development, Clinical Studies, and Regulatory Approval of Our Product Candidates

If we are not able to conduct our clinical trials properly and on schedule, marketing approval by FDA, EMA, MOH and other regulatory authorities may be delayed or denied.

The completion of our future clinical trials may be delayed or terminated for many reasons, such as:

●

The FDA, the EMA or the MOH do not grant permission to proceed or places trials on clinical hold;

●

Subjects do not enroll in our trials at the rate we expect;

●

Government actions, or other governmental measures limit the movement general populations;

●

The regulators may ask to increase subject’s population in the clinical trials;

●

Subjects experience an unacceptable rate or severity of adverse side effects;

●

Third party clinical investigators and other related vendors may not perform the clinical trials under the anticipated schedule or consistent with the clinical trial protocol, GCP and regulatory requirements;

●

Third party clinical investigators and other related vendors may declare bankruptcy or terminate their business unexpectedly, which most likely will result in further delays in our clinical trials’ anticipated schedule and cause additional expenditures;

●

Inspections of clinical trial sites by the FDA, EMA, MOH and other regulatory authorities find regulatory violations that require us to undertake corrective action, suspend or terminate one or more sites, or prohibit us from using some or all of the data in support of our marketing applications; or

●

One or more IRBs suspends or terminates the trial at an investigational site, precludes enrollment of additional subjects, or withdraws its approval of the trial.

If we are unable to conduct clinical trials properly and on schedule, marketing approval may be delayed or denied by the FDA, EMA, MOH and other regulatory authorities.

The results of our clinical trials may not support our product candidates’ claims or any additional claims we may seek for our product candidates, and our clinical trials may result in the discovery of adverse side effects.

Even if any clinical trial that we need to undertake is completed as planned, or if interim results from existing clinical trials are released, we cannot be certain that such results will support our product candidates claims or any new indications that we may seek for our products or that the FDA or foreign authorities will agree with our conclusions regarding the results of those trials. The clinical trial process may fail to demonstrate that our products or a product candidate is safe and effective for the proposed indicated use, which could cause us to stop seeking additional clearances or approvals for our product candidates. Any delay or termination of our clinical trials will delay the filing of our regulatory submissions and, ultimately, our ability to commercialize a product candidate. It is also possible that patients enrolled in clinical trials will experience adverse side effects that are not currently part of the product candidate’s profile.

Favorable results from compassionate use treatment or initial interim results from a clinical trial do not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful and success in early-stage clinical trials does not ensure success in later-stage clinical trials.

PLX cells have been administered as part of compassionate use treatments, which permit the administration of the PLX cells outside of clinical trials. No assurance can be given that any positive results are attributable to the PLX cells, or that administration of PLX cells to other patients will have positive results. Compassionate use is a term that is used to refer to the use of an investigational drug outside of a clinical trial to treat a patient with a serious or immediately life-threatening disease or condition who has no comparable or satisfactory alternative treatment options. Regulators often allow compassionate use on a case-by-case basis for an individual patient or for defined groups of patients with similar treatment needs.

Success in early clinical trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be successful, and initial results from a clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results. While results from treating patients through compassionate use have in certain cases been successful, we cannot be assured that further trials will ultimately be successful. Results of further clinical trials may be disappointing.

Even if early-stage clinical trials are successful, we may need to conduct additional clinical trials for product candidates with patients receiving the drug for longer periods before we are able to seek approvals to market and sell these product candidates from the FDA and regulatory authorities outside the United States. Even if we are able to obtain approval for our product candidates through an accelerated approval review program, we may still be required to conduct clinical trials after such an approval. If we are not successful in commercializing any of our lead product candidates, or are significantly delayed in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.

Our product development programs are based on novel technologies and are inherently risky.

We are subject to the risks of failure inherent in the development of products based on new technologies. The novel nature of our therapeutics creates significant challenges in regard to product development and optimization, manufacturing, government regulation, third party reimbursement and market acceptance. For example, the FDA, the EMA and other countries’ regulatory authorities have relatively limited experience with cell therapies. Very few cell therapy products have been approved by regulatory authorities to date for commercial sale, and the pathway to regulatory approval for our cell therapy product candidates may accordingly be more complex and lengthier. As a result, the development and commercialization pathway for our therapies may be subject to increased uncertainty, as compared to the pathway for new conventional drugs.

Our cell therapy drug candidates represent new classes of therapy that the marketplace may not understand or accept.

Even if we successfully develop and obtain regulatory approval for our cell therapy candidates, the market may not understand or accept them. We are developing cell therapy product candidates that represent novel treatments and will compete with a number of more conventional products and therapies manufactured and marketed by others, including major pharmaceutical companies. The degree of market acceptance of any of our developed and potential products will depend on a number of factors, including:

●

the clinical safety and effectiveness of our cell therapy drug candidates and their perceived advantage over alternative treatment methods, if any;

●

adverse events involving our cell therapy product candidates or the products or product candidates of others that are cell-based; and

●

the cost of our products and the reimbursement policies of government and private third-party payers.

If the health care community does not accept our potential products for any of the foregoing reasons, or for any other reason, it could affect our sales, having a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Interim, “top-line,” and preliminary data from our clinical trials that we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient data become available or as additional analyses are conducted, and as the data are subject to audit and verification procedures, which could result in material changes in the final data.

From time to time, we may publish interim, “top-line,” or preliminary data from our clinical studies. Interim data from clinical trials that we may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Preliminary or “top-line” data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the preliminary data we previously published. As a result, interim and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Material adverse changes between preliminary, “top-line,” or interim data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects.

Risks Related to Our Longevity, Wellness and Aesthetics Business

Our longevity, wellness and aesthetics products may not achieve market acceptance, and we have limited operating and commercialization history in this business. Regulatory uncertainty and the potential for differing product classifications could subject these products to additional requirements and adversely affect our ability to commercialize them.

Our longevity, wellness and aesthetics products are at an early stage of either development or commercialization, and we have limited operating and commercialization history in this business. Market acceptance by consumers, clinics, medical spas, distributors, strategic partners and other channels is uncertain and will depend on, among other things, successful development, validation, scale-up, manufacturing, quality control, shelf life, stability, formulation, packaging, supply chain management and third-party distribution. Regulation of these products in the United States, United Kingdom, European Union, Israel and other markets is evolving and uncertain, and products may be classified or reclassified as cosmetics, wellness products, consumer health products, medical devices, drugs, biologics, tissue- or cell-based products or other regulated products depending on their intended use, ingredients, claims, labeling, distribution channels and professional use.

The FDA, Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) and comparable international authorities oversee cosmetic labeling, advertising and claims, which must be truthful and not misleading, and products marketed as affecting the structure or function of the body or treating or preventing disease may be regulated as drugs or otherwise subject to additional requirements. Use of cell-derived ingredients, conditioned media, exosomes or other biologically derived materials could increase regulatory, safety, claims-substantiation, adverse-event, post-market monitoring, recall, import/export and enforcement risks. Regulators, customers or partners may disagree with our product characterization or claims, which could result in delays, increased costs, enforcement actions, product restrictions, recalls, reputational harm, inability to commercialize products or an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and prospects. Any failure to comply with applicable requirements could result in delays, restrictions, recalls, enforcement actions, an inability to commercialize, reputational harm or an adverse impact on our business.

Risks Related to Our Cultivated FoodTech Business

Ever After Foods has a limited operating history in the field of cultivated meat and is seeking to expand its capabilities to additional cultivated protein and seafood applications, including through the recently announced Fishway Acquisition. To-date, Ever After Foods and its prospects are, and are expected to continue being, dependent on its ability to meet a number of challenges.

Ever After Foods’ business prospects are difficult to predict due to its lack of operational history in the new and emerging food tech field, and its success will be dependent on its ability to meet a number of challenges. Because it has a limited operating history in the field of cultivated meat and it is in the early stages of development, Ever After Foods may not be able to evaluate its future prospects accurately. Ever After Foods’ prospects will be primarily dependent on its ability to successfully develop industrial scale cultivated meat and related cultivated protein or seafood applications, technologies and processes, and market these to its potential customers. Ever After Foods’ prospects will be primarily dependent on its ability to successfully develop industrial scale cultivated meat technologies and processes, and market these to its potential customers. If Ever After Foods is not able to successfully meet these challenges, its prospects, business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely impacted. In addition, Ever After Food may not successfully integrate or implement the newly acquired Fishway assets, know-how, scientific capabilities, aquatic cell biology, animal-component-free media development, team and European presence, and the expected benefits may not be realized, may take longer or cost more than expected, or may disrupt our existing efforts

In addition, Ever After Foods will be subject to changing laws, rules and regulations in the United States, Israel, Asia Pacific, the European Union and other jurisdictions relating to the food tech industry. Such laws and regulations may negatively impact Ever After Foods’ ability to expand its business and pursue business opportunities. Such laws and regulations may negatively impact its ability to expand its business and pursue business opportunities. Ever After Foods may also incur significant expenses to comply with the laws, regulations and other obligations that will apply to it.

Ever After Foods is primarily focused on utilizing its technology for the development of cultivated meat, and it has limited data on the performance of our and its technologies in the field of cultivated meat to date.

Ever After Foods does not currently have any products or technologies approved for sale and it is still in the early stages of development. To date, Ever After Foods has limited data on the ability of our and its technologies to successfully manufacture cultivated meat, towards which they have devoted substantial resources to date. Ever After Foods’ current technologies are, in large part, based on our technologies and IP. It may not be successful in developing its technologies in a manner sufficient to support its expected scale-ups and future growth, or at all. Ever After Foods expects that a substantial portion of its efforts and expenditures over the next few years will be devoted to the development of technologies designed to enable Ever After Foods to market industrial scale cultivated meat manufacturing processes. Ever After Foods cannot guarantee that it will be successful in developing these technologies, based on its current roadmap, or at all. If Ever After Foods is able to successfully develop its cultivated meat and related cultivated protein or seafood technologies, it cannot ensure that it will obtain regulatory approval or that, following approval, upon commercialization its technologies will achieve market acceptance. If Ever After Foods is able to successfully develop its cultivated meat technologies, it cannot ensure that it will obtain regulatory approval or that, following approval, upon commercialization its technologies will achieve market acceptance. Any such delay or failure could materially and adversely affect Ever After Foods’ financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Consumer preferences for alternative proteins in general, and more specifically cultivated meats, are difficult to predict and may change, and, if we are unable to respond quickly to new trends, Ever After Foods’ business may be adversely affected.

Ever After Foods’ business is focused on the development of cultivated meat manufacturing technologies. Consumer demand for the cultivated meats manufactured using these technologies could change based on a number of possible factors, including dietary habits and nutritional values, concerns regarding the health effects of ingredients and shifts in preference for various product attributes. If consumer demand for such products decreases, Ever After Foods’ business and financial condition would suffer. Consumer trends that we believe favor sales of products manufactured using our licensed technologies could change based on a number of possible factors, including a shift in preference from animal-based protein products, economic factors and social trends. A significant shift in consumer demand away from products manufactured using our technologies could reduce our sales or our market share and the prestige of our brand, which would harm our business and financial condition.

We expect that products utilizing Ever After Foods’ technologies will be subject to regulations that could adversely affect Ever After Foods’ business and operations.

The manufacture, distribution and marketing of food products is highly regulated. Ever After Foods and its suppliers and licensees, may be subject to a variety of laws and regulations. These laws and regulations apply to many aspects of Ever After Foods’ business, including the manufacture, composition and ingredients, packaging, labeling, distribution, advertising, sale, quality and safety of food products and food contact substances (including some manufacturing equipment), as well as the health and safety of our employees and the protection of the environment.

As applicable, the manufacturing equipment that will be manufactured by Ever After Foods will comply with the FDA’s regulatory requirements for food contact substances and analogous foreign regulations. Ever After Foods will also ensure that the edible scaffolds and any other production materials it sells to its customers comply with applicable FDA standards. From a regulatory perspective, in the United States, we expect companies manufacturing finished cultivated meat and related cultivated protein or seafood products ( i. From a regulatory perspective, in the United States, we expect companies manufacturing finished cultivated meat products ( i. e., the companies that will license Ever After Foods’ manufacturing technologies) to be subject to regulation by various government agencies, including the FDA, the USDA, the FTC, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as the requirements of various state and local agencies and laws, such as the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. We likewise expect these products to be regulated by equivalent agencies outside the United States by various international regulatory bodies.

While, as noted above, Ever After Foods will ensure that the products it sells to its customers (including manufacturing equipment and scaffolds) comply with applicable FDA and USDA standards, we believe that our customers, as entities engaged in the manufacture, distribution, and sale of cultivated meat products, will bear primary legal responsibility for ensuring that all finished foods produced using our technology is wholesome and not adulterated and otherwise in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Consistent with food industry norms, we expect that our customers will therefore request assurances from us that our products are suitable for their intended use under applicable U.S. legal requirements.

The manufacturing of cultivated meat is expected to be subject to extensive regulations internationally, with products subject to numerous food safety and other laws and regulations relating to the sourcing, manufacturing, composition and ingredients, storing, labeling, marketing, advertising and distribution of these products. In addition, enforcement of existing laws and regulations, changes in legal requirements and/or evolving interpretations of existing regulatory requirements may result in increased compliance costs and create other obligations, financial or otherwise, that could adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. In addition, we could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws, which generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making payments to foreign government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business, and require companies both to keep accurate books and records and to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls. While our policies mandate compliance with anti-bribery laws, including the FCPA, our internal control policies and procedures may not protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees, contractors or agents. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could result in government investigations, the assessment of fines and penalties, reputational damage, disruption to our business, and adverse impacts on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Any changes in, or changes in the interpretation of, applicable laws, regulations or policies of the USDA, state regulators or similar foreign regulatory authorities that relate to the use of the terms “meat” or “poultry” or other similar terms in connection with cultivated meat products could adversely affect our business, prospects, results of operations or financial condition.

The USDA, state regulators or similar foreign regulatory authorities, such as Health Canada or the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (“CFIA”), or authorities of the EU or the EU member states (e.g., European Food Safety Authority, or EFSA), could take action that impacts our customers’ ability to use the term “meat” or “poultry” or similar words, such as “beef” or “chicken”, to describe their finished products. In addition, a food may be deemed misbranded if its labeling is false or misleading in any particular way, and the USDA, CFIA, EFSA or other regulators could interpret the use of the terms “meat” or “poultry” or any similar phrase(s) to describe our customers’ cultivated meat and related cultivated protein or seafood products as false or misleading or likely to create an erroneous impression regarding their composition. In addition, a food may be deemed misbranded if its labeling is false or misleading in any particular way, and the USDA, CFIA, EFSA or other regulators could interpret the use of the terms “meat” or “poultry” or any similar phrase(s) to describe our customers’ cultivated meat products as false or misleading or likely to create an erroneous impression regarding their composition. In the U.S., the USDA intends to issue new labeling requirements for foods under its jurisdiction produced through cell culture technology as noted in an ANPR published in September 2021.

Our various new lines of business, including our plant-based vertical (e.g. Coffeesai and Kokomodo), and Ever After Foods, are new businesses with limited operating activity to date, and their success is dependent on the ability to deliver a high-quality product while overcoming multiple challenges.

The success of our various new lines of business is difficult to predict due to our lack of operational history in these industries, and we will be dependent on our ability to meet a number of challenges. Since our new lines of business have a limited operating history, these lines of business may not be able to deliver a successful high-quality product at the scale of production they aim to deliver. The success of these lines of business will be primarily, but not only, dependent on their ability to develop manufacturing solutions, and leveraging Pluri’s 3D cell expansion technology to create compelling products. If our businesses will not be able to successfully meet these challenges, and our prospects, business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely impacted.

In addition, certain of our lines of business, such as our biopharming and FoodTech lines (which include Coffeesai, Kokomodo and Ever After Foods), will be subject to changing laws, rules and regulations in the United States, Israel, Asia Pacific, the European Union and other jurisdictions. Such laws and regulations may negatively impact their ability to expand their businesses and pursue business opportunities. Our subsidiaries may also incur significant expenses to comply with the laws, regulations and other obligations that will apply to them.

Additionally, Kokomodo faces several key risks in connection with the development and potential commercialization of its cell-based cacao products. First, the regulatory landscape for cell-based cacao remains uncertain, as no regulatory agency has approved such products for commercial sale to date. Any delay or failure to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals could materially impact on the timing and feasibility of market entry. Second, the bioprocessing technology underlying Kokomodo’s platform is subject to significant technical challenges, including the need to optimize culture media composition, fermentation conditions, and quality control systems to ensure consistency and scalability. Finally, Kokomodo must successfully scale its technology beyond the POC stage to reach industrial-scale production. The transition from laboratory to commercial manufacturing involves substantial operational, financial, and technical risks, and any failure to do so may adversely affect our ability to achieve our commercial objectives.

We may need to raise additional financing to support our biopharming and plant-based business vertical and the research, development and manufacturing of their respective products. If we are unable to obtain additional financing to meet their needs, their operations may be adversely affected or terminated.

We will need to raise significant additional capital from investors in the future to finance our biopharming and plant-based business vertical operations. Our current capital may not be sufficient to finance our biopharming and plant-based operations until we are able to complete the development of a high-quality coffee and cacao, and other biopharming initiatives. Our current capital may not be sufficient to finance our AgTech lines of business and the plant-based operations until we are able to complete the development of a high-quality coffee and cacao. If we are not able to attract investors and obtain additional financing, the biopharming and plant-based operations may be adversely affected or terminated. If we are not able to attract investors and obtain additional financing, PluriAgTech’s and the plant-based operations may be adversely affected or terminated.

Cultivated plant-based products utilizing our 3D cell expansion technology may be subject to regulations that could adversely affect its business and results of operations.

In connection with our cultivated plant-based initiative, we are working with external regulatory consultants to assess the technical and scientific requirements for determining whether the plant-based cultivated coffee products (including all components) may be considered “Generally Recognized as Safe” (“GRAS”) under Section 201(s) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) and FDA’s implementing regulations (21 C.F.R. § 170.30). If determined to be GRAS in accordance with FDA requirements, the products would be excluded from the definition of a “food additive” under the FDCA and may be lawfully marketed in the United States without prior FDA authorization.

If the products (or any of their components) are not determined to be GRAS, they would be classified as food additives under Section 201(s) of the FDCA. In that case, the products or ingredients could only be marketed in the U.S. if authorized for its intended use under an applicable food additive regulation and in compliance with all other relevant FDA requirements. If no such regulation exists, the respective plant-based initiative may need to submit a food additive petition to request that FDA issue a new regulation authorizing the product’s intended use.

Additionally, before marketing the plant-based products in the United States, the respective plant-based initiative must also ensure compliance with applicable FDA food labeling requirements under section 403 of the FDCA and FDA’s implementing regulations (21 C.F.R. Part 101), manufactured at an FDA-registered food facility pursuant to section 415 of the FDCA and FDA’s implementing regulations (21 C.F.R. Part 1, Subpart H), and manufactured in accordance with all applicable FDA food safety requirements including, but not limited to, FDA’s Hazard Analysis and Preventive Controls and Current Good Manufacturing Practice requirements (21 C.F.R. Part 117). If the cultivated plant products are imported into the United States, additional regulatory requirements may apply, including submission of prior notice to FDA (21 C.F.R. Part 1, Subpart I) and compliance with Foreign Supplier Verification Program requirements (21 C.F.R. Part 1, Subpart L), as applicable.

Risks Related to Commercialization of Our Product Candidates

We may not successfully establish new collaborations, joint ventures or licensing arrangements, which could adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates.

One of the elements of our business strategy is to collaborate with partners and to license our technology to other companies. Our business strategy includes development and in-house manufacturing of innovative new cell- based products and solutions powered by our 3D cell expansion technology platforms and establishing joint ventures and partnerships that leverage our cell expansion technology and cell-based product portfolio to expand product pipelines and meet cell-based manufacturing needs for a variety of industries. To date, we have established Ever After Foods, a strategic partnership with Tnuva, with ICL Group (through its Open Innovation program) for advanced bioactive carriers and bio stimulants, and with an international agriculture corporation to enhance the global sustainable vegetable supply.

Notwithstanding, we may not be able to further establish or maintain such licensing and collaboration arrangements necessary to develop and commercialize our product candidates.

Even if we are able to maintain or establish licensing or collaboration arrangements, these arrangements may not be on favorable terms and may contain provisions that will restrict our ability to develop, test and market our product candidates. Any failure to maintain or establish licensing or collaboration arrangements on favorable terms could adversely affect our business prospects, financial condition, or ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates.

Our agreements with our collaborators and licensees may have provisions that give rise to disputes regarding the rights and obligations of the parties. These and other possible disagreements could lead to termination of the agreement or delays in collaborative research, development, supply, or commercialization of certain product candidates, or could require or result in litigation or arbitration. Moreover, disagreements could arise with our collaborators over rights to IP or our rights to share in any of the future revenues of products developed by our collaborators. These kinds of disagreements could result in costly and time-consuming litigation. Any such conflicts with our collaborators could reduce our ability to obtain future collaboration agreements and could have a negative impact on our relationship with existing collaborators.

The market for our cell therapy products will be heavily dependent on third party reimbursement policies.

Our ability to successfully commercialize our cell therapy product candidates will depend on the extent to which government healthcare programs, as well as private health insurers, health maintenance organizations and other third-party payers will pay for our products and related treatments.

Reimbursement by third party payers depends on a number of factors, including the payer’s determination that use of the product is safe and effective, not experimental, or investigational, medically necessary, appropriate for the specific patient and cost-effective. Reimbursement in the United States or foreign countries may not be available or maintained for any of our product candidates. If we do not obtain approvals for adequate third-party reimbursements, we may not be able to establish or maintain price levels sufficient to realize an appropriate return on our investment in product development. Any limits on reimbursement from third party payers may reduce the demand for, or negatively affect the price of, our products. The lack of reimbursement for these procedures by insurance payers has negatively affected the market for our products in this indication in the past.

Managing and reducing health care costs has been a general concern of federal and state governments in the United States and of foreign governments. In addition, third party payers are increasingly challenging the price and cost-effectiveness of medical products and services, and many limit reimbursement for newly approved health care products. Third-party payers may limit the indications for which they will reimburse patients who use any products that we may develop. In particular, third-party payers may limit the indications for which they will reimburse patients who use any products that we may develop. Cost control initiatives could decrease the price for products that we may develop, which would result in lower product revenues for us.

Risks Related to Intellectual Property

Our success depends in large part on our ability to develop and protect our technology and our cell therapy products. If our patents and proprietary rights agreements do not provide sufficient protection for our technology and our cell therapy products, our business and competitive position will suffer.

Our success will also depend in part on our ability to develop our technology and commercialize our products without infringing the proprietary rights of others. We have not conducted full freedom of use patent searches, and no assurance can be given that patents do not exist or could not be filed which would have an adverse effect on our ability to develop our technology or maintain our competitive position with respect to our potential cell therapy products. If our technology components, devices, designs, products, processes or other subject matter are claimed under other existing United States or foreign patents or are otherwise protected by third party proprietary rights, we may be subject to infringement actions. In such event, we may challenge the validity of such patents or other proprietary rights, or we may be required to obtain licenses from such companies in order to develop, manufacture or market our technology or products. There can be no assurances that we would be able to obtain such licenses or that such licenses, if available, could be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. Furthermore, the failure to either develop a commercially viable alternative or obtain such licenses could result in delays in marketing our proposed products or the inability to proceed with the development, manufacture or sale of products requiring such licenses, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we are required to defend ourselves against charges of patent infringement or to protect our proprietary rights against third parties, substantial costs will be incurred regardless of whether we are successful. Such proceedings are typically protracted with no certainty of success. An adverse outcome could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties and force us to curtail or cease our development of our technology and the commercialization of our potential cell therapy products.

We have built the ability to manufacture clinical grade adherent stromal cells in-house. Through our experience with adherent stromal cell-based product development, we have developed expertise and know-how in this field. We also have built the ability to grow on a large scale various immune cells including engineered placental MAIT cells for use in cell therapy. Additionally, we have built the ability to grow on a large-scale plant cells for various biofarming uses. To protect this expertise and know-how, our policies require confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, contractors, manufacturers and advisors. These agreements generally provide for protection of confidential information, restrictions on the use of materials and assignment of inventions conceived during the course of performance for us. These agreements might not effectively prevent disclosure of our confidential information.

Third parties may initiate legal proceedings alleging that we are infringing their IP rights, the outcome of which would be uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our commercial success depends upon our ability and the ability of our collaborators to develop, manufacture, market and sell our product candidates and use our proprietary technologies without infringing the proprietary rights of third parties. We have yet to conduct comprehensive freedom-to-operate searches to determine whether our proposed business activities or use of certain of the patent rights owned by us would infringe patents issued to third parties. We may become party to, or threatened with, future adversarial proceedings or litigation regarding IP rights with respect to our products and technology, including interference proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Third parties may assert infringement claims against us based on existing patents or patents that may be granted in the future. If we are found to infringe a third party’s IP rights, we could be required to obtain a license from such third party to continue developing and marketing our products and technology. However, we may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Even if we were able to obtain a license, it could be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us. We could be forced, including by court order, to cease commercializing the infringing technology or product. In addition, we could be found liable for monetary damages. A finding of infringement could prevent us from commercializing our product candidates or force us to cease some of our business operations, which could materially harm our business. For example, we are aware of issued third party patents directed to placental stem cells and their use for therapy and in treating various diseases. We may need to seek a license for one or more of these patents. No assurances can be given that such a license will be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Claims that we have misappropriated confidential information or trade secrets of third parties could have a similar negative impact on our business.

Even if resolved in our favor, litigation or other legal proceedings relating to IP claims may cause us to incur significant expenses and could distract our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities. In addition, there could be public announcements about the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments and if securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect on the price of our common shares. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce the resources available for development activities or any future sales, marketing or distribution activities. We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings. Some of our competitors are able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater financial resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace.

The patent approval process is complex, and we cannot be sure that our pending patent applications or future patent applications will be approved.

The patent position of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain, involves complex legal and factual questions and has in recent years been the subject of much litigation. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our and any future licensors’ patent rights are highly uncertain. Our pending and future patent applications may not result in patents being issued which protect our technology or products or which effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and products. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United States and other countries may diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of our patent protection. The laws of foreign countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States, and we may not be able to obtain meaningful patent protection for any of our commercial products either in or outside the United States.

No assurance can be given that the scope of any patent protection granted will exclude competitors or provide us with competitive advantages, that any of the patents that have been or may be issued to us will be held valid if subsequently challenged, or that other parties will not claim rights to or ownership of our patents or other proprietary rights that we hold. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that others have not developed or will not develop similar products, duplicate any of our technology or products or design around any patents that have been or may be issued to us or any future licensors. Since patent applications in the United States and in Europe are not publicly disclosed until patents are issued, there can be no assurance that others did not first file applications for products covered by our pending patent applications, nor can we be certain that we will not infringe any patents that may be issued to others.

Risks Related to Our Common Shares

The price of our common shares may fluctuate significantly.

The market price of our common shares may fluctuate significantly. A number of events and factors may have an adverse impact on the market price of our common shares, such as:

●

our ability to convert collaborations, pilot programs, results of our clinical trials, and strategic relationships into definitive commercial agreements or other revenue-generating arrangements;

●

the amount of our cash resources and our ability to obtain additional funding;

●

changes in our revenues, expense levels or operating results;

●

entering into or terminating strategic relationships;

●

announcements of technical or product developments by us or our competitors;

●

market conditions for pharmaceutical and biotechnology shares in particular;

●

changes in laws and governmental regulations, including changes in tax, healthcare, competition and patent laws;

●

disputes concerning patents or proprietary rights;

●

new accounting pronouncements or regulatory rulings;

●

public announcements regarding medical advances in the treatment of the disease states that we are targeting;

●

patent or proprietary rights developments;

●

regulatory actions that may impact our products;

●

future sales of our common shares, or the perception of such sales;

●

disruptions in our manufacturing processes; and

●

competition.

In addition, global or regional economic, political, public-health, military or security events, including regional security instability, and market downturns generally or in the biopharmaceutical sector in particular, may adversely affect the market price of our securities, which may not necessarily reflect the actual or perceived value of our Company.

We could fail to regain compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rules and to maintain the listing of our common shares on Nasdaq, which could seriously harm the liquidity of our shares and our ability to raise capital or complete a strategic transaction.

On July 7, 2026, we received a deficiency letter (the “Nasdaq Letter”) from the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”), notifying us that we are not in compliance with the MVLS Requirement under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(2), and are not in compliance with either of the alternative listing standards, including having stockholders’ equity of at least $2.5 million or net income of $500,000 from continuing operations in the most recently completed fiscal year, or in two of the three most recently completed fiscal years.

The Nasdaq Letter has no immediate effect on the listing or trading of our common shares, which continue to trade on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “PLUR”.

Pursuant to the Nasdaq Letter, and in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(C), we have been provided with an initial period of 180 calendar days, until January 4, 2027, to regain compliance with the MVLS Requirement (the “Compliance Period”). Nasdaq indicated that if, at any time during the Compliance Period, our MVLS closes at $35 million or more for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days (unless Nasdaq, in its discretion, requires a longer period, but generally no more than 20 consecutive business days), Nasdaq will provide a written confirmation that we have regained compliance and the matter will be closed. In the event we do not regain compliance within the Compliance Period, we expect that Nasdaq will provide written notification that our securities are subject to delisting. At that time, we may be eligible to appeal any delisting determination to a Nasdaq Hearings Panel. The hearing request would stay any suspension or delisting action pending the conclusion of the hearing process and the expiration of any additional extension period granted by the panel following the hearing.

We are evaluating options to regain compliance with the MVLS Requirement and intend to take appropriate actions to regain compliance; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to regain compliance with all applicable requirements or maintain compliance thereafter.

If we do not maintain compliance with Nasdaq’s listing requirements, our common shares will be subject to delisting. A delisting from Nasdaq would likely result in a reduction in some or all of the following, each of which could have a material adverse effect on shareholders:

●

the liquidity of our common shares;

●

the availability of information concerning the trading prices and volume of our common shares;

●

the number of market markers for our common shares or broker-dealers willing to execute trades in our common shares.

We intend to take all reasonable measures available to maintain compliance with Nasdaq’s listing requirements, including the MVLS Requirement and remain listed on Nasdaq. However, there can be no assurance that we will ultimately continue to maintain compliance with all applicable requirements for continued listing.

Future sales of our common shares may cause dilution.

Future sales of our common shares, or the perception that such sales may occur, could cause immediate dilution and adversely affect the market price of our common shares. If we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, the percentage ownership of our existing shareholders may be reduced, and accordingly these shareholders may experience substantial dilution. We may also issue equity securities that provide for rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of our common shares. Given our need for cash and that equity raising is the most common type of fundraising for companies like ours, the risk of dilution is particularly significant for shareholders of our common shares.

Shareholder activism, proxy contests, shareholder proposals and other efforts by shareholders to influence our business, strategy, governance or Board composition could disrupt our business and adversely affect our results of operations and the market price of our common shares

Shareholders may seek to influence our business, strategy, capital allocation, governance practices or Board composition through private or public engagement, the accumulation of our common shares, shareholder proposals, director nominations, proxy contests, litigation, requests to inspect corporate books and records or other actions. These activities may relate to economic, strategic, environmental, social, governance or other matters, and may be undertaken by investors with differing or conflicting objectives, including objectives that may not align with the interests of our other shareholders or our long-term strategy.

Responding to actual or threatened shareholder activism or other efforts to influence the Company could require significant time and attention from our Board, management and employees, divert resources from our business and strategic initiatives, require us to incur substantial legal, advisory, proxy solicitation, public relations and other costs, and create uncertainty or adversely affect relationships with investors, employees, collaborators, customers and other business partners. Such activities could also result in changes to our strategy or operations, proxy contests or litigation and may adversely affect the market price or trading volatility of our common shares.

Beneficial ownership information may be incomplete, delayed or inaccurate because it depends on information reported by our shareholders and in SEC filings.

Beneficial ownership information included in our periodic reports is based on information furnished by the applicable beneficial owners or contained in filings made with the SEC. Under Sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Exchange Act, and the rules thereunder, persons who beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common shares may be required to report their beneficial ownership and certain changes in ownership to the SEC on Schedule 13D or Schedule 13G, as applicable. We report beneficial ownership information based on the information made available to us by applicable beneficial owners or through publicly available SEC filings, as and when received or filed, and cannot independently verify the completeness or accuracy of that information.

A person or group that acquires beneficial ownership of more than 5% of our outstanding common shares and does not qualify to report on Schedule 13G generally must file a Schedule 13D within five business days after the acquisition. Schedule 13D requires disclosure regarding, among other matters, the reporting person’s purpose in acquiring or holding our common shares and any plans or proposals relating to a potential change in or influence over control of the Company or certain other significant corporate transactions. Certain investors that satisfy applicable eligibility requirements, including passive investors that certify that their acquisition and holding of our common shares is not for the purpose of or with the effect of changing or influencing control of the Company, may report their ownership on Schedule 13G instead.

The SEC has amended its beneficial-ownership reporting rules and issued interpretive guidance regarding the circumstances in which an investor may remain eligible to report on Schedule 13G rather than Schedule 13D. These requirements and related interpretations may affect the timing, content and availability of beneficial-ownership information publicly reported by significant shareholders. Accordingly, beneficial-ownership information reported in our periodic reports may not reflect changes in ownership or reporting status that occur after the date of the applicable information or filing, and investors may make investment or voting decisions based on information that is incomplete, delayed or inaccurate.

Risks Related to Foreign Exchange Rates

We are exposed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates.

A significant portion of our business is conducted outside the United States. Therefore, we are exposed to currency exchange fluctuations in other currencies such as the NIS and Euro. A significant portion of our expenses in Israel are paid in NIS, and we have also received €20 million pursuant to the EIB Finance Agreement, that bears 4% annual interest. All of these factors subject us to the risks of foreign currency fluctuations. Our primary expenses paid in NIS are employee salaries and lease payments on our facilities. From time to time, we may apply a hedging strategy by using options and forward contracts to protect ourselves against some of the risks of currency exchange fluctuations and we are actively monitoring the exchange rate differences of the NIS, Euro and U.S. Dollar; however, we are still exposed to potential losses from currency exchange fluctuation.

Our cash may be subject to a risk of loss.

Our assets include a significant component of cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits. Our investment committee sets investment guidelines, when applicable, which aims to preserve our financial assets, maintain adequate liquidity and maximize returns. We adhere to an investment policy set by our investment committee which aims to preserve our financial assets, maintain adequate liquidity and maximize returns. We believe that our cash is held in institutions whose credit risk is minimal and that the value and liquidity of our deposits are accurately reflected in our consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2026. Currently, we hold most of our cash assets in bank deposits in Israel. However, nearly all of our cash and bank deposits are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”), or similar governmental deposit insurance outside the United States. However, nearly all of our cash and bank deposits are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the FDIC, or similar governmental deposit insurance outside the United States. Therefore, our cash and any bank deposits that we now hold or may acquire in the future may be subject to risks, including the risk of loss or of reduced value or liquidity, particularly in light of the increased volatility and worldwide pressures in the financial and banking sectors.

Risks Related to Our Industries

Consolidation and other strategic transactions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may adversely affect us.

Companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may consummate mergers, acquisitions, business combinations, divestitures, restructurings and other strategic transactions from time to time. These developments may result in larger companies with greater financial resources, broader product portfolios, enhanced development, manufacturing, regulatory or commercialization capabilities, and increased bargaining power, which could intensify competition. Such transactions may also reduce the number of potential collaborators, licensees, suppliers, contract manufacturers, contract research organizations or acquirers for our product candidates or technologies. In addition, following a transaction, a potential or existing collaborator may reprioritize its pipeline or strategic objectives, reduce or discontinue investment in a program relevant to us, seek to renegotiate commercial terms, or elect to focus on products or technologies that compete with ours. As a result, we may be unable to enter into, maintain or obtain favorable terms under collaboration, license, development, manufacturing or commercialization arrangements, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If we do not keep pace with our competitors and with technological and market changes, our technology and products may become obsolete, and our business may suffer.

The cellular therapeutics industry, of which we are a part, is very competitive and is subject to technological changes that can be rapid and intense. We have faced, and will continue to face, intense competition from biotechnology, pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies, academic and research institutions and governmental agencies engaged in cellular therapeutic and drug discovery activities or funding, both in the United States and internationally. Some of these competitors are pursuing the development of cellular therapeutics, drugs and other therapies that target the same diseases and conditions that we target in our clinical and pre-clinical programs.

Some of our competitors have greater resources, more product candidates and have developed product candidates and processes that directly compete with our products. Our competitors may have developed, or could develop in the future, new products that compete with our products or even render our products obsolete.

Moreover, the alternative protein market is highly competitive, with numerous brands vying for limited space in retail, foodservice, and consumer preference. To succeed, Ever After Foods’ cultured meat products must excel in costs, taste, ingredients, marketing and branding. Generally, the food industry is dominated by multinational corporations with substantially greater resources and operations than Ever After Foods. We cannot be certain that Ever After Foods will successfully compete with larger competitors that have greater financial, marketing, sales, manufacturing, distributing and technical resources. Conventional food companies may acquire Ever After Foods’ competitors or launch their own competing products, and they may be able to use their resources and scale to respond to competitive pressures and changes in consumer preferences by introducing new products, reducing prices or increasing promotional activities, among other things. Competitive pressures or other factors could prevent Ever After Foods from acquiring market share or cause us to lose market share, which may require Ever After Foods to lower prices, or increase marketing and advertising expenditures, either of which would adversely affect its margins and could result in a decrease in its operating results and profitability. We cannot assure that we will be able to maintain a competitive position or compete successfully against such sources of competition.

Potential product liability claims could adversely affect our future earnings and financial condition.

We face an inherent business risk of exposure to product liability and CDMO service claims in the event that the use of our products or CDMO services results in adverse effects. We may not be able to maintain adequate levels of insurance for these liabilities at reasonable cost and/or reasonable terms. Excessive insurance costs or uninsured claims would add to our future operating expenses and adversely affect our financial condition.

Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties

We are dependent upon third party suppliers and service providers for raw materials, components, consumables, cleaning and sanitation materials, equipment, utilities and complementary services needed to manufacture PLX, provide CDMO services and support our longevity, wellness and aesthetics business; if any of these third parties fails or is unable to perform in a timely manner, our ability to manufacture products, provide services and satisfy our obligations to customers may be compromised.

In addition to the placenta used in the clinical manufacturing process of PLX, we require certain raw materials, components, consumables, process aids, reagents, packaging materials, cleaning and sanitation materials, equipment and other supplies and services. These items and services must be available to us in sufficient quantities, at acceptable quality levels and, where applicable, in compliance with current GMP requirements. To meet these requirements, we have entered into supply agreements with third parties that manufacture, supply or provide certain of these materials, components and services in accordance with applicable standards. To meet these requirements, we have entered into supply agreements with firms that manufacture these raw materials to current GMP standards. Our requirements for these items and services are expected to increase if and when we transition to the manufacture of commercial quantities of our cell-based drug candidates or expand our CDMO activities or longevity, wellness and aesthetics business. In addition, the development and manufacture of potential CAR/TCR-MAIT products may require us to obtain from third parties proprietary CAR or TCR constructs and associated intellectual-property rights, in sufficient quantities and, where applicable, in compliance with current GMP requirements.

Certain materials, components, supplies and services used in our operations may be made available to us from a limited number of qualified suppliers or service providers. Although we seek to qualify alternative sources where practicable and maintain business-continuity measures designed to mitigate supply-chain and service interruptions, we may be unable to do so in a timely manner, on commercially reasonable terms or at all. For potential CAR/TCR-MAIT products, suitable construct suppliers or licensors may be limited, and we may be unable to obtain the required constructs or associated rights on acceptable terms, or at all.

In addition, if we proceed with clinical-development activities, we must be able to continuously demonstrate to the FDA, EMA and other regulatory authorities that we can manufacture our cell therapy product candidates with consistent characteristics. Accordingly, we are materially dependent on these suppliers for supply of current GMP-grade materials and other inputs and services of consistent quality. Accordingly, we are materially dependent on these suppliers for supply of current GMP-grade materials of consistent quality. Our ability to complete ongoing clinical trials may be negatively affected in the event that we are forced to seek and validate a replacement source for any of these critical materials, components, supplies or services. Similarly, if we advance potential CAR/TCR-MAIT products into clinical development, we would need to establish and validate manufacturing processes for incorporating the applicable CAR or TCR constructs into MAIT cells and demonstrate the required quality, consistency, safety and other characteristics of the resulting product candidates.

Our CDMO activities and our longevity, wellness and aesthetics business may similarly depend on the timely availability of qualified suppliers and service providers for materials, components, consumables, equipment maintenance and calibration, testing, logistics, cleaning and sanitation, waste disposal, utilities and other complementary services. Certain materials or services may be available from a limited number of qualified sources, may require qualification, validation or regulatory approval before use, or may be subject to supply-chain disruptions, shortages, quality failures, price increases, import or export restrictions, labor disruptions or other delays. Any failure, delay or inability of any supplier or service provider to perform as required could delay or interrupt our operations or the delivery of products or services, increase our costs, impair product quality, result in regulatory or contractual claims, or harm our reputation and customer relationships.

We seek to qualify alternative suppliers and service providers where practicable and to maintain business-continuity measures designed to mitigate supply-chain and service interruptions. However, we may not be able to do so in a timely manner, on commercially reasonable terms or at all. However, we may not be able to obtain any required license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. The qualification, validation or replacement of a supplier or service provider may require substantial time, expense, technical resources, customer approval or regulatory review, particularly where the relevant material, component, process or service is critical to a regulated manufacturing process. Accordingly, disruptions affecting our suppliers or service providers may materially adversely affect our ability to conduct our operations, manufacture and deliver products, provide CDMO services, serve our longevity, wellness and aesthetics customers, advance our potential CAR/TCR-MAIT products and achieve our business objectives.

A cybersecurity incident, other technology disruptions, risks associated with artificial intelligence (“AI”), or failure to comply with laws and regulations relating to privacy and the protection of data relating to individuals, could negatively impact our business and our reputation.

We have relied on and utilized services provided by third parties in connection with our clinical trials, as well as other third-party service providers that may be involved in the collection, use, storage, transmission and analysis of personal health information and other sensitive, confidential or proprietary information. While we seek contractual assurances and apply a risk-based approach to assessing and overseeing cybersecurity and data-protection risks associated with third-party vendors and service providers, we do not control their information-security or privacy practices and cannot ensure that they will comply with applicable legal, regulatory, contractual or other obligations. Non-compliance, cybersecurity incidents or any other failure by such third parties could result in liability, regulatory inquiries, litigation, contractual claims, remediation costs, business disruption or reputational harm to us, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Future security breaches technology disruptions, system failures, unauthorized access, ransomware or other malicious activity could result in a material disruption to our development programs and our business operations. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed or future clinical trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the lost data. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur liability and the further development and commercialization of our product candidates could be delayed. Although we maintain information-security measures, incident-response and recovery plans, employee training, and third-party oversight designed to prevent, detect, contain and remediate cybersecurity incidents, these measures may not be sufficient to prevent, detect, contain or remediate all incidents. See Item 1C, “Cybersecurity,” for additional information regarding our cybersecurity risk management and governance.

We use AI tools in certain administrative functions and are evaluating the suitability of these technologies for broader administrative and data-processing applications. Although AI tools are not currently embedded in our core operations or product-development systems, our use of AI, or our reliance on third-party providers that use AI, may create additional risks relating to inaccurate, incomplete, biased or misleading outputs; unauthorized access to, disclosure of or misuse of data; confidentiality, privacy and intellectual-property concerns; cybersecurity vulnerabilities; regulatory compliance; and third-party claims. The increasing availability and sophistication of AI technologies may also increase the frequency, scale and effectiveness of cyberattacks, including phishing, social-engineering, impersonation, malware and other attacks.

In addition, we are subject to laws, rules and regulations in Israel, the United States, the European Union and other jurisdictions relating to the collection, use and security of personal information and data. Such data privacy laws, regulations and other obligations may require us to change our business practices and may negatively impact our ability to expand our business and pursue business opportunities. We may incur significant expenses to comply with the laws, regulations and other obligations that apply to us. Additionally, the privacy- and data protection-related laws, rules and regulations applicable to us are subject to significant change. Several jurisdictions have passed new laws and regulations in this area, and other jurisdictions are considering imposing additional restrictions. Privacy- and data protection-related laws and regulations also may be interpreted and enforced inconsistently over time and from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Any actual or perceived inability to comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws, regulations, or other obligations could result in significant cost and liability, litigation or governmental investigations, damage our reputation, and adversely affect our business.

Failure to comply with certain European privacy regulations could have an adverse effect on our business and reputation.

The collection and use of personal health data in the EU is governed by the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”). The GDPR imposes several requirements relating to lawful bases for processing data, including additional conditions applicable to special categories of personal data such as health data; transparency and information provided to individuals; data-subject rights; security and confidentiality; data-protection impact assessments in certain circumstances; personal-data breach notifications; governance of service providers; and restrictions on international transfers of personal data. The GDPR also extends the geographical scope of EU data protection law to non-EU entities under certain conditions, tightens existing EU data protection principles and creates new obligations for companies and new rights for individuals. Because clinical-trial activities may involve the regular processing of special categories of personal data, including health data, on a large scale, we are required to appoint a data protection officer (“DPO”). We engage with an external provider to perform DPO services; however, our use of an external DPO does not relieve us of our obligations under the GDPR. Failure to comply with the requirements of the GDPR and the related national data protection laws of the EU member States may result in fines, as well as other administrative measures, claims for damages and reputational harm. Failure to comply with the requirements of the GDPR and the related national data protection laws of the EU member States may result in fines and other administrative penalties. There may be circumstances under which a failure to comply with GDPR, or the exercise of individual rights under the GDPR, would limit our ability to utilize clinical trial data collected on certain subjects. The GDPR imposes significant accountability obligations and liability in relation to personal data that we process. Although we maintain compliance measures, including external DPO services, and may implement additional measures from time to time, we cannot assure that these measures will be sufficient to ensure compliance with applicable data-protection laws and regulatory guidance.

Changes to these European privacy regulations, developments in their interpretation and enforcement, and any failure to comply with them may be onerous and adversely affect our business, financial condition, prospects, results of operations and reputation.

We may be exposed to liabilities under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and any determination that we violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act (“FCPA”) and other laws that prohibit U.S. companies or their agents and employees from providing anything of value to a foreign official or political party for the purposes of influencing any act or decision of these individuals in their official capacity to help obtain or retain business, direct business to any person or corporate entity or obtain any unfair advantage. We have operations and agreements with third parties. Our international activities create the risk of unauthorized and illegal payments or offers of payments by our employees or consultants, even though they may not always be subject to our control. We maintain policies and procedures which are intended to promote compliance with these laws by our employees and consultants. However, our existing safeguards and any future improvements may prove to be less than effective, and our employees or consultants, may engage in conduct for which we might be held responsible. However, our existing safeguards and any future improvements may prove to be less than effective, and our employees or consultants, may engage in conduct for which we might be held responsible for Any failure by us to adopt appropriate compliance procedures and ensure that our employees and consultants comply with the FCPA and applicable laws and regulations in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial penalties or restrictions on our ability to conduct business in certain foreign jurisdictions. Any failure by us to adopt appropriate compliance procedures or to ensure that our employees and consultants comply with the FCPA and applicable laws and regulations in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial penalties or restrictions on our ability to conduct business in certain foreign jurisdictions.

Violations of the FCPA may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions, and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could negatively affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. In addition, the U.S. government may seek to hold our Company liable for successor liability FCPA violations committed by companies in which we invest or that we acquire.

Other Risks

Since we received grants from the IIA, we are subject to on-going restrictions.

We have received royalty-bearing grants from the IIA, for research and development programs that meet specified criteria. The terms of the IIA’s grants limit our ability to transfer know-how developed under an approved research and development program (by way of sale and/or granting a license to use the IP), and/or the manufacturing of products developed under an approved research and development program, outside of Israel, regardless of whether the royalties are fully paid. Any non-Israeli citizen, resident or entity that, among other things, becomes a holder of 5% or more of our share capital or voting rights, is entitled to appoint one or more of our directors or our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), serves as a director of our Company or as our CEO, is generally required to notify the same to the IIA and to undertake to observe the law governing the grant programs of the IIA, the principal restrictions of which are the transferability limits described above. To the extent a company wishes to transfer its IIA-supported know-how outside of Israel (by way of sale and/or granting a license to use the IP) – the IIA acts under the Law for the Encouragement of research, Development and Technological Innovation in the Industry 1984 and the related IIA rules and regulations, it must be preapproved by the IIA and the company may be required to pay an additional payment to the IIA. The minimum amount of the payment is the total sum of grants received plus interest, and the maximum amount shall be no higher than six times the total sum of grants received plus interest. In the case that the IIA-supported company sells the IP but retains its research and development center in Israel for at least three consecutive years, following the year of transferring the IIA-supported know-how outside of Israel, while maintaining at least 75% of its research and development employees in Israel – the payment will be limited to three times the total sum of grants received plus interest. For more information, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Recent global inflation may adversely affect our business results.

Inflation could affect our ability to purchase materials needed to support our research, development and operational activities, which in turn could result in higher burn rate and a higher end price of our future products. As a result, we may not be able to effectively develop our cell-based product candidates or cultivated meat products. If we are not able to successfully manage inflation, our prospects, business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely impacted.

Non-compliance with environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) practices could harm our reputation, or otherwise adversely impact our business, while increased attention to ESG initiatives could increase our costs.

Companies across industries are facing scrutiny from a variety of stakeholders related to their ESG and sustainability practices, disclosures, performance, goals and commitments. The nature and extent of such scrutiny continue to evolve and, in some cases, have become more fragmented and politicized, with stakeholders, jurisdictions and markets taking differing or conflicting approaches to ESG-related matters. Certain market participants, including institutional investors and capital providers, may consider ESG and sustainability factors, including through the use of third-party benchmarks, ratings and scores, in making investment, financing or voting decisions or in engaging with companies regarding their practices. Certain market participants, including institutional investors and capital providers, are increasingly placing importance on the impact of their investments and are thus focusing on corporate ESG practices, including the use of third-party benchmarks and scores to assess companies’ ESG profiles in making investment or voting decisions, and engaging with companies to encourage changes to their practices. At the same time, certain investors, regulators, policymakers and other stakeholders have questioned or opposed the consideration of certain ESG factors, creating additional uncertainty regarding stakeholder expectations and disclosure practices. Unfavorable ESG ratings could lead to increased negative investor sentiment towards us or our industry. If we do not comply with applicable legal or regulatory requirements, or if our practices, disclosures, goals or commitments are viewed as inadequate, misleading, insufficiently substantiated or inconsistent with stakeholder expectations or our actual performance, our business and reputation could be negatively impacted and our share price could be materially and adversely affected, as well as our access to and cost of capital.

While we may, at times, engage in voluntary initiatives (such as voluntary disclosures, certifications, or goals, among others) or commitments to improve the sustainability, environmental or social profile of our company and/or products, such initiatives or the achievement of related commitments may not have the desired effect and may be costly. They may also require significant management attention, operational changes, capital expenditures, data collection and verification processes, and engagement with suppliers, customers and other third parties.

In addition, we may commit to certain initiatives or goals but not ultimately achieve such commitments or goals due to factors that are both within or outside of our control. Moreover, actions or statements that we may take based on expectations, assumptions, or third-party information that we currently believe to be reasonable may subsequently be determined to be erroneous or be subject to misinterpretation. Our ESG- and sustainability-related disclosures, claims, targets and progress updates may be subject to heightened scrutiny by investors, customers, employees, regulators, advocacy groups and other stakeholders, including allegations that they are incomplete, inaccurate, misleading or insufficiently supported. We may also be subject to inquiries, investigations, litigation, enforcement actions or other proceedings in connection with such matters. Evolving and, in some cases, inconsistent or conflicting laws, regulations, reporting standards, customer requirements and stakeholder expectations relating to climate, emissions, environmental matters, human capital, supply chains, human rights, product sustainability and corporate governance may increase our compliance, reporting, assurance, operational and capital costs. For example, although the SEC has indicated that it does not intend to pursue or revisit its previously adopted climate-related disclosure rules (which it is now seeking to repeal), certain state laws, including California requirements concerning certain climate-related disclosures and emissions-reduction claims that may apply to companies doing business in California and meeting specified thresholds or making specified claims, may impose additional disclosure, reporting or assurance obligations.

Expectations around a company’s management of ESG matters continue to evolve rapidly, and may vary among, or conflict between, stakeholders, jurisdictions and markets. Changes in the approaches of institutional investors, proxy advisory firms, regulators and policymakers to ESG-related matters may also affect voting outcomes, shareholder engagement, access to capital and our disclosure and governance practices. To the extent ESG matters negatively impact our reputation, our ability to attract and retain employees, customers, investors, business partners and other stakeholders may decrease, which could adversely affect our operations, financial condition and results of operations. To the extent ESG matters negatively impact our reputation, it may also impede our ability to compete as effectively to attract and retain employees or customers, which may adversely impact our operations.

Since we have signed the EIB Finance Agreement, we agreed to guaranty the loan as well as agreed to limitations that require us to notify the EIB, and in some cases obtain their approval, before we engage with other banks for additional sources of funding or with potential partners for certain strategic activities.

The EIB Finance Agreement contains certain limitations that we must adhere to such as the use of proceeds received from the EIB, the disposal of assets, substantive changes in the nature of our business, our potential execution of mergers and acquisitions, changes in our holding structure, distributions of future potential dividends and our engaging with other banks and financing entities for other loans.

Our principal research and development and manufacturing facilities are located in Haifa, Israel and military conditions in Israel, including the armed conflict between Israel and terrorist organizations from the Gaza Strip, Lebanon and Yemen, tensions with regional countries hostile to Israel such as Iran - may cause interruption or suspension of our business operations without warning.

Our principal R&D and manufacturing facilities are located in Haifa, Israel, thus, political, economic, and military conditions in Israel, and in particular, conflicts involving Israel and terrorist organizations such as Hamas in the Gaza Strip, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Ansar Allah (Houthis) in Yemen, the conflict with Iran, as well as tensions with regional countries hostile to Israel, may directly affect our business.

As of September 10, 2026, there has been no material impact on our operations. According to the recent guidelines of the Israeli government, the Company’s offices in Haifa are open and functioning; however, if a war will escalate or expand, with one or more of the countries or organizations in conflict with Israel, this situation may change and the Israeli government may impose certain restrictions on movement and travel, which will affect our management and employees’ ability to effectively perform their daily tasks, and may result in disruptions and delays in some of our projects.

Any hostilities involving Israel, terrorist activities, political instability or violence in the region, or the interruption or curtailment of trade or transport between Israel and its trading partners could make it more difficult for us to raise capital, if needed in the future, and adversely affect our operations and results of operations and the market price of our common shares. In addition, to the extent the IIA no longer makes grants similar to those we have received in the past, it could adversely affect our financial results.

Furthermore, certain of our employees may be obligated to perform annual reserve duty in the Israel Defense Forces and are subject to being called up for active military duty at any time. Many Israeli citizens who have served in the army are required to perform reserve duty until they reach the age of 40 or older, depending upon the nature of their military service. Currently, none of our employees has been called for active military reserve duty.

The war’s implications, including but not only the war’s economic implications, on the Company’s business and operations and on Israel’s economy in general are difficult to predict. Such events may be intertwined with wider macroeconomic indications of a deterioration of Israel’s economic standing, for instance, a downgrade in Israel’s credit rating by rating agencies, which may have a material adverse effect on the Company and its ability to effectively conduct its operations.

In addition, Israeli-based companies and companies doing business with Israel, have been the subject of an economic boycott by members of the Arab League and certain other predominantly Muslim countries since Israel’s establishment. Although Israel has entered into various agreements with certain Arab countries and the Palestinian Authority, and various declarations have been signed in connection with efforts to resolve some of the economic and political problems in the Middle East, we cannot predict whether or in what manner these problems will be resolved. Wars and acts of terrorism have resulted in significant damage to the Israeli economy, including reducing the level of foreign and local investment.

The potential assignment of the EIB Loan to a third party and the potential conversion of such indebtedness our securities in the future, if such third party is a related party, may create conflicts of interest, or the perception of such conflicts of interest, and may result in terms that are not as favorable to us as those that could be obtained in an arm’s-length transaction.

The potential sale of the EIB Loan to a related party, or any subsequent agreement to convert the loan into our securities if such third party is a related party, may not be on the same terms as if they were negotiated on an arm’s-length basis between unrelated parties. Although our Board has formed a Special Committee of the Board, consisting of independent directors to review and approve any such related-party transaction or subsequent arrangement in connection with the EIB Loan, including the potential sale of the EIB Loan and a potential future conversion of such indebtedness into our securities, those procedures may not eliminate all actual or perceived conflicts of interest or assure that the terms of such transactions are as favorable to us as those that could be obtained with an unaffiliated lender, purchaser or investor.

If a related part purchases the EIB Loan, their interests as a creditor may differ from our interests and those of our other shareholders. Such related party may have an incentive to seek repayment, equity conversion, additional financing, collateral, fees, protections or other terms that preserve or enhance his investment, even if such terms are not optimal for us or for our other shareholders. Conversely, the Company may agree to terms that benefit such related party in his capacity as lender or investor in order to address our liquidity needs, including terms that could involve cash payments, equity or equity-linked securities, dilution, restrictive covenants, governance rights or limitations on our strategic flexibility.

In addition, the need to negotiate the potential sale of the EIB Loan and the potential future conversion of such indebtedness to our securities with a related party may increase the risk of disputes, litigation, regulatory scrutiny, adverse publicity and reputational harm. If we do not effectively manage these conflicts, or if any arrangement is not completed or is completed on unfavorable terms to us, our liquidity, financial condition, ability to raise additional capital and our ability to continue as a going concern could be materially adversely affected. There can be no assurance that the transactions described above will be completed or, if completed, as to their timing, structure or final terms. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in finding the relevant partners to fund and market our cell-based products.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY

We operate in the biotechnology industry, where the protection of sensitive information and the continuity of our operations are critical. We are subject to cybersecurity risks which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations. We maintain a risk-based cybersecurity program designed to identify, assess, and mitigate cybersecurity threats. Our program incorporates applicable industry standards and is managed through a cross-functional approach involving our Information Technology, legal, compliance, and other relevant teams. It is overseen by our chief information officer, which is responsible for the day-to-day management of cybersecurity risks and the implementation of our information security program and incident response plans.

Our risk management activities include periodic assessments, vulnerability testing, and tabletop exercises, as well as regular engagement with third-party experts to perform independent security assessments. We have expanded employee training and phishing simulations, and we conduct ongoing monitoring of access to our systems, including oversight of third-party vendors and service providers. The results of assessments and reviews are reported to senior management and the Audit Committee, and our policies and controls are updated as necessary.

We have experienced cybersecurity incidents in the past and continue to encounter cybersecurity threats in the ordinary course of business. To date, none of these incidents or threats have had a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Although we maintain cybersecurity measures designed to protect our information systems, including employee training and vendor oversight, cybersecurity threats continue to evolve, and our measures may not be sufficient to prevent, detect, contain or remediate all cybersecurity incidents. The increasing availability and sophistication of artificial intelligence technologies may increase the frequency, scale and effectiveness of cyberattacks, including phishing, social-engineering, impersonation, malware and other attacks, and may increase the risk of unauthorized access to, disclosure of or misuse of our or third parties’ data. Our use of, or reliance on third-party providers that use, artificial intelligence technologies may also create additional risks relating to data privacy, confidentiality, security, accuracy, intellectual property, regulatory compliance and third-party claims. A future cybersecurity incident, including an incident involving our third-party service providers, could disrupt our operations; compromise, destroy, alter or result in unauthorized access to our systems or data; result in regulatory inquiries, legal claims, remediation costs or contractual liabilities; and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or reputation.

Risk Management and Strategy

As part of our overall risk management framework, our cybersecurity program takes a comprehensive, layered approach to identifying, preventing and mitigating cybersecurity threats and incidents. This includes implementing controls and escalation procedures to ensure that significant incidents are promptly communicated to management for timely decision-making regarding public disclosure and regulatory reporting.

We deploy multiple technical safeguards designed to protect our information systems, including firewalls, intrusion prevention and detection systems, anti-malware tools, access controls, and ongoing monitoring. These safeguards are evaluated and enhanced through regular vulnerability assessments, penetration testing and ongoing cybersecurity threat intelligence.

During calendar year 2026, we adopted internal procedures and guidelines relating to the responsible and secure use of artificial intelligence tools within the Company. In connection with these efforts, we implemented an enterprise artificial intelligence tool within our Microsoft 365 environment, which operates based on existing organizational access permissions and is intended to support AI-enabled work within the Company’s secured enterprise environment.

We maintain formal incident response and recovery plans that define our procedures for addressing cybersecurity incidents. These plans are tested, updated, and refined on a regular basis to ensure readiness.

We apply a risk-based approach to managing cybersecurity risks posed by third parties, including vendors, contract research organizations, service providers and other external users of our systems. This approach includes assessment and oversight of cybersecurity risks associated with third-party systems that, if compromised, could negatively impact our business operations.

Governance

The Audit Committee of our Board oversees our risk management process, including the management of risks from cybersecurity threats. Until August 31, 2026, our cybersecurity program was managed internally by qualified internal personnel. Effective as of September 2026, we engaged an external service provider to provide chief information officer services, including responsibility for the day-to-day administration of our cybersecurity program. The external service provider has expertise in information security and cybersecurity and supports our management of cybersecurity risks, implementation of our information security program and incident response planning. The external service provider reports to the Audit Committee on cybersecurity matters. The Audit Committee receives periodic reports and presentations addressing cybersecurity risks, recent developments, evolving standards, results of vulnerability assessments, findings from third-party and independent reviews, current threat intelligence, technological trends, and relevant developments regarding security considerations arising with respect to our peers and third parties. According to our procedures, the Audit Committee is promptly informed of any cybersecurity incident that meets established reporting thresholds and receives ongoing updates until the matter is fully resolved.